1 11/26/2017
we balance Europe 11/26/2017 1 Mod Modular ular Li Li-Ion Ion - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
we balance Europe 11/26/2017 1 Mod Modular ular Li Li-Ion Ion - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
we balance Europe 11/26/2017 1 Mod Modular ular Li Li-Ion Ion ce cell ll pr prod oduc uction tion with with zer ero CO o CO 2 foo ootp tprint rint 1. Why in Germany/Europe 2. Unique opportunity 3. Our sequential und parallel
Mod Modular ular Li Li-Ion Ion ce cell ll pr prod
- duc
uction tion with with zer ero CO
- CO2 foo
- otp
tprint rint
11/26/2017 2
- 1. Why in Germany/Europe
- 2. Unique opportunity
- 3. Our sequential und parallel plan
- 4. TerraE CO2 footprint
Organization
11/26/2017 3
Why in Germany/Europe?
1. Huge local demand in Europe 2. The logistic for an European-based cell production is easier 3. Industry consortium available 4. High level of renewable energy 5. Strong R&D competence 6. Experienced machine and plant builder with strong Li-Ion experience 7. Financial Government an EU support for the starting phase 8. Significant local supplier market
Unique opportunity
11/26/2017 4
Summary Demand of Li-Ion cells Production Capacity Cell price time today
5 10 15 20 25 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028
Planned capacities (in GWh)
2 4 6 8 10 12 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028
Planned capacities (in GWh)
Automotive Non-Automotive
11/26/2017 5
TerraE growth plan to serve increasing customer demands
Phas hase 1 e 1
up t to 1,5 1,5 GWh
Phas hase 2 e 2
34 G GWh
11/26/2017 6
Serve the industrial market first and immediately
Ph Phase ase 2 Ph Phas ase e 1
Prepare capacity for serving the automotive market in 3 years with following strategy Syner Synergy y fr from Phase 1
- m Phase 1
to be g to be graded aded in Phase 2 in Phase 2
TerraE defines Two-Steps-Strategy to serve market’s need
Europäische Batterie-Allianz
11/26/2017 7
Summary
11/26/2017 8
Planning group for highly modern Giga-Fab is led by TerraE
Su Summa mmary y of
- f Sw
Swed edish ish St Stud udy, , May May 20 2017 17
Focus of the Study
- Analysis of Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions and
Energy Use for Li-Ion Battery Production
- Recommendations for a CO2 neutral Electric Car fleet
- Literature Review on
– Lithium-ion batteries for light-duty vehicles – Energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions – Current and near future chemistries
- Lithium iron phosphate (LFP) cathodes
- Lithium nickel manganese cobalt oxide (NMC) cathodes
- Lithium manganese oxide (LMO) cathodes
- Graphite anodes
Find Findings ings Lif Life Cy e Cycle le As Asse sess ssme ment nt with with th the Sp e Spec ecifi ific c GHG GHG Foo
- otp
tprin rint
Mining
- Total
18 – 50 Material Processing
- Total
48 – 121 (216)
- Most likely
60 -70
Battery Manufacturing
- Total
20 -110
- Most likely
70 -110 Recycling
- Most likely
15
- Pyrometallurgy
Total and Most likely values in kg CO2-eq/kWh [Table 24, page 39] The studies indicate greenhouse gas emissions of 120-250 kg CO2-eq/kWh. Based on the assessment
- f transparency and scientific method this report views a range of 150-200 kg CO2-eq/kWh as the
most likely impact. [page 28] Comment: The range is w.r.t. a fossil share of 50-70%.
w.r.t. = with reference to
Calculation of GHG Footprint
based on the Study Results
Car Battery Size [kWh] 150 kg CO2-eq/kWh 200 kg CO2-eq/kWh Tesla Model S 86 12.9 t CO2 17.2 t CO2 Nissan Leaf 23.8 3.6 t CO2 4.8 t CO2
This calculation shows the GHG Footprint of two batteries with the assumed data from the report. The range of 150 – 200 kg CO2 eq/kWh is w.r.t. a fossil share of 50-70%. About 60% of the emissions are from the battery manufacturing process. Assuming we can use 100% renewable energy in the manufacturing process, we can reduce the GHG Footprint by 60%.
w.r.t. = with reference to
Car Battery Size [kWh] 60 kg CO2-eq/kWh 80 kg CO2-eq/kWh Tesla Model S 86 5,2 t CO2 6,9 t CO2 Nissan Leaf 23,8 1,4 t CO2 1,9 t CO2
CO2 Footprint of ICE and Electrical Powered Cars
11/26/2017 12
2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000
10 000 20 000 30 000 40 000 50 000 60 000 70 000
KG CO2-EQ DRIVING DISTANCE [KM]
EPC (Study) ICE PC EPC (TerraE)
German electricity mix in 2015: 535 g CO2/kWh Assumptions:
- 7 l/100 km: 165 g CO2/km (tank to wheel)
- 18 kWh/100 km (plug to wheel)
- 15,000 km/a average driving distance
TerraE target ~1.5 years for break-even IVL Study based result ~ 2.5 years for break-even
13 11/26/2017