SLIDE 8 8
Emergent Systems, Jonny Pettersson, UmU
Adaptive Path Optimization
❒ How do they do it?
❍ Deposit pheromone
- Can be several different
- Can detect gradients and
frequency of contact
❍ Does not follow trails
perfectly
❍ Feedback reinforces
”good” trails
28/1 - 13 Emergent Systems, Jonny Pettersson, UmU
Adaptive Path Optimization
❒ Adaptive significance
❍ Chooses the “best” food source ❍ Chooses the shortest trail ❍ Adapt grade of exploration to the quality of the
food source
❍ Collective decision making
❒ Observations at trail formation
❍ If equal length, one is chosen randomly ❍ Sometimes a longer/worse is selected ❍ Pros
- Easier to follow
- Easier to protect
- Safer
28/1 - 13 Emergent Systems, Jonny Pettersson, UmU
Formation of trails
❒ Find trail
❍ ”Forager” deposit pheromone ❍ How and when pheromone is deposited varies ❍ Other follows trail ❍ Pheromone also act as orientation aid
❒ Follow trail
❍ PL = ((CL + k)h) /((CL + k)h + (CR + k)h) ❍ CL, CR : concentration of pheromone ❍ k, h: to fit the model to experimental data
❒ Pheromone evaporation
❍ Trails can last several hours to several months ❍ The lifetime of pheromone
- average 30-60 min, but can be detected much longer
28/1 - 13