which bio diversity indices
play

Which Bio-Diversity Indices Fuzzy Logic Justifies . . . - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Gauging Bio-Diversity . . . Why These Measures? An Intuitive Meaning . . . Which Bio-Diversity Indices Fuzzy Logic Justifies . . . Bio-Diversity of . . . Are Most Adequate Localness Property Possibility of Scaling Olga Kosheleva 1 , Craig


  1. Gauging Bio-Diversity . . . Why These Measures? An Intuitive Meaning . . . Which Bio-Diversity Indices Fuzzy Logic Justifies . . . Bio-Diversity of . . . Are Most Adequate Localness Property Possibility of Scaling Olga Kosheleva 1 , Craig Tweedie 2 , Main Result and Vladik Kreinovich 3 Home Page Title Page 1 Department of Teacher Education 2 Environmental Science and Engineering Program ◭◭ ◮◮ 3 Department of Computer Science University of Texas at El Paso ◭ ◮ 500 W. University Page 1 of 21 El Paso, Texas 79968, USA olgak@utep.edu, ctweedie@utep.edu Go Back vladik@utep.edu Full Screen Close Quit

  2. Gauging Bio-Diversity . . . 1. Gauging Bio-Diversity Is Important Why These Measures? An Intuitive Meaning . . . • One of the main objectives of ecology is to study and Fuzzy Logic Justifies . . . preserve bio-diversity. Bio-Diversity of . . . • Most existing measures of diversity are based on the Localness Property relative frequencies p i of different species. Possibility of Scaling • The most widely used measures are: Main Result Home Page n – the Shannon index H = − � p i · ln( p i ) , and Title Page i =1 n ◭◭ ◮◮ p 2 � – the Simpson index D = i . i =1 ◭ ◮ • Ecologists also use indices related to D : 1 D and 1 − D . Page 2 of 21 n Go Back p q • They also use indices related to the sum � i , such as Full Screen i =1 � n � 1 � p q Close R´ enyi entropy H q = 1 − q · ln . i i =1 Quit

  3. Gauging Bio-Diversity . . . 2. Why These Measures? Why These Measures? An Intuitive Meaning . . . • The above measures of diversity are, empirically, in Fuzzy Logic Justifies . . . good accordance with the ecologists’ intuition. Bio-Diversity of . . . • However, from the theoretical viewpoint, the success Localness Property of these measures of diversity is somewhat puzzling. Possibility of Scaling Main Result • Why these expressions and not other possible expres- Home Page sions? Title Page • In this talk, we provide possible justification for the above empirically successful measures. ◭◭ ◮◮ ◭ ◮ • We provide two possible justification: Page 3 of 21 – we start with a simple fuzzy logic-based justifica- tion which explains Simpson index, and then Go Back – we provide a more elaborate justification that ex- Full Screen plains all the above diversity measures. Close Quit

  4. Gauging Bio-Diversity . . . 3. An Intuitive Meaning of Bio-Diversity Why These Measures? An Intuitive Meaning . . . • An ecosystem is perfectly diverse if all its species are Fuzzy Logic Justifies . . . reasonably frequent but not dominant. Bio-Diversity of . . . • In other words, the ecosystem is healthy if: Localness Property Possibility of Scaling – the first species is reasonably frequent but not dom- Main Result inant, and Home Page – the second species is reasonably frequent but not Title Page dominant, – etc. ◭◭ ◮◮ ◭ ◮ • This statement uses an imprecise (“‘fuzzy”) natural- language terms like “reasonably frequent”. Page 4 of 21 • We need to translate this statement into precise terms. Go Back • We will use fuzzy logic, since fuzzy logic was invented Full Screen exactly for such a translation. Close Quit

  5. Gauging Bio-Diversity . . . 4. Let Us Use Fuzzy Logic Why These Measures? An Intuitive Meaning . . . • For each p i , let µ ( p i ) be the degree to which the species Fuzzy Logic Justifies . . . is reasonably frequent and not dominant. Bio-Diversity of . . . • To compute bio-diversity, we need to combine use Localness Property “and”-operation to combine these degrees. Possibility of Scaling • The general strategy in applications of fuzzy techniques Main Result is to select the simplest possible “and”-operation. Home Page • The two simplest (and most frequently used) “and”- Title Page operations are the product and the minimum. ◭◭ ◮◮ • Our objective is to optimize bio-diversity, and most ◭ ◮ efficient optimization techniques use differentiation. Page 5 of 21 • From this viewpoint, it is desirable to come up with Go Back the differentiable measure of diversity. Full Screen • This eliminates min (since min( a, b ) is not differen- n Close � tiable when a = b ), so we use the product µ ( p i ) . i =1 Quit

  6. Gauging Bio-Diversity . . . 5. Let Us Use Fuzzy Logic (cont-d) Why These Measures? An Intuitive Meaning . . . n � • Maximizing µ ( p i ) is equivalent to maximizing its Fuzzy Logic Justifies . . . i =1 Bio-Diversity of . . . n def logarithm L = � f ( p i ) , where f ( p i ) = ln( µ ( p i )). Localness Property i =1 Possibility of Scaling • In a diverse ecosystem all the frequencies p i are rather Main Result small. Home Page • Indeed, if one of the values is large, this means that we Title Page have a dominant species, not a diversity. ◭◭ ◮◮ • For small p i , we can replace each value f ( p i ) with the ◭ ◮ sum of the few first terms in its Taylor expansion. Page 6 of 21 • In the first approximation, f ( p i ) = a 0 + a 1 · p i , so Go Back L = a 0 · n + a 1 . Full Screen • This expression does not depend on the frequencies p i Close and thus, cannot serve as a measure of diversity. Quit

  7. Gauging Bio-Diversity . . . 6. Fuzzy Logic Justifies the Simpson Index Why These Measures? An Intuitive Meaning . . . n • We want to maximize L = � f ( p i ). Fuzzy Logic Justifies . . . i =1 Bio-Diversity of . . . • We have shown that linear terms in f ( p i ) are not suf- Localness Property ficient. Possibility of Scaling • So, to adequately describe diversity, we need to take Main Result into account quadratic terms Home Page f ( p i ) = a 0 + a 1 · p i + a 2 · p 2 Title Page i . ◭◭ ◮◮ • In this approximation, ◭ ◮ n � p 2 L = a 0 · n + a 1 + a 2 · i . Page 7 of 21 i =1 Go Back • Maximizing this expression is equivalent to maximizing Full Screen n � p 2 the Simpson index D = i . Close i =1 Quit

  8. Gauging Bio-Diversity . . . 7. The Ultimate Purpose of Diversity Estimation Why These Measures? Is Decision Making An Intuitive Meaning . . . Fuzzy Logic Justifies . . . • We want to describe which combinations of frequencies Bio-Diversity of . . . p = ( p 1 , . . . , p n ) are preferred and which are not. Localness Property • Most plans succeed only with a certain probability. Possibility of Scaling • So, we need to consider “lotteries”, in which different Main Result Home Page combinations A i appear with different probabilities P i . Title Page • The main result of utility theory states that: – if we have a consistent ordering relation L � L ′ (“ L ◭◭ ◮◮ is preferable to L ′ ”) between such lotteries, ◭ ◮ – then there exists a function u (called utility ) s.t. Page 8 of 21 L � L ′ if and only if u ( L ) ≥ u ( L ′ ) , where Go Back Full Screen u ( L ) = P 1 · u ( A 1 ) + . . . + P n · u ( A n ) . Close • In our case, we need a utility function u ( p 1 , . . . , p n ). Quit

  9. Gauging Bio-Diversity . . . 8. Bio-Diversity of Subsystems Why These Measures? An Intuitive Meaning . . . • An important intuitive feature of bio-diversity is the Fuzzy Logic Justifies . . . localness property: Bio-Diversity of . . . – that, in addition to the bio-diversity of the whole Localness Property ecosystem, Possibility of Scaling – we may be interested in the bio-diversity of its sub- Main Result systems. Home Page • For the whole ecosystem, the sum of frequencies is 1. Title Page • When we analyze a subsystem, we only take into ac- ◭◭ ◮◮ count some of the species. ◭ ◮ • So the sum of the frequencies can be smaller than 1. Page 9 of 21 • Thus, we need to consider the values u ( p ) for tuples Go Back for which � p i < 1. Full Screen i • It makes sense to compare possible arrangements Close within a subsystem. Quit

  10. Gauging Bio-Diversity . . . 9. Localness Property Why These Measures? An Intuitive Meaning . . . • We only compare tuples p = ( p 1 , . . . , p n ) and Fuzzy Logic Justifies . . . n n p ′ = ( p ′ 1 , . . . , p ′ p ′ � � n ) for which p i = i . Bio-Diversity of . . . i =1 i =1 Localness Property • Let us assume that for all species i from some set I , Possibility of Scaling the frequencies are the same: p i = p ′ i . Main Result • Suppose also that, from the point of bio-diversity, the Home Page tuple p is preferable to tuple p ′ : p � p ′ ; so: Title Page – while in the two tuples, the level of diversity is the ◭◭ ◮◮ same for species from the set I , ◭ ◮ – species from the complement set − I have a higher Page 10 of 21 degree of bio-diversity. Go Back • Thus, if we replace the values p i = p ′ i for i ∈ I with some other values q i = q ′ i , we will still have q � q ′ . Full Screen Close Quit

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend