2017 TAX LEVY INFORMATION BOARD OF EDUCATION MEETING OCTOBER 19, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

2017 tax levy information
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

2017 TAX LEVY INFORMATION BOARD OF EDUCATION MEETING OCTOBER 19, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

2017 TAX LEVY INFORMATION BOARD OF EDUCATION MEETING OCTOBER 19, 2017 Local Property Taxes are the Primary Source of Revenue for D211 TAX REVENUE SUPPORTS INSTRUCTIONAL AND OPERATIONAL NEEDS OF THE DISTRICT INTEREST ON 2017-2018


slide-1
SLIDE 1

2017 TAX LEVY INFORMATION

BOARD OF EDUCATION MEETING OCTOBER 19, 2017

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Local Property Taxes are the Primary Source of Revenue for D211

LOCAL PROPERTY TAXES, 85.3% INTEREST ON INVESTMENTS, 0.3% GENERAL STATE AID, 2.7% CATEGORICAL STATE AID, 3.9% FOOD SERVICE SALES, 1.3% CORPORATE P.P.R. TAX, 1.2% FEES & OTHER, 2.1% TUITION, 0.4% FEDERAL AID, 2.8%

2017-2018 REVENUE BY CATEGORY

TAX REVENUE SUPPORTS INSTRUCTIONAL AND OPERATIONAL NEEDS OF THE DISTRICT

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Understanding the “Tax Cap”

District 211 is subject to the Property Tax Extension Limitation Law (PTELL) also known as the “Tax Cap” Impacts all school districts in Cook County and numerous other counties throughout the state The Tax Cap limits the aggregate levy amount to:

 A) increase in the prior year’s CPI % plus  B) addition of new property growth

Prohibits districts from fully recovering operating revenue if amounts are levied less than the tax cap amount Each year’s levy sets the foundation amount by which taxes may be levied for the following year Does not “cap” individual property tax bills

CPI‐U History

2009 0.1% 2010 2.7% 2011 1.5% 2012 3.0% 2013 1.7% 2014 1.5% 2015 0.8% 2016 0.7% 2017 2.1%

CPI‐U is a factor in determining the limit by which a Tax Capped district may increase their levy

slide-4
SLIDE 4

2017 Levy Considerations

Aggregate levy limit: 2.4% 2016 CPI‐U amount to determine tax cap limit for the 2017 levy = 2.1% New property growth estimated at 0.3% Because we will be debt free, we will no longer have a debt service levy 2017 levy impacts the 2018‐2019 fiscal year budget Levy must provide revenue sufficient to support annual instructional programming,

  • perating needs, life safety and facility improvement projects

Property Tax refunds at unprecedented amounts last fiscal year and trend continues

slide-5
SLIDE 5

2017 Levy Recommendation

 Levy in accordance with tax cap restrictions (CPI+ New Property = 2.4%)  Allocate additional funds for bus replacement needs  Allocate levy funds to pay for life safety projects  Allocate funds in Educational fund to support current programming  Levy to support IMRF and Social Security employer costs

Educational 171,838,446 173,000,000 0.7% Operations/Maintenance 28,552,574 28,875,000 1.1% Transportation 7,481,124 8,500,000 13.6%

  • IL. Municipal Retirement

4,835,822 4,950,000 2.4% Social Security 4,835,822 4,950,000 2.4% Working Cash 2,500,000 100.0% TOTAL 217,543,788 222,775,000 2.4% 2017 Recommended 2016 Actual Levy % Change

slide-6
SLIDE 6

School Bus Replacement Needs

Approximately 160 buses Targeted Life: 10‐12 Years Accelerate purchases of buses to lower the current life

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Life Safety/ Facility Improvement Projects

2018‐2019 Project Planning

  • Life Safety Mechanical

Equipment Replacement

  • Restroom Renovations
  • Stadium Carpet/Track

Replacement

  • Outdoor Field Renovations
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Impact of the Recommended Levy on the Median Home Value Taxpayer

  • Median Home Value: $252,300
  • Impact of D211 Recommended Levy: $48

Hoffman Estates

  • Median Home Value: $266,700
  • Impact of D211 Recommended Levy: $51

Palatine

  • Median Home Value: $233,400
  • Impact of D211 Recommended Levy: $43

Schaumburg

These figures do NOT include the additional homeowner exemptions recently approved for Cook County. Additional $3,000/$6,000 exemptions would further reduce these amounts

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Tax Levy Increase vs. Tax Refund Losses

Levy Year Levy Increase Year‐Over‐ Year Total Property Tax Refund Losses 2016 1,069,333 9,147,181 2015 428,231 5,426,922 2014 3,628,525 5,071,657 For each of the last 3 years, the District has lost more in property tax refunds than it has increased in its levy

slide-10
SLIDE 10

5‐Year Fund Balance Projection

Cash Basis ‐ rounded $000's

2017‐2018 2018‐2019 2019‐2020 2020‐2021 2021‐2022 Budgeted % +(‐) Projected % +(‐) Projected % +(‐) Projected % +(‐) Projected % +(‐) BEGINNING FUND BALANCE 131,087,000 $ 110,608,000 $ 107,593,000 $ 105,340,000 $ 102,914,000 $ TOTAL DIRECT REVENUE 249,320,000 1.7% 256,376,000 2.8% 261,043,000 1.8% 264,826,000 1.4% 269,111,000 1.6% TOTAL DIRECT EXPENDITURES 241,162,000 2.7% 246,961,000 2.4% 251,296,000 1.8% 255,252,000 1.6% 259,799,000 1.8% BUDGET SURPLUS/ (DEFICIT) 8,158,000 9,415,000 9,747,000 9,574,000 9,313,000 (2,000,000) (2,000,000) (2,000,000) (2,000,000) (2,000,000) TRANSFERS OUT (NET) (26,637,000) (10,431,000) (10,000,000) (10,000,000) (10,000,000) FUND BALANCE 110,608,000 $ 107,593,000 $ 105,340,000 $ 102,914,000 $ 100,226,000 $ Operating Fund Balance % 45% 43% 41% 40% 38%

  • f Next Yr. Expenditures

Educational Fund Balance % 40% 39% 38% 36% 34%

  • f Next Yr. Expenditures

SPECIAL PAYMENT TO IMRF

Five-Year Financial Projection (Operating Funds)

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Impact of a Reduced Levy‐ What If…

  • The District reduced its 2017 levy by ½ of the recommended increase?
  • The District abated its aggregate operating levy instead of its debt service levy over the past 2

years?

Proposed Levy 2.4% Increase Decrease in Operating Fund Balance $ FY22

  • Operating Fund Balance % FY22

38% Educational Fund Balance % FY22 34% What If? Levy Reduced by 50% 1.2% vs. Recommended 2.4% Increase ($12.5 Million) Loss 33% 32%

What If? Abated Operating Funds Instead of Debt Service in 2015 & 2016 Levies ($27 Million) Loss 28% 29%

Impact demonstrated over a 5‐year period and would continue to compound into future years

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Average Levy Change Over Three Years…

Over the last 3 years, the average levy change is for District 211 is 1%. Actual Levy Dollars % increase 2014 Levy 216,100,000 $ 2015 Levy 216,500,000 $ 0.2% 2016 Levy 217,500,000 $ 0.5% 2017 Levy 222,775,000 $ 2.4% Average increase over 3 years: 1.0%

The Board of Education has accomplished reduction (abatement) of the total levy amount by more than $33 million over the past 10 years

slide-13
SLIDE 13

How Does the Levy Impact Individual Property Tax Bill Calculations?

Factors Used to Calculate Property Tax Bill: Description: Controlled By: Property Value Value of property compared to properties of similar size and location Cook County Assessor Property Assessment Level (by Property Type) Factor applied to property value to calculate assessed value Cook County Assessor Equalization Factor Factor applied to bring Cook County properties in line with all of Illinois IL Dept. of Revenue Tax Rate Sum of all tax rates‐determined by levy amounts Local taxing body (including D211) Exemptions Lessen the amount owed and apply to individuals meeting certain criteria Cook County Treasurer

Local taxing bodies control only 1 of 5 components used to determine individual property tax bill amounts

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Residential Property Tax Bill Change in 2016

A sample of 50 residential property owners individual tax bills demonstrates the fluctuation and unpredictability of change for a taxpayer year‐over‐year

D211 Levy Increased by 0.5% during same time period

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Why Did Property Tax Bills Vary?

Factors Used to Calculate Property Tax Bill: Description: Controlled By: Property Value Value of property compared to properties of similar size and location Cook County Assessor Property Assessment Level (by Property Type) Factor applied to property value to calculate assessed value Cook County Assessor Equalization Factor Factor applied to bring Cook County properties in line with all of Illinois IL Dept. of Revenue Tax Rate Sum of all tax rates‐determined by levy amounts Local taxing body (including D211) Exemptions Lessen the amount owed and apply to individuals meeting certain criteria Cook County Treasurer

The State equalization factor increased in 2016 and property values were reassessed in 2016 (Total EAV increased by 13%)— These factors impact the calculation of each individual tax bill

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Current and Future Reserve Allocations

  • At 6/30/17, the Operating Fund

balance of the District was 54%.

  • $19.2 million is unassigned and

available for strategic initiatives and contingencies.

  • Capital Projects
  • IMRF Special Payment
  • iPad lease
  • This fund balance will be used or

retained over the next year as shown in the aside chart.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Tax Levy Calendar

October 11, 2017 Budget and Finance Committee Meeting‐ Review levy material October 19, 2017 Board of Education Meeting‐ Levy Presentation November 1, 2017 Tentative Budget and Finance Committee Meeting if needed‐ Review levy material November 9, 2017 Board of Education Meeting‐ Determine amount of proposed 2017 levy (not less than 20 days prior to levy adoption) November 30, 2017‐December 7, 2017 Public hearing notice must be published (no more than 14 nor less than 7 days prior to public hearing) December 14, 2017 Board of Education Meeting‐ Public hearing of 2017 levy and adoption of 2017 levy December 26, 2017 Last day to file 2017 levy

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Levy Summary and Financial Highlights

  • 2.4% levy increase for 2017 brings three‐year historical average levy change to 1%
  • No further Debt Service levy reduces annual levy amount—D211 will be Debt Free in 2017
  • D211 is self‐funding its life safety and capital projects through its annual operating budget
  • The levy provides funds necessary to supports the Board’s strategic initiatives for the

duration of the plan

  • D211 operating fund balance projected to reach 38% after 5 years—this is the result of

planned reserve use as strategically prioritized

  • D211 is able to make advance payments toward IMRF obligations to reduce annual costs
  • D211 has implemented $3.8 million in reductions since FY16
  • D211 levy increase will impact the average homeowner’s tax bill by approximately $50