1
CORPORATE PRESENTATION
Scotiabank Mining Conference November 2018
A Canadian Focused Gold Producer
A Canadian Focused Gold Producer CORPORATE PRESENTATION Scotiabank - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
A Canadian Focused Gold Producer CORPORATE PRESENTATION Scotiabank Mining Conference November 2018 1 Cautionary statements ALL AMOUNTS IN U.S. DOLLARS UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS Certain
1
CORPORATE PRESENTATION
Scotiabank Mining Conference November 2018
A Canadian Focused Gold Producer
Cautionary statements
2 ALL AMOUNTS IN U.S. DOLLARS UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Certain information contained in this presentation, including any information relating to New Gold’s future financial or operating performance are “forward looking”. All statements in this presentation, other than statements of historical fact, which address events, results, outcomes or developments that New Gold expects to occur are “forward-looking statements”. Forward-looking statements are statements that are not historical facts and are generally, but not always, identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “plans”, “expects”, “is expected”, “budget”, “scheduled”, “targeted”, “estimates”, “forecasts”, “intends”, “anticipates”, “projects”, “potential”, “believes” or variations of such words and phrases or statements that certain actions, events or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “should”, “might” or “will be taken”, “occur” or “be achieved” or the negative connotation of such terms. Forward looking statements in this presentation include statements with respect to: guidance for production and costs, and the factors contributing to those expected results, including mill throughput, metal recoveries and ore grade, as well as expected capital and other expenditures; planned development activities and timing for 2018 and future years; and the expected completion of the Rainy River security perfection. All forward-looking statements in this presentation are based on the opinions and estimates of management as of the date such statements are made and are subject to important risk factors and uncertainties, many of which are beyond New Gold’s ability to control or predict. Certain material assumptions regarding such forward-looking statements are discussed in this presentation, New Gold’s latest annual management’s discussion and analysis (“MD&A”), Annual Information Form and Technical Reports filed at www.sedar.com and on EDGAR at www.sec.gov. In addition to, and subject to, such assumptions discussed in more detail elsewhere, the forward-looking statements in this presentation are also subject to the following assumptions: (1) there being no significant disruptions affecting New Gold’s operations; (2) political and legal developments in jurisdictions where New Gold
estimates; (4) the exchange rate between the Canadian dollar and U.S. dollar, and to a lesser extent, the Mexican Peso, being approximately consistent with current levels; (5) prices for diesel, natural gas, fuel oil, electricity and other key supplies being approximately consistent with current levels; (6) equipment, labour and materials costs increasing on a basis consistent with New Gold’s current expectations; (7) arrangements with First Nations and other Aboriginal groups in respect of the Rainy River mine and Blackwater project being consistent with New Gold’s current expectations; (8) all required permits, licenses and authorizations being obtained from the relevant governments and other relevant stakeholders within the expected timelines and the absence of material negative comments during the applicable regulatory processes; and (9) in the case of production, cost and expenditure
for the purposes for 2018. Forward-looking statements are necessarily based on estimates and assumptions that are inherently subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results, level of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, without limitation: significant capital requirements and the availability and management of capital resources; additional funding requirements; price volatility in the spot and forward markets for metals and other commodities; fluctuations in the international currency markets and in the rates of exchange of the currencies of Canada, the United States and, to a lesser extent, Mexico; discrepancies between actual and estimated production, between actual and estimated mineral reserves and mineral resources and between actual and estimated metallurgical recoveries; risks related to early production at the Rainy River Mine, including failure of equipment, machinery, the process circuit or other processes to perform as designed or intended; fluctuation in treatment and refining charges; changes in national and local government legislation in Canada, the United States and, to a lesser extent, Mexico or any other country in which New Gold currently or may in the future carry on business; taxation; controls, regulations and political or economic developments in the countries in which New Gold does or may carry on business; the speculative nature of mineral exploration and development, including the risks of obtaining and maintaining the validity and enforceability of the necessary licenses and permits and complying with the permitting requirements of each jurisdiction in which New Gold operates, the lack of certainty with respect to foreign legal systems, which may not be immune from the influence of political pressure, corruption or other factors that are inconsistent with the rule of law; the uncertainties inherent to current and future legal challenges New Gold is or may become a party to; diminishing quantities or grades of mineral reserves and mineral resources; competition; loss of key employees; rising costs of labour, supplies, fuel and equipment; actual results of current exploration or reclamation activities; uncertainties inherent to mining economic studies; changes in project parameters as plans continue to be refined; accidents; labour disputes; defective title to mineral claims or property or contests over claims to mineral properties; unexpected delays and costs inherent to consulting and accommodating rights of Indigenous groups; risks, uncertainties and unanticipated delays associated with
business of mineral exploration, development and mining, including environmental events and hazards, industrial accidents, unusual or unexpected formations, pressures, cave-ins, flooding and gold bullion losses and risks associated with the start of production of a mine, such as Rainy River, (and the risk of inadequate insurance or inability to obtain insurance to cover these risks) as well as “Risk Factors” included in New Gold’s Annual Information Form, MD&A and other disclosure documents filed on and available at www.sedar.com and
in such statements. All of the forward-looking statements contained in this news release are qualified by these cautionary statements. New Gold expressly disclaims any intention or
3
RAINY RIVER MINE GOLD PRODUCER NEW AFTON MINE GOLD/COPPER PRODUCER
Located near Kamloops B.C. Underground block cave with mine life to 2030 (assuming development
2018 guidance: 55-65k oz Gold 75-85Mlb Copper
BLACKWATER GOLD PROJECT
Annual production +450k
CERRO SAN PEDRO MINE GOLD/SILVER PRODUCER
In Reclamation
Rainy River Mine: Ontario, Canada
equipment availability
recoveries
procurement
execution
New Afton Mine: B.C., Canada
extension; internally funded
package
~13.5 M ounces of gold and 941 Mlbs copper reserves in Canada
Redesigning Our Future: Positioning for Success
Located near Fort Frances Open pit with u/g component 2018 updated guidance: 210-250k oz gold (1) Refer to Endnote on Free Cash Flow under the heading “Non-GAAP measures”
4 REVOLVING CREDIT FACILITY SENIOR UNSECURED NOTES (November 2012) SENIOR UNSECURED NOTES (May 2017) Face Value $400 million(1)(2) $500 million $300 million Maturity August 14, 2021 November 15, 2022 May 15, 2025 Interest Rate See ‘Key features’ below 6.25% 6.375% Payable Revolving credit Semi-annually Semi-annually Current trading value n/a 85.00(4) 78.50(4) Key features
1.25%-3.75% based on leverage ratio
3.25%
declining to 100% after 2020
May 15, 2020 at 104.8%, declining to 100% after 2023
facility will be limited to a maximum draw of $225 million. Figures shown reflect the full credit facility, which will be available after security perfection.
No long-term debt maturities for four years
Capital Structure: Summary of Debt
5
Open Pit / Underground mine in Canada
Mineral Reserves and Resources (June 30, 2018) (3) Grade (g/t) Gold (Koz) Proven & Probable 1.09 4,220 Measured & Indicated(4) 1.06 2,142 Inferred 1.10 313
Rainy River Mine: Ontario, Canada
and Mineral Resources” and “Technical Information”. Additional information can also be found in Appendix 3.
Production and Costs Q3 2018 YTD 2018 2018 Guidance(1) Gold Production (oz) 55,538 150,082 210k-250k Operating expense per oz. 760 905 730-770 AISC per oz.(2) 1,546 1,700 1,600-1,700 Capital ($M) Q3 2018 YTD 2018 2018 Guidance(1) Sustaining Capital 43 117 210 Growth Capital 1 22 35
The operational plan forward
65km from Fort Frances, Ontario Mine life of 14 years
Tailings Management Area Overburden Stockpile West Mine Rock Stockpile Open Pit Mill East Mine Rock Stockpile Low Grade Stockpile
Operational Metrics Q4 2017 Q1 2018 Q2 2018 Q3 2018
Tonnes mined per day (ore and waste) 111,820 112,432 107,416 102,290 110,248 Ore tonnes mined per day 29,639 36,296 36,043 30,439 23,085 Strip Ratio (waste:ore) 2.77 2.10 1.98 2.36 3.78 Tonnes milled per day 16,022 17,534 16,549 16,962 20,462 Gold grade milled (g/t) 0.94 1.08 1.24 1.21 1.32 Gold recovery (%) 86.1 81.0 87.0 87.0 89.0 Mill availability (%) N/A 77 74 76 90 Production 28,509 39,325 55,219 55,538 25,517 6
Short-term Operating Plan
20,462 tpd processed following August shutdown
September
and mobile equipment availability
Rainy River Mine: Short-Term Operating Plan
Reserve Pit Underground Reserves and Infrastructure
7 From Geology – Ore from Survey: 2017 Resource Block Model(1) Tonnes Au g/t Ag g/t Au Ounces Ag Ounces HGO 1,490,076 1.54 2.39 73,868 114,325 MGO 859,475 0.64 1.73 17,687 47,865 LGO 681,798 0.40 1.63 8,811 35,628 Total 3,031,349 1.03 2.03 100,396 197,949 From Geology – Ore from Survey: Grade Control Blocks Block Model Tonnes Au g/t Ag g/t Au Ounces Ag Ounces HGO 1,572,593 1.54 2.07 77,970 104,627 MGO 904,452 0.64 1.72 18,685 49,907 LGO 705,987 0.39 1.54 8,950 34,921 Total 3,183,032 1.03 1.85 105,659 189,777 From Geology – Ore from Surveyed Dig Shapes: Grade Control Blocks Dig Blocks Tonnes Au g/t Ag g/t Au Ounces Ag Ounces HGO 1,854,754 1.26 1.85 75,428 110,539 MGO 760,113 0.77 2.06 18,877 50,418 LGO 214,705 0.45 1.66 3,118 11,473 Total 2,829,571 1.07 1.90 97,423 172,429 From Mill – Ore Processed Tonnes Au g/t Ag g/t Au Ounces Ag Ounces Milled 1,620,498 1.21 1.80 62,949 94,029
Reconciliation between resource and blast hole model
been in line with the blast hole block model Dilution sources
control shapes
mining shovel (PC 8000)
favourably to the reserve model RC Drilling
and improve grade control practices and near-term mine plan
Rainy River: Q3 Grade Reconciliation
HGO: High grade ore MGO: Medium grade ore LGO: Low grade ore
Rainy River: Mill Performance
8
Key Priorities
16,022 17,534 16,549 16,962 20,462 24,000
77% 74% 76% 90% 93% Q4 2017 Q1 2018 Q2 2018 Q3 2018
Target
Tonnes milled per day Mill availability (%)
Mill availability has improved significantly since the August shutdown
Mill Shutdown
9
Rainy River Intrepid North Target
Intrepid North
Opportunity: Potential eastward continuation of mineralized gold zones that host main ODM, HS and 433 ore horizons in folded felsic sequence as it extends north of the Intrepid ore body.
junior explorer Bayfield Resources in 2007 and 2008.
localized in the hanging wall position above the main stratigraphic sequence hosting the main deposits currently being mined in the open pit. The untested sequence underlying Intrepid to the northeast extends at least another 1 km north the planned Intrepid underground development. Potential continuation of known ODM, HS, 433 gold horizons extending north from Intrepid ore body INTREPID
1 km OPEN TO NORTHEAST
Granite
Intrepid U/G Portal
MILL
New Afton Mine: B.C., Canada
10 Mineral Reserves and Resources (Dec., 2017) (3) Gold Grade (g/t) Gold (Koz) Copper Grade (%) Copper Mlbs. Proven & Probable 0.61 1,078 0.78 941 Measured & Indicated(4) 0.63 1,170 0.76 968 Inferred 0.39 192 0.41 131
concerning estimates of Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources” and “Technical Information”. Additional information can also be found in Appendix 3.
Production and Costs Q3 2018 YTD 2018 2018 Guidance(1) Gold Production (oz) 19,916 58,551 55k-65k Operating expense/Au oz.(2) 342 387 455-495 Copper Production (Mlbs) 21.7 64.3 75-85 Operating expense/Cu lb.(2) 0.84 0.94 1.10-1.30 AISC per oz.(3) (1,057) (1,097) (1,020)-(980) Capital ($M) Q3 2018 YTD 2018 2018 Guidance(1) Sustaining Capital 9 28 40 Growth Capital 1 2 5
On Track to Meet, or Exceed, 2018 Guidance
New Afton Operational Plan
11
C-zone
advance an internally-funded development strategy
2018 with development activities beginning in early 2019 Exploration potential
New Gold’s broader district property holdings Supergene ore
to be operational in Q4
12
New Afton Near-mine Potential
Down plunge extension of New Afton ore body; C-zone open at depth
4,250 Level - limit of deepest drill intercept Resource shell
B3 Main Zone C – Zone
4,525 Level Base of C-zone Reserve
D – Zone
Blackwater Project: B.C., Canada
13
southwest of Prince George
and processing options
gold with a grade of 0.74 g/t gold
expected in 2019
Mineral Reserves and Resources (December 31, 2017) (1) Gold Grade (g/t) Gold (Koz) Proven & Probable
0.74 8,170
Measured & Indicated(2)
0.71 1,402
Inferred
0.66 385
Mineral Reserves and Resources (December 31, 2017) (1) Silver Grade (g/t) Silver (Koz) Proven & Probable
5.5 60,800
Measured & Indicated(2)
4.5 8,915
Inferred
3.9 2,267
concerning estimates of Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources” and “Technical Information”. Additional information can also be found in Appendix 3.
Blackwater Project: B.C., Canada
14
economics
flowsheet to reduce capital and operating costs
$1,020 $200
~80%
reduction in Blackwater analyst consensus value
Average Gold Price (C$/oz)(3)
Average Analyst Consensus Value ($mm)
Resource Base(4) Environmental Assessment Status
$1,555 4.8 Moz
M&I Resource
Not Started
~$1,655
Expected in 2019
the heading “Cautionary note to U.S. readers concerning estimates of Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources” and “Technical Information”. Additional information can also be found in Appendix 3. (1) (2)
8.2 Moz Reserve
1.4 Moz M&I Resource
Multiple options to unlock value
Cerro San Pedro Mine: Mexico
15
government agencies
$15.6 million in place
four years of final processing, including residual leaching in line with permit requirements
legacy for the local communities
Production and Costs Q3 2018 YTD 2018 2018 Guidance(1) Gold Production (oz)
2,079 9,422 10k-15k
Operating expense per oz.
7,715 2,950 $1,960-$2,000
AISC per oz.(2)
3,287 2,258 $2,000-$2,140
16
New Gold: The Path Forward
Canadian focused intermediate gold producer
Rainy River
development scenarios
launched
at Rainy River and New Afton
Corporate 18 Top Institutional Shareholders 20 Reserves and Resources 21
2018 guidance assumptions
Commodity Price/Foreign Exchange Assumptions
18
Spot (Nov. 27, 2018)
SPOT Gold price ($/oz) 1,212 Silver price ($/oz) 14.07 Copper price ($/lb) 2.79 CDN/USD 1.33 MXN/USD 20.52 2018 Gold price ($/oz) 1,300 Silver price ($/oz) 16.00 Copper price ($/lb) 3.00 CDN/USD 1.30 MXN/USD 18.00
Appendix 1
2018 Guidance and All-in Sustaining Costs Sensitivities
19
Appendix 1
Gold Production Copper Production Operating Expense Operating Expense All-in Sustaining Costs(1) (thousand ounces) (million pounds) ($ per gold ounce) ($ per copper pound) ($ per gold ounce) Rainy River
210 - 250 – $730 - $770 – $1,600 - $1,700
New Afton
55 - 65 75 - 85 $455 - $495 $1.10 - $1.30 ($1,020) - ($980)
Cerro San Pedro
10 – 15 – $1,960 - $2,000 – $2,000 - $2,140
2018 Guidance
Top Institutional Shareholders
20
Institution Name Shares Held % Ownership Location
Van Eck Associates Corporation 80,507,292 13.91 New York Kopernik Global Investors, LLC 38,210,125 6.60 Tampa Dimensional Fund Advisors, L.P. (U.S.) 21,431,465 3.70 Austin Morgan Stanley & Company, LLC 17,400,000 3.01 London EXOR Investments (U.K.), LLP 16,717,997 2.89 London
16,003,970 2.77 Baltimore The Vanguard Group, Inc. 13,935,477 2.41 Malvern First Eagle Investment Management, LLC 9,607,331 1.66 New York Ingalls & Snyder, LLC (Asset Management) 8,346,375 1.44 New York Saba Capital Management, L.P. 6,755,498 1.17 New York Renaissance Technologies, LLC 6,332,384 1.09 New York Morgan Stanley & Company, LLC 6,215,314 1.07 New York Fidelity Management & Research Company 6,140,419 1.06 Boston Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas 5,953,430 1.03 New York BlackRock Fund Advisors 5,594,955 0.97 San Francisco Norges Bank Investment Management (Norway) 5,235,294 0.90 Oslo Sprott Asset Management, L.P. 4,815,588 0.83 Toronto Exane Derivatives SNC 4,586,349 0.79 Paris Schroder Investment Management, LTD 4,272,957 0.74 London TD Asset Management, Inc. 4,244,851 0.73 Toronto Newton Investment Management, LTD 4,193,152 0.72 London Credit Suisse Securities (USA), LLC (Broker) 3,989,468 0.69 New York BMO Asset Management, Inc. 3,945,089 0.68 Toronto BlueMountain Capital Management, LLC 3,824,559 0.66 New York Azvalor Asset Management, S.G.I.I.C., S.A. 3,767,620 0.65 Madrid
Source: Ipreo BD Corporate (as of November 26, 2018)
Appendix 2
Mineral Reserves and Resources Summary
21
AS AT DECEMBER 31, 2017 AS AT DECEMBER 31, 2016 GOLD Koz SILVER Moz COPPER Mlbs GOLD Koz SILVER Moz COPPER Mlbs
Proven and Probable reserves
13,468 77 941 13,274 75 1,033
Rainy River (1)
4,220 12 – 3,943 10 –
New Afton
1,078 4 941 1,161 4 1,033
Blackwater
8,170 61 – 8,170 61 –
Measured and Indicated resources (exclusive of reserves)(1)
4,715 21 968 4,325 19 950
Inferred resources(1)
890 4 131 1,392 4 137
Mineral Reserves and Resources Summary
Appendix 3
22 New Afton A&B Zones Proven – – – – – – – Probable 28,126 0.51 2.2 0.79 462 1,961 488 C-zone Proven – – – – – – – Probable 26,741 0.72 1.8 0.77 616 1,571 453 Total New Afton P&P 54,867 0.61 2.0 0.78 1,078 3,533 941
Mineral Reserves Statement as at December 31, 2017
Proven and Probable
Appendix 3
METAL GRADE CONTAINED METAL TONNES 000s GOLD g/t SILVER g/t COPPER % GOLD Koz SILVER Koz COPPER Mlbs
Rainy River(1) Direct
processing
reserves Open Pit Proven
21,468 1.22 2.5 – 842 1,739 –
Probable
50,409 1.15 3.1 – 1,860 5,069 –
Open Pit P&P (direct processing)
71,878 1.17 2.9 – 2,701 6,807 –
Underground Proven
– – – – – – –
Probable
8,954 3.55 9.5 – 1,021 2,728 –
Underground P&P (direct processing)
8,954 3.55 9.5 – 1,021 2,728 –
Low grade reserves Open Pit Proven
7,407 0.38 2.0 – 90 478 –
Probable
26,900 0.36 2.4 – 308 2,086 –
Open Pit P&P (low grade)
34,307 0.36 2.3 – 398 2,564 –
Stockpile Proven
5,313 0.58 1.8 – 99 299 –
Stockpile reserves
5,313 0.58 1.8 – 99 299 –
Combined P&P Proven
34,189 0.94 2.3 – 1,031 2,516 –
Probable
86,263 1.15 3.6 – 3,189 9,882 –
Total Rainy River P&P
120,451 1.09 3.2 – 4,220 12,398 –
23 METAL GRADE CONTAINED METAL TONNES 000s GOLD g/t SILVER g/t COPPER % GOLD Koz SILVER Koz COPPER Mlbs Blackwater Direct processing material Proven 124,500 0.95 5.5 – 3,790 22,100 – Probable 169,700 0.68 4.1 – 3,730 22,300 – P&P (direct processing) 294,200 0.79 4.7 – 7,520 44,400 – Low grade reserves Proven 20,100 0.50 3.6 – 325 2,300 – Probable 30,100 0.34 14.6 – 325 14,100 – P&P (stockpile) 50,200 0.40 10.2 – 650 16,400 – Total Blackwater P&P 344,400 0.74 5.5 – 8,170 60,800 –
Mineral Reserves Statement as at December 31, 2017
Proven and Probable continued
Appendix 3
24
Mineral Reserves Statement as at December 31, 2017
Appendix 3
METAL GRADE CONTAINED METAL TONNES 000s GOLD g/t SILVER g/t COPPER % GOLD Koz SILVER Koz COPPER Mlbs
Rainy River(1) Direct
processing
resources Open Pit Measured
2,996 1.14 5.7 – 109 550 –
Indicated
26,541 1.12 3.4 – 957 2,921 –
Open Pit M&I (direct processing)
29,537 1.12 3.7 – 1,066 3,471 –
Underground Measured
– – – – – – –
Indicated
7,934 3.06 8.6 – 780 2,206 –
Underground
7,934 3.06 8.6 – 780 2,206 –
Low grade resources Open Pit Measured
2,462 0.35 3.3 – 28 261 –
Indicated
23,175 0.36 2.3 – 268 1,713 –
Open Pit M&I (low grade)
25,637 0.36 2.4 – 296 1,974 –
Combined M&I Measured
5,458 0.78 4.6 – 137 811 –
Indicated
57,650 1.08 3.7 – 2,005 6,840 –
Total Rainy River M&I
63,108 1.06 3.8 – 2,142 7,651 –
Measured and Indicated (Exclusive of Reserves)
New Afton A&B Zones Measured
17,155 0.63 2.0 0.83 348 1,090 313
Indicated
10,689 0.46 2.4 0.68 159 824 159
A&B Zone M&I
27,844 0.57 2.1 0.77 507 1,909 473
C-zone Measured
6,424 0.91 2.3 1.07 188 471 152
Indicated
11,918 0.74 2.1 0.88 284 816 231
C-zone M&I
18,342 0.80 2.2 0.95 472 1,284 383
HW Lens Measured
– – – – – – –
Indicated
11,841 0.50 2.0 0.43 191 750 111
HW Lens M&I
11,841 0.50 2.0 0.43 191 750 111
Total New Afton M&I
58,038 0.63 2.1 0.76 1,170 3,970 968
Mineral Resources Statement as at December 31, 2017
25 METAL GRADE CONTAINED METAL TONNES 000s GOLD g/t SILVER g/t COPPER % GOLD Koz SILVER Koz COPPER Mlbs Blackwater Direct processing resources Measured
288 1.39 6.6 – 13 61 –
Indicated
45,440 0.84 4.7 – 1,227 6,866 –
M&I (direct processing)
45,728 0.84 4.7 – 1,240 6,927 –
Low grade resources Measured
11 0.29 7.4 – – 3 –
Indicated
15,831 0.32 3.9 – 162 1,985 –
M&I (low grade)
15,842 0.32 3.9 – 162 1,988 –
Total Blackwater M&I
61,570 0.71 4.5 – 1,402 8,915 –
Measured and Indicated (Exclusive of Reserves) continued
Appendix 3
Mineral Resources Statement as at December 31, 2017
26 METAL GRADE CONTAINED METAL TONNES 000s GOLD g/t SILVER g/t COPPER % GOLD Koz SILVER Koz COPPER Mlbs Rainy River(1) Direct processing Open Pit
3,697 1.06 3.2 – 126 385 –
Underground
1,215 3.59 2.7 – 140 107 –
Total Direct Processing
4,912 1.69 3.4 – 266 492 –
Low grade material Open Pit
3,959 0.37 1.4 – 47 180 –
Total Rainy River Inferred
8,871 1.10 2.4 – 313 672 –
Blackwater Direct processing
13,933 0.76 4.0 – 341 1,792 –
Low grade resources
4,225 0.32 3.5 – 44 475 –
Total Blackwater Inferred
18,159 0.66 3.9 – 385 2,267 –
Inferred
Appendix 3
New Afton A&B Zones
7,564 0.35 1.3 0.35 85 322 58
C-zone
7,688 0.43 1.3 0.48 106 325 72
HW Lens
– – – – – – –
Total New Afton Inferred
15,253 0.39 1.3 0.41 192 647 131
Reserves and Resources notes
27 MINERAL PROPERTY RESERVES LOWER CUT-OFF RESOURCES LOWER CUT-OFF GOLD $/oz SILVER $/oz COPPER $/lb CAD/USD MXN/USD Mineral Reserves $1,275 $17.00 $2.75 1.30 18.00 Mineral Resources $1,375 $19.00 $3.00 1.30 18.00
43-101.
River, which have been reported as of June 30, 2018 per the Technical Report dated July 25, 2018.
Technical Report dated July 25, 2018, have been estimated based on the following metal prices and foreign exchange rate criteria: Blackwater O/P direct processing: O/P low grade material: 0.26 – 0.38 g/t AuEq 0.32 g/t AuEq All Resources: 0.40% AuEq Rainy River O/P direct processing: 0.30 – 0.50 g/t AuEq 0.30 – 0.50 g/t AuEq O/P low grade material: 0.30 g/t AuEq 0.30 g/t AuEq U/G direct processing: 2.20 g/t AuEq 2.00 g/t AuEq
Appendix 3
New Afton Main Zone – B1 & B2 Block: C$ 17.00/t All Resources: 0.40% CuEq B3 Block & C-Zone: C$ 24.00/t
Reserves and Resources notes (cont’d)
28
not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. Inferred mineral resources have a greater amount of uncertainty as to their existence, economic and legal feasibility, do not have demonstrated economic viability, and are likewise exclusive of mineral reserves. Numbers may not add due to rounding.
economic parameters consistent with the methods most suitable to their potential commercial extraction. Where different mining and/or processing methods might be applied to different portions of a mineral resource, the designators ‘open pit’ and ‘underground’ are used to indicate the envisioned mining method. Likewise in certain instances, the designators ‘direct processing’ and ‘lower grade reserves’ or ‘lower grade resources’ have been applied to differentiate material envisioned to be mined and processed directly from material to be mined and stored separately for future
marketing and other risks and relevant issues. Additional information regarding mineral reserve and mineral resource estimation, classification, reporting parameters, key assumptions and associated risks for each of New Gold’s material properties are provided in the respective NI 43-101 Technical Reports, which are available at www.sedar.com.
according to the following criteria: Underground mineral reserves are reported peripheral to and/or below the open pit mineral reserve pit shell, which has been designed and optimized based on a $1,275/oz gold price. Open pit and underground mineral resources are reported based on a $1,375/oz gold price. Open pit mineral resources are reported from within an open pit resource shell that extends to a depth of approximately 400 metres from surface. Underground mineral resources are reported below and peripheral to the mineral resource pit shell. Approximately forty percent (40%) of the gold metal content defined as underground mineral reserves is derived from material located between the mineral reserve pit shell and the mineral resource pit shell; the remaining sixty percent (60%) of the metal content defined as underground mineral reserves is derived from material located below the mineral resource pit shell. Open pit mineral resources exclude material reported as underground mineral reserves.
under NI 43-101, under the oversight and review of Mr. Mark A. Petersen, a Qualified Person under NI 43-101.
Appendix 3
Endnotes
29
CAUTIONARY NOTE TO U.S. READERS CONCERNING ESTIMATES OF MINERAL RESERVES AND MINERAL RESOURCES Information concerning the properties and operations of New Gold has been prepared in accordance with Canadian standards under applicable Canadian securities laws, and may not be comparable to similar information for United States companies. The terms “Mineral Resource”, “Measured Mineral Resource”, “Indicated Mineral Resource” and “Inferred Mineral Resource” used in this news release are Canadian mining terms as defined in the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (“CIM”) Definition Standards for Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves adopted by CIM Council on May 10, 2014 and incorporated by reference in National Instrument 43-101. While the terms “Mineral Resource”, “Measured Mineral Resource”, “Indicated Mineral Resource” and “Inferred Mineral Resource” are recognized and required by Canadian securities regulations, they are not defined terms under standards of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. As such, certain information contained in this news release concerning descriptions of mineralization and mineral resources under Canadian standards is not comparable to similar information made public by United States companies subject to the reporting and disclosure requirements of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. An “Inferred Mineral Resource” has a great amount of uncertainty as to its existence and as to its economic and legal feasibility. Under Canadian rules, estimates of inferred mineral resources may not form the basis of feasibility or pre-feasibility studies. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of an “Inferred Mineral Resource” will ever be upgraded to a higher confidence category. Readers are cautioned not to assume that all or any part of an “Inferred Mineral Resource” exists or is economically or legally mineable. Under United States standards, mineralization may not be classified as a “Reserve” unless the determination has been made that the mineralization could be economically and legally produced or extracted at the time the reserve estimation is made. Readers are cautioned not to assume that all or any part of the measured or indicated mineral resources will ever be converted into mineral reserves. In addition, the definitions of “Proven Mineral Reserves” and “Probable Mineral Reserves” under CIM standards differ in certain respects from the standards
TECHNICAL INFORMATION The scientific and technical information relating to the operation of New Gold’s operating mines contained herein has been reviewed and approved by Mr. Nicholas Kwong, Director, Business Improvement of New Gold. All other scientific and technical information contained herein has been reviewed and approved by Mr. Mark A. Petersen, Vice President, Exploration of New Gold. Mr. Kwong is a Professional Engineer and a member of the Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of British Columbia. Mr. Petersen is a SME Registered Member and AIPG Certified Professional Geologist. Mr. Kwong and Mr. Petersen are "Qualified Persons" for the purposes of Canadian NI 43-101. For additional technical information on New Gold’s material properties, including a detailed breakdown of Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources by category, as well as key assumptions, parameters and risks, refer to New Gold’s Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2017 filed on www.sedar.com and the Rainy River Technical Report dated July 25, 2018. NON-GAAP MEASURES (1) ALL-IN SUSTAINING COSTS “All-in sustaining costs” per ounce is a non-GAAP financial measure. Consistent with guidance announced in 2013 by the World Gold Council, an association of various gold mining companies from around the world of which New Gold is a member, New Gold defines “all-in sustaining costs” per ounce as the sum of total cash costs, capital expenditures that are sustaining in nature (as presented in the cash flow statement), corporate general and administrative costs, capitalized and expensed exploration that is sustaining in nature and environmental reclamation costs, all divided by the ounces of gold sold to arrive at a per ounce figure. New Gold believes this non-GAAP financial measure provides further transparency into costs associated with producing gold and assists analysts, investors and other stakeholders of the Company in assessing the Company’s operating performance, its ability to generate free cash flow from current operations and its overall value. This data is furnished to provide additional information and is a non-GAAP financial measure. All-in sustaining costs presented do not have a standardized meaning under IFRS and may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other mining companies. It should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS and is not necessarily indicative of cash flow from operations under IFRS or operating costs presented under
filed from time to time on www.sedar.com. “Sustaining costs” is a non-GAAP financial measure. New Gold defines sustaining costs as the difference between all-in sustaining costs and total cash costs, being the sum of net capital expenditures that are sustaining in nature, corporate general and administrative costs, capitalized and expensed exploration that is sustaining in nature, and environmental reclamation
all in sustaining costs in the tables below break down the components of sustaining costs. Sustaining costs is intended to provide additional information only and does not have any standardized meaning under IFRS and may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other mining companies. It should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS.
Endnotes
30
(2) TOTAL CASH COSTS “Total cash costs” per ounce is a non-GAAP financial measure which is calculated in accordance with a standard developed by The Gold Institute, a worldwide association of suppliers
measures of other companies. New Gold reports total cash costs on a sales basis. The Company believes that certain investors use this information to evaluate the Company’s performance and ability to generate liquidity through operating cash flow to fund future capital expenditures and working capital needs. This measure, along with sales, is considered to be a key indicator of the Company’s ability to generate operating earnings and cash flow from its mining operations. Total cash costs include mine site operating costs such as mining, processing and administration costs, royalties, production taxes, and realized gains and losses on fuel contracts, but are exclusive of amortization, reclamation, capital and exploration costs and net of by-product sales. Total cash costs are then divided by ounces of gold sold to arrive at a per ounce figure. Co-product cash costs remove the impact of
divides the amount by the total ounces of gold or silver or pounds of copper sold, as the case may be, to arrive at per ounce or per pound figures. Unless otherwise indicated, all total cash cost information in this news release is net of by-product sales. This data is furnished to provide additional information and is a non-GAAP financial measure. Total cash costs and co-product cash costs presented do not have a standardized meaning under IFRS and may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other mining companies. It should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS and is not necessarily indicative of cash flow from operations under IFRS or operating costs presented under GAAP. Further details regarding historical total cash costs and a reconciliation to the nearest IFRS measures are provided in the MD&A accompanying New Gold’s financial statements filed from time to time on www.sedar.com. (3) CASH GENERATED FROM OPERATIONS BEFORE CHANGES IN WORKING CAPITAL “Cash generated from operations before changes in working capital” is a non-GAAP financial measure with no standard meaning under IFRS, excludes changes in non-cash operating working capital. Management uses this measure to evaluate the Company’s ability to generate cash from its operations before working capital changes. Further details regarding cash generated from operations before changes in working capital and a reconciliation to the nearest IFRS measure is provided in the MD&A accompanying New Gold’s financial statements filed from time to time on www.sedar.com. (4) ADJUSTED NET EARNINGS/(LOSS) “Adjusted net earnings/(loss)” and “adjusted net earnings/(loss) per share” are non-GAAP financial measures. Net earnings/(loss) have been adjusted and tax affected for the group of costs in “Other gains and losses” on the condensed consolidated income statement. The adjusted entries are also impacted for tax to the extent that the underlying entries are impacted for tax in the unadjusted net earnings/(loss) from continuing operations. The Company uses this measure for its own internal purposes. Management’s internal budgets and forecasts and public guidance do not reflect fair value changes on senior notes and non-hedged derivatives, foreign currency translation and fair value through profit or loss and financial asset gains/losses. Consequently, the presentation of adjusted net earnings and adjusted net earnings per share enables investors and analysts to better understand the underlying operating performance of our core mining business through the eyes of management. Management periodically evaluates the components of adjusted net earnings and adjusted net earnings per share based on an internal assessment of performance measures that are useful for evaluating the operating performance of our business and a review of the non-GAAP measures used by mining industry analysts and other mining companies. Adjusted net (loss)/earnings and adjusted net (loss)/earnings per share are intended to provide additional information only and do not have any standardized meaning under IFRS and may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other companies. They should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS. The measures are not necessarily indicative of operating profit or cash flows from operations as determined under IFRS. 5) AVERAGE REALIZED PRICE “Average realized price per ounce or pound sold” is a non-GAAP financial measure with no standard meaning under IFRS. Management uses this measure to better understand the price realized in each reporting period for gold, silver, and copper sales. Average realized price is intended to provide additional information only and does not have any standardized definition under IFRS; it should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS. Other companies may calculate this measure differently and this measure is unlikely to be comparable to similar measures presented by other companies. Further details regarding average realized price and a reconciliation to the nearest IFRS measure is provided in the MD&A accompanying New Gold’s financial statements filed from time to time on www.sedar.com. (6) OPERATING MARGIN “Operating margin” is a non-GAAP financial measure with no standard meaning under IFRS, which management uses to evaluate the Company’s aggregated and mine-by-mine contribution to net earnings before non-cash depreciation and depletion charges. (7) FREE CASH FLOW “Free cash flow” is defined as operating cash flow less capital expenditures.