6 negative semi definite matrices
play

6. Negative (Semi-)Definite Matrices Daisuke Oyama Mathematics II - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

6. Negative (Semi-)Definite Matrices Daisuke Oyama Mathematics II May 1, 2020 Some Facts from Linear Algebra Let M R N N . M is said to be nonsingular if there exists A R N N such that MA = AM = I . In this case, A is called


  1. 6. Negative (Semi-)Definite Matrices Daisuke Oyama Mathematics II May 1, 2020

  2. Some Facts from Linear Algebra Let M ∈ R N × N . ▶ M is said to be nonsingular if there exists A ∈ R N × N such that MA = AM = I . In this case, A is called the inverse matrix of M and denoted by M − 1 . ▶ The following are equivalent: ▶ M is nonsingular. ▶ rank M = N . ▶ | M | ̸ = 0 . ▶ { z ∈ R N | Mz = 0 } = { 0 } . ▶ 0 is not a characteristic root of M . 1 / 34

  3. Some Facts from Linear Algebra Let M ∈ R N × N . ▶ The equation in λ , | M − λI | = 0 , is called the characteristic equation of M . ▶ The characteristic equation of M has N solutions in C (counted with multiplicity). ▶ The solutions to the characteristic equation of M are called the characteristic roots of M . ▶ If λ 1 , . . . , λ N are the characteristic roots of M , then | M | = ∏ N n =1 λ n . ▶ If M is nonsingular and λ 1 , . . . , λ N are its characteristic roots, then λ − 1 1 , . . . , λ − 1 N are the characteristic roots of M − 1 . 2 / 34

  4. Some Facts from Linear Algebra Let M ∈ R N × N . ▶ λ ∈ C is an eigenvalue of M if there exists z ∈ C N with z ̸ = 0 such that Mz = λz. In this case, z is called an eigenvector of M that corresponds (or belongs) to λ . ▶ λ is an eigenvalue of M if and only if it is a characteristic root of M . 3 / 34

  5. Some Facts from Linear Algebra Let M ∈ R N × N be a symmetric matrix. ▶ All the eigenvalues (hence characteristic roots) of M are real. ▶ Each eigenvalue of M has real eigenvectors. ▶ ∃ U ∈ R N × N orthogonal (i.e., U T U = UU T = I ) such that   λ 1 O ... U T MU = (= diag( λ 1 , . . . , λ N )) ,     O λ N where λ 1 , . . . , λ N ∈ R are the eigenvalues of M . ▶ If M is nonsingular, then M − 1 is symmetric. 4 / 34

  6. Negative (Semi-)Definite Matrices Definition 6.1 ▶ M ∈ R N × N is negative semi-definite if z · Mz ≤ 0 for all z ∈ R N . ▶ M ∈ R N × N is negative definite if z · Mz < 0 for all z ∈ R N with z ̸ = 0 . ▶ M ∈ R N × N is positive definite ( positive semi-definite , resp.) if − M is negative definite (negative semi-definite, resp.). 5 / 34

  7. Remark ▶ In many math books, negative definiteness is defined only for symmetric matrices, or for quadratic forms ∑ N i,j =1 a ij z i z j . (Any quadratic form is written as z · Mz for some symmetric M .) ▶ Sometimes, matrices (not necessarily symmetric) that are negative definite in our sense are called negative quasi-definite. 6 / 34

  8. Example: Negative (Semi-)Definiteness of Jacobi Matrices Let X ⊂ R N be a non-empty open convex set. Suppose that f : X → R N is differentiable. 1. ( y − x ) · ( f ( y ) − f ( x )) ≤ 0 for all x, y ∈ X if and only if Df ( x ) is negative semi-definite for all x ∈ X . 2. If Df ( x ) is negative definite for all x ∈ X , then ( y − x ) · ( f ( y ) − f ( x )) < 0 for all x, y ∈ X , x ̸ = y . ▶ For N = 1 , “ ( y − x ) · ( f ( y ) − f ( x )) ≤ 0 ( < 0 ) for all x, y ∈ X ” implies that f is nonincreasing (strictly decreasing). ▶ Cf. Proposition 5.20. 7 / 34

  9. Example: Negative (Semi-)Definiteness of Hesse Matrices Let X ⊂ R N be a non-empty open convex set. Suppose that f : X → R N is differentiable and ∇ f is differentiable. 1. f is concave if and only if D 2 f ( x ) is negative semi-definite for all x ∈ X . 2. If D 2 f ( x ) is negative definite for all x ∈ X , then f is strictly concave. ▶ Proposition 5.21. 8 / 34

  10. Characterizations of Negative (Semi-)Definiteness Proposition 6.1 Let M ∈ R N × N . 1. M is negative definite ⇒ M + M T is negative definite. ⇐ 2. Suppose that M is symmetric. M is negative definite ⇐ ⇒ all the characteristic roots of M are negative. 3. M is negative definite ⇒ M is nonsingular and M − 1 is negative definite. = 9 / 34

  11. Proof 1. For any z ∈ R N , z T ( M + M T ) z = 2 z T Mz . 2. Since M = U T diag( λ 1 , . . . , λ N ) U for some U orthogonal (hence nonsingular), z T Mz < 0 for all z ∈ R N \ { 0 } ⇒ ( Uz ) T diag( λ 1 , . . . , λ N )( Uz ) < 0 for all z ∈ R N \ { 0 } ⇐ n =1 λ n ( y n ) 2 = y T diag( λ 1 , . . . , λ N ) y < 0 ⇒ ∑ N ⇐ for all y ∈ { Uz | z ∈ R N \ { 0 }} = R N \ { 0 } ⇐ ⇒ λ 1 , . . . , λ N < 0 . 10 / 34

  12. 3. Suppose Mz = 0 . Then z T ( M + M T ) z = 0 . Thus, if M is negative definite (and so is M + M T ), we must have z = 0 . Take any z ∈ R N , z ̸ = 0 . Let x = M − 1 z ( ̸ = 0 ). Then z = Mx . Then we have z T M − 1 z = ( Mx ) T M − 1 ( Mx ) = x T M T x = x T Mx < 0 . 11 / 34

  13. Characterizations of Negative (Semi-)Definiteness Proposition 6.2 Let M ∈ R N × N be symmetric. 1. M is negative semi-definite ⇒ ∃ B ∈ R N × N such that M = − B T B . ⇐ 2. M is negative definite ⇒ ∃ B ∈ R N × N nonsingular such that M = − B T B . ⇐ 12 / 34

  14. Proof ▶ The “if” part: Suppose that M = − B T B . Then for any z ∈ R N , z T Mz = − z T B T Bz = −∥ Bz ∥ 2 ≤ 0 . ▶ If B is nonsingular and z ̸ = 0 , then ∥ Bz ∥ ̸ = 0 . 13 / 34

  15. Proof ▶ The “only if” part:   λ 1 O ... Since M is symmetric, we have U T MU =     O λ N for some U orthogonal (hence nonsingular). If M is negative semi-definite, then λ 1 , . . . , λ N ≤ 0 . √− λ 1   O ...  U T . ▶ Let B =   √− λ N  O   λ 1 O ...  U T = M . Then − B T B = U    O λ N ▶ If M is negative definite, then λ 1 , . . . , λ N < 0 , so that B is nonsingular. 14 / 34

  16. Characterizations of Negative (Semi-)Definiteness Proposition 6.3 Let M ∈ R N × N be symmetric. M is negative definite ⇒ ( − 1) r | r M r | > 0 for all r = 1 , . . . , N . ⇐ ▶ r M r ∈ R r × r is the r × r submatrix of M obtained by deleting the last N − r columns and rows of M , which is called the leading principal submatrix of order r of M . ▶ | r M r | is called the leading principal minor of order r of M . ▶ r M ∈ R r × N will denote the r × N submatrix of M obtained by deleting the last N − r rows of M . 15 / 34

  17. Proof ▶ The “only if” part: If M is negative definite, then r M r is negative definite and its characteristic roots λ 1 , . . . , λ r are all negative, and thus, ( − 1) r | r M r | = ( − λ 1 ) × · · · × ( − λ r ) > 0 . ▶ The “if” part: by induction: Trivial for N = 1 . ▶ Assume that the assertion holds for N − 1 . Suppose that ( − 1) r | r M r | > 0 for all r = 1 , . . . , N . Then L = N − 1 M N − 1 is negative definite by the induction hypothesis. Hence, ▶ L is nonsingular, and B T ˜ ▶ L = − ˜ B for some nonsingular ˜ B . 16 / 34

  18. Proof ( L ) b ▶ Write M = , where b ∈ R ( N − 1) × 1 . b T a NN L − 1 b ( I N − 1 ) ▶ Let U = . 0 T 1 ( L ) 0 Then one can verify that M = U T U , 0 T c where c = a NN − b T L − 1 b . ▶ Thus, | M | = c | L | . But by assumption, ( − 1) N | M | > 0 and ( − 1) N − 1 | L | > 0 , so that c < 0 . ( ˜ ) B 0 ▶ Let B = √− c U , which is nonsingular, 0 T B T ˜ where L = − ˜ B . Then M = − B T B . Hence, M is negative definite. 17 / 34

  19. Note ▶ “ ( − 1) r | r M r | ≥ 0 for all r = 1 , . . . , N ” does not imply that M is negative semi-definite. ▶ For example, ( 0 ) 0 M = 0 1 satisfies this condition ( ( − 1) | 1 M 1 | = ( − 1) 2 | M | = 0 ), but is not negative semi-definite. 18 / 34

  20. Characterizations of Negative (Semi-)Definiteness Proposition 6.4 Let M ∈ R N × N . ▶ Suppose that M is symmetric. M is negative semi-definite ⇒ ( − 1) r | r M π ⇐ r | ≥ 0 for all r = 1 , . . . , N and for all permutations π of { 1 , . . . , N } . ▶ If (not necessarily symmetric) M is negative semi-definite, then ( − 1) r | r M π r | ≥ 0 for all r = 1 , . . . , N and for all permutations π of { 1 , . . . , N } . 19 / 34

  21. Application to Concave Functions ∂ 2 f Denote f ij ( x ) = ∂x j ∂x i ( x ) . ▶ f ( x 1 , x 2 ) is strictly concave = D 2 f ( x 1 , x 2 ) is negative definite ⇐ ∀ ( x 1 , x 2 ) � � f 11 f 12 ⇒ ( − 1) f 11 > 0 and ( − 1) 2 � � ⇐ � > 0 ∀ ( x 1 , x 2 ) � � f 21 f 22 � ⇒ f 11 < 0 and f 11 f 22 − ( f 12 ) 2 > 0 ⇐ ∀ ( x 1 , x 2 ) ▶ f ( x 1 , x 2 ) is concave ⇒ D 2 f ( x 1 , x 2 ) is negative semi-definite ⇐ ∀ ( x 1 , x 2 ) � � f 11 f 12 ⇒ ( − 1) f 11 ≥ 0 , ( − 1) 2 � � ⇐ � ≥ 0 , � � f 21 f 22 � � � f 22 f 21 ( − 1) f 22 ≥ 0 , and ( − 1) 2 � � � ≥ 0 ∀ ( x 1 , x 2 ) � � f 12 f 11 � ⇒ f 11 ≤ 0 , f 22 ≤ 0 , and f 11 f 22 − ( f 12 ) 2 ≥ 0 ⇐ ∀ ( x 1 , x 2 ) 20 / 34

  22. Characterizations of Negative (Semi-)Definiteness Proposition 6.5 Let M ∈ R N × N be symmetric, and B ∈ R N × S with S ≤ N be such that rank B = S . Let W = { z ∈ R N | B T z = 0 } . ▶ M is negative definite on W if and only if � � r M r r B ( − 1) r � � � > 0 � ( r B ) T � 0 � for all r = S + 1 , . . . , N . ▶ M is negative semi-definite on W if and only if � r M π r B π � ( − 1) r � r � � ≥ 0 � ( r B π ) T � 0 � for all r = S + 1 , . . . , N and for all permutations π of { 1 , . . . , N } . 21 / 34

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend