3 All amounts are in US$ unless otherwise indicated. TREVALIS - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

3
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

3 All amounts are in US$ unless otherwise indicated. TREVALIS - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TREVALI . COM TSX: TV | BVL: TV | OTCQX:TREVF| FRANKFURT: 4T Cautionary Note Regarding Forward Looking Information This presentation contains forward -looking information within the meaning of Canadian securities legislation and forward


slide-1
SLIDE 1

TSX: TV | BVL: TV | OTCQX:TREVF| FRANKFURT: 4T TREVALI.COM

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward Looking Information This presentation contains “forward-looking information” within the meaning of Canadian securities legislation and “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (collectively, “forward-looking statements”). Forward-looking statements are based on the beliefs, expectations and opinions of management of Trevali Mining Corporation (“Trevali” or the “Company”) as of the date the statements are published, and the Company assumes no obligation to update any forward-looking statement, except as required by law. Forward-looking statements relate to future events or future performance and reflect management’s expectations or beliefs regarding future events including, but not limited to, statements with respect to the Company’s growth strategies, expected annual savings from capital projects, anticipated effects of commodity prices on revenues, estimation of mineral reserves and mineral resources, the realization of mineral reserve estimates, the timing and amount of estimated future production, costs of production and capital expenditures, success of mining

  • perations, environmental risks, unanticipated reclamation expenses, title disputes or claims, future anticipated property acquisitions, the content, cost, timing and results of future exploration

programs and life of mine expectancies. In certain cases, forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of words such as “plans”, “expects”, “outlook”, “guidance”, “budget”, “scheduled”, “estimates”, “forecasts”, “intends”, “anticipates” or “believes”, or variations of such words and phrases or statements that certain actions, events or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “might”, “will be taken”, “occur” or “be achieved” or the negative of these terms or comparable terminology. By their very nature, forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and

  • ther factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or

implied by the forward-looking statements. Such factors include, among others, risks related to actual results of current exploration activities; changes in project parameters as plans continue to be refined; future prices of zinc, lead, silver and other minerals and the anticipated sensitivity of our financial performance to such prices; possible variations in ore reserves, grade or recoveries; dependence on key personnel; potential conflicts of interest involving our directors and officers; labour pool constraints; labour disputes; availability of infrastructure required for the development

  • f mining projects; delays or inability to obtain governmental and regulatory approvals for mining operations or financing or in the completion of development or construction activities;

counterparty risks; increased operating and capital costs; foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations; operating in foreign jurisdictions with risk of changes to governmental regulation; compliance with governmental regulations; compliance with environmental laws and regulations; land reclamation and mine closure obligations; challenges to title or ownership interest of our mineral properties; maintaining ongoing social license to operate; impact of climatic conditions on the Company’s mining operations; corruption and bribery; limitations inherent in our insurance coverage; compliance with debt covenants; competition in the mining industry; our ability to integrate new acquisitions into our operations; cybersecurity threats; litigation; and other risks of the mining industry including, without limitation, other risks and uncertainties that are more fully described in the Company’s annual information form, interim and annual audited consolidated financial statements and management’s discussion and analysis of those statements, all of which are filed and available for review under the Company’s profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com. Although the Company has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual actions, events or results to differ materially from those described in forward-looking statements, there may be

  • ther factors that cause actions, events or results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. Trevali provides no assurance that forward-looking statements will prove to be accurate, as

actual results and future events may differ from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. Compliance with NI 43-101 Unless otherwise indicated, Trevali has prepared the technical information in this presentation ("Technical Information") based on information contained in the technical reports, news releases and MD&A's (collectively the "Disclosure Documents") available under the Company’s company profile on SEDAR at www.sedar.com. Each Disclosure Document was prepared by, or under the supervision of, a qualified person (a "Qualified Person") as defined in National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects of the Canadian Securities Administrators ("NI 43- 101"). Readers are encouraged to review the full text of the Disclosure Documents which qualifies the Technical Information. Readers are advised that mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. The Disclosure Documents are each intended to be read as a whole, and sections should not be read or relied upon out of context. The Technical Information is subject to the assumptions and qualifications contained in the Disclosure Documents. The disclosure of Technical Information in this presentation was reviewed and approved by Yan Bourassa, P. Geol., Vice President, Mineral Resource Management, a Qualified Person under NI 43-101. Non-IFRS Financial Performance Measures This presentation refers to “EBITDA” (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization), “Adjusted EBITDA”, “Net Debt”, “C1 Cash Cost”, “All-In Sustaining Cost” and “Free Cash Flow”. These financial performance measures have no standardized meaning under International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) and are therefore unlikely to be comparable to similar measures presented by other issuers. Management uses these measures internally to evaluate the underlying operating performance of Trevali for the relevant reporting periods. The use of these measures enables management to assess performance trends and to evaluate the results of the underlying business of Trevali. Management understands that certain investors, and others who follow Trevali’s performance, also assess performance in this way. Management believes that these measures reflect Trevali’s performance and are better indications of its expected performance in future periods. This data is intended to provide additional information and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS. For further detail, refer to Trevali’s Management’s Discussion and Analysis for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019. Currency All amounts are in US$ unless otherwise indicated.

3

slide-3
SLIDE 3

4

TREVALI’S OBJECTIVE IS TO BECOME AN INDUSTRY LEADER IN SUSTAINABILITY AND ONE OF THE BEST UNDERGROUND MINING COMPANIES IN THE WORLD.

(1) This is a Non-IFRS Financial Performance Measure; refer to the Company’s news release of November 5, 2019 for full details.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Production

2019 Zinc Production (Mlbs) 2019 Lead Production (Mlbs) 2019 Silver Production (kozs)

Guidance 361 – 401 44 – 49 1,322 – 1,469 Q3 YTD 312.6 36.5 1,111

Operating Costs and Capital Expenditures

C1 Cash Cost1 ($/lb Zn) All-in Sustaining Cost1 ($/lb Zn) Capital and Exploration Expenditures ($M)

Guidance $0.81 – $0.88 $0.99 – $1.09 $82 Q3 YTD $0.88 $1.01 $46

0.95 0.86 0.84 1.07 1.00 0.96 $0.70 $0.75 $0.80 $0.85 $0.90 $0.95 $1.00 $1.05 $1.10 90 95 100 105 110 Q1-2019 Q2-2019 Q3-2019

C1 Cash Cost and AISC1 ($/lb) Quarterly Zinc Production (Mlbs)

2019 Quarterly Zinc Production and Costs

Zinc Production C1 Cash AISC

56 134 71 52

Q3 YTD Zinc Production by Mine (Mlbs)

Caribou Perkoa Rosh Pinah Santander

5

2019 production and cost guidance confirmed. All mines performing well; operational improvements being realized at each operation. Potential for production metrics to exceed top end of range. AISC tracking to middle of guidance range and C1 Cash Cost1 tracking to high-end of range despite higher zinc treatment charges:

  • 2018: $147/t
  • 2019: ~$250/t

(1) This is a Non-IFRS Financial Performance Measure; refer to the Company’s news release of November 5, 2019 for full details.

slide-5
SLIDE 5
  • Significant reduction in AISC1

from $1.23/lb in Q2 2019 to $1.05/lb in Q3 2019.

  • Mill has proven it’s capable of

exceeding nameplate capacity. With multiple days >3ktpd.

  • 12% increase in tonnes milled
  • ver Q2 2019.
  • Mining and milling throughput

have steadily increased.

  • Mill is proving to reliably

sustain throughput in excess of 2.5ktpd through improved maintenance planning. Q3 average 2.4ktpd.

  • Grade up 8% over Q2 2019

due to better dilution control.

  • Increased metallurgical zinc

recovery by ~2% to 92.1% from 90% due to iron pre- floatation.

  • Iron in concentrate reduced

from 12.5% to 10% YTD yielding higher margins.

  • Mining dilution reduced from

15% in Q2 to 11% in Q3 2019.

  • Three stopes actively mined at

the end of Q3 2019 with nine ready to blast consisting of 236K tonnes.

  • Metallurgical recovery: One-off

impact due to inventory reconciliation.

  • Filtration and grinding upgrade

project on track for Q4 2019 completion.

6

HIGHLIGHTS HIGHLIGHTS HIGHLIGHTS HIGHLIGHTS

(1) This is a Non-IFRS Financial Performance Measure; refer to the Company’s news release of November 5, 2019 for full details.

48.3Mlbs

Record quarterly zinc production

6%

Increase in ore milled tonnes from Q2 2019 at 181kt

15%

Reduction in AISC from Q2 2019 to $1.05/lb

6%

Increase in payable zinc production from Q2 2019 at 17.9Mlbs

AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2019

slide-6
SLIDE 6

7

(1) This is a Non-IFRS Financial Performance Measure; refer to the Company’s news release of November 5, 2019 for full details. (2) Refer to the Company’s financial statements for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019 for full details on the accounting policy update.

Consolidated Financial Results Q3’19 Q2’19 Q3’18 Zinc payable production Mlbs 106.8 105.2 101.6 Zinc payable sold Mlbs 111.1 93.2 75.5 Revenue $M $87.1 $82.3 $73.1 Adjusted EBITDA1 $M $22.5 $17.6 $21.2 C1 Cash Cost1 $/lb $0.84 $0.86 $0.72 AISC1 $/lb $0.96 $1.00 $0.87 ZINC PRICE – $1.06/lb LME AVERAGE

  • September average spot price flat to 3-month forward price.

ZINC SALES VOLUMES – 111 MILLION POUNDS

  • Reduced inventory by 9,300 dmt since Q2 2019; total inventory

stands at 26,800 dmt.

  • Sold 18 Mlbs more than Q2 2019.
  • 152 Mlbs of zinc provisional at September 30, 2019.

COST – $0.96/lb AISC1

  • AISC1 decreased quarter-over-quarter.

Q3 2019 PROVISIONAL ADJUSTMENT – ($11 million)

  • Q3 2019 mark-to-market adjustments of ($11) million ($4 million

closed and $7 million future).

  • Q3 2019 volume adjustments of $0 million.

17.6 (10.1) 14.9 (3.6) 1.8 2.0 22.5 $0m $5m $10m $15m $20m $25m

Adj. EBITDA Q2 Sales Price Inventory Sales Volume OPEX Distribution & Royalties Adj. EBITDA Q3

AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2019

LIQUIDITY – $232 MILLION

  • Cash and cash equivalents of $36 million.
  • Available on revolving credit facility of $196 million.

SHARE BUYBACK (NCIB) – $5.4 MILLION

  • 20.2 million shares repurchased.
  • Average buy back price $0.27 per share.

ACCOUNTING POLICY UPDATE2

  • Change to disclose provisional revenue outside of the revenue

accounting line to:

  • Improve transparency around operational performance.
  • Reduce volatility on financial metrics.
  • Change does not impact the calculation of net income/loss.
slide-7
SLIDE 7

8

@grimbeekricus, President and CEO T90 is just the beginning of our move down the cost curve. We believe the program will transform Trevali and

  • pen the door to future improvements and guarantee our businesses resilience and robustness throughout the

commodity price cycle. #T90 #thefutureofmining

  • Improvement opportunities unique to each operating site.
  • Standardization – “one company over four orebodies”.
  • Deploying technology to improve productivity & decision making.
  • Rosh Pinah RP2.0 expansion project.

T90 targets reducing AISC1 to $0.90/lb by 2022.

$0.90

PER POUND

$50

MILLION Pre-tax annual sustainable efficiencies. $30 million identified as of Q3 2019.

(1)This is a Non-IFRS Financial Performance Measure; refer to the Company’s news release of November 5, 2019 for full details. (2) This is a Non-IFRS Financial Performance Measure; this measure is used to analyze the profitability of a project or initiative and represents the cash generated after cash outflows to support that project or initiative.

The T90 program consists of:

A T90 PROGRAM FEATURED INITIATIVE OPP OPPORTUNIT ORTUNITY

Increase recoveries and decrease iron content and net costs.

SOL OLUT UTION ON

A flotation bank was repurposed as an iron flotation stage. The iron is floated with only the addition of a frother – Methyl isobutyl carbinol (MIBC). This retrofitted bank allows the zinc concentrate grade to be maintained at historical values despite increasing iron levels in the feed by removing the excess iron in advance of zinc activation.

ECONOM ECONOMIC BENEFI IC BENEFITS TS

✓ Zinc metallurgical recovery improvement ✓ Reduced freight costs ✓ Reduced beneficiation costs

$4.8 million

(Pre-tax free cash flow2)

ZINC FLOTATION IRON FLOTATION

slide-8
SLIDE 8

9

PEA / Scoping Study Pre-feasibility study Feasibility study Permitting Execution Production 2019 2020 2021

Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

CARIBOU – Sublevel caving & sill pillar mining OPERATIONS CARIBOU – Restigouche ROSH PINAH – Filtration & grinding upgrades OPERATIONS ROSH PINAH – RP2.0 OPERATIONS SANTANDER – Santander Pipe

CARI CARIBOU BOU SUB LEVEL CAVING & SILL PILLAR MINING Alternative sublevel caving mining method and the extraction of historic sill pillars. CARI CARIBOU BOU RESTIGOUCHE Located approximately 35km away from the Caribou mill, Restigouche is being considered as a supplemental ore source to the Caribou

  • peration.

ROSH ROSH PINAH PINAH FILTRATION & GRINDING UPGRADES Filtration and grinding upgrades to the processing plant to improve metallurgical recoveries, reduce processing times, and reduce inventory levels. ROSH ROSH PINAH PINAH RP 2.0 An expansion project that is expected to increase production, reduce unit costs, and improve recoveries and concentrate grades. SANT SANTANDER ANDER SANTANDER PIPE Evaluating the economic viability of incorporating the Santander Pipe ore into the existing

  • peration. Drilling is
  • ngoing.

STRONG ORGANIC PIPELINE OF OPPORTUNITIES

Note: Timeline subject to change.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

2019 2020 2021

Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Strategic optimization Trade-off studies Feasibility study Detailed engineering – processing

DELIVERED

Detailed engineering – other Plant construction Mining ramp-up

ONGOING OPTIMIZATION Trade-off studies

  • Mining Method
  • Material Handling
  • Processing plant sizing
  • Surface infrastructure
  • Underground

infrastructure

  • Water & tailings
  • Power

ENGINEERING AND CONSULTING FIRMS: Mining, material handling, & underground infrastructure Processing & surface infrastructure Water & tailings

Phase I Approval

(Order major long lead items)

Phase II Approval

(Full project sanction)

10

Note: Timeline subject to change and not limited to programs or studies above.

(1) This is a Non-IFRS Financial Performance Measure; refer to the Company’s news release of November 5, 2019 for full details.

slide-10
SLIDE 10
  • Total drilling of 3,300 metres

year-to-date with 1,400 metres planned for Q4 2019.

  • Mine Extension: Northern Limb

mineral resource conversion drilling.

  • Regional Exploration:

Geophysical surveys completed at Heath Steele East and California Lake in Q3 2019 with planned drilling and EM survey at Murray Brook South in Q4 2019.

FROM $8.4 MILLION (36,000 METRES) TO $11.7 MILLION (45,000 METRES)

The exploration program objective is to discover new near-mine deposits all within trucking distance of the current operations and increase mineral resources.

  • Total drilling of 6,200 metres

year-to-date with 10,000 metres planned for Q4 2019.

  • Mine Extension: Magistral UG

drilling to test the south extension.

  • Satellite Deposit: Santander

Pipe exploration and infill drilling to target new mineral resources at depth and convert Inferred Mineral Resources to Indicated level leading to a PEA in Q3 2020.

  • Regional Exploration:

Geochemistry and geophysics program targeting untested anomalies.

  • Total drilling of 11,000 metres

YTD with 4,500 metres planned for Q4 2019.

  • Mine Extension: Hanging wall

lens mineral resource conversion drilling.

  • Satellite Deposit: T3 drilling

targeting down-plunge extension from discovery holes PUX013 and PUX020a. – Follow up hole PUX021 intersected mineralization consistent with T3 and intersected a second VMS horizon at depth ~50 metres true width below T3.

  • Regional Exploration: Surface

EM surveys continue in Q3. Regional drilling to resume in Q4 2019 at Aswe & AF1.

  • Total drilling of 7,100 metres

year-to-date with 2,400 metres planned for Q4 2019.

  • Mine Extension: WF3 drilling

from surface and UG and drilling at AAB from UG.

  • Regional Exploration:

Conducting geophysics Northwest of RP along two prospective corridors, the RP- Gergarub corridor on the western limb of the RP fold and

  • n the eastern limb of the RP

fold. Mine Extension Satellite Deposit Regional Exploration

11

slide-11
SLIDE 11
  • The T3 horizon represents the third VMS

horizon discovered at the Perkoa Mine.

  • A total of three underground holes have

now intersected the T3 VMS horizon (~200 metres from main Footwall).

  • Drill hole PUX021 intersected the T3

horizon 65-metres northeast of PUX020a, at the same depth, ~920- metres below surface.

  • Drill hole PUX021 intersected a second

VMS horizon within the same alteration assemblage as the T3 horizon.

  • Drill hole PUX022 was underway at the

end of Q3 targeting the down plunge extension of the T3 horizon, ~100 metres below drill hole PUX020a.

  • A total of 3,200 metres has been planned

to explore the T3 horizon and the Perkoa hanging wall area in Q4 2019.

Perkoa Mineralized lenses at the 500RL level showing Footwall lens (blue) Hanging wall lens (green) and new T3 horizon (purple) based on drill holes and geochemistry.

12

OPENS WINDOW FOR FURTHER DISCOVERY OF VMS DISTRICT

slide-12
SLIDE 12

RICUS GRIMBEEK, PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER GERBRAND VAN HEERDEN, CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER DEREK DU PREEZ, CHIEF TECHNOLOGY OFFICER STEVE MOLNAR, CHIEF LEGAL OFFICER AMBER JOHNSTON-BILLINGS, CHIEF SUSTAINABILITY OFFICER YAN BOURASSA, VP, MINERAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT BRENDAN CREANEY, VP, INVESTOR RELATIONS

361-401 million payable lbs zinc 44-49 million payable lbs lead 1.3-1.4 million payable ozs silver Operating Cost of US$69-$76 per tonne Cash Cost of US$0.81-$0.88 AISC1 of US$0.99-$1.09 Capital and Exploration Expenditures of US$82M

JESSICA MCDONALD, CHAIR DAN ISSEROW, DIRECTOR RUSSELL BALL, DIRECTOR

  • DR. MARK CRUISE, DIRECTOR

CHRIS ESKDALE, DIRECTOR JILL GARDINER, DIRECTOR DAN MYERSON, DIRECTOR RICHARD WILLIAMS, DIRECTOR

Excellent operational performance underpinned by strong sales volumes, delivering quality product. Unique optimization opportunities at each operation targeting $50 million

  • f pre-tax, annual sustainable efficiencies

with AISC1 to decline to $0.90/lb by 2022 A growing project pipeline of near-mine mineral resource discoveries and the expansion of current mining operations. Robust balance sheet, strong

  • perating cash flow and low leverage.

Committed to sustainability through a strategic framework benefiting employees, contractors, the environment and communities.

100%-owned by Trevali. 3,000 tonne-per-day processing mill. 100%-owned by Trevali. 2,000 tonne-per-day mine and processing mill. 44 km2 land package with exploration potential. 90%-owned by Trevali and 10%-owned by Government of Burkina Faso. 2,000 tonne-per-day mine and processing mill. 90%-owned by Trevali and 10%-owned by Namibian Broad-Based Empowerment Groupings and an Employee Empowerment Participation Scheme (EEPS). 2,000 tonne-per-day mine and processing mill.

(1) This is a Non-IFRS Financial Performance Measure; refer to the Company’s news release of November 5, 2019 for full details.

(as of September 30, 2019) Shares issued/outstanding: 811 million Shares fully diluted: 822 million Market capitalization: C$187 million Cash position approx.: $36 million cash and cash equivalents and $196 million credit facility

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Perkoa Mine

Q3'19 Q2'19 Q3'18 Q3'19 vs Q2'19 Q3'19 vs Q3'18

Tonnes milled 189,445 187,191 183,367 1% 3% Zinc head grade 14.9% 14.8% 14.5% 1% 3% Zinc recovery 92.1% 90.3% 90.0% 2% 2% Zinc payable production (Mlbs) 48.3 46.3 44.4 4% 9% C1 Cash Cost per pound1 ($/lb) 0.77 0.89 0.79

  • 13%
  • 3%

AISC per pound1 ($/lb) 0.82 0.96 0.84

  • 15%
  • 2%

Cash Operating Costs ($/tonne milled) 88 104 103

  • 15%
  • 15%

Santander Mine

Q3’19 Q2’19 Q3’18 Q3’19 vs Q2’19 Q3’19 vs Q3’18

Tonnes milled 218,898 223,761 200,299

  • 2%

9% Zinc head grade 5.1% 4.8% 4.1% 6% 24% Zinc recovery 87.5% 86.5% 89.5% 1%

  • 2%

Zinc payable production (Mlbs) 17.9 16.9 13.5 6% 33% Lead payable production (Mlbs) 2.8 2.8 2.1 0% 33% Silver payable production (Moz) 0.1 0.1 0.1 0% 0% C1 Cash Cost per pound1 ($/lb) 0.71 0.81 0.69

  • 12%

3% AISC per pound1 ($/lb) 0.92 1.05 0.89

  • 12%

3% Cash Operating Costs ($/tonne milled) 45 43 41 5% 10%

Rosh Pinah Mine

Q3'19 Q2'19 Q3'18 Q3'19 vs Q2'19 Q3'19 vs Q3'18

Tonnes milled 181,490 171,389 141,860 6% 28% Zinc head grade 7.2% 8.8% 10.9%

  • 18%
  • 34%

Zinc recovery 83.8% 86.1% 88.4%

  • 3%
  • 5%

Zinc payable production (Mlbs) 20.3 24.0 25.1

  • 15%
  • 19%

Lead payable production (Mlbs) 3.2 1.9 1.0 68% 220% C1 Cash Cost per pound1 ($/lb) 1.01 0.67 0.48 52% 110% AISC per pound1 ($/lb) 1.25 0.88 0.71 42% 76% Cash Operating Costs ($/tonne milled) 52 54 66

  • 4%
  • 21%

Caribou Mine

Q3'19 Q2'19 Q3'18 Q3'19 vs Q2'19 Q3'19 vs Q3'18

Tonnes milled 248,710 221,628 227,596 12% 9% Zinc head grade 5.6% 5.6% 5.7% 0%

  • 2%

Zinc recovery 79.5% 78.6% 77.7% 1% 2% Zinc payable production (Mlbs) 20.3 18.0 18.6 13% 9% Lead payable production (Mlbs) 7.5 6.6 6.1 14% 23% Silver payable production (Moz) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0% 0% C1 Cash Cost per pound1 ($/lb) 0.93 1.09 0.89

  • 15%

4% AISC per pound1 ($/lb) 1.05 1.23 1.11

  • 15%
  • 5%

Cash Operating Costs ($/tonne milled) 66 72 62

  • 8%

7%

(1) This is a Non-IFRS Financial Performance Measure; refer to the Company’s news release of November 5, 2019 for full details.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Trevali Mining Corporation Suite 1400-1199 West Hastings Street Vancouver, BC, V6E 3T5, CANADA Tel: +1 604-488-1661 Fax: +1 604-629-1425 info@trevali.com www.trevali.com Investor contact Brendan Creaney Vice President, Investor Relations Email: bcreaney@trevali.com Direct: +1 604-638-5623