6 1 2013
play

6/1/2013 SURGICAL INDICATIONS INDICATIONS FOR COMBINED ASF/PSF - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

6/1/2013 SURGICAL INDICATIONS INDICATIONS FOR COMBINED ASF/PSF Neurologic compression SPINAL SURGERY Spinal instability Severe or progressive deformity UCSF Spine Course Pain attributable to spinal cause


  1. 6/1/2013 SURGICAL INDICATIONS INDICATIONS FOR COMBINED ASF/PSF • Neurologic compression SPINAL SURGERY • Spinal instability • Severe or progressive deformity UCSF Spine Course • Pain attributable to spinal cause • Spondylolisthesis Serena S. Hu, MD • Deformity David S. Bradford Endowed Chair of Orthopedic Surgery • Truncal imbalance Department of Orthopedic Surgery • ?degenerative conditions University of California, San Francisco GOALS OF SURGERY SPINAL FUSION • • Decompress neural Stabilizing the spine by removing motion elements • Bone bridges motion segments • Stabilize spine • Healing rate improved by • Correct and stabilize • Improved rigidity of construct • deformity Instrumentation: screws, hooks, wires, rods • Achieve truncal balance • Growth factors • Circumferential fusion • May require spinal fusion 1

  2. 6/1/2013 INDICATIONS FOR COMBINED SURGERY INDICATIONS FOR COMBINED SURGERY • High risk of • High risk of pseudoarthrosis pseudoarthrosis • Prior pseudoarthrosis • Prior pseudoarthrosis • Deficient bone stock INDICATIONS FOR COMBINED SURGERY • High risk of pseudoarthrosis • Prior pseudoarthrosis • Deficient bone stock • Long fusion to sacrum 2

  3. 6/1/2013 INDICATIONS FOR COMBINED SURGERY INDICATIONS FOR COMBINED SURGERY • High risk of • High risk of pseudoarthrosis pseudoarthrosis • Prior pseudoarthrosis • Prior pseudoarthrosis • Deficient bone stock • Deficient bone stock • Long fusion to sacrum • Long fusion to sacrum • Improve curve correction • Improve curve • Sagittal balance • Coronal balance: correction shoulders, trunk • Sagittal balance INDICATIONS FOR COMBINED SURGERY ACHIEVING CIRCUMFERENTIAL FUSION • High risk of pseudoarthrosis • Prior pseudoarthrosis • Open anterior approach • Deficient bone stock • Lateral approach • Long fusion to sacrum • Posteriorly based approach • Improve curve correction • PLIF • Sagittal balance • TLIF • Coronal balance: shoulders, trunk • Clinical deformity (don’t forget thoracoplasties) 3

  4. 6/1/2013 ANTERIOR APPROACH LATERAL APPROACHES • Advantages • Advantages • Most complete removal of disc • Less invasive • Least risk to neural elements • ?less pain • Most correction of sagittal • Technique allows horizontalization deformity of disc space • Disadvantages • Disadvantages • Most invasive • More nerve retraction (esp L4-5) • Abdominal muscle weakness • Cannot access L5-S1 • Risk of DVT • May still have muscle weakness • May need vascular surgeon for • approach More xray exposure WHEN TO STAGE? POSTERIOR BASED APPROACH: TLIF, PLIF • Surgery too long (>12 • Advantages: hours) • Same incision as posterior • Patient unable to tolerate • Can decompress directly • Coagulopathy • Pulmonary • Disadvantages • Cardiac • Nerve retraction • Surgeon unable to tolerate • Least disc resection • ?decreased efficiency • Least lordosis restoration • ?technical fatigue • Less experienced staff 4

  5. 6/1/2013 IMPROVE DEFORMITY CORRECTION 60 yo WF, healthy • After first stage ALIF progressive and L4-5 and L5-S1 increasingly painful • XLIF L1-2, L2-3, L3-4 curve Has lived with deformity all of adult life, but now • Traditionally, this might that she has opportunity have included a TL to correct, she wants anterior approach maximal deformity correction RISKS OF STAGED SURGERY • Nutritional depletion • Pulmonary compromise • Development of complications: may delay, preclude 2 nd stage • Longer hospital stay • Increased costs 5

  6. 6/1/2013 NUTRITIONAL DEPLETION PULMONARY COMPLICATIONS • Nutritional • Preexisting disease supplementation: staged • spinal surgery Thoracotomy • High EBL • TPN • Fluid shifts • Decreased nutritional • Transfusion-related ARDS depletion (prealbumin) • Higher rate of pneumonias, infectious complications in malnourished patients DECISION MAKING ALTERNATIVES • Potential role for widely • Risk-benefit ratio staged surgery? • Lumbar fusion • Delayed thoracic fusion • Posterior first: repair pseudo or Thomasen • Delayed ASF • ?older patients 6

  7. 6/1/2013 THANK YOU SUMMARY • Indications for combined surgery • Increase fusion rate • Improve deformity correction and balance • Options for circumferential fusion • ASF • Lateral fusion • Posterior interbody • Selection based on indications for surgery and risk benefit ratio FOR MORE INFORMATION WWW.ISSLS.ORG 7

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend