10 may 2012 safe harbor statement
play

10 May 2012 Safe Harbor Statement Matters discussed in this - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Presentation of Q1 2012 results 10 May 2012 Safe Harbor Statement Matters discussed in this presentation may constitute forward-looking statements. Such statements reflect TORM's current expectations and are subject to certain risks and


  1. Presentation of Q1 2012 results 10 May 2012

  2. Safe Harbor Statement Matters discussed in this presentation may constitute forward-looking statements. Such statements reflect TORM's current expectations and are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could negatively impact TORM's business. To understand these risks and uncertainties, please read TORM's announcements and filings with The US Securities and Exchange Commission. The presentation may include statements and illustrations concerning risks, plans, objectives, goals, strategies, future events or performance, and underlying assumptions and other statements, which are other than statements of historical facts. The forward-looking statements in this presentation are based upon various assumptions, many of which are based, in turn, upon further assumptions, including without limitation, TORM's examination of historical operating trends, data contained in our records and other data available from third parties. As many of these factors are subject to significant uncertainties and contingencies which are difficult or impossible to predict and are beyond our control, TORM makes no warranties or representations about accuracy, sequence, timeliness or completeness of the content of this presentation. 2

  3. Highlights Highlights for Q1 2012 Tanker market Dry bulk market Finance • Q1 loss before tax of USD 79m reflecting challenging market conditions • Result was negatively impacted by TORM’s financial position in the challenging markets Results • Includes one-offs related to vessel sales (USD -16m), mark-to-market effects (USD 11m) and advisory fees related to restructuring of the capital structure (USD -22m) • LR2 and LR1 suffered from oversupply of vessels and lower demand in the East market • Tanker MR segment in the West was firmer in Q1 2012 • EBIT of USD -42m in Q1 2012, despite beating commercial spot benchmarks again • Bulk market under significant pressure in Q1 2012 due to tonnage influx, slower Chinese demand growth and the delayed grain season Bulk • EBIT of USD 3m in Q1 2012 • Continued high tonnage inflow in all segments - Manageable order book for product tankers • S&P Vessel prices continued to slide into Q1 2012 • Net loss from vessel sales of USD 16m (Tanker Division) • Result for 2012 is subject to considerable uncertainty given TORM’s situation and the changes to the Company’s business model that may follow Guidance • Consequently, no earnings guidance until a solution is in place • A conditional framework agreement reached with the bank group and time charter partners Framework – New working capital (USD 100m) and debt repayment relief agreement – Time charter contracts realigned to market level or terminated • In exchange for these concessions the bank group and time charter partner will become majority shareholders 3

  4. Highlights TORM is pursuing the framework agreement in principle Tanker market Dry bulk market announced on 4 April 2012 Finance Banks New capital Extension of payments until 31 December USD 100m in working capital over two 2016 years *** Majority owners of the Company going forward T/C-in partners Newbuilding program Compre- T/C-rates adjusted to market Elimination of newbuilding program hensive level or contracts terminated completed finance *** solution for TORM Co-owners of the Company going forward TORM Cost and cash initiatives with a cumulative effect of at least USD100m over three years *** Cost program office in place and the identified initiatives under implementation 4

  5. Highlights Key steps toward documenting and finalizing framework Tanker market Dry bulk market agreement Finance Step Status Comment  • Announced on 4 April 2012 Enter into framework agreement  • Given by shareholders at AGM 23 April 2012 Obtain necessary authorisations (  ) • Decision made at AGM Decrease share capital • Awaiting administrative process • Legally binding contract with main terms and Agree on transaction structure In progress conditions • Full documentation on all aspects Finalize completion Pending • Contracts and new funding comes into effect • Share capital increased (method and size TBD) • Prospectus required to make shares eligible Admit new shares for trading Pending for trading at NASDAQ 5

  6. Highlights Q1 2012 proved to be challenging Tanker market Dry bulk market Finance Financial highlights for Q1 2012 USD million Q1 2012 Q1 2011 2011 2010 2009 P&L • Q1 2012 loss before tax of USD Gross profit/(loss) 27 28 81 180 243 79m (USD -45m in Q1 2011) • Q1 2012 result driven by Sale of vessels -16 -6 -53 2 33 – Challenging freight rate EBITDA -7 4 -44 97 203 environment Profit((loss) before tax -79 -45 -451 -136 -19 – Effects from vessels sales of USD -16m (USD -6m in Q1 Balance 2011) Equity 569 1,075 644 1,115 1,247 – Extraordinary advisory costs of USD 22m NIBD 1,838 1,853 1,787 1,875 1,683 – Mark-to-market gains of USD Cash and cash equivalents 29 142 86 120 122 11m • Financing cash flow of USD -5m Cash flow statement positively affected by standstill Operating cash flow -57 -11 -75 -1 116 agreement with the bank group Investment cash flow 5 33 168 -187 -199 Financing cash flow -5 0 -128 186 37 6

  7. Highlights Product tanker freight rates are still under pressure and Tanker market Dry bulk market especially the LR2 segment is weak due to oversupply of tonnage Finance Freight rates in USDt/day 80 LR2 (TC1) 70 60 50 LR2 and LR1 40 • Positive effects: 30 – Naphtha arbitrage from the West to the Far 20 East open 10 – Jet fuel arbitrage from the Arabian Gulf to the 0 West open Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 70 LR1 (TC5) • Negative effects: 60 – Oversupply of tonnage 2007-2011 range 2012 2011 – Weak East market with reduced naphtha 50 exports from India/Middle East 40 30 20 10 0 MR 50 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec MR (TC2) • Positive effects: – Refinery closures; Hovensa and Valero in Caribs 2007-2011 range 2012 2011 40 – Refinery expansion in the US Gulf 30 – Demand from South America and West Africa • Negative impacts: 20 – Reduced demand in Asia pushing more ships into the Arabian Gulf and West markets 10 – Declining gasoline demand in the US 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 7 2007 - 2011 range 2012 2011 7 Source: Clarksons, 20 April 2012. Spot earnings: LR2: TC1 (Ras Tanura-> Chiba), LR1: TC5 (Ras Tanura-> Chiba) and MRT: C2 (Rotterdam->NY)

  8. Highlights Achieved spot rates are well above benchmarks Tanker market Dry bulk market Finance TORM spot rate Benchmark TORM spot vs. benchmark Q1 2012 (USD/day) • TORM’s financial position posed +14% +394% a challenge as markets were low 15,000 +260% and customers had alternatives • Nevertheless, TORM outper- 10,000 formanced on all segment due to – Relative large exposure to West market (MR & LR1) 5,000 – Increased East Africa activity (LR2) – Relative higher dirty market 0 than clean (LR2) LR2 LR1 MR – Utilization of triangulation TORM spot vs. benchmark last 4 quarters (USD/day) +23% 15,000 +72% +23% • Consistent spot rates that exceed benchmarks due to 10,000 – Large and high quality fleet – Cooperation on key functions – Demonstrating organizational 5,000 strengths 0 LR2 LR1 MR 8 Source: Clarksons, 20 April 2012. Spot earnings: LR2: TC1 (Ras Tanura-> Chiba), LR1: TC5 (Ras Tanura-> Chiba) and MRT: C2 (Rotterdam -> NY)

  9. Highlights Product market impacted by slow growth in global oil demand Tanker market Dry bulk market and refinery shut downs in America and Europe Finance Slow growth in world oil demand Mbbl/day Y-O-Y change Global oil demand Y-O-Y % 90 3,5 3,0 • 2012 will likely show modest 89 2,5 expansion in oil product 88 consumption due to subdued 2,0 economic backdrop coinciding 1,5 87 with relatively high oil prices 1,0 86 0,5 85 0,0 Q1 10 Q2 10 Q3 10 Q4 10 Q1 11 Q2 11 Q3 11 Q4 11 Q1 12 Refinery closures (mbbl/day) 2,0 Asia Pacific • Planned shut down of refineries 1,7 on the US East Coast will require Europe increased imports of gasoline to 1,5 North America the US, likely from India and 1,2 Other Europe • More triangulation expected in 1,0 the Atlantic due to refinery 0,6 expansions in Latin America 0,5 adding distillate cargoes for 0,2 export to Europe, Africa and South America 0,0 2010 2011 2012E 2013E 9 Source: IEA Oil Market Report 14 March 2012 & JBC Energy

  10. Highlights Order book for product tanker is manageable Tanker market Dry bulk market Finance Net fleet growth y-o-y in % of total fleet 16% LR2 LR1 MR Handysize • Net fleet growth is expected to gradually decline to manageable levels in 2012-2014 • Scrapping will mostly impact Handysize leading to a negative 9% 8% fleet growth 8% • 6% Total order book (2012-13E) 5% 5% stands at ~5% of total fleet (# of 4% 4% vessels) 3% 3% • Possibility to get newbuilding 1% 1% order delivered in second half 2013 -1% -2% -3% 2010 2011 2012E 2013E 10 Note: Number of vessels beginning 2012: LR2 203, LR1 339, MR 958, Handy 552 Note: Net fleet growth: Gross order book adjusted for expected scrapping 10 Source: SSY, 3 May 2012

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend