2012 NCSFPA SNAP Survey The Interaction Between CSFP and SNAP - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

2012 ncsfpa snap survey
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

2012 NCSFPA SNAP Survey The Interaction Between CSFP and SNAP - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

2012 NCSFPA SNAP Survey The Interaction Between CSFP and SNAP Benefits for Senior CSFP Box Recipients Nationwide Good Afternoon! Jennifer Wright Philabundance Government Relations and External Affairs AmeriCorps VISTA Philadelphia, PA (215)


slide-1
SLIDE 1

2012 NCSFPA SNAP Survey

The Interaction Between CSFP and SNAP Benefits for Senior CSFP Box Recipients Nationwide

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Good Afternoon!

Jennifer Wright Philabundance Government Relations and External Affairs AmeriCorps VISTA Philadelphia, PA (215) 339 – 0900, ext. 1070 jwright@philabundance.org Supervisor: George Matysik, NCSFPA VP

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Survey Objectives

  • 1. Study the interaction between CSFP and

federal hunger relief programs

Solicit honest consumer feedback about how CSFP works in conjunction with other federal hunger relief programs, and how to best advocate for our consumers’ interests

  • 2. Develop a powerful advocacy tool

Aggregate consumers’ voices to present to:

  • Government officials
  • Resources for grants
  • Anyone else looking to get involved with advocacy at

the state/local/national level

slide-4
SLIDE 4

DEADLINES

Surveys will be released to State Agencies from NCSFPA during the first week of December 2012. Survey tools should be completed at the Local Agencies by the end of December 2012.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

NCSFPA FSP Survey 2007

The 2012 NCSFPA SNAP Survey follows the 2007 NCSFPA FSP Survey conducted by Sheila Christopher (PA) and Barb Packett (NE). This survey demonstrated that:

  • Seniors were frequently denied large benefit amounts;

a plurality received less than $20 per month

  • Some seniors were unable to use the FSP benefits they

were granted because they were unable to access grocery stores; however, they were able to access the CSFP distribution site, or the CSFP boxes were delivered to their homes

  • Many seniors avoided applying for FSP benefits

because of the amount of work required for limited payout

  • Brought forth economic and social concerns, e.g. lack
  • f access, stigma
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Respondents’ FSP Status (2007)

34% 36% 30%

% of Respondents

Receiving SNAP Benefits Applied for SNAP Benefits, but Ineligible Never Applied for SNAP

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Respondents Receiving FSP Benefits (2007)

43% 25% 19% 8% 5%

Benefit Amounts Received

< $20 < $50 < $100 < $150 > $151

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Respondents Not Receiving FSP Benefits (2007)

42% 29% 16% 9% 4%

Stated Reasons for Not Receiving Benefits

Rejected Benefit Because Benefit < $10 Denied Benefits Paperwork Complicated No Transportation Homebound (Receiving CSFP Box Delivered)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Differences in CSFP Since 2007

108 176.8 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 2007 2012

National CSFP Budget ($1,000,000)

485,614 588,000 100,000 200,000 300,000 400,000 500,000 600,000 700,000 2007 2012

Individuals Served by CSFP

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Differences in SNAP Since 2007

$33,326 $73,184 $0 $10,000 $20,000 $30,000 $40,000 $50,000 $60,000 $70,000 $80,000 2007 2012

National SNAP Budget ($1,000,000)

26,000,000 45,000,000 8,676,234 14944642 5,000,000 10,000,000 15,000,000 20,000,000 25,000,000 30,000,000 35,000,000 40,000,000 45,000,000 50,000,000 2007 2012

Individuals Receiving SNAP Benefits

Individuals Households

slide-11
SLIDE 11

What We Hope to Demonstrate

We hope to demonstrate that a network of federal programs is integral to the continued health and wellness of our seniors, and to prove that cutting any or all of these programs will hurt our seniors.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

What We Need to Do

We will be surveying 12% of the national caseload.

  • This will necessarily be a collaborative effort on

the parts of all CSFP state and local agencies

  • Underrepresentation and overrepresentation of

certain states will be an issue if all states do not submit surveys from 12% of their entire caseloads

  • The USDA has encouraged the repeat of NCSFPA’s

Senior SNAP Survey in order to better understand the needs of CSFP recipients over time

slide-13
SLIDE 13

What We Need You to Do

As state agency leaders, you are in a unique position to ensure that this survey is conducted by CSFP distribution sites in your region.

  • Encourage CSFP distributors to submit their

results in full, and on time

  • Return results in as timely a manner as possible

to NCSFPA

  • Impress upon local agencies the importance of

this survey for helping both NCSFPA and USDA in assessing current CSFP recipients’ food security needs

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Regions

Regional Office (Location) Total Allotted Caseload, % Total* (Surveys Needed) States Region 1 (Northeast) 46613, 7% (5592) ME; NH; NY; VT Region 2 (Mid-Atlantic) 46553, 8% (5584) DE; DC; NJ; PA Region 3 (Southeast) 56331, 9% (6757) GA; KY; MS; NC; SC; TN Region 4 (Midwest) 146732, 25% (17605) IL; IN; MI; MN; OH; WI Region 5 (Southwest) 124688, 21% (14960) AR; LA; NM; OK; TX Region 6 (Mountain Plains) 71515, 12% (8578) CO; IA; KS; MO; MT; NE; ND; SD; UT Region 7 (Western) 106252, 18% (12748) AL; AZ; CA; NV; OR; WA

* Percentage values approximate

slide-15
SLIDE 15

CSFP Programs by Region

7.00% 8.00% 9.00% 25% 21% 12% 18%

Allotted Caseload by Region (Total 598,684)*

Region 1 (Northeast), 44613 Participants Region 2 (Mid-Atlantic), 46553 Participants Region 3 (Southeast), 56331 Participants Region 4 ( Midwest), 146732 Participants Region 5 (Southwest), 124688 Participants Region 6 (Mountain Plains) 71515 Participants Region 7 (Western), 106252 Participants

*Excludes Red Lake and Oglala Sioux CSFP Programs; total 696 CSFP box recipients

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Regional Analyses

We will be analyzing data both holistically and by region. Regional analyses will:

  • Examine how various geographic regions’ seniors differ

in how they access and use federal benefits

  • Help to determine how seniors in more urban or more

rural areas are able or unable to access benefits from federal programs Importantly, this means that all regions must contribute equally:

  • If certain states or regions do not provide sufficient

data, both the whole report and the regional analyses will suffer.

  • If larger urban caseload agencies are better-

represented by survey results, this will paint an inaccurate picture.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Report Format

We will be generating two documents:

  • 1. Larger executive document
  • As rigorous an analysis of our data as possible
  • 2. Smaller brochure to distribute to legislators and

constituents

  • Summarily and accessibly presents the first

document in an aesthetically pleasing, easy-to- read format

  • Full of statistics that can be communicated in

various situations and environments

slide-18
SLIDE 18

How this Survey Will Be Conducted

Survey questions will be available in online and PDF formats

  • n the NCSFPA Survey Monkey account. To the extent

practicable, seniors should be permitted to complete the survey independently.

  • In the interest of ensuring that all local agencies would be

able to administer this survey, both online and print formats will be available.

  • To ensure the maximum comfort of survey respondents, we

are requesting that all local agencies provide an alternative to the online survey format, even when there is an online format available.

  • When possible seniors should be permitted to conduct the

survey independently. However, to ensure a high rate of completed surveys, we are requesting that local agencies provide staff or a volunteer to assist seniors in taking the survey to ensure that they do not face language and/or technological barriers in answering the questions accurately.

slide-19
SLIDE 19

What does the NCSFPA need from State CSFP Agencies?

A list of your states local agencies with assigned caseload allocations and the local agencies contact information. This information will be utilized by NCSFPA to assess the percentage of surveys being received by each local agency.

slide-20
SLIDE 20

How Data Will Be Analyzed

CSFP Participants/Local Agency staff/volunteers will record the surveys in the electronic Survey Monkey account.

  • If a Local Agency is unable to access

Survey Monkey due to a lack of internet capacity they may utilize paper surveys.

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Entering Data from Paper Surveys

If paper surveys can not be data entered at each local agency they should be faxed or mailed to NCSFPA at USDA/FNS Regions: 1; 3; 4 and 6 Fax: 603-645-6734 Mailing address: Jennifer Wall Southern New Hampshire Services, Inc. PO Box 5040 Manchester, NH 03108 USDA/FNS Regions: 2; 5 and 7 Fax: 215-339-0924 Mailing address: Jennifer Wright Philabundance 3616 South Galloway St. Philadelphia, PA 19148

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Thank you!

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me directly: Jennifer Wright Philabundance Department of Government Relations and External Affairs (215) 339-0900, x 1070 jwright@philabundance.org Philadelphia, PA