A coexistence story oat crown rust Puccinia coronata Emily Burns - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

a coexistence story
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

A coexistence story oat crown rust Puccinia coronata Emily Burns - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

A coexistence story oat crown rust Puccinia coronata Emily Burns (UVa) & Georgiana May (UMN) A coexistence story Multiple rust strains (genotypes) Each strain carries multiple (~10 15) p ( ) virulence alleles Different hosts


slide-1
SLIDE 1

A coexistence story

  • at crown rust

Puccinia coronata Emily Burns (UVa) & Georgiana May (UMN)

slide-2
SLIDE 2

A coexistence story

  • Multiple rust strains (genotypes)
  • Each strain carries multiple (~10‐15)

p ( ) virulence alleles

  • Different hosts (oat cultivers) bred

with varying degrees of resistance with varying degrees of resistance

  • Cost of virulence: rust strains show

negative correlation between number f i l ll l d l i d

  • at crown rust

Puccinia coronata

  • f virulence alleles and latent period

(time between initial infection and later spore production) p p

  • Competition‐colonization trade‐off?

Emily Burns (UVa) & Georgiana May (UMN)

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Aphidius ervi, a parasitoid wasp

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Micro‐ vs. macro‐parasites: A useful (?) distinction for animal parasites Microparasites (e g viruses bacteria protozoa): Microparasites (e.g., viruses, bacteria, protozoa):

  • reproduce within host
  • often small
  • short generation time

short generation time

  • hosts can develop immunity
  • one does not need to account for the severity of infection within host
  • and so, hosts can be classified by their infection status (susceptible,

infectious, recovered) Macroparasites (e.g., parasitic helminths [worms], arthropods [fleas, ticks, lice, mites], copepods)

  • No (or slow) reproduction within host
  • often larger in size
  • longer generation time
  • longer generation time
  • short‐lived immunity of hosts
  • aggregated distribution of parasites among hosts. Average parasite burden is

not necessarily representative not necessarily representative.

  • riginally from R. M. Anderson & R. M. May; summary courtesy A. L. Lloyd
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Aggregated distribution of macroparasites among hosts Ascaris lumbricoides (roundworm) in humans  = 2.18, 2 = 5.05 Ancylostoma duodenale (hookworm) in humans = 24.5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Host‐parasitoid models: A brief history

  • Nicholson‐Bailey model: A discrete‐time predator‐prey
  • model. Thought to be useful for host‐parasitoid systems.
  • Problem: the Nicholson‐Bailey model predicts unstable
  • scillations and rapid extinction of one or both species.
  • 1980s, 90s: Long search for mechanisms that might stabilize

host‐parasitoid dynamics p y

  • Result: Most commonly cited stabilizing mechanism is

aggregation of risk: host individuals vary in their aggregation of risk: host individuals vary in their susceptibility to parasitism