Weak Factorization and Hankel operators on Hardy spaces H 1 . Aline - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

weak factorization and hankel operators on hardy spaces h
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Weak Factorization and Hankel operators on Hardy spaces H 1 . Aline - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Weak Factorization and Hankel operators on Hardy spaces H 1 . Aline Bonami Universit e dOrl eans Bardonecchia, June 16, 2009 Let D be the unit disc (or B n C n ) the unit ball ), D its boundary. The Holomorphic Hardy space is


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Weak Factorization and Hankel operators on Hardy spaces H1.

Aline Bonami

Universit´ e d’Orl´ eans

Bardonecchia, June 16, 2009

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Let D be the unit disc (or Bn ∈ Cn) the unit ball ), ∂D its boundary. The Holomorphic Hardy space is Hp := {F holo ; sup

r<1

  • ∂D

|F(rξ)|pdσ(ξ) < ∞}.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Let D be the unit disc (or Bn ∈ Cn) the unit ball ), ∂D its boundary. The Holomorphic Hardy space is Hp := {F holo ; sup

r<1

  • ∂D

|F(rξ)|pdσ(ξ) < ∞}. Hp identifies with the space of its boundary values Hp = Hp(∂D) ∩ Hol,

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Let D be the unit disc (or Bn ∈ Cn) the unit ball ), ∂D its boundary. The Holomorphic Hardy space is Hp := {F holo ; sup

r<1

  • ∂D

|F(rξ)|pdσ(ξ) < ∞}. Hp identifies with the space of its boundary values Hp = Hp(∂D) ∩ Hol, Hp(∂D) = {f ;

  • ∂D

|Mf (ξ)|pdσ(ξ) < ∞}.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Let D be the unit disc (or Bn ∈ Cn) the unit ball ), ∂D its boundary. The Holomorphic Hardy space is Hp := {F holo ; sup

r<1

  • ∂D

|F(rξ)|pdσ(ξ) < ∞}. Hp identifies with the space of its boundary values Hp = Hp(∂D) ∩ Hol, Hp(∂D) = {f ;

  • ∂D

|Mf (ξ)|pdσ(ξ) < ∞}. Mf (ξ) := sup

r<1

  • ∂D

PS(rξ, η)f (η)dσ(η)

  • with PS the Poisson (Szeg¨
  • ) kernel, which reproduces holomorphic

functions.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Let Φ : [0, ∞) → [0, ∞) be an increasing homeomorphism. We assume that φ is doubling, and, for some p < 1, Φ(st) ≤ CspΦ(t) for s < 1. Particular interest for Φ concave (and, in particular, sub-additive). For us: Φ(t) :=

t log(e+t).

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Let Φ : [0, ∞) → [0, ∞) be an increasing homeomorphism. We assume that φ is doubling, and, for some p < 1, Φ(st) ≤ CspΦ(t) for s < 1. Particular interest for Φ concave (and, in particular, sub-additive). For us: Φ(t) :=

t log(e+t).

LΦ is the space of functions such that f LΦ :=

  • D

Φ(|f |)dσ < ∞. The Luxembourg “norm” is f lux

LΦ := inf

  • λ > 0 :
  • X

Φ |f (x)| λ

  • dµ(x) ≤ 1
  • .
slide-8
SLIDE 8

HΦ := {F holo ; sup

r<1

  • ∂D

Φ (|F(rξ)|) dσ(ξ) < ∞.} The space HΦ identifies with the space of its boundary values HΦ = HΦ(∂D) ∩ Hol, HΦ(∂D) := {f ;

  • ∂D

Φ (Mf (ξ)) dσ(ξ) < ∞}. Studied by S. Janson and Viviani. The dual of HΦ is B M O Aρ, defined by sup

Q

1 ρ(σ(Q))σ(Q)

  • Q

|b − bQ|dσ < ∞. ρ(t) := ρΦ(t) = 1 tΦ−1(t).

slide-9
SLIDE 9

HΦ := {F holo ; sup

r<1

  • ∂D

Φ (|F(rξ)|) dσ(ξ) < ∞.} The space HΦ identifies with the space of its boundary values HΦ = HΦ(∂D) ∩ Hol, HΦ(∂D) := {f ;

  • ∂D

Φ (Mf (ξ)) dσ(ξ) < ∞}. Studied by S. Janson and Viviani. The dual of HΦ is B M O Aρ, defined by sup

Q

1 ρ(σ(Q))σ(Q)

  • Q

|b − bQ|dσ < ∞. ρ(t) := ρΦ(t) = 1 tΦ−1(t). Main tool: the atomic decomposition.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Multiplication of functions in H1(∂D) and B M O

Theorem [B. Iwaniec Jones Zinsmeister]. The product b × h, with b ∈ B M O and h ∈ H1 can be given a meaning as a distribution, and e b × h ∈ L1 + HΦ, with Φ(t) = t/ log(e + t).

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Multiplication of functions in H1(∂D) and B M O

Theorem [B. Iwaniec Jones Zinsmeister]. The product b × h, with b ∈ B M O and h ∈ H1 can be given a meaning as a distribution, and e b × h ∈ L1 + HΦ, with Φ(t) = t/ log(e + t). Main tool: H¨

  • lder Inequality.

bhlux

LΦ ≤ Chlux L1 blux exp L.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Multiplication of functions in H1(∂D) and B M O

Theorem [B. Iwaniec Jones Zinsmeister]. The product b × h, with b ∈ B M O and h ∈ H1 can be given a meaning as a distribution, and e b × h ∈ L1 + HΦ, with Φ(t) = t/ log(e + t). Main tool: H¨

  • lder Inequality.

bhlux

LΦ ≤ Chlux L1 blux exp L.

Obtained as a consequence of the elementary inequality uv log(e + uv) ≤ u + ev − 1.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Multiplication of functions in H1(∂D) and B M O

Theorem [B. Iwaniec Jones Zinsmeister]. The product b × h, with b ∈ B M O and h ∈ H1 can be given a meaning as a distribution, and e b × h ∈ L1 + HΦ, with Φ(t) = t/ log(e + t). Main tool: H¨

  • lder Inequality.

bhlux

LΦ ≤ Chlux L1 blux exp L.

Obtained as a consequence of the elementary inequality uv log(e + uv) ≤ u + ev − 1. Moreover, for holomorphic functions, one can erase the term in L1.

slide-14
SLIDE 14
  • Remark. One can answer a question in [BIJZ]: find two

continuous bilinear operators S and T, such that b×h = S(b, h)+T(b, h) with S(b, h) ∈ HΦ and T(b, h) ∈ L1.

slide-15
SLIDE 15
  • Remark. One can answer a question in [BIJZ]: find two

continuous bilinear operators S and T, such that b×h = S(b, h)+T(b, h) with S(b, h) ∈ HΦ and T(b, h) ∈ L1. Proof in the dyadic setting in [0, 1]: b × h =

  • j
  • k

(Pjb − Pj−1b)(Pkh − Pk−1h) =

  • j

Pj−1b Qjh +

  • j

Pj−1h Qjb +

  • Qjb Qjh.

One recognizes paraproducts.

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Hankel operators

Let B be the unit disc/unit ball. Then P : L2(∂B) → H2 is the Szeg¨

  • orthogonal projection.

The Hankel operator hb, with symbol b ∈ H2, is given by hb(f ) := P(b f ). Theorem[Nehari (d=1),Coifman-Rochberg-Weiss]. hb bounded on H2 ⇔ b ∈ B M O A.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Hankel operators

Let B be the unit disc/unit ball. Then P : L2(∂B) → H2 is the Szeg¨

  • orthogonal projection.

The Hankel operator hb, with symbol b ∈ H2, is given by hb(f ) := P(b f ). Theorem[Nehari (d=1),Coifman-Rochberg-Weiss]. hb bounded on H2 ⇔ b ∈ B M O A. Theorem[Janson, Tolokonnikov (d=1), B.- Grellier-Sehba (d > 1)] hb bounded on H1 ⇔ b ∈ LMOA. That is, sup

Q

log 4/σ(Q) σ(Q)

  • Q

|b − bQ|dσ < ∞,

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Hankel operators

Let B be the unit disc/unit ball. Then P : L2(∂B) → H2 is the Szeg¨

  • orthogonal projection.

The Hankel operator hb, with symbol b ∈ H2, is given by hb(f ) := P(b f ). Theorem[Nehari (d=1),Coifman-Rochberg-Weiss]. hb bounded on H2 ⇔ b ∈ B M O A. Theorem[Janson, Tolokonnikov (d=1), B.- Grellier-Sehba (d > 1)] hb bounded on H1 ⇔ b ∈ LMOA. That is, sup

Q

log 4/σ(Q) σ(Q)

  • Q

|b − bQ|dσ < ∞, b ∈

  • HΦ∗

with Φ(t) = t log(e + t). For d = 1, Janson-Peetre-Semmes through commutators.

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Characterizations of symbols of bounded Hankel

  • perators in H1.

hb(f ), g = P(bf ), g = b, fg.

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Characterizations of symbols of bounded Hankel

  • perators in H1.

hb(f ), g = P(bf ), g = b, fg. Products of functions of B M O A and H1 are in HΦ. The dual of HΦ is LMOA. Sufficient conditions are given by continuity properties of products.

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Characterizations of symbols of bounded Hankel

  • perators in H1.

hb(f ), g = P(bf ), g = b, fg. Products of functions of B M O A and H1 are in HΦ. The dual of HΦ is LMOA. Sufficient conditions are given by continuity properties of products. Necessary conditions are given by (weak) factorization theorems.

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Necessary conditions are given by factorization theorems.

Want to estimate (log 4/σ(Q))2 σ(Q)

  • Q

|b − bQ|2dσ = b, a = b, Pa with a an atom (up to a constant), with zero mean, supported by Q with a2 ≤ log 4/σ(Q) (σ(Q))

1 2

  • Q

|b − bQ|2dσ 1

2

.

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Necessary conditions are given by factorization theorems.

Want to estimate (log 4/σ(Q))2 σ(Q)

  • Q

|b − bQ|2dσ = b, a = b, Pa with a an atom (up to a constant), with zero mean, supported by Q with a2 ≤ log 4/σ(Q) (σ(Q))

1 2

  • Q

|b − bQ|2dσ 1

2

. Done if we can write Pa = fg, so that b, a = b, Pa = hbf , g.

slide-24
SLIDE 24

The factorization

Theorem [BIJZ]. B M O A × H1 = HΦ.

  • Proof. Let F ∈ HΦ. Then
  • ∂D
  • MF

log(e + MF)

  • dσ < ∞.
slide-25
SLIDE 25

The factorization

Theorem [BIJZ]. B M O A × H1 = HΦ.

  • Proof. Let F ∈ HΦ. Then
  • ∂D
  • MF

log(e + MF)

  • dσ < ∞.

Assume that there exists G ∈ B M O A such that log(e + MF) ≤ |G|. Then H := F/G is holomorphic with boundary values in L1(∂D).

slide-26
SLIDE 26

The factorization

Theorem [BIJZ]. B M O A × H1 = HΦ.

  • Proof. Let F ∈ HΦ. Then
  • ∂D
  • MF

log(e + MF)

  • dσ < ∞.

Assume that there exists G ∈ B M O A such that log(e + MF) ≤ |G|. Then H := F/G is holomorphic with boundary values in L1(∂D). Use Coifman-Rochberg Theorem on the maximal function of Hardy and Littlewood MHL, with u an integrable function: g := log

  • e + MHLu
  • ∈ B

M O(∂D) Take for u the boundary values of the sub-harmonic function |F|p, so that MF ≤ C(MHLu)1/p. Take G := g + iHg.

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Weak factorization

Coifman Rochberg Weiss in the unit ball: Every function in H1 can be as a sum of products of H2.

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Weak factorization

Coifman Rochberg Weiss in the unit ball: Every function in H1 can be as a sum of products of H2. Theorem [B. Grellier]. In the unit ball, there is a weak factorization of HΦ in products of functions in H1 and B M O A. Key Point: log(1 − w.z) is uniformly in B M O A.

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Weak factorization

Coifman Rochberg Weiss in the unit ball: Every function in H1 can be as a sum of products of H2. Theorem [B. Grellier]. In the unit ball, there is a weak factorization of HΦ in products of functions in H1 and B M O A. Key Point: log(1 − w.z) is uniformly in B M O A. Possible extensions to smooth bounded convex domains of finite type and to Hardy-Orlicz spaces.

slide-30
SLIDE 30

The case of the bi-disc

B M O(T2) is the space of functions such that

|PΩb|2 ≤ C|Ω| where PΩ can be defined in terms of wavelets (project on the ones that are related to rectangles R ⊂ Ω).

slide-31
SLIDE 31

The case of the bi-disc

B M O(T2) is the space of functions such that

|PΩb|2 ≤ C|Ω| where PΩ can be defined in terms of wavelets (project on the ones that are related to rectangles R ⊂ Ω). Can also be defined in terms of Carleson measures. The analogue of Nehari’s Theorem has been proved by Lacey and Ferguson in 2002. Theorem.The Hankel operator hb is bounded on H2(D2) if and

  • nly if b is in B

M O A.

slide-32
SLIDE 32

The case of the bi-disc

B M O(T2) is the space of functions such that

|PΩb|2 ≤ C|Ω| where PΩ can be defined in terms of wavelets (project on the ones that are related to rectangles R ⊂ Ω). Can also be defined in terms of Carleson measures. The analogue of Nehari’s Theorem has been proved by Lacey and Ferguson in 2002. Theorem.The Hankel operator hb is bounded on H2(D2) if and

  • nly if b is in B

M O A. What is the space L M O A for the bidisc?

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Definition [Pott-Sehba].b is in L M O A if, for each rectangle I × J containing Ω, log 4 |I|

  • × log

4 |J|

|PΩb|2 ≤ C|Ω|. Theorem[Pott-Sehba].The Hankel operator hb is bounded on H2(D2) if b is in L M O A.

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Definition [Pott-Sehba].b is in L M O A if, for each rectangle I × J containing Ω, log 4 |I|

  • × log

4 |J|

|PΩb|2 ≤ C|Ω|. Theorem[Pott-Sehba].The Hankel operator hb is bounded on H2(D2) if b is in L M O A.

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Definition [Pott-Sehba].b is in L M O A if, for each rectangle I × J containing Ω, log 4 |I|

  • × log

4 |J|

|PΩb|2 ≤ C|Ω|. Theorem[Pott-Sehba].The Hankel operator hb is bounded on H2(D2) if b is in L M O A. Theorem[B. Pott Sehba Wick].If the Hankel operator hb is bounded on H2(D2), then b is in L M O A.