5: : G L S 5 G D ES SS SI IO ON N LO OB BA AL LI IZ - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

5
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

5: : G L S 5 G D ES SS SI IO ON N LO OB BA AL LI IZ - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

S E 5: : G L S 5 G D ES SS SI IO ON N LO OB BA AL LI IZ ZA AT TI IO ON N A AN ND W O -S S Y W D - M TH HE E OR RL LD YS ST TE EM T I N I NT TR RO OD DU UC CI IN NG G W O -S S Y A N W D - A S OR


slide-1
SLIDE 1

1

S SE

ES SS SI IO ON N 5

5: :

G

GL

LO OB BA AL LI IZ ZA AT TI IO ON N A AN ND D T TH HE E W

WO

OR RL LD D-

  • S

SY

YS ST TE EM M

I IN

NT TR RO OD DU UC CI IN NG G

W WO

OR RL LD D-

  • S

SY

YS ST TE EM MS S A

AN

NA AL LY YS SI IS S

“What difference it would make to our understanding if we looked at the world as a whole, a totality, a system, instead of as a sum of self-contained societies and cultures; if we understood better how this totality developed over time; if we took seriously the admonition to think of human aggregates as ‘inextricably involved with other aggregates, near and far, in weblike, netlike, connections’.”—Eric Wolf, Europe and the People without History

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

A CRITIQUE OF MODERNIZATION THEORY

 Walt W. Rostow-- 1960, The Stages of Economic Growth: A Non-Communist Manifesto--universal stages through which all societies go in achieving economic growth and development—progress, evolutionism  Modernization Theory (Developmentalism)  “Why was the Third World failing to develop according to expectations?”  Impediments to a universal process of transformation:  cultural backwardness  the predominance of tradition  the lack of a Need to Achieve  the failure to think in terms of progress  Assumption: nation-states act autonomously

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

THE LATIN AMERICAN THESIS: DEPENDENCY THEORY  1950s—1970s, Latin American economists, historians, sociologists  Raul Prebisch, UN Economic Commission for Latin America: The Economic Development of Latin America and its Principal Problems What Modernization Theory ignored: a) Latin America had over a century of foreign private investment b) Modern state structures copied from Europe and the US c) Extensive trade d) European immigrants Explanation?  unequal trade, net capital loss  foreign investment in natural resource extraction  dependence on manufactured imports

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

ANDRE GUNDER FRANK  development of underdevelopment  capitalism and imperialism  against EUROCENTRIC analyses  metropolis-satellite

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

 underdevelopment is not “local”: the product of incorporation into world capitalism Walter Rodney Samir Amin

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

WORLD-SYSTEMS ANALYSIS

 Immanuel Wallerstein

  • n

world political-economic history, 1970s— (1) net drain

  • f

capital from the underdeveloped world (2) basic division in the world between core and periphery  Unit of analysis? The capitalist world- system, came into being with colonial expansion of Europe  Critique of state-centrism  Critique of Marxist conceptions

  • f

capitalism  Capitalism is not a mode of production: world-wide system of exchange

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

 Defining feature: global circulation of commodities  Commodity: any object that can be sold for a profit  World capitalism results in commodification of everything  Market exchange: central feature of global capitalism  Production is for the market  Essentials of life, not just luxuries, sold in the market  Centre and a periphery: surplus accumulated in the centre, away from the periphery = a single axial division of labour

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

Basic premises of World-Systems Analysis: 1. ceaseless accumulation of capital 2. division of labor along center-periphery lines 3. boundary correspondence between capitalist world-economy and interstate system 4.

  • rigins lie in sixteenth century

5. began in Europe, expanded via incorporations 6. Particular states experienced periods of hegemony 7. States, ethnic groups, households possess only a “nonprimordial character” 8. Racism & sexism = fundamental organizing & disciplining principles 9. Antisystemic movements arise to challenge the system

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

 How change occurs  repetition (recursion): cyclical  unidirectional and irreversible changes: secular  “long waves”: cyclical processes played out in tune with secular trends  cyclical processes:  rise and fall of hegemons  warfare  forty to sixty year business cycle  colonization and decolonization  hegemony and decline

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

 secular trends:  long-term proletarianization of world work force,  growing concentration of capital,  increasing internationalization of capital investment & trade,  accelerating internationalization of political structures.  new cycles bring about small but significant structural shifts  The modern world-system is finite in duration  kairos, the time of change—bifurcation

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

CULTURE AND THE WORLD-SYSTEM

 Liberalism, the geoculture of the world-system  Culture: universalizing & particularizing  Culture as the ideological battleground of the modern world-system

REVOLUTIONS AND ANTI-SYSTEMIC MOVEMENTS

 “World revolutions”, 1848, 1968-89  Old vs. new anti-systemic movements  Problem of capturing state power  1968, rebellion against the old left; disillusion with the state; “the forgotten peoples”