2017 Land Acquisition Monitoring Program Context, History & - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

2017 land acquisition monitoring program context history
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

2017 Land Acquisition Monitoring Program Context, History & - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

2017 Land Acquisition Monitoring Program Context, History & Accomplishments Oregon Constitution: OWEB may fund projects that secure long-term protection for land that provides significant habitats for native fish and wildlife Late


slide-1
SLIDE 1

2017 Land Acquisition Monitoring

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Program Context, History & Accomplishments

  • Oregon Constitution: OWEB may fund projects that

secure long-term protection for land that provides significant habitats for native fish and wildlife

  • Late 1990s: OWEB began making land acquisition grants
  • 2004: the Board adopted priorities and principles for

land acquisition

  • To date: $49 million awarded for the protection of

79,000 acres of land

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Project Types & Portfolio

  • Fee simple purchase
  • Conservation easement purchase
  • OWEB has interests in more than 100 properties
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Importance of Monitoring

  • Assesses easement compliance
  • Evaluates progress toward ecological objectives
  • Identifies matters for follow-up
  • Can assist in relationship building
  • Can lead to better project outcomes
slide-5
SLIDE 5

2017 Monitoring

  • 63 properties
  • Contractors monitored each property for conservation

easement compliance and assessed whether ecological

  • bjectives are being met
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Monitoring Process

  • Document review; Q&A with OWEB staff
  • Grantee interview
  • Site visit
  • Standardized monitoring form
  • Property scores
  • 2017 data compared to 2012 data
  • Summary report
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Monitoring Results

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Achieving Ecological Goals Score of 9 or More Easement Compliance 2012 2017

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Monitoring Follow-up

  • Contractors noted specific needs that require follow-up
  • Examples: invasive species, outdated management

plans, incomplete restoration work

  • Grantees were notified of the needs
  • OWEB project managers are following up
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Considerations for the future

  • Each property should be monitored at a minimum of

every 5 years

  • The size of OWEB’s portfolio is continuously growing. It

may be necessary to split the monitoring work between years or biennia.