A First Gaia look at the inner halo* Giuliano Iorio DIFA, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

a first gaia look at the inner halo
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

A First Gaia look at the inner halo* Giuliano Iorio DIFA, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

A First Gaia look at the inner halo* Giuliano Iorio DIFA, University of Bologna IoA, Cambridge Vasily Belokurov, Denis Erkal, Sergey Koposov, Carlo Nipoti, Filippo Fraternali *Iorio et al., 2017, submitted, arXiv:1707.03833 The science of


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Vasily Belokurov, Denis Erkal, Sergey Koposov, Carlo Nipoti, Filippo Fraternali

DIFA, University of Bologna IoA, Cambridge

The science of Gaia and future challenge 01/09/2017 Lund

A First Gaia look at the inner halo*

*Iorio et al., 2017, submitted, arXiv:1707.03833 Giuliano Iorio

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Why study the Halo?

  • Relic of the Galactic formation
  • Trace the Galactic potential

Lightest component

  • f the MW!

Stellar Halo 109 Msun DM Halo 1012 Msun Disc 6x1010 Msun Bulge 1010 Msun

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Why study the Halo?

  • Relic of the Galactic formation
  • Trace the Galactic potential

Lightest component

  • f the MW!

Stellar Halo 109 Msun DM Halo 1012 Msun Disc 6x1010 Msun Bulge 1010 Msun

How?

  • Counting of Halo Tracers: e.g. RRLyrae
  • PopII stars
  • Known absolute magnitude
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Star-counting results, so far:

BHB: Deason+2011

Different tracers:

  • Power Law
  • Oblate

α ≈ 2 − 4

q ≈ 0.4 − 0.8

Only gross agreement and partial sky coverage..

Halo properties:

ρ ∝ m−α

  • K-Giants (e.g. Xue+15)
  • BHB (e.g. Deason+11, Das+16)
  • RRL (e.g. Sesar+10)
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Star-counting results, so far:

BHB: Deason+2011

Different tracers:

Gaia is a formidable all sky variable machine

…. but RRLs available at the end of the missions (>2020)

  • K-Giants (e.g. Xue+15)
  • BHB (e.g. Deason+11, Das+16)
  • RRL (e.g. Sesar+10)
  • Power Law
  • Oblate

q ≈ 0.4 − 0.8

Only gross agreement and partial sky coverage..

Halo properties:

The Gaia Revolution

α ≈ 2 − 4

ρ ∝ m−α

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Exploiting DR1

Photometry in DR1

  • G-band mean mag.
  • Mean Flux in G band
  • Std Flux in G band
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Exploiting DR1

Variable star

Photometry in DR1 Variability in DR1

Non-Variable star

  • G-band mean mag.
  • Mean Flux in G band
  • Std Flux in G band
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Exploiting DR1

Photometry in DR1

Variable star Non-Variable star Variable star

  • G-band mean mag.
  • Mean Flux in G band
  • Std Flux in G band

Variability in DR1

Belokurov+17, Deason+17

AMP = log σ FF−1 Nobs

( )

large small

Variable

Non-Variable

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Exploiting DR1

AMP alone is not enough… we need a colour! Cross-match with 2MASS!

Variable star

Photometry in DR1 Variability in DR1

Belokurov+17, Deason+17

Variable star

RRLs

AMP = log σ FF−1 Nobs

( )

large small

Variable

Non-Variable

  • G-band mean mag.
  • Mean Flux in G band
  • Std Flux in G band
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Final sample

  • 0.95<J*-G*<-0.4 ‘Colour Cut’

Selection Cuts (Driven by Bona Fide RRLs)

*Magnitude corrected for dust extinction using E(B-V) from Schlegel+98

Map: Gaia+2Mass CRTS RRLs (Drake+13) Stripe82 RRLs (Sesar+10)

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Final sample

  • 0.95<J*-G*<-0.4 ‘Colour Cut’

Selection Cuts (Driven by Bona Fide RRLs)

  • 0.4<Amp<-0.7 ‘AMP Cut’

*Magnitude corrected for dust extinction using E(B-V) from Schlegel+98

Iorio+17 (arXiv:1707.03833)

Contamination analysis using Stripe82

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Final sample

  • 0.95<J*-G*<-0.4 ‘Colour Cut’

Selection Cuts (Driven by Bona Fide RRLs)

  • 0.4<Amp<-0.7 ‘AMP Cut’
  • G*<17.1 ‘Uniform completeness’

Not so complete… ….but we don’t care

Completeness analysis using Stripe82

*Magnitude corrected for dust extinction using E(B-V) from Schlegel+98

Iorio+17 (arXiv:1707.03833)

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Final sample

  • 0.95<J*-G*<-0.4 ‘Colour Cut’

Selection Cuts (Driven by Bona Fide RRLs)

*Magnitude corrected for dust extinction using E(B-V) from Schlegel+98

  • 0.4<Amp<-0.7 ‘AMP Cut’
  • G*<17.1 ‘Uniform completeness’
  • |b|>10°

85% of the stars has E(B-V)<0.25 1% of the stars has E(B-V)>0.8

slide-14
SLIDE 14

(l,b,G)

D⊙(MG)

(Xg,Yg,Zg)

From sky to physical coordinates

Final sample

slide-15
SLIDE 15

(l,b,G)

D⊙(MG)

(Xg,Yg,Zg)

From sky to physical coordinates

  • Little spread around median

Iorio+17 (arXiv:1707.03833)

< MG >= 0.53 < σ M G >= 0.09

Final sample

slide-16
SLIDE 16

(l,b,G)

D⊙(MG)

(Xg,Yg,Zg)

From sky to physical coordinates

  • Little spread around median
  • MG distribution almost constant with b

Final sample

slide-17
SLIDE 17

(l,b,G)

D⊙(MG)

(Xg,Yg,Zg)

From sky to physical coordinates

  • Little spread around median
  • MG distribution almost constant with b

MG=0.53 for all the stars

Final sample

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Final sample

about 22000 stars Contamination < 10% Completeness 20%

D⊙ ≈ 0.5 − 20 kpc fV

tot ≈ 50%

Sampled Vol. fraction:

Previous works < 20% (e.g. Deason+11)

DG ≈1− 28 kpc

Properties

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Final sample

about 22000 stars Contamination < 10% Completeness 20%

D⊙ ≈ 0.5 − 20 kpc fV

tot ≈ 50%

Sampled Vol. fraction:

Previous works < 20% (e.g. Deason+11)

DG ≈1− 28 kpc

Sky distribution Properties

Iorio+17 (arXiv:1707.03833)

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Exploring the Halo

Density in the RZ plane

  • Disky at low Z
  • Ellipsoidal at high Z

Iorio+17 (arXiv:1707.03833)

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Exploring the Halo

Density profile Assumption: Density stratified on ellipsoids

ρ = ρ(m) m= x2 + p−2y2 + q−2z2

m [kpc]

Iorio+17 (arXiv:1707.03833)

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Exploring the Halo

Flattening

ρ = ρ(m) m= x2 + p−2y2 + q−2z2

θ

m

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Exploring the Halo

Flattening

ρ = ρ(m) m= x2 + p−2y2 + q−2z2

θ

m

Mock sample: qtrue=0.5 ptrue=1

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Exploring the Halo

Flattening

ρ = ρ(m) m= x2 + p−2y2 + q−2z2

m [kpc] m [kpc]

θ

m

slide-25
SLIDE 25

m [kpc] m [kpc]

Exploring the Halo

Flattening

ρ = ρ(m) m= x2 + p−2y2 + q−2z2

θ

m

slide-26
SLIDE 26

m [kpc] m [kpc]

Exploring the Halo

Flattening

ρ = ρ(m) m= x2 + p−2y2 + q−2z2

θ

m

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Exploring the Halo

Flattening

ρ = ρ(m) m= x2 + p−2y2 + q−2z2

θ

m

Direct evidence of a change of flattening

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Exploring the Halo

MCMC Likelihood sampling

  • about half of RRLs in our sample
  • No due to disc cont. (Rd=2.6, zd=0.2)

Maybe Monoceros (e.g. Juric+08)

  • r related to Gaia DR1 problems

at low latitude

m [kpc]

  • Exclude the disky structure |θ |> 20!
slide-29
SLIDE 29

Exploring the Halo

  • about half of RRLs in our sample
  • No due to disc cont. (Rd=2.6, zd=0.2)

Maybe Monoceros (e.g. Juric+08)

  • r related to Gaia DR1 problems

at low latitude MCMC Likelihood sampling

m [kpc]

  • Exclude the disky structure |θ |> 20!
slide-30
SLIDE 30

Exploring the Halo

  • Exclude the disky structure
  • Halo model

|θ |> 20!

Halo recipes

  • Density
  • Single Power Law
  • Double Power Law
  • Broken Power Law
  • Core Power Law
  • Einasto
  • Spherical
  • Axisymmetric
  • Triaxial
  • Tilted
  • Off-set
  • Varyng q
  • Shape

MCMC Likelihood sampling

m [kpc]

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Exploring the Halo

MCMC Likelihood sampling - Main results

  • No strong evidence of deviation from a SPL ρ ∝ m−2.95
slide-32
SLIDE 32

Exploring the Halo

MCMC Likelihood sampling - Main results

  • No strong evidence of deviation from a SPL
  • Triaxial: flattening along Z (q=0.6), elongation along Y(p=1.3)

ρ ∝ m−2.95

22°

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Exploring the Halo

  • No strong evidence of deviation from a SPL
  • Triaxial: flattening along Z (q=0.6), elongation along Y(p=1.3)
  • q increasing with m

MCMC Likelihood sampling - Main results

m

ρ ∝ m−2.95

Iorio+17 (arXiv:1707.03833)

slide-34
SLIDE 34

MCMC Likelihood sampling - Main results

  • No strong evidence of deviation from a SPL
  • Triaxial: flattening along Z (q=0.6), elongation along Y(p=1.3)
  • q increasing with m
  • No significant off-set (doffset) wrt GC or tilt wrt G. plane

tilt < 6°

doffset = 0.43± 0.07 kpc

Xoffset = 0.39 ± 0.05 kpc

Compatible with uncertainties in Sun dist. wrt GC

McMillan+10

ρ ∝ m−2.95

Exploring the Halo

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Conclusions

First analysis of RRLs in the inner halo (Rg<28 kpc) using Gaia data*:

Thank you for your attention!

  • Density is a Single Power Law
  • The halo is Triaxial and highly flattened along Z
  • Flattening changes with radius becoming more spherical

GAIA DR2 expected for April 2018

  • Release of Gaia colors!
  • Get rid of 2MASS

Extend this analysis up to 90 kpc!

ρ ∝ m−2.95 (q ≈ 0.6)

*Iorio et al., 2017, submitted, arXiv:1707.03833

slide-36
SLIDE 36

EXTRA

slide-37
SLIDE 37

ρ = m−2.95

p = 1.25

q = 0.56 → 0.82

Iorio+17 (arXiv:1707.03833)

MCMC Likelihood sampling - Main results

Exploring the Halo

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Iorio+17 (arXiv:1707.03833)

ρ = m−2.95

p = 1.25

q = 0.56 → 0.82

MCMC Likelihood sampling - Main results

Exploring the Halo

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Map: Gaia+2Mass CRTS RRLs (Drake+13) Stripe82 RRLs (Sesar+10)

Iorio+17 (arXi

CRTS RRLs (Drake+13) Stripe82 RRLs (Sesar+10)

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Exploring the Halo

slide-41
SLIDE 41

G distribution

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Z distribution

slide-43
SLIDE 43
  • Extended disky feature
  • It contains about half of RRLs in our sample
  • It cannot be explained (entirely) by the Galactic disc

ρ

It could be Monoceros (e.g. Juric+08) or related to Gaia DR1 problems at low latitude

Structures

Structures - Low Latitude

(Juric+08)

Data Disc+ halo model

slide-44
SLIDE 44
  • Extended disky feature
  • It contains about half of RRLs in our sample
  • It cannot be explained (entirely) by the Galactic disc

It could be Monoceros (e.g. Juric+08) or related to Gaia DR1 problems at low latitude

Structures

Structures - Low Latitude

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Structures - High Latitude

  • Overdensity at very high-latitude

Structures

It is likely related to the Virgo Overdensity (Bell+08) Yg Yg Xg

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Z-Slab

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Rz Residuals

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Flattening: previous works

m [kpc]

slide-49
SLIDE 49

Dens models

m [kpc] m [kpc]

slide-50
SLIDE 50

Metallicity distribution

slide-51
SLIDE 51

Corner Plot