A continuum based macroscopic unified low- and high cycle fatigue - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

a continuum based macroscopic unified low and high cycle
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

A continuum based macroscopic unified low- and high cycle fatigue - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

A continuum based macroscopic unified low- and high cycle fatigue model Tero Frondelius 1 , 2 , Sami Holopainen 3 , Reijo Kouhia 3 , Niels Saabye Ottosen 4 , Matti Ristinmaa 4 , Joona Vaara 1 1 W artsil a Finland Oy, J arvikatu 2-4,


slide-1
SLIDE 1

A continuum based macroscopic unified low- and high cycle fatigue model

Tero Frondelius1,2, Sami Holopainen3, Reijo Kouhia3, Niels Saabye Ottosen4, Matti Ristinmaa4, Joona Vaara1

1W¨

artsil¨ a Finland Oy, J¨ arvikatu 2-4, FI-65100 Vaasa, Finland

2Oulu University, Materials and Mech. Eng., P. Kaiteran katu 1, FI-90014 Oulu, Finland 3Tampere University, Structural Mechanics, P.O. Box 600, FI-33014 Tampere University 4Lund University, Solid Mechanics, P.O. Box 117, SE-22100 Lund, Sweden

ICMFF12 - 12th International Conference on Multiaxial Fatigue and Fracture Bordeaux, France, June 24-26, 2019

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Introduction - fatigue models

Problems in fatigue analyses:

◮ low-cycle- and high-cycle -fatigue regimes are treated separately, ◮ mostly based on well defined cycles, ◮ multiaxiality.

A more fundamental approach for HCF based on evolution equations proposed by Ottosen, Stenstr¨

  • m and Ristinmaa in IJF 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.08.009

In this study this idea is combined with a plasticity model to obtain a unified model.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Evolution equation based HCF model

Key ingredients are: Endurance surface β(σ, {α}; parameters) = 0 evolution equations for the fatigue damage D ˙ D = g(β, D) ˙ β and the internal variables {α} { ˙ α} = {G}(σ, {α}) ˙ β

σ1 σ2 σ3 α dα A B ds β < 0 β > 0

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Conditions for evolution

σ1 σ2 σ3 α dα s ds β > 0 ˙ β ≥ 0 ˙ α ̸= 0 ˙ D ≥ 0 (a) σ1 σ2 σ3 α s ds β > 0 ˙ β < 0 ˙ α = 0 ˙ D = 0 (b)

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Original formulation for HCF

Endurance surface: β = 1 σ−1

  • 3 ¯

J2 + AI1 − σ−1

  • = 0

where ¯ J2 = 1

2tr (s − α)2,

I1 = tr σ, A = σ−1/σ0 − 1 and σ−1 = σaf,R=−1 σ0 = σaf,R=0

σa σm σ−1 A

Evolution equations: ˙ α = C(s − α) ˙ β, ˙ D = K exp(Lβ) ˙ β

slide-6
SLIDE 6

LCF-HCF approach

Couples with the plasticity model, Chaboche type model adopted: f(σ, X , R) =

  • 3

2(s − X ) : (s − X )−(σy+R) = 0

˙ εp = ˙ λ ∂f ∂σ , ˙ εp

eff =

  • 2

3 ˙

εp : ˙ εp R =

  • Ri,

˙ Ri = γR∞,i (1 − Ri/R∞,i) ˙ εp

eff

X =

  • X i,

˙ X i = 2

3X∞,i ˙

εp − γi ˙ εp

effX i

σ1 σ2 σ3 α dα s ds X β > 0 ˙ β ≥ 0 ˙ α ̸= 0 ˙ D ≥ 0 (a)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

LCF-HCF approach - damage evolution

dD dt = g(β)dβ dt + M d dt(exp(Qβ)εp

eff)

where the high cycle part is modified to g(β) = K

  • 1 + 1 − exp(−˜

L(β − b)) a + exp(−˜ L(β − b))

  • ≈ K exp Lβ

when β 1 Parameters M and Q from two standard cyclic tests with different amplitudes: dD dN ≈ M exp(Qβ)dεp

eff

dN = 4M exp(Qβ)εp

a

Q = 1 β(N1) − β(N2) ln N2εp

a2

N1εp

a1

, M = 1 4Ni exp(Qβ(Ni))εp

ai

slide-8
SLIDE 8

LCF-parameters

Using the Coffin-Manson and Ramberg-Osgood relations: εp

a = ε′ f(2N)−c,

σa = σ′

c(εp a)nc

Q = 1 − c β(N1) − β(N2) ln N2 N1

  • M =

1 4Ni exp(Qβ(Ni))ε′

f(2Ni)−c

β(Ni) = 1 σ−1

  • (1 + A)σ′

c(ε′ f)−c(2Ni)−cnc − σ−1

  • log(2N)

log(εa) ε′

f

σ′

f

E LCF HCF ∆εp > ∆εe ∆εp < ∆εe

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Preliminary results, S-N curve for AISI 4340

σ−1 = 315 MPa, A = 0.225, C = 1.2, K = 2.5 · 10−6, ˜ L = 14.5, a = 0.005, b = 0.5, M = 10−11, Q = 16. σy = 331 MPa, X∞,1 = 35921 MPa, X∞,2 = 6972 MPa, X∞,3 = 4222 MPa, γ1 = 651, γ2 = 53.3, γ3 = 5.7 , no isotr. hardening, Chaboche model data from

  • Y. Gorash, D. MacKenzie, Open Engineering, 7, 126 (2017)

https://doi.org/10.1515/eng-2017-0019 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 102 103 104 105 106 107

N σa [MPa]

bc bc bc bc bc bc bc bc bc bc bc bc bc bc bc bc bc

Present model fit with blue solid line. Dashed red line fit by Gorash, MacKenzie. Experimental results (black dots) from N.E. Dowling: Mean stress effects in stress-life and strain-life fatigue. SAE Technical Paper 1 (2004), 1-14.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Two-level test

Two-level loading 735 → 810 MPa (blue), 810 → 735 MPa (red). Experimental data shown by triangles from W.H. Erickson, C.E. Work, A study of the accumulation of fatigue damage in steel, 64th Annual Meeting of ASTM, 704-718 (1961). Present model predictions by solid lines.

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

n1/(n1 + n2) n2/N2

ut ut ut ut ut ut ut ut ut ut ut

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Concluding remarks and future work

◮ Continuum based Unified LCF-HCF model. ◮ Multiaxial, applicable to arbitrary loading history. ◮ Applicable for post-processing. ◮ Can be easily extended to include anisotropic, gradient and

stochastic effects.

◮ Parameter estimation. ◮ Micromechanical motivation of the evolution equations.

Human fatigue illustrated by Akseli Gallen-Kallela 1894 Acknowledgements: The work was partially funded by TEKES - The National Technology Foundation of Finland (Business Finland from January 1, 2018), project MaNuMiES.

Thank you for your attention!