1
play

1 After the first cesarean After the first cesarean Risks for - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Disclosures No financial disclosures LEADING THE QUEST FOR HEALTH No off-label use of medications Nulliparous Term Singleton Vertex (NTSV): Is Healthy People 2020 Goal Possible? Kimberly D. Gregory MD, MPH Vice Chair Womens


  1. Disclosures � No financial disclosures LEADING THE QUEST FOR HEALTH  � No off-label use of medications Nulliparous Term Singleton Vertex (NTSV): Is Healthy People 2020 Goal Possible? Kimberly D. Gregory MD, MPH Vice Chair Women’s Healthcare Quality & Performance improvement Department Obstetrics & Gynecology Cedars Sinai Medical Center Professor, David Geffen School of Medicine & UCLA School of Public Health KD Gregory 5/2014 KD Gregory 5/2014 Objectives Why is this important? � Cesarean delivery is the most commonly performed � Participants will be able to surgical procedure in the United States —Discuss the different strategies for defining normal � Approximately 1/3 of pregnancies are delivered via and abnormal labor cesarean —Describe the risks associated with cesarean � In 2010, 26.4% of low risk women underwent a delivery with an emphasis on nulliparous patients cesarean —Discuss potential interventions which may help —Low risk = nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex reduce the risk of having the ‘first’ cesarean (NTSV) delivery and impact the NTSV rate � Over 90% of women undergoing a primary cesarean in the US will have a repeat cesarean KD Gregory 5/2014 KD Gregory 5/2014 1

  2. After the first cesarean… After the first cesarean… � Risks for abnormal placentation increase � Maternal risk for complications increase — Previa � Intraoperative risks — Accreta — Increta —Hemorrhage — Percreta —Injury to viscera � Risk of uterine rupture increases — Fetal/Maternal jeopardy � Bowel � With all of these, there is an increased risk for: � Bladder — Hysterectomy —Adhesions — Blood transfusion — Wound infection/breakdown — DVT KD Gregory 5/2014 KD Gregory 5/2014 Summary � The decision to undertake the first cesarean has profound implications on a woman’s future reproductive health � Much of labor management in the US relies on information based on Friedman’s curves (1955) � Some of these concepts have been challenged Let’s start with the 1950’s —Review of key concepts introduced throughout the years regarding labor management KD Gregory 5/2014 KD Gregory 5/2014 2

  3. Historical Background Friedman Curve � Friedman curve 1955 � Focused on looking at rate of cervical dilation � 500 patients � Recorded all ‘rectal’ and ‘vaginal’ exams —Ages 13-42 (mostly 20-30) � Dilation plotted over time —SVD in 202 (40.4%) � Noted features such as age, pelvis type, fetal presentation, — Low forceps in 256 (51.2%) fetal station —Mid forceps in 19 (3.8%) — Cesarean delivery 9 (1.8%) � Augmentation / induction —69 patients (13.8%) received pitocin � 22 for ‘induction’ Individually plotted by hand! � 47 for ‘stimulation’ KD Gregory 5/2014 KD Gregory 5/2014 Friedman 1955 Friedman Curve – ‘Ideal Labor’ 95%tile Characteristic Mean Range Stat Maximum ‘Primagravidas whose labors Latent phase (hr) 8.6 1.0-44 20.6 progressed Active phase (hr) 4.9 0.8-34 11.7 normally without Deceleration (hr) 0.9 0.0-14 3.3 Iatrogenic Max slope (cm/hr) 3.0 0.4-12 6.8 tampering.’ First stage (hr) 13.3 2.0-58 28.5 Second stage (hr) 0.95 0.0-5.5 2.5 14.3 hrs 31 hrs Friedman EA. Primagravid Labor: A graphostatistical Analysis. Friedman EA. Primagravid Labor: A graphostatistical Obstet Gynecol 1955 (6): 567-89. Analysis. Obstet Gynecol 1955 (6): 567-89. KD Gregory 5/2014 KD Gregory 5/2014 3

  4. On to the 1970’s… Friedman Curve � ‘Clinical Inertia’ — 46 patients Average of 13 hours in latent phase � Average of 12.2 hours in active phase � Second stage was 1.6 hours � Maximum slope was 1.4 cm / hr � — Primary inertia 21 patients (46%) � — Secondary inertia 20 patients (43%) These people didn’t � — Reasons: fit his curves! Excessive medication (46%) � CPD (28%) � Occiput posterior (28%) � Caudal Anesthesia (22%) � Unknown � KD Gregory 5/2014 KD Gregory 5/2014 Alternate Ways to Monitor Labor Progress Cervicograph � Founded on Friedman’s � Philpott and Castle (1972) work —Cervicograph — Low resource conditions � Composed of alert and action lines — Starts at 3 cm plotted against time (hours) — Alert: close observation — Action: augment/transfer —Partograph Philpott & Castle, J Ob Gyn Brit Comm 1972 KD Gregory 5/2014 KD Gregory 5/2014 4

  5. On to the 1990s…. WHO Partograph � Definition of “active phase” — Shift from “rate of change” (slope) to specific cm — 3 cm KD Gregory 5/2014 KD Gregory 5/2014 Active Phase Labor Arrest Active Phase Arrest � Term, gravid patients � Rouse et al (1999) � Spontaneous labor —Prospectively studied a labor-management � Active phase arrest protocol which mandated at least 4 hours of — 4 cm dilated oxytocin prior to cesarean delivery for active — < 1 cm in 2 hours of cervical change phase arrest � Excluded: —Malpresentation, prior cesarean deliveries, multiple gestation, and nonreassuring fetal heart tracings (NRFHT) KD Gregory 5/2014 KD Gregory 5/2014 5

  6. Active Phase Arrest Active Phase Arrest � After the diagnosis of active phase arrest, oxytocin was initiated to achieve >200 Mv Units (IUPC) Vaginal delivery and infection rate based on labor progress and time after active phase arrest � Cesarean delivery not performed until 4 hours with adequate MVU —Or a minimum of 6 hours (if adequacy not achieved) Rouse DJ et al. Failed Labor Induction . Obstet Gynecol 2011 (117): 267-72. (modified) KD Gregory 5/2014 KD Gregory 5/2014 Rouse’s Take Home Point: A little more time… � 2 hours may not be enough time for some women to progress in labor � A minimum of 4 hours of oxytocin-augmented labor (adequate Mv units) should be allowed � For women who do not achieve adequate mvu, a minimum of 6 hours of augmentation should be allowed for these patients Into the 21 st century… KD Gregory 5/2014 KD Gregory 5/2014 6

  7. Reassessing Friedman in the 21 st century Study populations REASSESSMENT OF THE FRIEDMAN CURVE (2002) Zhang J, Troendle JF, Yancey MK. Reassessing the labor curve in nulliparous women . Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002 (187): 824-8. Comparison of Friedman and Zhang Labor Curves Zhang J, Troendle JF, Yancey MK. Reassessing the labor curve in nulliparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002 (187): 824-8. (modified) KD Gregory 5/2014 KD Gregory 5/2014 Zhang Conclusions � Labor progress may be more gradual than originally thought (especially for nulliparous 5 cm patients) Rate of change based on cervix exam � Women may enter active labor between 3-5 cm Cervix (cm) dilation � Even the course of the active phase of labor will vary from person to person —May result in a flatter curve � Friedman’s curve likely represents an individual Labor Duration (hrs) patient with an ‘ideal’ curve Zhang J, Troendle JF, Yancey MK. Reassessing the labor curve in nulliparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002 (187): 824-8. (modified KD Gregory 5/2014 KD Gregory 5/2014 7

  8. Recap Safe Labor � Friedman focused on individual progress, defined � Consortium for Safe Labor* active labor based on maximum slope rate of change � Large multicenter study � Latent phase could be a long time � Contemporary women in spontaneous labor undergoing the ‘usual’ care may: � Philpott & Castle, WHO started curves at 3 cm; ignored latent phase and/or early labor — Take 6 hours to change from 4-5 cm — Take more than 3 hours to change from 5-6 cm � Zhang nulliparous slower, mimics Friedman after — After that point, labor curve is steeper active phase; rate of change occurs around 5 cm � Redefine the starting point of active labor from 4 cm to 6 —Similar population as Friedman; more cm contemporaneous cohort � Does this mean that Friedman’s results are wrong? —Data started at 3 cm *includes patients from CSMC (2002-2008) KD Gregory 5/2014 KD Gregory 5/2014 Demographics Safe Labor Consortium 2002-2008 Cervical Exam on Admission 95%tile of cumulative duration of spontaneous Diverse pop labor from admission to vaginal delivery Zhang et al. Contemp Labor Patterns Obstet Gynecol 2010 KD Gregory 5/2014 KD Gregory 5/2014 8

  9. Duration of Labor by Method of Onset Duration of Labor Based on Exam on Admission “ 6 is the new 4” Median (95%tile) After “active phase” (6 cm) doesn’t matter, all “clinically” the same Zhang et al. Contemp Labor Patterns. Obstet Gynecol 2010 (modified) KD Gregory 5/2014 KD Gregory 5/2014 Implications Duration of Labor by Method of Onset, Parity � If the definition of active labor is shifted to 6 cm —many cesarean deliveries performed prior to Spontaneous Induction Multips Multips that point would be considered “latent phase Nullips Nullips cesareans” � Arrest of labor diagnosis prior to 6 cm of cervical dilation needs to be considered carefully —Zhang et al KD Gregory 5/2014 KD Gregory 5/2014 9

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend