2 nd Fermi Symposium – Washington DC ‐ Tuesday, November 3 rd , 2009
• GBM has an effecHve area 1/36 of its famous predecessor BATSE => GBM required bright events BUT • Even if smaller, GBM/BGO detectors are much thicker with higher z. 12 Iodine Sodium detectors (NaI: => Much beWer photo‐peak efficiency and effecHve area 8 keV to 1 MeV) above 1 MeV : BATSE maximal energy ~10 MeV. GBM maximal energy ~40 MeV. => Spectroscopy of hard bursts possible with GBM. 2 Germanate Bismuth detectors • GBM has : (BGO: 200 keV to 40 MeV) much more available on‐board memory. a much higher telemetry downlink budget. a beWer data design for Time Tag Events (TTE). => Data available with a Hme resoluHon down to 2 μs, 128 spectral channels from 8 keV to 40 MeV and from ‐30 to 300 s. => Ideal for the study of short events like short GRBs, TGFs (see Michael Briggs talk and Jerry Fishman poster on TGFs) and SGRs (see Chryssa Koveliotou and Ersin Gogus talks) 2/10 Sylvain Guiriec – Fermi Symposium 2009
• About 68 short GRBs detected with GBM since since July, 2008. • Short GRBs correspond to ~20% of the total GRBs detected with GBM Sample criteria for this analysis • T 50 < 1s • Fluence > 2e ‐6 erg/cm2 => bright enough for Hme‐resolved spectroscopy with GBM => This selecHon results in 3 brightest and hardest short GRBs detected with GBM so far: • GRB 090227B • GRB 090228 • GRB 090510 In all the following, spectral analysis performed from 8 keV to 40 MeV. 3/10 Sylvain Guiriec – Fermi Symposium 2009
Standard model before the Fermi Era • Various model tested : Power‐law with exponenHal decay (comptonized) Band funcHon Comptonized+PL Band+PL AddiHonal component onen present in Fermi’s GRB spectra • Fit performed with the analysis package Rmfit • Choice of the best model : staHsHcal improvement of the Castor Cstat value between models according to the addiHonal degree of freedom 4/10 Sylvain Guiriec – Fermi Symposium 2009
Band (Cstat: 699/607 dof) Comptonized + PL (Cstat: 689/606 dof) NaI Count spectrum BGO υF υ spectrum The addiHonal component dominates the standard Band funcHon at both low and high Energy 5/10 Sylvain Guiriec – Fermi Symposium 2009
Name Model Parameters of the Band func7on PL Castor Cstat / dof E peak (keV) α β index GRB 090227B Compt 706/608 + 90 + 0.02 -0.52 2227 − 0.02 − 85 + 97 + 0.02 + 0.27 Band 699/607 2116 -0.50 -3.35 − 0.02 − 0.39 − 95 Compt+PL + 96 + 0.05 + 0.06 689/606 1995 -0.36 -1.37 − 0.05 − 91 − 0.06 Band+PL 686/605 + 205 + 0.05 + 0.58 + 0.05 1947 -0.36 -3.44 -1.51 − 0.13 − 0.80 − 98 − 0.04 GRB 090228 Compt 813/729 + 52 + 0.03 862 -0.59 − 0.03 − 47 Band 813/728 + 50 + 0.03 + 0.64 860 -0.59 -3.77 − 0.03 − 0.64 − 49 + 0.11 Compt+PL + 47 + 0.09 795/727 722 -0.23 -1.63 − 42 − 0.10 − 0.15 Band+PL + 0.10 + 1.14 795/726 + 45 + 0.03 723 -0.24 -4.74 -1.64 − 41 − 0.10 −∞ − 0.02 GRB 090510 Compt + 0.02 922/851 + 255 4797 -0.77 − 237 − 0.02 Band 911/850 + 0.02 + 0.20 + 290 4383 -0.75 -2.80 − 278 − 0.02 − 0.28 Compt+PL + 265 + 0.08 + 0.04 897/849 3731 -0.51 -1.35 − 246 − 0.07 − 0.04 Band+PL 897/848 + 284 + 0.08 + 0.75 + 0.04 3695 -0.51 -3.65 -1.38 − 265 − 0.08 −∞ − 0.03 (GBM+LAT) Band+PL + 0.06 + 0.14 + 0.03 + 280 3936 -0.58 -2.83 -1.62 − 260 − 0.05 − 0.20 − 0.03 • Comp + PL is systemaHcally prefered => Existence of an addiHonal component in these 3 GRBs • Value of the index of the addiHonal PL similar in all these bursts • Higher E peak values than for long GRBs (=> quesHon during Ehud talk : short vs long GRBs with GBM) • Steep β values (which confirm the comment from Guido to Nicola in the previous talk) 6/10 • GBM only results and GBM+LAT fits are consistent for GRB 090510 Sylvain Guiriec – Fermi Symposium 2009
The existence of addiHonal components in these 3 GRBs is consistent with LAT data See Poster Valerie Connaughton P3‐171 (Wed‐Thur) 7/10 Sylvain Guiriec – Fermi Symposium 2009
GRB 090227B GRB 090228 • Similar to what we observed in long GRBs GRB 090510 but contracted in Hme and shined to higher 10000 energy (Ford et al.). • E peak tracks the light curves like for the long burst. • The hardest part is not always at the beginning. • The most intense peaks are not always the hardest. 8/10 Sylvain Guiriec – Fermi Symposium 2009
α < ‐3/2 : e ‐ synchrotron α < ‐2/3 : • α nearly systemaHcally violates the emission valid e ‐ synchrotron synchrotron line of death of ‐2/3. for fast cooling emission valid for slow cooling • E peak evolves over an incredible broad range of energy 9 9/10 Sylvain Guiriec – Fermi Symposium 2009
Time-integrated spectra • Time-integrated spectra are best fit with Band+Power law model => Additional component : electron SSC or hadronic emission • The additional power law dominates the standard Band spectrum at low and high energy => low energy extension of the PL challenges all the models • The hardest short GRBs have Epeak values well above those of the hardest long GRBs. Fine time-resolved spectroscopy • Short GRBs have similar light curves than long GRBs but contracted in time and shifted towards higher energy, and appear to have steeper β . E peak tracks the light curves and spreads over a broad energy range • => consistent with the electron synchrotron models in the internal shocks context ( AcceleraHon and cooling of the electrons leading to a hardening with the peak rise then a sonening of the burst during the pulse decay) • α in the time resolved spectroscopy violates the synchrotron limits ( Frederic Daigne talk: possible answer with IC ?) 10/10 Sylvain Guiriec – Fermi Symposium 2009
Band (Cstat: 699/607 dof) Comptonized + PL (Cstat: 689/606 dof) NaI Count spectrum BGO υF υ spectrum The addiHonal component dominates the standard Band funcHon at both low and high Energy 12/10 Sylvain Guiriec – Fermi Symposium 2009
Band (Cstat: 813/728 dof) Comptonized + PL (Cstat: 795/727 dof) NaI Count spectrum BGO υF υ spectrum The addiHonal component dominates the standard Band funcHon at both low and high Energy 13/10 Sylvain Guiriec – Fermi Symposium 2009
Band (Cstat: 911/850 dof) Comptonized + PL (Cstat: 897/849 dof) NaI Count spectrum BGO υF υ spectrum The addiHonal component dominates the standard Band funcHon at both low and high Energy 14/10 Sylvain Guiriec – Fermi Symposium 2009
Recommend
More recommend