WHS Legal Update
WELCOME
Brisbane Region Meeting – 30 April 2019
WHS Legal Update WELCOME Brisbane Region Meeting 30 April 2019 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
WHS Legal Update WELCOME Brisbane Region Meeting 30 April 2019 Brisbane Region Representatives Jo Kitney Jane Willis Cameron Caldwell SIA Brisbane Region Range of events and venues Meetings and site visits Networking and
WELCOME
Brisbane Region Meeting – 30 April 2019
Jo Kitney Jane Willis Cameron Caldwell
www .minterellison.com
the Regulator
P e t e r Th
i n g , D i r e c t
, R eg u l a t
S t ra t egy a n d B
rd I S S C S e rv i c e s , W H S Q
D e a n n a M c M a s t e r , P a rt n e r , M i n t e r E l l i s
J
i t n e y , B r i s b a n e R eg i
R e p r e s e n t a t i v e
Director , Regulatory Strategy and Board/ISSC Services, WHSQ
A view from the regulator – post Best Practice Review Peter Thorning Director, Regulatory Strategy and Board/ISSC Services Workplace Health and Safety Queensland
Tragic Events of October 2016
Eagle Farm construction site 6 October 2016
ABC News (2016) http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-10- 08/workers-walked-off-job-before-eagle-farm- construction-deaths/7915804
Dreamworld theme park 25 October 2016
The Conversation (2016) http://theconversation.com/deat hs-at-dreamworld-theme-park- could-lead-to-safety-changes-for- amusement-rides-67701
Best Practice Review Context
Dreamworld and Eagle Farm Six years of harmonisation – many stakeholders still hold the view that
Queensland was short-changed (WHSOs and CoPs)
Concerns that WHSQ’s regulatory pendulum had swung too far towards
encouraging and assisting compliance
Tightening fiscal environment and highly controlled FTE count WHS Board and Industry Committees not being fully engaged Broadening of government’s advisory base – not limited to public sector Changing societal views – expectations of tighter regulation and
active/empowered regulators
Banking Royal Commission Aged Care Royal Commission
Best Practice Review – Terms of reference
Conducted by Independent Reviewer: Mr Tim Lyons Between April and July 2017 Terms of Reference
The appropriateness of WHSQ’s compliance and enforcement policy The effectiveness of WHSQ’s compliance and enforcement activities WHSQ’s effectiveness in relation to providing compliance
information and promoting work health and safety awareness and education
The appropriateness and effectiveness of the administration of
public safety matters by WHSQ
Further measures that can be taken to discourage unsafe work
practices
58 recommendations
Compliance
Need to re-balance towards directed compliance Queensland specific compliance and enforcement policy
Sufficient detail about enforcement actions to be utilized Directed compliance as vital, widely available tool
Better metrics for regulatory/inspectorate activity Inspector qualifications, competencies, visibility Staffing model which keeps pace with increases in
economic activity, population growth and regulatory responsibility.
Licensing…competency Health and safety representatives
Investigations and sanctions
Industrial manslaughter offence Creation of Officer of WHS prosecutor Appointment of an independent WHS prosecutor Increased data analytics and reporting of investigations and
prosecutions
Better use of this data to guide WHSQ’s intervention activity
WHS Board to …
develop a five year plan and include inspectorate activity as a
core element
monitor WHSQ activity (including directed compliance) and report
to WHSQ and Minister
monitor patterns and trends of prosecutions monitor implementation of new ICT system
Representation and consultation
Better support for health and safety representatives Re-establish work health and safety officers, not mandatory but
potential use as evidence of duty holder mitigation of risks
Competency and legislative reform
Competency of high risk work licence assessors Better guidance for RTOs to support competency Quality indicators relating to RTOs and their trainers
Competency and legislative reform
Re-establish status of Codes of Practice (mandatory minimum
standard)
Review of model national laws/harmonisation
Reverse onus of proof National data capture and reporting – improved Comparative
Performance Monitoring report
Increased penalties
Public safety
Stronger regulatory requirements for theme parks and other
Mandatory major inspections Competency of people conducting inspections Competency/licensing of operators of amusement devices Safety case requirement for operators of amusement devices
which are collectively high risk
Work health and safety management system for operators of
amusement devices which are collectively high or medium risk
Consideration of need for a Public Safety Ombudsman Consideration of additional resources needed for regulation
care and social assistance sectors
Focusing on a couple of aspects…
Strategic Plan for WHS in Queensland Compliance and Enforcement Policy
BPR Recommendation Three
The Work Health and Safety Act 2011 be amended to require the Work Health and Safety Board to develop, monitor and review a five-year strategic plan, and consistent with its role in the WHS Act 2011, provide advice to the Minister on a more regular and systematic basis.
Five Year Strategic Plan – launched Oct 2018
Embracing innovation
and technology
Designing healthy and
safe work
Fostering a culture of
health and safety
Regulating effectively
Strategic ic lever 1
Em Embracing innovati tion an and tech echnology
Partnerships and collaboration for WHS research, innovation and technology to achieve:
Str trategic ic lever 2
De Desi signin ing hea ealt lthy an and sa safe e wor
Partnerships and promotion of healthy and safe work design to achieve:
Strategic ic le lever 3
Fos
ing a cu cult lture of
ealt lth and sa safety
Partner, leverage, investigate and promote focus in the area of WHS culture to achieve:
Strategic ic le lever 4
Reg egula latin ing effectiv ively ly
Support, promote, leverage and defend effective regulation to achieve:
BPR Recommendation Nine
WHSQ develops a new policy in supplement to the NCEP, that provides sufficient detail about enforcement actions to be utilised in certain circumstances to ensure compliance. In developing the new policy it is recommended that WHSQ:
more precisely identify the use of “directed compliance” as a vital, widely available tool to ensure safe workplaces
consult with stakeholders and the Work Health and Safety Board in
developing the new policy
publish the new policy on their website
review the new policy at least every five years
measure and report annually on compliance and enforcement performance against the policy
The WHS Board review WHSQ’s performance against the policy as part of their 5-year strategic plan, to ensure that WHSQ’s compliance & enforcement balance is continually monitored
200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 2005–06 2006–07 2007–08 2008–09 2009–10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15
Improvement Notices per 10,000 businesses
New South Wales Victoria Queensland Western Australia South Australia Tasmania Why the focus on ‘directed compliance’?
200 400 600 800 1000 1200 2005–06 2006–07 2007–08 2008–09 2009–10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15
Improvement Notices per 10,000 Businesses
New South Wales Queensland South Australia Why the focus on ‘directed compliance’?
BPR 9 also linked with
BPR 1 - Rebalanced Compliance Approach BPR 12 - Data Analytics and Reporting Metrics – Standardised Reporting Metrics BPR 15 - Rebalanced Compliance Approach – Holistic Assessment Process BPR 20 - Inspector Skills Development – Inspector Training BPR 21 - Inspector Skills Development – Inspector Skills Identification BPR 22 - Data Analytics and Reporting Metrics – Data Capture and Reporting BPR 23 - Rebalanced Compliance Approach – Inspector Visibility BPR 24 - Inspector Skills Development – Directed Compliance Comprehension BPR 25 - WHS Board Five Year Strategic Plan – Inspectorate Activity BPR 50 - HSRs – Support and Encouragement
New Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement approach…
No advance notice of visits unless management approval is given –
“natural state” of workplace (exception limited circumstances)
A breach, if not immediately remedied = an improvement notice Immediate rectifications to be noted and recorded Around 60 of the 240 WHS and ES infringeable offence identified as
“Priority”
A breach on priority infringement list = an infringement notice Failure to comply with Improvement Notice = Infringement Better use of authorisations (i.e. HRW Licences) as a sanction Integrating provision of advice and information with enforcement
Priority Infringeable Offences – 10 areas
Full list at: https://www.worksafe.qld.gov.au/laws-and-compliance/compliance-and- enforcement/compliance-monitoring-and-enforcement-policy
A breach on priority infringement list = an infringement notice
Greater focus on ‘duties-based’ or systematic work health and safety based contraventions
PCBU - Primary duty of care (s19) (work environment without risks; safe plant and structures; safe systems of work; safe use, handling and storage of
plant, structures and substances; adequate facilities; provision of supervision, information, training and instruction; health and conditions monitoring)
Officer duty (s27) Consult with other duty holders (s46) Consult with workers (s47) Hazard Identification, Risk Management and Hierarchy of Controls
(Reg s34, s35, s36)
Inspector Guidance
Priorities for enforcement action
Any serious risk to health and safety Action to be proportionate to the risk and circumstances
Issuing and explaining notices
Clear explanation of the contravention Relevant legislative provisions What compliance looks like (but not directing how to achieve it) MAY provide practical guidance and support (by reference to reliable
information sources)
Sustained compliance
Improvement notices for systematic WHS management failure Multiple hazard/risk contraventions should prompt enforcement of ‘higher
Response to focus on ‘directed compliance’…
2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 Improvement Notices Issued - Queensland
Dreamworld and Eagle Farm Oct 2016 Best Practice Review Report July 2017
Projected
31 March 2019
Industry focus
WHSQ’s industry focus is guided by the Australian Strategy and
by our own “heat map” analysis of industry subsectors
Australian Strategy:
Other industry sub-sectors from ‘heat map’ analysis (some examples):
gardening
Priority conditions
WHSQ’s focus on priority conditions is informed by the Australian Strategy and
emerging issues
musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) mental health conditions cancers (including skin cancer and asbestos-related cancers) occupational lung diseases (especially silicosis) contact dermatitis noise-induced hearing loss
Significant focus on MSDs, mental health, asbestos and silicosis
Industries with significant public safety aspects:
Theme parks and amusement device operators Construction Transport (but this dealt with by other regulators) Major Hazard Facilities (hazardous chemical storage – schedule 15) Large dangerous goods location (manifest quantity workplace) Tourism – particularly diving and snorkelling, but also other adventure
tourism activities
Electrical industries (particularly network)
Workplace Health and Safety Queensland's vision is that everyone will return home safely at the end of a day's work. “Work health and safety laws were established because our society believes it's important to protect workers and
safety and welfare from risks arising at work”
WHS Board (2018) Five-year Strategic Plan for WHS in Queensland
Partner , MinterEllison
Deanna McMaster Partner 30 April 2019
Agenda
WHS legislative framework in the current regulatory climate Key cases Action items 1 2 3
Officer duty
Officers can be personally liable for not exercising their due diligence obligations even if the PCBU has not breached the WHS Act Officers have a personal positive duty to exercise due diligence to ensure compliance with WHS Act Officers will not be deemed to have committed an offence simply because PCBU has breached the WHS Act
Exercising due diligence
Knowledge of health and safety Understanding
risks Ensure appropriate resources Processes for receiving and responding Verifying compliance
Changes arising from the Best Practice Review
Reintroducing Workplace Health and Safety Officers Commenced 1 July 2018 Issue resolution amendments Commenced 13 November 2017 Formally restricting availability of enforceable undertakings Commenced 23 October 2017
Prohibition on insurance for penalties
Increasing support for Health and Safety Representatives Commenced 1 July 2018 Restoring the status of codes of practice Commenced 1 July 2018 Independent statutory office for WHS prosecutions Date to be fixed
Industrial Manslaughter
A PCBU or senior officer commits an offence if:
The person’s conduct causes the death of the worker (i.e. substantially contributes) A worker dies in the course of carrying
The person is negligent in respect
New offence is a
crime
Standard for criminal negligence applies
Beyond reasonable doubt
Maximum penalty
20 years imprisonment (individual) OR 100,000 penalty units, up to $10,000,000 (body corporate)
Industrial Manslaughter (cont)
Senior officer
Executive officer (however described) A person who is concerned with, or takes part in, PCBU’s management
Officer
Director, secretary A person who makes, or participates in making, decisions that affect the whole, or a substantial part, of PCBU
National Review of model WHS law
Report from first national review of model WHS laws released on 26 February 2019
196 page report
Key recommendations address:
Next steps
WHS Ministers are expected to respond later this year
34 recommendations Further change possible
Key issue: insurance cover for WHS penalties
Current position
provision for insurance against penalties under WHS Act Review findings
sentencing process
effect of regime
detrimental impact on workers as no fear of consequences Recommendations
to prohibit insurance covering WHS penalties and fines
prohibition on insurance should constitute an
was endorsed in the 2018 National Review
Key issue: psychological health
associated with psychological injury and the appropriate control measures to manage those risks National Review recommendation
about how to address it in the workplace
abilities to enforce the duty to ensure health and safety
Reasoning
Increased regulatory activity
First case of director being imprisoned for WHS breaches in Qld Increase in issue of improvement notices including to officers Complaints Notices Prosecutions Anecdotally, a substantial number of complaints waiting to be issued by WHSQ
Dreamworld coronial inquest
Thunder River Rapids Ride, when the raft they were riding in collided with another raft and flipped up vertically, throwing them from the ride
following the accident
October and December 2018. Evidence before the inquest included… 6 recent failures of ride pump Two emergency stop buttons – operators not adequately trained to use them No alarm to signal pump failure despite recent safety upgrade Multiple previous collisions and incidents Budget cutbacks in repairs and maintenance 7 months prior to accident.
Eagle Farm fatalities
working in an excavation pit
being lowered by a crane
a lesser offence and fined $405,000
accepted safe practices. Charges since dropped
Charges since dropped
Queensland fatality – Multi-Run Roofing
A roofer fell 6 metres to his death when working on the edge of a roof The roofer was working without appropriate fall- prevention equipment
Director sentenced to 12 months’ imprisonment (suspended after 4 months) and company fined $1 million
Multi-Run Roofing was installing roof sheeting
Victorian fatality – Recycling Emporium scrap metal yard
No attempt to secure bin to forklift and forklift
ground Court held risk of death
persons in vicinity of forklift
Director sentenced to 6 months’ imprisonment and fined $10,000
Director operating a fork lift dropped metal bin on worker’s head causing death
Canberra fatality - University of Canberra Hospital construction
Crane being used to move 11-tonne generator overturned Multiplex was principal contractor RAR Cranes was the subcontractor Crane driver charged with manslaughter under ACT criminal legislation
Category 2 charges against Multiplex’s Site Manager and CEO and RAR’s Managing Director
Category 1 charges against Multiplex and RAR Site personnel Worker was killed at University of Canberra construction site
For organisations…
Review governance structure
Do you have an incident reporting system? Is it regularly reviewed? Does it work well? Do you have a team or teams dedicated to safety that are appropriately resourced?
Review safety and environment culture
Are health and safety issues and compliance discussed at all levels of the
Do workers feel safe to report safety incidents?
Ensure
trained
Is the flow of safety information to officers adequate? Are officers trained in respect of their due diligence obligations? See next slide
For officers…
Regularly make time for discussion on emerging issues Ensure WHS issues are raised at executive level Understand key risks and hazards in organisation
Appoint a staff member who takes responsibility for reporting
Audit safety management systems annually against relevant laws Ensure any reportable incident is raised directly to its Officers immediately
Review data and question anything that does not look right
Understand where concurrent duties apply with third parties Ensure safety management systems address risks and that reporting is in a timely way Attend regular briefings Be alert to trends
issues as this may indicate a problem
Key contacts
Deanna McMaster Partner T +61 7 3119 6126 Rhian O’Sullivan Senior Associate T +61 7 3119 6463 Samantha Betzien Partner T +61 7 3119 6429
SIA Brisbane Region SIA National H&S Conference SIA Qld Visions Conference
https://www.sia.org.au/events
https://www.sia.org.au/events
https://sianationalconference.com.au/ https://www.sia.org.au/events
https://www.visions.org.au/
Deanna McMaster, Partner
www .minterellison.com
safety-institute-of-australia @SIA_OHSProf SafetyInstituteofAustralia www.sia.org.au