Y P Clinical Applications O of TMS C T & O Evidence in - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

y p
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Y P Clinical Applications O of TMS C T & O Evidence in - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Y P Clinical Applications O of TMS C T & O Evidence in N Depression O D Adam Stern, M.D. E 2553480 S Director of Psychiatric Applications A Berenson-Allen Center for E Noninvasive Brain Stimulation, BIDMC L Instructor in


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Clinical Applications

  • f TMS

& Evidence in Depression

2553480

Adam Stern, M.D.

Director of Psychiatric Applications Berenson-Allen Center for Noninvasive Brain Stimulation, BIDMC Instructor in Psychiatry Harvard Medical School

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Overview

  • TMS Basics in Psychiatry
  • TMS studies in depression
  • Treatment program at BIDMC

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Disclosures

Research has been supported by

Harvard Catalyst / The Harvard Clinical and Translational Science Center (National Center for Research Resources and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health Award UL1 TR001102) and financial contributions from Harvard University and its affiliated academic health centers. The content is solely the responsibility of the author and does not necessarily represent the official views of Harvard Catalyst, Harvard University and its affiliated academic healthcare centers,

  • r the National Institutes of Health.

NARSAD Young Investigator Grant from the Brain and Behavior Research Foundation

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Disclosures (cont.)

  • TMS has been approved for treatment in

treatment-resistant depression though we may discuss other uses which have not been FDA approved.

  • Some portion of the material has been

shared by other members of the BA-CNBS and are used with permission.

  • I have no financial conflicts to report.

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-5
SLIDE 5

What is the need for non-invasive brain stimulation?

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

1st century 1900 ’50s ’60s ’70s ’80s ’90s ’30s ’40s

“Black Bile” ECT TCAs MAOIs SSRIs Lithium Heterocyclics Pharmacologic Refinements

Developments in Medical Treatment of Depression

Courtesy of: ASCP Psychopharmacology Curriculum: “Electroconvulsive Therapy”

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-7
SLIDE 7

What about Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT)?

Image courtesy of: http://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/topics/brain- stimulation-therapies/brain-stimulation- therapies.shtml

  • Many decades of safety

and efficacy data

  • Gold Standard for

treatment-resistant depression

  • Invasive stimulation

requiring anesthesia with frequent cognitive adverse effects

  • Enormous stigma

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-8
SLIDE 8

A.T. Barker 1984

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Electro-Magnetic Induction

“I think I got hold of a good thing”

  • M. Faraday

29 August 1831

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Stimulation Coils

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Equipment Repetitive Stimulators

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Topographic resolution

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Stern AP, Cohen D. Neuropsychiatry 2013.

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Scalp to Brain Relation

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-15
SLIDE 15

TMS Parameters

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-16
SLIDE 16

rTMS: Lasting Modulation of Cortical Activity

Sham TMS

TMS

1 Hz TMS 20 Hz TMS

Valero et al. 2002

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Therapeutic Applications of rTMS

  • Depression
  • Bipolar Disorder
  • OCD
  • PTSD
  • Schizophrenia
  • Auditory Hallucinoses
  • Pain

– Visceral pain – Atypical facial pain – Phantom pain

  • PD
  • Focal dystonia
  • Epilepsy

– Myoclonic epilepsy – Focal status epilepticus

  • Stuttering
  • Tics
  • Neurorehabilitation

– Neglect – Aphasia – Hand weakness

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Potential Adverse Effects

  • Common:

– Headache – Auditory effects

  • Rare

– Seizure induction – Effects on Cognition – Mania – Endocrine effects

Safety Guidelines Monitoring

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-19
SLIDE 19

2013_______ Brainsway DeepTMS FDA cleared

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-20
SLIDE 20

rTMS in Depression

  • Kolbinger et al. 1993, 95
  • Grisaru et al. 1994
  • George et al. 1996
  • Pascual-Leone et al. 1996

– Double Blind – Multiple Control Conditions – 17 patients – 9/17 with ∂HDRS > 50% Lancet 1996

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-21
SLIDE 21

rTMS for depression treatment Efficacy - Review

Gershon, Dannon and Grunhaus (Am J Psychiatry 2003; 160:835–845)

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-22
SLIDE 22

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Sen‐Star Treatment Link

4 key functions: * Contact sensing to ensure treatment coil is positioned correctly * Magnetic field confirmation to ensure patient receives desired treatment * Surface field cancellation to reduce stimulation of the scalp * Charge approximately $100 per treatment

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Stimulation Parameters 10 pulses/sec 120% of motor threshold 3000 pulses/session 4–6 weeks Iron-core coil

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-25
SLIDE 25

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-26
SLIDE 26

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Phase I Drug-Free Lead-I n

7-10 days

Phase I I Acute Treatment Phase

6 weeks

Phase I I I Taper Phase

3 weeks

Primary Timepoint @ 4 weeks Durability of Effect @ 9 weeks [TMS Taper + Open-label AD Mono-Rx]

Study 101 Trial Design

Randomized, Double‐blind, Sham‐Controlled

Secondary Timepoint @ 6 weeks NeuroStar TMS Therapy (N= 155) Sham TMS (N= 146) Randomization n= 325

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-28
SLIDE 28

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-29
SLIDE 29

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-30
SLIDE 30

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-31
SLIDE 31

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-32
SLIDE 32

How does TMS compare to other approaches for treatment‐resistant depression?

  • Olanzapine/Fluoxetine (Thase, 2007): 0.33
  • Aripiprazole (Marcus, 2008): 0.34
  • Neurostar TMS Therapy (Demitrack, 2009): 0.52
  • Brainsway DeepTMS (Levkovitz, 2015): 0.76
  • Electroconvulsive Therapy (UK ECT Review Group, 2003): 0.91

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Brainsway DeepTMS: A New Device

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-34
SLIDE 34

CONSORT

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Levkovitz, et al. World Psychiatry 2015;14:64–73

DeepTMS HDRS Change

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-36
SLIDE 36

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Is this as good as it gets? Probably Not.

  • 100

100 200

  • 50

50 100

HAM-D (rho=0.43**) BDI (rho=0.51***) % change MEP amplitude % reduction depression score Oliveira-Maia A, Press DZ, Pascual-Leone A. (preliminary/submitted): Modulation of motor cortex excitability predicts antidepressant response to prefrontal cortex repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-38
SLIDE 38

What about Stim. Target?

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Patient Referral

  • For patients with

medication resistant depression

  • Must be under care of

psychiatrist

  • Referral form on

tmslab.org or call: 667‐0307

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Initial Evaluation

  • Referral from treating psychiatrist
  • Neurology

– Contraindications – Effect of medication on TMS

  • Psychiatry

– Caution if: Psychotic depression, bipolar, personality disorders – At least one adequate trial of antidepressant medication

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-41
SLIDE 41

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Consent

  • Discussion of on‐label vs. off‐label treatment
  • Explanation of side‐effects

– Seizure – Headache – Neck pain – Scalp pain

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Initiation Phase

  • Treatments daily (excluding weekends)
  • Various mood assessments

daily/weekly/monthly

  • Minimum 2 weeks
  • Maximum 4‐6 weeks

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Assessment tools

  • Beck, Hamilton, Analogue scale
  • Target symptoms
  • Clinician evaluation of patient
  • Other sources of information (e.g. family, referring

psychiatrist)

  • Side effects questionnaire
  • Weekly meeting of all staff to discuss progress

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Alternatives being investigated

  • Choosing protocol on clinical parameters

(anxiety, risk of mania/sz)

  • Using rs‐fMRI guidance for targeting
  • Using anatomical MRI to help with intensity of

stimulation (particularly in elderly)

  • Plasticity measures as guide
  • Others: mood induction, more than one

session/day

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-46
SLIDE 46

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Maintenance Phase

  • Minimal evidence (absence of evidence, not evidence
  • f absence)
  • Relapse prevention

– Start with weekly treatment – Gradually space out sessions

  • “Watchful Waiting”

– Patient presents when feeling worse

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Cost

  • Insurance coverage depends on location

– Medicare jurisdiction – Private payers

  • Additional fee for assessments
  • Helping with billing, talking with payers

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-49
SLIDE 49

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-50
SLIDE 50

Conclusions

  • TMS can be used to affect brain circuitry
  • TMS has potential therapeutic effects for

certain neuropsychiatric disorders

  • It is FDA cleared for treatment of medication

resistant depression

  • Our clinical program is on forefront of

treatment (bidmc.org/tms or tmslab.org)

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-51
SLIDE 51

I am confident that I know how to refer patients for rTMS

  • Mean 2.71 (3.5 is neutral)
  • Disagree 69.9%, Agree 30.1%

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-52
SLIDE 52
  • Mean 3.76
  • Disagree 31.6%, Agree 68.4% (even though they don’t know how!)

I will likely refer patients for TMS in the future

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-53
SLIDE 53
  • Mean 2.30
  • Residents 2.05, Faculty 2.52 (p<0.01)
  • Academic 2.20, Community 2.59 (p=0.092)

approaches significance

I am confident that TMS is covered by most insurance plans

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-54
SLIDE 54

I feel that TMS is an effective treatment for treatment-resistant depression:

  • Mean 3.82

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y

slide-55
SLIDE 55
  • Mean 2.89

I know and understand the FDA indications for TMS use in treatment-resistant depression:

P L E A S E D O N O T C O P Y