wui an insurmountable task
play

WUI: An insurmountable task??? Urbanization brings Fragmentation - PDF document

C. Dicus & K. Defino Association for Fire Ecology 2008 The Paradox of Vegetative Fire Risk vs. Societal Benefits in a SW Wildland-Urban Interface Community Christopher A. Dicus Kenneth Delfino WUI: An insurmountable task???


  1. C. Dicus & K. Defino Association for Fire Ecology 2008 The Paradox of Vegetative Fire Risk vs. Societal Benefits in a SW Wildland-Urban Interface Community Christopher A. Dicus Kenneth Delfino WUI: An insurmountable task??? • Urbanization brings… • Fragmentation • > ignitions • >costs & losses, type conversion • >Invasive species • Fuel treatments 1

  2. C. Dicus & K. Defino Association for Fire Ecology 2008 Hazards vs. benefits Pismo Beach, California • Vegetation provides benefits • Air pollution removal • Carbon sequestration Vegetation is • (Take THAT THAT peak oil!!!) • Soil stabilization more than fuel!! • Home cooling costs • Stormwater retention • Wildlife habitat • And on and on… Previously… • FARSITE not effective at fine- scale parcel-level analysis • CITYgreen not effective at… • anything • (except spending tax dollars) • Would I-tree work??? • UFORE • (Urban Forest Effects Model) • Air pollution removal • C sequestration • Slew of other goodies 2

  3. C. Dicus & K. Defino Association for Fire Ecology 2008 The objectives…. For major ecotypes in an E. Sierra, high- desert WUI community, determine … 1. Potential fire behavior 2. Societal benefits • Pollution removal • C sequestration 3. If I-tree is going to work Study Site Study Site • Kennedy Meadows • Eastern Sierras • ~6500’ between Sierra Crest and Mojave Desert 3

  4. C. Dicus & K. Defino Association for Fire Ecology 2008 Study Site Study Site • Risk assessed in 2006 as part of consulting work Pinyon • Pinyon pine • Pinus monophylla • Juniper (minor) • Juniperus californica • Some litter, grass, and shrubs 4

  5. C. Dicus & K. Defino Association for Fire Ecology 2008 Sagebrush • Sagebrush • Artemisia tridentata • Rabbit brush • Ericameria nauseosus Manter Fire (2000) • Both burned… • Until the wind stopped 5

  6. C. Dicus & K. Defino Association for Fire Ecology 2008 Burned • Low annual grasses • (when it rains) • Pinyon snags • Very little regeneration Fire Behavior • Fuel per SSGIC • Pinyon = TU1 • Sagebrush = GS2 • Burned = GR1 • Weather per Manter • Calibrated in FARSITE per Manter progression • Midflame Winds = 15 mph upslope • High Temp = 95 o F • RH = 10% 6

  7. C. Dicus & K. Defino Association for Fire Ecology 2008 Societal benefits • 3 plots per ecotype • Trees • Species, DBH, Ht, Crown Base Height and width • Shrubs • Species, Ht, Width, % Crown cover • Calculated benefits for entire study area • Partitioned benefits via leaf area estimates • Trees easy • Shrubs hard . 7

  8. C. Dicus & K. Defino Association for Fire Ecology 2008 Rate of Spread (chains/hr) Sagebrush Sagebrush Burned Burned n n o o y n y n P i i P # I Structures Flame Length (ft) <VALUE> 0 <4' 4'-8' 8'-11' 11'+ 8

  9. C. Dicus & K. Defino Association for Fire Ecology 2008 Flame Length (ft) h h s s u u r r b b e e g g a a S S Pinyon Pinyon Burned Burned Pollutant Removal (kg ha -1 yr -1 ) 12.00 Pinyon ABC Sagebrush 10.00 Burned 8.00 α = 0.05 for g/ha/yr treatment 6.00 effects K 4.00 ABC 2.00 AAB ABC ABC 0.00 PM10 CO NO2 O3 S02 Pollutant 9

  10. C. Dicus & K. Defino Association for Fire Ecology 2008 Pollutant Removal ($ ha -1 yr -1 ) ABC 70.00 Pinyon Sagebrush 60.00 Burned ABC 50.00 α = 0.05 for 40.00 $/ha/yr treatment effects 30.00 20.00 ABC ABC 10.00 AAB ABC 0.00 Total PM10 CO NO2 O3 S02 Pollutant Stored C (kg/ha) A AB α = 0.05 for 16000.00 treatment 14000.00 effects 12000.00 A 10000.00 K g/ha 8000.00 6000.00 B 4000.00 2000.00 0.00 Pinyon Sagebrush Burned Ecotype 10

  11. C. Dicus & K. Defino Association for Fire Ecology 2008 C sequestration A 700.00 600.00 500.00 Kg/ha/yr 400.00 300.00 200.00 B B 100.00 0.00 Pinyon Burned Ecotype So what does it mean??? • Fire Behavior: Shrubs>Pinyon>Burned Fire Behavior: Shrubs>Pinyon>Burned • • Didn Didn’ ’t consider transition to crown fire t consider transition to crown fire • • • Flames <1/2 your problem Flames <1/2 your problem • Fire behavior pretty straight forward Fire behavior pretty straight forward • • • Will also use FFE/FVS where possible Will also use FFE/FVS where possible • Beware the near Beware the near- -structure variability!!! structure variability!!! • • Benefits: Pinyon Benefits: Pinyon greatest greatest • • I I- -Tree (UFORE) needs tweaking Tree (UFORE) needs tweaking • • • Had to send away data for analysis Had to send away data for analysis • • I I- -Tree good, I Tree good, I- -Shrub needed Shrub needed − Shrubs still the red Shrubs still the red- -headed stepchild headed stepchild − 11

  12. C. Dicus & K. Defino Association for Fire Ecology 2008 Jon Large • Future work • Specific fuel treatments Chris Hamma Alex Kirkpatrick Holistic approach needed… Construction Fuels Management Suppression Land-use planning Education 12

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend