? 10th International Conference Neonatal & Childhood Pulmonary - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

10th international conference neonatal childhood
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

? 10th International Conference Neonatal & Childhood Pulmonary - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

3/10/2017 Clinical problem Surgical Interventions for Pulmonary Vein Stenosis Christopher Caldarone Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto ? 10th International Conference Neonatal & Childhood Pulmonary Vascular Disease March 10, 2016 San


slide-1
SLIDE 1

3/10/2017 1

Surgical Interventions for Pulmonary Vein Stenosis

Christopher Caldarone Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto

10th International Conference Neonatal & Childhood Pulmonary Vascular Disease March 10, 2016 San Francisco

Clinical problem

?

Surgical repair of TAPV

?

TAPV repair: Strong era effect – We are getting better!

Karamlou, Circulation 2007

slide-2
SLIDE 2

3/10/2017 2

TAPV repair: Still a problem in ‘unfavorable patients’

Karamlou, Circulation 2007

Karamlou, Circulation 2007

TAPV repair: Early hazard phase for reoperation TAPV repair: Risk Factors for Reoperation

Yun, JTCVS 2005

High risk population Small PV confluence Mixed type Small patients (<2 kg) Right atrial isomerism

Years From Complete Repair

% Freedom From Reoperation Unobstructed Postop obstruction

Karamlou, Circulation 2007

Residual stenosis predicts reop

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3/10/2017 3

Diagnosis: Post-repair pulmonary vein stenosis

?

Post-repair Pulmonary Vein Stenosis

Three varieties

  • Anastomotic stenosis
  • Fibrosis of confluence
  • Retrograde ‘UPSTREAM’ progression into lungs

– Unilateral or bilateral – Often relentless

Surgical evaluation: Post-repair pulmonary vein stenosis

?

Who is operable?

slide-4
SLIDE 4

3/10/2017 4

  • Grading of PVS in each pulmonary vein
  • Summation of PVS grades of 4 PVs
  • Possible range: 0 - 12

Extent of disease can predict survival: PVS Score

0: None 1: Mild-Moderate 2: Severe 3: Occlusion

Yun, JTCVS 2005

P<0.0001

Yun, JTCVS 2005

PVS Score ‘Upstream’ pulmonary veins

LoRito, JTCVS 2016

‘Upstream’ pulmonary veins

LoRito, JTCVS 2016

Operate HERE! (Not here)

Use a clinical surveillance protocol to detect recurrence early! 1, 6, 12 months (at least)

slide-5
SLIDE 5

3/10/2017 5

Congenital PVS

?

Congenital PVS

Viola, JTCVS 2011

PR-PVS and congenital PVS

Quinonez, JTCVS, 2015

5 year survival ~55%

Surgical treatment for PR-PVS: Sutureless repairs

?

slide-6
SLIDE 6

3/10/2017 6

Irregular contour >> geometric distortion which is ‘fixed’ by a sutureline

John Coles’ Hypothesis

Upstream propagation

Distortion Local injury Flow disturbance

John Coles’ Hypothesis

  • ‘Sutureless repair’
  • Atrium to pericardium

– No direct anastomotic suture – “Controlled bleed” into neoatrium

  • No geometric constraints on tissue

>>> Tissue conforms to local flow patterns

Sutureless Repairs: A Controlled Bleed

Courtesy: Nicola Viola

slide-7
SLIDE 7

3/10/2017 7

Post-repair PVS

Yun, JTCVS 2005

Post-repair PVS

Devaney, Ann Thor Surg 2006

Honjo, Ann Thor Surg 2010

Mixed TAPVD

Simplifies complex geometry

If beneficial for PR-PVS, should we use sutureless repairs for all TAPV patients? > Prophylactic procedure

slide-8
SLIDE 8

3/10/2017 8

Konstantinov 2004

Primary sutureless repair for TAPV

Konstantinov 2004

Primary sutureless repair for TAPV

Positive Attributes: Less precision required >> EASY Short learning curve Easier to teach No circulatory arrest

Konstantinov 2004

Primary sutureless repair for TAPV

Negative Attributes: Broncho-atrial fistula? Pleural disruption? Embolism? >>> Uncommon

Konstantinov 2004

Primary sutureless repair for TAPV

slide-9
SLIDE 9

3/10/2017 9

  • Shi et al
  • n=768
  • Lower restenosis in patients with preop PVS

Shi, Circulation 2017

Primary sutureless repair for TAPV

Can we prove there is a benefit? Sample size requirement

– Assume 50% decrease PR-PVS – 150 patients (10 years of accrual) needed

High risk populations >> smaller sample size Registry (e.g. PVS Network) will enable Low risk of adverse events makes it attractive

Yun, JTCVS 2005

Primary sutureless repair for TAPV Conclusions: Sutureless repairs

  • Sutureless repairs for treatment of post-repair

pulmonary vein stenosis >> ‘superior’ midterm results

  • Sutureless repairs for prevention of PVS

– Less clearly supported, but little downside – Recommended for:

  • patients at high risk of recurrence
  • mixed TAPV

Surgical treatment for PR-PVS: Lung transplant

?

slide-10
SLIDE 10

3/10/2017 10

Lung transplant and PVS

  • 12 congenital PVS + 8 acquired PVS
  • Median wait: 26d
  • Bilateral lung transplants on CPB

J HeartLungTransplant2013;32:621–625

Lung transplant and PVS

J HeartLungTransplant2013;32:621–625

5 year survival: 60% BO-free survival ~50% Preop ECMO is risk factor*

Waiting for transplant

  • Mechanical Pulmonary Support

– ECMO

  • Rapidly evolving techniques

– RA>LA (pump + oxygenator, special cannula) – PA>LA (oxygenator)

Dual lumen ECMO catheter RA > LA

Javidfar JTCVS 2012

slide-11
SLIDE 11

3/10/2017 11

Paracorporeal lung assist device (PLAD) PA > LA

Sweet, JTCVS 2014, Gazit Pediat Transplant 2016

Paracorporeal lung assist device (PLAD) PA > LA

  • Stabilize awaiting

transplant

  • Enable therapies in

non-hypertensive lungs

  • Enable surgical

interventions

Conclusion

  • Surgery is not enough
  • Immediately achievable:

– Match surveillance to velocity of disease

  • Detect while still treatable
  • Use Clinical Surveillance Protocol (1,6,12 months)
  • Use dedicated ‘PVS Team’ to manage surveillance and treatment
  • Our future

– Combination therapy offers opportunities

  • Integrate catheter-based <> surgical interventions
  • Mechanical pulmonary support <> transplant <> MPS-enabled therapies
  • Medical adjuncts (losartan, gleevec, avastin)