2018 Capital Plan Update
Board Workshop August 6, 2018
1
2018 Capital Plan Update Board Workshop August 6, 2018 1 2018 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
2018 Capital Plan Update Board Workshop August 6, 2018 1 2018 CAPITAL PLAN Historical Perspective: Bond failed in May 2003 and then passed that November Successful election in 2007 followed by: Downturn in economy and slower growth
1
2
3
4
5
6
2018 CAPITAL PLAN SUMMARY
New Construction 324.0 $ 187.0 $ 511.0 $ Building Modernization Rebuild 65.0
14.4
14.0
14.3 Sub-Total New Construction 403.4 215.3 618.7 Construction Total 799.9 645.1 1,444.9 Special Education Security Cameras 1.3 1.3 2.5 Door Locks 1.2
Security Cameras Storage 2.6 2.6 5.2 Window Film 4.0 1.0 5.0 Student ID System 3.0
Fencing 1.3 1.3 2.6 Police Vehicles 1.6 0.3 1.9 Safety and Security Total 14.9 6.4 21.4 429.8 Life Cycle Deficiencies & Educational Adequacy 826.2 396.5
7
2018 CAPITAL PLAN SUMMARY (Cont.)
Buses & Other Vehicles 8.8 8.8 17.7 District-Wide White Fleet 1.7 1.7 3.4 Transportation Total 10.6 10.6 21.1 Classroom Toolset 94.0
Systems 7.3 31.0 38.3 Infrastructure 24.3
Staff Computer Refresh 11.3
Network Infrastructure 3.7 4.9 8.6 Campus Audio/Video 2.0 0.1 2.2 Technology Total 142.6 36.0 178.6 Land 19.7 2.4 22.1 Bond Program Contingency 5.0 5.0 10.0
8
2018 CAPITAL PLAN
PROJECT ($millions) New Construction, Rebuilds & Additions
Technology
Building Envelope & Mechanical
9
2018 CAPITAL PLAN
PROJECT ($millions) Building and Grounds
Fine Arts
Athletics
10
2018 CAPITAL PLAN
PROJECT ($millions) Civil, Mechanical, Electrical & Plumbing
Land
Safety & Security – Building Systems
Child Nutrition
11
2018 CAPITAL PLAN
PROJECT ($millions) Safety & Security
Furniture, Fixtures & Equipment
Transportation
Program Contingency
Phase 1 Phase 2
Elementary School 51 - Northwest 2019 $46,000,000 Elementary School 52 - Fort Bend Tollway 2021 $45,000,000 Elementary School 53 - Riverstone/or Additions to CWE, APE,SWE Elementary School 54 - Southeast 2024 $47,000,000 Elementary School 55 - Southeast 2024 $53,000,000 Middle School 16 - Southeast 2023 $10,000,000 $87,000,000 High School 12 - Southeast 2024 $178,000,000 Rebuild LVE and ME LVE 2022 ME 2021 $65,000,000 School Additions - JNE & CVME JNE 2020 CVME 2022 $14,400,000 Natatorium TBD $14,000,000 Bus Terminal TBD $14,300,000
$45,000,000 2021
12
2018 CAPITAL PLAN
Phase 1 Phase 2
Fencing around portable classrooms $1,250,000 $1,250,000 Door Locks $1,200,000 Student/Staff ID System $3,000,000 Special Education Security Cameras $1,250,000 $1,250,000 Security Camera Storage $2,600,000 $2,600,000 Window Film $4,000,000 $1,000,000 Police Vehicles $1,600,000 $300,000
13
2018 CAPITAL PLAN
14
15
16
2018 CAPITAL PLAN
17
2018 CAPITAL PLAN
*Exterior LED lighting upgrades: Phase 1 - 33 Campuses, Phase 2 - 16 Campuses *Interior LED lighting upgrades: Phase 2 - 13 Campuses
18
19
Elementary $237/SF Middle School $250/SF High School $265/SF
Humble ES #28 $243/SF Humble ISD Dean Leaman JH $245/SF Lamar CISD Grand Oaks HS $299/SF Conroe ISD Lamar ES #24 $246/SF Lamar CISD Humble MS #9 $259/SF Humble ISD Energy Institute HS $275/SF Houston ISD Carter ES $229/SF Lamar CISD Kranz JH $241/SF Dickinson ISD Katy HS #8 $268/SF Katy ISD
20 2027 District is projected to be built out
Recent and Expected Enrollment Growth
21
(2005) $199,505,000 (2006) $269,472,225 (2006) $798,000,000 (2006) $286,116,000 (2007) $692,670,000 (2007) $807,000,000 (2007) $593,600,000 (2007) $597,150,000 (2007) $559,000,000 (2007) $428,000,000 (2008) $343,717,819 (2008) $697,670,000 (2008) $646,900,000 (2008) $527,000,000 (2008) $490,000,000 (2010) $535,142,000 (2010) $459,795,000 (2010) $515,000,000 (2013) $489,731,000 (2013) $489,860,000 (2014) $648,340,000 (2014) $748,120,000 (2014) $1,209,280,000 (2014) $775,000,000 (2014) $484,000,000 (2015) $498,100,000 (2015) $487,000,000 (2016) $481,000,000 (2016) $450,000,000 (2017) $609,200,000 (2017) $1,050,984,000 (2017) $749,735,000 (2017) $737,550,000 (2017) $898,400,000 (2017) $454,405,000 (2018) $848,910,000
$0.00B $0.50B $1.00B $1.50B $2.00B $2.50B $3.00B Northside ISD Katy ISD Cypress-Fairbanks ISD Austin ISD Fort Worth ISD Lewisville ISD Frisco ISD Spring Branch ISD Leander ISD Klein ISD Conroe ISD Plano ISD San Antonio ISD Fort Bend ISD
Successful Bond Elections (2005-2018)
FBISD UNDER INVESTING IN CURRENT FACILITIES
$1.32 $1.00 $1.10 $1.20 $1.30 $1.40 $1.50 $1.60 $1.70
Source: FBISD Finance
22
FINANCING THE PLAN
FACILITY ASSESMENT HIGHLIGHTS
FACILITY ASSESSMENT HIGHLIGHTS
23
Ranked By Bond Principal Outstanding as of 5/31/2018
$3,287 $2,604 $1,793 $1,304 $1,121 $973 $963 $792 $725 $670 $596
$500 $1,000 $1,500 $2,000 $2,500 $3,000 $3,500 Houston ISD Cypress-Fairbanks ISD Katy ISD Conroe ISD Klein ISD Clear Creek ISD Fort Bend ISD Lamar CISD Spring Branch ISD Spring ISD Humble ISD Bond Principal Outstanding ($Millions)
$1,574 in 2025 $992M Bond
Source: The Municipal Advisory Council of Texas – As of May 31, 2018. Includes Voted and M&O debt.
Fort Bend ISD
25
FBISD OUTSTANDING DEBT (2014-2018)
Source: FBISD Finance
Ranked By Bond Principal Outstanding Per Student as of 5/31/2018
$24,627 $23,125 $23,076 $22,372 $21,183 $21,118 $20,712 $18,529 $15,346 $14,048 $13,059
$12,000 $14,000 $16,000 $18,000 $20,000 $22,000 $24,000 $26,000 Lamar CISD Katy ISD Clear Creek ISD Cypress-Fairbanks ISD Conroe ISD Klein ISD Spring Branch ISD Spring ISD Houston ISD Humble ISD Fort Bend ISD Bond Principal Outstanding Per Student
$19,061 in 2025 $992M Bond
Source: Texas Education Agency – PEIMS and The Municipal Advisory Council of Texas – As of May 31, 2018. Includes Voted and M&O debt.
Fort Bend ISD
Comparison of Certain Texas School Districts Within the Greater Houston Area
Ranked By Bond Principal Outstanding as a Percentage of Taxable Value as of 5/31/2018
5.4% 5.3% 5.2% 5.1% 4.6% 4.3% 3.8% 3.7% 2.6% 2.2% 1.9%
1.0% 2.0% 3.0% 4.0% 5.0% 6.0% Klein ISD Spring ISD Cypress-Fairbanks ISD Lamar CISD Katy ISD Clear Creek ISD Conroe ISD Humble ISD Fort Bend ISD Spring Branch ISD Houston ISD Bond Principal Outstanding Per TAV Source: Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts and The Municipal Advisory Council of Texas – As of May 31, 2018. Includes Voted and M&O Debt.
Fort Bend ISD
Comparison of Certain Texas School Districts Within the Greater Houston Area
3.2% in 2025 $992M Bond
28
Source: Forecast 5/ AEIS / Consumer Price Index as of June – All Urban Consumers – All City Average – All Items M&O Rate = 1.06%
Compound Annual Growth Rate .48% Over 12 Years (Adjusted for Inflation)
$2,000 $3,000 $4,000 $5,000 $6,000 $7,000 $8,000
Operating Rev Per ADM * Adj for Inflation Rev Per ADM
GF Revenue Per Student Adjusted for Inflation
Ranked By Students served per Central Administration FTE 2016-17 (All Funds)
227.76 194.65 192.49 160.43 141.69 140.10 132.04 125.77 122.49 108.93
0.00 50.00 100.00 150.00 200.00 250.00 CYPRESS- FAIRBANKS ISD FORT BEND ISD KATY ISD HOUSTON ISD NORTHSIDE ISD (BEXAR COUNTY) NORTH EAST ISD ALDINE ISD FORT WORTH ISD AUSTIN ISD DALLAS ISD # of Students Served per Administrative FTE
Higher is Better
Source: FBISD Finance Department & Forecast 5 Analytics (functions 13, 21, 41, 53)
Comparison of 10 Largest School Districts in Texas
30
$462 $465 $484 $508 $552 $566 $567 $593 $672 $739 $835
100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900
Expenditure per Pupil Fiscal Year 2017
State Peers Expenditure per Pupil GF199 - Function 51*
Source: Forecast5, FBISD Business & Finance * Function 51 w/o utilities
31
32
33
Source: Fort Bend CAD and FBISD Finance
10.1% 2.6% 6.4% 12.0% 12.9% 12.4% 9.3% 10.9% 8.4% 9.7% 9.4% 10.2% 11.7% 4.4%
0.4% 4.3% 7.0% 10.3% 10.8% 11.3% 6.8% 3.8%
0.00% 2.00% 4.00% 6.00% 8.00% 10.00% 12.00% 14.00% 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
34
$- $20 $40 $60 $80 $100 $120 $140 $160 $180 $200 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 2046 2047 2048 2049 2050 2051 2052 2053 2054 2055
Millions Period Ending August 31
Existing Debt Service Remaining 2014 Debt Potential 2018 Bond Property Tax Collections with $0.26 tax rate Property Tax Collections with $0.29 tax rate 35
36
FINANCING THE PLAN
1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.27 0.29
$1.34 $1.34 $1.34 $1.34 $1.34 $1.34 $1.34 $1.32 $1.32 $1.32 $1.33 $1.35
$0.50 $0.60 $0.70 $0.80 $0.90 $1.00 $1.10 $1.20 $1.30 $1.40 $1.50
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Proj 2020 Proj 2021 Proj
Total Tax Rate
Tax Year
M&O I&S
$- $20 $40 $60 $80 $100 $120 $140 $160 $180 $200 $220 $240 $260 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 2046 2047 2048 2049 2050 2051 2052 2053 2054 2055
Millions Period Ending August 31
Existing Debt Service Remaining 2014 Debt Phase 1 - 2018 Bond $990M Phase 2 - 2021 Bond $710M Property Tax Collections with $0.26 tax rate Property Tax Collections with $0.35 tax rate 37
$- $20 $40 $60 $80 $100 $120 $140 $160 $180 $200 $220 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 2046 2047 2048 2049 2050 2051 2052 2053 2054 2055
Millions Period Ending August 31
Existing Debt Service Remaining 2014 Debt Phase 1 - 2018 Bond $990M Phase 2 - 2021 Bond $710M Property Tax Collections with $0.26 tax rate Property Tax Collections with $0.34 tax rate 38
39
* Based on 2018/2019 property value growth of 3% over prior year
Tax Rate Scenarios Current +3₵ $1.32 $1.35 Avg Market/Assessed Value of Residences $284,377 $284,377 Avg Taxable Value of Residences $255,111 $255,111 Total Tax Rate $1.32 $1.35 Annual Taxes on Average Residence $3,367.47 $3,444.00 Annual Increase in Taxes $76.53 Monthly Increase in Taxes $6.38 % Change 2.27%
40
Our citizens with Over 65 or Disabled Persons exemptions have established tax ceilings on their homesteads and those ceilings will not be impacted. In other words, homestead taxes are frozen for our citizens with the Over 65 or Disabled Persons exemptions unless the citizen is currently paying below their tax ceiling.
41
42