2020 2020 21 p proposed budget
play

2020 2020-21 P Proposed Budget June 2, 2020 Public Hearing No. 1 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

2020 2020-21 P Proposed Budget June 2, 2020 Public Hearing No. 1 Presented by: Stephen Dickinson Chief Business and Financial Officer Budget Report No. 6 Economic Effects of COVID-19 Eleven years of economic expansion came to a


  1. 2020 2020-21 P Proposed Budget June 2, 2020 Public Hearing No. 1 Presented by: Stephen Dickinson Chief Business and Financial Officer Budget Report No. 6

  2. Economic Effects of COVID-19 ➢ Eleven years of economic expansion came to a screeching halt this year • As former Governor Jerry Brown always warned us, a recession was coming, but even he could not have foreseen this ➢ No aspect of the national or state economy seems to be unscathed by the virus and the path to recovery is unknown • There are no models for how a world recovers from a near total shutdown of economies around the globe o Initial recovery projections were optimistic, but along with the number of cases of COVID-19, have become more and more grim ➢ The actual economic effects will not be known for months and years, but nonetheless, the Administration must make some assumptions as to how far California will fall and how it will make its eventual comeback 2 2

  3. California Revenues ➢ The May Revision assumes that the state will suffer from a $41.2 billion loss in revenues compared to January estimates in 2019 – 20 and 2020 – 21 combined • -$9.1 billion for 2019 – 20 • -$32.2 billion for 2020 – 21 ➢ Revenue losses are compounded by the growing number of Californians who need access to state safety net services, bringing the state’s total shortfall to $54 billion 3

  4. Risks to State Budget ➢ Biological risks ➢ Performance of the international • Epidemiology of the coronavirus economy • Worldwide reductions of gross • Lack of widespread testing, tracing, domestic product effective therapies, and a vaccine • Continuing distortions of supply and • Viral rebound in the fall or winter ➢ Fiscal risks demand ➢ Increasing Sino-U.S. tensions • Expiration of federal • Pandemic finger pointing unemployment • Potential trade “Cold benefits • Lack of federal War” stimulus measures that meet need 4

  5. Proposition 98 Funding ➢ Proposition 98 funding levels have decreased significantly from the 2020 –21 Governor’s State Budget for two of the three fiscal years • The May Revision estimates that the minimum guarantee will decline approximately 23% from the 2019 State Budget Act over the three-year budget period Governor’s $78.4 Billion $81.6 Billion $84.0 Billion State Budget May $77.4 Billion $70.5 Billion $78.7 Billion Revision 2018 – 19 2019 – 20 2020 – 21 5

  6. Statutory COLA ➢ While the May Revision acknowledges a ➢ Categorical programs outside of the LCFF will 2.31% statutory COLA (up slightly from the also have the statutory COLA suspended 2.29% estimated COLA in January), it Mandated Block Grant suspends the COLA for 2020 – 21 Special Education Preschool 2.31% Child Nutrition 2.29% Foster Youth 0.00% American Indian Education Centers & Early Childhood Education Programs In typical years, as costs continue to rise, these programs would see adjust- January Budget Statutory May Revision ments for COLA only and average daily attendance (ADA) for special education 6 6

  7. January Budget vs. May Revision Item January Budget May Revision 2020 – 21 LCFF Funding Change +$1.2 billion [-$6.5 billion] Proposition 98 Minimum Guarantee 2018 – 19 $78.4 billion $78.7 billion 2019 – 20 $81.6 billion $77.4 billion 2020 – 21 $84.0 billion $70.5 billion 2020 – 21 Statutory COLA 2.29% 2.31% (Suspended) One-Time Discretionary Funds $0 $0 7

  8. 2020-21 LCFF Funding Factors ➢ The May Revision suspends the 2.31% COLA and includes an additional reduction — for a total of 10% cut to the LCFF • First, the 2.31% COLA is applied to arrive at the 2020 – 21 base grants • Then the 10% reduction is applied — for an effective reduction of 7.92% to the 2019 – 20 base grant amounts 8

  9. 2020-21 LCFF Add-On Reductions ➢ In addition to the base, supplemental, and concentration grants, all of the following LCFF add-on funding will also receive a 10% reduction Targeted Instructional Minimum State Aid Improvement Grants EC § 41544 Education Code Section (EC §) 42238.02(g) Basic Aid Home-to-School Supplement Transportation EC § 47663 EC § 42238.02(h) Economic District of Choice Recovery Target EC § 48310 EC § 42238.025 9

  10. Special Education Reflects a 15% increase over the amount provided in 2019 – 20 budget Base Rates increased to Reflects suspension of 2.31% $645 per ADA based on COLA three-year rolling average ADA Maintains all other existing categorical programs in the Assembly Bill (AB) 602 formula At the January State until a finalized formula is adopted Budget Proposal this Maintains Special Education Local was $660 per ADA Plan Area (SELPA) Governance and Accountability Structure 10

  11. Child Care and Preschool ➢ State-subsidized child development programs are taking their fair share cut as a result of declining state revenues in the May Revision 2.31% Elimination Suspension COLA of the 1% of planned suspended add-on for expansions for provider Full-Day in child rates and State care and rates are Preschool preschool cut by 10% rates See the “Other Local Agency Operations” module in workshop resources for more information on the daily and annualized rates 11 11

  12. Categorical Program Cuts ➢ Total savings of $352.9 million by cutting categorical programs roughly in half ➢ Cuts may be reversed if additional federal funds materialize ➢ Programs reduced by the following amounts: K-12 Strong After School Workforce Career Technical Education and Adult Education Program: Education Safety: $100 million Block Grant: $79.4 million Incentive Grant $66.7 million Career Program: Clean Technical California $77.4 million Specialized Technology Education Partnership Online Resource Secondary Partnership: Initiative: Academies: Subscriptions for Program: $1.3 million $7.7 million $9.4 million Agricultural Schools: $2.4 million Exploratorium: Career Technical $3 million $3.5 million Education Incentive Grant: $2.1 million 12

  13. 000 What Does the LCFF Mean for Glendale Unified School District GUSD – 2020-21 2020-21 LCFF Projected Projected 2020-21 LCFF Per ADA Funding 2020-21 ADA Total Revenue $8,860 24,710 $218,932,735 $23M less than the projection at Second Interim of $242M 13

  14. 000 District’s 2020 -21 Primary Budget Components ➢ Net LCFF Impact of COLA, UPP, and other factors - decrease of $20.7 million for 2020-21 & $1.8 million for 2021-22 ➢ 2020-21 CalSTRS employer rate at 16.15% ➢ 2020-21 CalPERS employer rate at 20.70% ➢ 2020-21 unduplicated pupil percentage is 54.35% from 54.68% in 2019-20 (Statewide average is approx. 62%) ➢ CSEA/GTA/GSMA 2018-19, and 2019-20 salary settlements - $5.3 million total 14

  15. 2020-21 Proposed Budget 000 TOTAL REVENUES & EXPENDITURES – GENERAL FUND Other Outgo & Other Local Transfer Out 6.12% 0.19% Other State 9.64% Capital Outlay 0.34% Federal Services 5.06% & Other Certificated Salaries Operating 43.61% 11.17% Personnel Cost 85.41% Classified Salaries 14.90% Local Control Funding Formula 79.18% Employees Benefits 26.90% Books and Supplies 2.90% Be aware of annual carryover Rev $276.52m process -Exp $306.05m Current Deficit= ($29.53)m Total Revenues $276,516,352 Total Expenditures $ 306,045,889 15

  16. Designated Reserves: 2019-20 Second Interim • LACOE charges=$.56 000 • Carry over/MAA/One Time Disc.=$10.14 Summary of General Fund Ending Fund Balances • GTA/GSMA Est. Settlement @2.5%=$3.8 70.00 Assumes $5m ongoing $62.19 Actuals Projections Expense reductions are 60.00 $57.28 $57.85 $55.72 made for 2019-20 Restricted $53.53 $53.14 13.68 Includes $2.4m PS SPED 8.48 10.64 $48.71 50.00 11.95 one time & $.83m SPED $46.52 $47.41 0.17 9.34 9.30 0.17 $36.10 1.04 5.78 funding 7.08 7.61 0.13 0.11 1.46 $40.66 Revolving 6.45 11.56 8.12 $40.02 $39.57 40.00 Cash/Warehou 0.60 6.98 10.77 0.20 11.29 0.11 se/Prepaid 14.54 7.08 8.79 Assumes $5m ongoing 11.16 6.80 In Million Dollars 11.61 Expenditure 0.11 Expense reductions in 2.22 0.17 30.00 Site/Various 0.11 16.11 2020-21 & $2.5m 6.97 Carry Over & 35.93 34.88 31.28 increase in SPED 13.25 Designated 27.71 23.51 22.94 20.00 Funding 19.67 Reserves 24.60 20.03 18.53 Undesignated 17.30 11.70 3% REU grows in Reserve 9.76 10.00 0.30 proportion to total budget 9.48 9.23 9.42 9.54 9.06 9.09 8.44 8.04 7.26 6.63 6.67 6.80 6.79 Reserve for 0.00 Economic -7.83 Uncertainty -10.00 -20.00 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 As of 3/04/2020 16

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend