18 04 16
play

18-04-16 The BEST Hemodialysis Vascular Access Fistula failure how - PDF document

18-04-16 The BEST Hemodialysis Vascular Access Fistula failure how to use risk scores and algorithms Charmaine Lok, MD Professor of Medicine, University of Toronto UCSF Vascular Symposium 2018 A functioning FISTULA! April 19, 2018 San


  1. 18-04-16 The BEST Hemodialysis Vascular Access Fistula failure – how to use risk scores and algorithms Charmaine Lok, MD Professor of Medicine, University of Toronto UCSF Vascular Symposium 2018 A functioning FISTULA! April 19, 2018 San Francisco Fistula is 35 years old, 1 intervention no complications Would we recommend a fistula is these patients? Problem: Fistula Failure • Multiple previously failed fistula? • Deemed “ marginal ” by the surgeon • “ Suitability Failure ” or “ Failure to Mature ” • Multiple comorbidities • Early thrombosis • Elder age e.g. >75? • Failure of vessel dilatation and maturation (stenosis, collaterols) • Limited life expectancy • Difficulties with cannulation: infiltration injury • O ’ Hare, A, et al., Kidney Int, 2007 • pts >85 yrs would have 5:1 unneccessary to necessary procedures • Richardson, et.al, J Vasc Access, 2009 • Pts >70 yrs → 50% 18 mo survival • Fistula survival: 39% at 12 mos • Only 35% accessed their fistulas Potential Uses of Score FTM Risk Score Risk of Fistula Failure to Mature • Patient Education • Identifies high risk patients • Stratify post op for need of close follow-up (e.g. look for change in blood Variable Points Score flow, diameter size) +/- intervention +3 +3 Baseline • Consider high risk patients for a graft + 2 Age >=65 Score <2 2-3 3.1-7.9 >8.0 PVD + 3 • A tool that may assist in decision of choice of access along with other evaluations + 2.5 ü CAD Discrimmination ü Calibration Caucasian - 3 ü External validation Total Lok et al, JASN, 2006 1

  2. 18-04-16 Great! What are “other” evaluations? HOW WELL DO SURGEONS PREDICT? This Patient Comes to See You Application to Our Patient Score for Our • 68 years old, active Variable Points Patient • Non-caucasian • Longstanding HTN +3 Baseline +3 • DM II, poorly controlled; Age >=65 + 2 +2 had BKA • Already has 2 failed PVD + 3 +3 forearm fistulas, eGFR 15 ml/min , ACR 3 mg/mmol CAD + 2.5 0 • Patient strongly dislike needles, Caucasian - 3 0 “ okay ” with continual CVC use • PD not an option Total 8 = Very High Risk Nb: High risk if Caucasian (score=5) Implementation Considerations Tangri KFRE and our case Critical Data to Consider for Access Creation • Patient ’ s CKD status + timelines • Predialysis or long-term dialysis? • Timeframe for fistula creation and maturation • Patient ’ s overall status • Patient survival should be at least equivalent to access survival • Risk of fistula failure → should consider: • History of prior access failure • Vessel quality as per surgeon evaluation +/- vessel mapping • Clinical factors (+/- with help of Score ) 2

  3. 18-04-16 KFRE Results Clinical Thinking & Risk Stratification Results Allon & Lok, CJASN, 2010 The Graft A Patient ’ s Access Trajectory … .. can harmoniously include Grafts and Fistulae Don’t Forget about Secondary AVF 3

  4. 18-04-16 Practical Considerations for Graft Points about Prediction Models • Prevalent dialysis patients FTM Risk Score Stenosis Size • Suffered multiple prior fistula failures • Needs an UPDATE! Calcification Vessel • Patients and • Has high – very high FTM risk score integrity practice patterns Flow Venipuncture/ PICCs etc have changed • Incident patients • Generalizability to Mobility Nutrition CVD CHF • Expected to start HD in 2-3 weeks + high –very high FTM YOUR patient population risk score - ↑ likelihood CVC Functional AGE Comorbidity status • In such cases, emphasis= temporary in preparation for Tangri KFRE DM CAD secondary AVF fistula once graft becomes problematic Cognition PVD • Has not been tested/ • Advantages: start HD without CVC & avoid complications; validated for clinical use Available for VA planning access Sites improve bloodflow and vessel calibre for fistula Interventions • ? Pts who went on for Impact of Highlights need for timely and appropriate vascular access prior access VA surgery vs not • Competing risk of death care Surgeon Reasons for Factors loss Summary: Use of Risk Scores & Algorithms THANK YOU! § Fistulas continue to have high rates of FTM /non- suitability for dialysis § Risk scores are tools that may support a clinician/surgeon’s decision making § Multiple variables must be considered in deciding on hemodialysis AVF creation – patient age, comorbidity, vessel characteristics, timing +more § Tangri KFRE may be used in help priorize urgency for decision making and planning for AVF creation and use § FTM Score is one tool that may assist in determining risk of fistula failure § Fistulas remain the preferred vascular access for dialysis if they mature and are usable § Grafts are a reasonable alternative and better than a catheter whenever a fistula is not feasible or appropriate 4

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend