15 Atomospheric and Glare E ff ects Steve Marschner CS5625 Spring - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

15 atomospheric and glare e ff ects
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

15 Atomospheric and Glare E ff ects Steve Marschner CS5625 Spring - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

15 Atomospheric and Glare E ff ects Steve Marschner CS5625 Spring 2020 Plan Physics of the Air Bibliography scattering due to gases Nishita et al., Display of The Earth Taking into Account Atmospheric scattering due to


slide-1
SLIDE 1

15 Atomospheric and Glare Effects

Steve Marschner CS5625 Spring 2020

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Plan

Physics of the Air

  • scattering due to gases
  • scattering due to aerosols/particles
  • distribution of atmosphere

Atmospheric Phenomena

  • sunlight
  • skylight
  • aerial perspective
  • clouds

Computational Models

  • ray and path tracing
  • analytic approximations

Bibliography

  • Nishita et al., “Display of The Earth

Taking into Account Atmospheric Scattering,” SIGGRAPH 1993.

  • Preetham, Shirley, Smits, “A Practical

Analytic Model for Daylight,” SIGGRAPH 1999.

  • Hosek & Wilkie, “An Analytic Model

for Full Spectral Sky-dome Radiance,” SIGGRAPH 2012.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Turbidity Rm (km) exceptionally clear pure air very clear clear light haze haze thin fog 1 2 4 8 16 32 64

. 5 1 2 4 8 16 32 64 128 256

Preetham, Shirley, & Smits SIGGRAPH 1999

slide-4
SLIDE 4

S E N W v θ θs φs γ

Preetham, Shirley, & Smits SIGGRAPH 1999

slide-5
SLIDE 5

42°, T=1 .5°, T=1 .25°, T=7 .5°, T=6 Hosek & Wilkie CG&A 2013

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Hosek & Wilkie SIGGRAPH 2012

(a) T = 2 (b) T = 4 (c) T = 6 (d) T = 8

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Obtaining Reference Data

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Result: Raw Data

slide-9
SLIDE 9

CIE Standardized sky model

  • parameters A…E are tabulated for various conditions and solar elevations
  • Preetham provides empirical analytic functions for these coefficients in x, y, Y

Hosek extended sky model

  • They provide tabulated values for A…I, fitted to simulation; models turbidity quite a bit better.

Empirical analytic sky models

FCIE2003(θ, γ) = (1+AeB/ cos θ)(1+C(eDγ−eD π

2 )+E cos2 γ)

(2)

F(θ, γ) =(1 + Ae

B cos θ+0.01 ) · (C + DeEγ+

+ F cos2 γ + G · χ(H, γ) + I · cos

1 2 θ)

χ(g, α) = 1 + cos2 α (1 + g2 − 2g · cos α)

3 2

Equations: Hosek & Wilkie SIGGRAPH 2012

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Sky Colour Patterns (sunset)

slide-11
SLIDE 11

(a) Sunrise (b) α = 0.1 T=3

(e) Daytime sky (f) α = 0.9 T=7

Hosek & Wilkie SIGGRAPH 2012

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Aerial perspective

Attenuation removes light from the viewing ray

  • more blue removed, resulting


in warmer colors

Inscattering adds light
 to the viewing ray

  • more blue added (usually),


resulting in blue contribution
 (away from sunrise/sunset)

Computing both requires
 integration along ray

  • density, sun radiance change with h
  • analytic approximations used


for fast performance

Preetham, Shirley, & Smits SIGGRAPH 1999

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Preetham, Shirley, & Smits SIGGRAPH 1999 T=2 morning T=2 evening T=6 evening T=10

  • vercast
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Scattering in the eye

Scattering also happens inside the eye Causes “flare” from bright sources to add with other parts of the image Amount of flare

  • depends on angle 


between the source 
 and the pixel 
 receiving flare

  • angle ~= image-space


distance, so model
 as a convolution

Spencer, Shirley, Zimmerman, Greenberg SIGGRAPH 1995

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Bloom and lenticular flare

Spencer, Shirley, Zimmerman, Greenberg SIGGRAPH 1995