45x disclaimer
play

45x Disclaimer The analyses and conclusions of Pershing Square - PDF document

Pershing Square Capital Management, L.P. 45x Disclaimer The analyses and conclusions of Pershing Square Capital Management, L.P. ("Pershing Square") contained in this presentation are based on publicly available information. Pershing


  1. Pershing Square Capital Management, L.P. 45x

  2. Disclaimer The analyses and conclusions of Pershing Square Capital Management, L.P. ("Pershing Square") contained in this presentation are based on publicly available information. Pershing Square recognizes that there may be nonpublic information in the possession of the companies discussed in this presentation that could lead these companies and others to disagree with Pershing Square’s analyses, conclusions and opinions. This presentation and the information contained herein is not investment advice or a recommendation or solicitation to buy or sell any securities. All investments involve risk, including the loss of principal. The analyses provided may include certain forward-looking statements, estimates and projections prepared with respect to, among other things, the historical and anticipated operating performance of the companies discussed in this presentation, access to capital markets, market conditions and the values of assets and liabilities. Such statements, estimates, and projections reflect various assumptions by Pershing Square concerning anticipated results that are inherently subject to significant economic, competitive, and other uncertainties and contingencies and have been included solely for illustrative purposes. No representations, express or implied, are made as to the accuracy or completeness of such statements, estimates or projections or with respect to any other materials herein and Pershing Square disclaims any liability with respect thereto. Actual results may vary materially from the estimates and projected results contained herein. The information contained in this presentation may not contain all of the information required in order to evaluate the value of the companies discussed in this presentation. The opinions, analyses, conclusions and proposals presented herein represent the views of Pershing Square and not those of any third party. Funds managed by Pershing Square and its affiliates are invested in securities of some of the companies mentioned in this presentation. Pershing Square manages funds that are in the business of trading – buying and selling – securities and financial instruments. It is possible that there will be developments in the future that cause Pershing Square to change its position regarding these companies. Pershing Square may buy, sell, cover or otherwise change the form of its investment in these companies for any or no reason. Pershing Square hereby disclaims any duty to provide any updates or changes to the analyses contained here including, without limitation, the manner or type of any Pershing Square investment. 2

  3. Jarden Corporation: ~45x Return in 14 Years Since Martin Franklin joined Jarden in 2001, the company has achieved success as a well-managed consolidator of consumer products assets, generating a ~45x total shareholder return to-date Indexed total shareholder return of Jarden from 6/25/2001 to 5/1/2015 8/29/14: 5,000% 4,518% Acquired 1/24/05: 3/27/02: 9/5/06: Rexair for Acquired 4,500% Acquired Tilia Acquired $349mm Indexed total shareholder return American for $160mm Pine Household 4,000% Mountain for for $845mm $150mm 2/7/03: 3,500% Acquired 7/18/05: Diamond 4/1/10: 4/6/07: Acquired 3,000% Brands for Acquired Acquired Holmes $110mm MAPA for Pure Fishing Group for 2,500% $500mm for $400mm $625mm 9/2/03: 2,000% 7/9/07: 10/3/13: Acquired Acquired K2 Acquired Leigh for 1,500% for $1.2bn Yankee Candle $155mm for $1.8bn 1,000% 6/28/04: Acquired U.S. 362% 500% Playing Card for $240mm 228% 0% Jun-01 Jun-02 Jun-03 Jun-04 Jun-05 Jun-06 Jun-07 Jun-08 Jun-09 Jun-10 Jun-11 Jun-12 Jun-13 Jun-14 Jarden Corp. S&P 500 S&P Mid Cap 400 Note: Total shareholder returns are calculated per Bloomberg from June 25, 2001 to May 1, 2015 with all starting values indexed to 100%. 3 3

  4. Investors Have Consistently Underestimated Jarden’s Earnings Potential In June 2001, investors could have purchased Jarden’s shares at ~0.4x 2016 Consensus EPS (1) Jarden’s Historical Share Price as a Multiple of 2016E Earnings (6/25/2001 to 5/1/2015) 16x 14x 12x 10x P/E Multiple 8x 6x 4x 2x 0x 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 P/E Multiple of 2016E Earnings Source: Bloomberg. Stock price adjusted to assume reinvestment of dividends. (1) Based on Bloomberg Consensus 2016 EPS of $3.149 as of May 1, 2015. 4

  5. Platform Specialty Products (NYSE: PAH)  Martin Franklin, Chairman of Jarden, and private investor Nicolas Berggruen co-founded PAH in early 2013  In May 2013, PAH raised approximately $900mm (1) in a public offering at $10 per share  In October 2013, PAH announced the acquisition of MacDermid Inc., a specialty chemical company, for $1.8bn  PAH has subsequently acquired three businesses in the agricultural chemicals industry for approximately $5 billion  Today, PAH trades at $27.40 per share, a ~175% increase from its public offering price just two years ago (1) http://ir.platformspecialtyproducts.com/faq.cfm 5

  6. Platform Specialty: ~175% Return in Two Years PAH Share Price from 5/16/2013 to 5/1/2015 $35 $30 10/10/13: $27.40 Announced acquisition of MacDermid for $25 $1.8bn TEV PAH Share Price 5/16/2013: $20 Began trading 8/6/14: near cash NAV Announced 10/20/14: acquisition of $15 Announced Agriphar SA for acquisition of €300m TEV Arysta 4/17/14: $10 LifeScience for Announced $3.5bn TEV acquisition of Chemtura $5 AgroSolutions for $1.0bn TEV $0 5/16/2013 8/16/2013 11/16/2013 2/16/2014 5/16/2014 8/16/2014 11/16/2014 2/16/2015 Source: Bloomberg. 6

  7. Nomad Holdings Limited (NOMHF) (“Nomad”)  Martin Franklin and Noam Gottesman, co-founder of GLG Partners, co-founded Nomad in early 2014  In April 2014, Nomad raised $500mm (1) in a public offering and began trading at a valuation approximating its cash per share  In April 2015, Nomad announced the acquisition of Iglo Foods Holdings, the largest frozen foods business in Europe, for approximately €2.6 billion from private equity owner Permira  Nomad is financing its acquisition of Iglo with cash on hand from its IPO, debt financing, and a $750mm private placement of equity Nomad has called Iglo its “anchor investment” (2) , and intends to use this asset as a base for future food industry acquisitions (1) Includes $485mm in ordinary shares (with matching warrants) and $15mm in founder preferred shares. (2) Source: http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/04/20/us-iglo-m-a-nomad-foods-idUSKBN0NB1C520150420. 7

  8. Nomad Holdings: ~80% Return Since IPO Nomad shares have increased by ~80% in just over a year, driven by the Iglo acquisition announcement Nomad share price from 4/9/2014 to 4/27/2015 (1) 4/20/15: $20 $18 Announces acquisition of Iglo 4/9/2014: Foods Holdings Began trading for €2.6bn TEV $15 near cash NAV Nomad Share Price $10 $5 $0 Source: Bloomberg Note: Presented as Nomad Holdings (LSE) through 4/20/15 and NOMHF US, a grey market tracking stock, from 4/20/15 through 5/1/15 following the LSE de-listing. (1) Trading in Nomad shares was halted subsequent to 4/27/2015. 8

  9. Nomad Holdings: Why Has the Stock Gone Up So Much? Nomad’s share price has increased dramatically since the Iglo Foods acquisition was announced What are the possible explanations for this 80% price increase?  Did Nomad purchase Iglo for materially less than its fair value?  Nomad paid ~8.5x 2014 adjusted EBITDA, a reasonable multiple given Iglo Foods’ business quality and modest growth potential  The seller was a private equity firm with no urgency to sell  Are there substantial synergies with the acquirer’s assets?  Prior to the acquisition, Nomad’s only asset was cash 9

  10. What is going on here?

  11. Platform Value Businesses managed by superior operators that execute value- enhancing acquisitions and shareholder-focused capital allocation have substantial Platform Value Additional Examples of Well-Known, Successful Platforms: Liberty Media 11

  12. Martin Franklin’s Platform Strategy Franklin’s intense focus on value-creating capital allocation has driven significant share price appreciation across several companies  Value-creating acquisition and capital allocation strategy  Maintains high standards for quality and valuation of acquired businesses  Focus on shareholder value creation not reported GAAP earnings  Intelligent use of debt and equity to finance acquisitions  Capital allocation and acquisitions are a core competency and a significant focus of senior management and the board A decentralized organizational structure allows Franklin’s companies to move quickly to seize opportunities and to keep costs down 12

  13. Not All Acquisitive Businesses Create Value While Martin Franklin and other intelligent capital allocators have created tremendous value through platforms, there are many examples of acquisition-intensive companies that have destroyed shareholder value  These failures can be distinguished from successful platform models in the following ways  Lacked a competitive advantage in cost structure or strategy  Overpaid for acquisitions to generate growth  Relied on overvalued equity as an acquisition currency  Failed to integrate and achieve cost synergies  Focused on growing reported GAAP earnings rather than economic earnings per share 13

  14. Appreciated Platform Valeant: An Under-

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend