8.1 Report on 2014 Alameda Voter Research Conducted for Alameda - - PDF document

8 1
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

8.1 Report on 2014 Alameda Voter Research Conducted for Alameda - - PDF document

8.1 Report on 2014 Alameda Voter Research Conducted for Alameda County Transportation Commission June 26, 2014 2014 Opinion Research Telephone survey of likely voters in Alameda County Objective Details Test support for the ballot measure


slide-1
SLIDE 1

1

Report on 2014 Alameda Voter Research

Conducted for Alameda County Transportation Commission June 26, 2014

2014 Alameda CTC Research | 2

2014 Opinion Research

Telephone survey of likely voters in Alameda County

Objective Details

  • Test support for the ballot measure

among a representative sample of likely November 2014 voters

  • Test the impact that information has on

support for the measure

  • Interviewing conducted April 3-14, 2014
  • 803 total interviews countywide; Margin of

error: + 3.5 percentage points

  • Data is representative of the likely

November 2014 voter population

Web-panel survey of voters in Alameda County

Objective Details

  • Test the order of ballot question wording

and element order

  • Allow voters to read the ballot language

to better simulate how they would react to it when voting

  • Interviewing conducted June 2-8, 2014
  • 400 total interviews; Margin of error: +4.9

percentage points

  • Data reflects demographics of a likely

November 2014 voter population; vote history and voter registration status of web panelists was unavailable

8.1

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

2014 Alameda CTC Research | 3

2014 Opinion Research Key Findings

  • The revenue measure environment in Alameda County has

improved since 2012.

  • A measure to augment and extend the existing county

transportation sales tax is supported by more than two-thirds of Alameda County voters.

  • Elements of the Transportation Expenditure Plan are well

supported by the voters.

  • Measure support holds up under strong opposition messaging

and under the conditions of a low turnout election.

  • The ballot question under consideration communicated the

components of the measure clearly.

2014 Alameda CTC Research | 4

Right Direction/Wrong Track Over Time

60% 56% 43% 49% 36% 41% 40% 49%51% 23% 20% 34% 34% 48% 36% 42% 28% 26% Right Direction Wrong Track Overall optimism has improved significantly since 2012.

Q3:Do you think things in Alameda County are generally going in the right direction, or do you feel that things are pretty seriously off on the wrong track?

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

2014 Alameda CTC Research | 5

Initial Vote

Ballot Question (Sample A)

Shall voters authorize implementing the Alameda County 30 year Transportation Expenditure Plan to:

  • Expand and modernize BART in Alameda County;
  • Improve transit connections to jobs and schools;
  • Fix roads, improve highways and increase bicycle

and pedestrian safety;

  • Reduce traffic congestion and improve air

quality;

  • Keep senior, student, and disabled fares

affordable? Approval augments and extends the existing County sales tax, with independent oversight and audits. All money will benefit local residents.

A measure to augment and extend Alameda County’s transportation sales tax is supported by 72% of Alameda County voters.

The following measure may be on the ballot this year in Alameda County…If this measure were on the ballot today, are you likely to vote yes to approve it, or no to reject it? (Q6, Sample A) *Shows the combined results from Samples A (Question-led) and B (Elements-led) in April telephone poll.

68% 3%

5% 1% 22%

Overall*

Definitely/ Probably No Lean No Und Lean Yes Definitely/ Probably Yes

72%

2014 Alameda CTC Research | 6

Measure Information

38% 35% 36% 33% 29% 29% 34% 28% 29% 34% 36% 35% 35% 37% 37% 32% 37% 36% 72% 71% 71% 68% 66% 66% 66% 65% 65%

Improve transportation for those who live in AC Helps seniors be transit independent Fund youth transit pass Road and pothole repairs throughout county Improve walking routes Improve biking routes Improve air quality Smooth traffic flow Improve BART frequency, reliability, comfort, and safety Much more likely to support (7) More likely to support (5-6) Total

Elements of the expenditure plan are well supported.

I’m going to read you some things people might say about the transportation sales tax ballot measure. After each statement, please tell me if it would make you less likely or more likely to support this measure…(Q38-54). (April 2014)

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

2014 Alameda CTC Research | 7

Vote Progression

The vote does drop after the opposition messaging, but it stays above the two- thirds mark.

72% 75% 71% 5% 4% 3% 23% 21% 26% Initial vote* After Information* After Opposition* No Undecided Yes

* Combined votes from Samples A & B. 2014 Alameda CTC Research | 8

November General Elections Turnout Over Time

100,000 200,000 300,000 400,000 500,000 600,000 700,000 800,000 900,000 Nov-98 Nov-00 Nov-02 Nov-04 Nov-06 Nov-08 Nov-10 Nov-12 Nov-14* Total Registration Total Ballot 74% Turnout has edged up over the decade, but was lower in 2012 than in 2000. 61% 78% 61% 77% 53% 56% 75%

*projected

51-58%

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

2014 Alameda CTC Research | 9

Initial Vote by Turnout Scenarios

72% 71%

5% 5%

23% 24%

  • Nov. 2014 Electorate

Overall - (57% Turnout) Voted 3-6/6 - (53% Turnout) No Undecided Yes

There is a 1 point difference in measure support between a 57% voter turnout election and a more conservative 53% turnout election.

Combined initial vote.

A Closer Look at the Ballot Question

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

2014 Alameda CTC Research | 11

Additional Research Looked at Question Wording

Proposed Ballot Question Shall voters authorize implementing the Alameda County 30 year Transportation Expenditure Plan to:

  • Expand and modernize BART in Alameda County;
  • Improve transit connections to jobs and schools;
  • Fix roads, improve highways and increase bicycle and pedestrian

safety;

  • Reduce traffic congestion and improve air quality; and
  • Keep senior, student, and disabled fares affordable?

Approval augments by ½ cent and extends the existing County sales tax, with independent oversight and audits. All money will benefit local residents.

2014 Alameda CTC Research | 12

Vote by List Placement

37% 35% 20% 14% 14% 21%

13% 12%

15% 19% Question-led. "Shall voters authorize..." came before elements Elements-led. Elements came before "Shall voters authorize..."

1 - Will definitely vote YES 2 3 4 Neutral 5-7 No

Overall, the question-led wording tested stronger than the elements-led wording.

Please indicate how you would vote on the following measure if it were on the ballot today... (V1-V8)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

2014 Alameda CTC Research | 13

Vote by Listed Elements Stressed

35% 32% 19% 17% 17% 17%

14% 13%

14% 21% Stress BART & Senior/Student Fares Stress Roads/Safety & Traffic

1 - Will definitely vote YES 2 3 4 Neutral 5-7 No

Reading BART or Senior/Student Fares first tested stronger than reading Roads/Safety or Traffic first.

Please indicate how you would vote on the following measure if it were on the ballot today... (V1-V8) 2014 Alameda CTC Research | 14

Vote by Elements Listed First/Last

42% 41% 37% 24% 13% 15% 20% 20% 19% 15% 17% 19%

11% 7% 13% 18%

15% 22% 13% 19% BART first, Senior/Student fares last Traffic first, Roads/Safety last Senior/Student fares first, BART last Roads/Safety first, Traffic last

1 - Will definitely vote YES 2 3 4 Neutral 5-7 No

Leading with BART was the strongest question wording, followed by leading with Traffic. However, leading with Traffic resulted in elevated opposition.

Please indicate how you would vote on the following measure if it were on the ballot today... (V1-V8)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

2014 Alameda CTC Research | 15

A measure to augment and extend the existing county transportation sales tax is supported by more than two-thirds of Alameda County voters.

The proposed ballot question wording is clear and understandable to voters.

A privately financed communication effort will help bolster support for a measure.

A low turnout scenario is anticipated, was tested for in this research, and should not significantly impact

  • utcome.

Conclusions

2014 Alameda CTC Research | 16

Contacts

Alex Evans Alex@EMCresearch.com 510-550-8920 Ruth Bernstein Ruth@EMCresearch.com 510-550-8922 Sara LaBatt Sara@EMCresearch.com 510-550-8924