Whats on the Horizon? Accountability, Compliance & Monitoring - - PDF document

what s on the horizon
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Whats on the Horizon? Accountability, Compliance & Monitoring - - PDF document

Whats on the Horizon? Accountability, Compliance & Monitoring will have some changes based on mandates under Senate Bill 1, Rider 70 Texas 83 rd Legislative Session, 2013 Impl plem emen entation tion of of St Stan and Al Alone Specia


slide-1
SLIDE 1

1

What’s on the Horizon?

Accountability, Compliance & Monitoring will have some changes based on mandates under Senate Bill 1, Rider 70 Texas 83rd Legislative Session, 2013 Performance‐Based Monitoring Analysis System (PBMAS)

Implementation beginning in 2004 SPED CTE BE/ESL Stage of Intervention Stage of Intervention Stage of Intervention Stage of Intervention NCLB

Required Determination Levels: Meets Requirement, Needs Assistance, Needs Intervention, Needs Substantial Intervention Meets Requirement =

LEA Allowable Maintenance of Effort (MOE) Flexibility

Federally Required LEA Determinations

Implementation beginning in 2005

Federally Defined Elements

  • 1. Compliance SPP Indicators 9,10,11,12,13
  • 2. Valid, reliable, and timely data submission
  • 3. Uncorrected noncompliance
  • 4. Financial audit findings

State Defined Elements

  • 5. PBMAS SPED stage of intervention (2008)
  • 6. Significant Disproportionality (2012)

On-site Reviews Residential Facility (RF) Monitoring

Implementation beginning in 2006

Impl plem emen entation tion of

  • f St

Stan and‐Al Alone Specia Special Educ ducation ion Mo Monit nitoring ring Syste Systems (2004 (2004‐ 2011) 2011)

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Weblink: tea.texas.gov/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=25769819435

Charge: Coordinate & Align Monitoring, Accountability & Compliance Requirements

Rider 70 Legislative Report

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

Rider 70 Legislative Report Federally Required LEA Determinations

Required Determination Levels: Meets Requirement, Needs Assistance, Needs Intervention, Needs Substantial Intervention Federally Defined Elements

  • 1. Compliance SPP Indicators 9,10,11,12,13
  • 2. Valid, reliable, and timely data submission
  • 3. Uncorrected noncompliance
  • 4. Financial audit findings

State Defined Elements

  • 5. PBMAS SPED stage of intervention
  • 6. Significant Disproportionality

Meets Requirement = LEA Allowable MOE Flexibility

Residential Facility (RF) Monitoring Performance Based Monitoring Analysis System (PBMAS)

SPED CTE BE/ESL NCLB Stage of Intervention Stage of Intervention Stage of Intervention Stage of Intervention Integrated Intervention

(assigned a stage of intervention for more than one program area) (required engagement in the Texas Accountability Intervention System (TAIS))

Stage of Intervention Unified State & Federal Accountability System

Performance Based Monitoring (PBM)

Tr Transition to to a Unifie ified Specia Special Educ ducation ion Mo Moni nitori ring ng Syste System (2012 (2012‐Pres esen ent) t)

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

Unified Performance Based Monitoring System (PBM)

SPED: Integrated analysis of: 1.PBMAS indicators 2.Compliance SPP Indicators 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 3.Valid, reliable, and timely data submission 4.Uncorrected noncompliance 5.Financial audit findings CTE BE/ESL NCLB Stage of Intervention Stage of Intervention Stage of Intervention Stage of Intervention/Federal LEA Determinations: Stage 1 or Not Staged = Meets Requirement Stage 2 = Needs Assistance Stage 3 = Needs Intervention Stage 4 = Needs Substantial Intervention Integrated Intervention

(assigned a stage of intervention for more than one program area) (required engagement in the Texas Accountability Intervention System (TAIS))

Residential Facility (RF) Monitoring

Stage of Intervention Unified State & Federal Accountability System

Proposal Unified Special Education Monitoring System (2015 and Beyond)

St Stagin aging of

  • f Special

Special Ed Educat ation Pr Progr

  • gram

in in th the Uni Unified ied Syste System

Performance levels of indicators from PBMAS report + Performance levels on 4 federally required determination elements

  • 1. Compliance SPP Indicators 9, 10, 11, 12, 13
  • 2. Valid, reliable, and timely data submission
  • 3. Uncorrected noncompliance
  • 4. Financial audit findings

= State of Intervention/Determination

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

Result‐‐‐This year will be a transition year for Determination ratings.

34 Code of Federal Regulations §300.616 requires states to make annual determinations about the performance of districts. Determinations based on 2013‐2014 district data must be provided this year.

For technical assistance, contact

SPP 3, 5 Kirsten Omelan, Ph.D. komelan@esc4.net SPP 4 Clynita Grafenreed, Ph.D. cgrafenreed@esc4.net SPP 6, 7, 12 Sonja Hollan sonja.hollan@esc4.net SPP 8, 13, 14 Karen Pepkin karen.pepkin@esc4.net SPP 9, 10 Gayla Lutz gayla.lutz@esc4.net SPP 11, 12 Kara Zwolinski kara.zwolinski@esc4.net Linda De Zell Hall, Ph.D. lhall@esc4.net Jerry Klekotta gklekotta@esc4.net