why are we here
play

Why are we here? New expectations regarding extreme disaster Crisis - PDF document

3/6/2014 Why are we here? New expectations regarding extreme disaster Crisis Standards of Care response from the Feds EMS Work Group Institutes of Medicine, Crisis Standards of Care October 10, 2013 EMS likely to be the first to


  1. 3/6/2014 Why are we here? • New expectations regarding extreme disaster Crisis Standards of Care response from the Feds EMS Work Group • Institutes of Medicine, Crisis Standards of Care October 10, 2013 • EMS likely to be the first to implement • Success only achieved with input from experts Terry Mullins, Bureau Chief • Desire to take care of our community and AzDHS, EMS and Trauma System support public’s health azdhs.gov azdhs.gov He alth and We llne ss for all Ar izonans He alth and We llne ss for all Ar izonans 1 2 EMS Work Group Charter Agenda PURPOSE: Provide guidance in defining the roles and responsibilities of pre ‐ hospital care, an essential component of the continuum of emergency health care, in the provision of timely medical response to the community during extreme emergency disaster situations by developing crisis standards of care (CSC) for the state of Arizona . • Informational briefing on Crisis Standards of GOALS: Care (CSC) • Maintain a coordinated and integrated emergency response system congruent with the state CSC plan and the guidance of the SDMAC (Statewide Disaster Management Advisory Committee). • Importance of EMS in continuum of care • Develop plan to address shortages of limited staff, supplies and equipment, a limited supply of fuel and medications, limited mutual aid and disruption of coordination and • Arizona’s Conceptual Framework: the communication systems. • Explore process for changes in scope of practice , functioning in extraordinary settings, Balanced Scorecard (AzBSC) providing care for longer periods of time and methods for just ‐ in ‐ time training. • Ensure proposed practices are consistent across jurisdictions . • Cross ‐ walk AZ process with IOM • Review EMS authority currently mandated by Arizona statutes. • Conduct an EMS Incident Response and Readiness Assessment (EIRRA ) and preform a gap recommendations analysis. • Determine the current status and capacity of Arizona’s dispatch centers. • Develop gap analysis and action plan • Address needs of urban, suburban and rural locations in planning. azdhs.gov azdhs.gov He alth and We llne ss for all Ar izonans He alth and We llne ss for all Ar izonans 3 4 Crisis Standards of Care Planning in AZ • 2008 ‐ 2009 Partners from Arizona Hospital and Healthcare Association, Arizona Medical Association, ADHS, and numerous Crisis Standards of Care other partners developed Disaster Triage Protocol Recommendations Briefing • Spring 2009, H1N1 appears, the Assistant Scretary for Preparedness and Response (ASPR) asks the Institutes of Medicine (IOM) to develop guidance Wendy Lyons, RN, BSN, MSL WHL Enterprises • Later in 2009, IOM defines term “Crisis Standards of Care” in EMS Work Group the “letter report” October 10, 2013 • Jan. 2011, ADHS conducts Disaster Triage Protocol Workshop with nearly 100 attendees in Phoenix. After Action Report is developed along with recommendations azdhs.gov azdhs.gov He alth and We llne ss for all Ar izonans He alth and We llne ss for all Ar izonans 5 6 1

  2. 3/6/2014 Crisis Standards of Care Planning in AZ Crisis Standards of Care • IOM held public meetings in May & July 2011 to inform CSC guidance A Systems Framework for Catastrophic • March 2012, IOM releases 7 volumes of guidance Disaster Response • Jan. 24, 2013 – Initial Planning Workshop for AZ CSC Plan VOLUME 1: Introduction and CSC Framework VOLUME 2: State and Local Government • June 27, 2013 – Mid Planning workshop for AZ CSC Plan VOLUME 3: EMS VOLUME 4: Hospital • July 17, 2013 ‐ First Workgroup meetings for Clinical and Legal/Ethical Workgroups VOLUME 5: Alternate Care Site Facilities VOLUME 6: Public Engagement • August 28, 2013 ‐ First Meeting for Public Engagement WG VOLUME 7: Appendices • GOAL – Feb 2014 – Plan Developed, Implemented, and Tested azdhs.gov azdhs.gov He alth and We llne ss for all Ar izonans He alth and We llne ss for all Ar izonans 7 8 CSC Assumptions Catastrophic Disaster Defined for catastrophic disaster response conditions: 1) Most or all of the community’s infrastructure is • Resources are unavailable or undeliverable across the impacted. continuum of care 2) Local officials are unable to perform usual roles for • Similar strategies being invoked by other healthcare delivery a period of time extending well beyond the initial systems aftermath of the incident • Patient transfer not possible 3) Most or all routine community functions are • Access to medical countermeasures (vaccine, meds, immediately and simultaneously disrupted antidotes, blood) likely to be limited 4) Surrounding communities are similarly affected, • Available local, regional, state, federal resource caches and thus there are no regional resources (equip, supplies, meds) have been distributed ‐ no short term resupply (IOM, Introduction and CSC Framework 1 ‐ 15) (IOM, Crisis Standards of Care , 1 ‐ 10) azdhs.gov azdhs.gov He alth and We llne ss for all Ar izonans He alth and We llne ss for all Ar izonans 9 10 Five Key Elements for all CSC Plans Crisis Standards of Care Defined  A strong ethical grounding … based transparency, consistency, The level of care possible during a crisis or disaster due to limitations in proportionality, and accountability supplies, staff, environment, or other factors . These standards will usually incorporate the following principles:  Integrated and ongoing community and provider engagement , education, and communication 1) prioritize population health rather than individual outcomes; 2) respect ethical principles of beneficence, stewardship, equity,  The necessary legal authority and protections and legal environment in and trust; which CSC can be ethically and optimally implemented 3) modify regulatory requirements to provide liability protection for healthcare providers making resource allocation decisions;  Ensure intrastate & interstate consistency during CSC 4) designate a crisis triage officer and include provisions for palliative care in triage models for scarce resource allocation. Clear indicators, triggers, & lines of responsibility Evidence ‐ based clinical processes & operations (IOM, Crisis Standards of Care , 1 ‐ 10) (IOM, Crisis Standards of Care , 1 ‐ 10) azdhs.gov azdhs.gov He alth and We llne ss for all Ar izonans He alth and We llne ss for all Ar izonans 11 12 2

  3. 3/6/2014 Crisis Standards of Care cont. What are we talking about? …Crisis standards of care will usually follow a formal declaration or recognition by state government during  Multiple healthcare access points within a community or region are a pervasive (pandemic influenza) or catastrophic impacted (earthquake, hurricane) disaster which recognizes that  Resources are unavailable or undeliverable to healthcare facilities contingency surge response strategies (resource sparing  Similar strategies being invoked by other healthcare delivery strategies) have been exhausted , and crisis medical systems care must be provided for a sustained period of time .  Patient transfer not possible or feasible, at least in the short term Formal recognition of these austere operating  Access to medical countermeasures (vaccine, medications, conditions enables specific legal/regulatory powers and antidotes, blood products) is likely to be limited protections for healthcare provider allocation of scarce  Available local, regional, state, federal resource caches (equipment, medical resources and for alternate care facility supplies, medications) have been distributed, and no short ‐ term operations… resupply of such stocks is foreseeable (IOM, Crisis Standards of Care , 1 ‐ 10) azdhs.gov azdhs.gov He alth and We llne ss for all Ar izonans He alth and We llne ss for all Ar izonans 13 14 CSC Hazard Identification Does this qualify as a CSC Incident? Outcome: Ensure this CSC plan accounts for all types of hazards that could invoke a crisis-level response within the state, including: • CBRNE (Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear, Explosive) • Natural disasters Gabrielle Giffords’ Shooting • Technological failure • Other human-caused incidents. azdhs.gov azdhs.gov He alth and We llne ss for all Ar izonans He alth and We llne ss for all Ar izonans 15 16 Does this qualify as a CSC Incident? Does this qualify as a CSC Incident? Boston Bombing azdhs.gov azdhs.gov He alth and We llne ss for all Ar izonans He alth and We llne ss for all Ar izonans 17 18 3

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend