Uniqueness Christian Fleischhack Universit at Paderborn Institut - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

uniqueness
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Uniqueness Christian Fleischhack Universit at Paderborn Institut - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Uniqueness Christian Fleischhack Universit at Paderborn Institut f ur Mathematik Jurekfest, Warszawa, September 2019 1 Canonical Quantization Strategy Given: classical system with first-class constraints 1. Elementary Variables


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Uniqueness

Christian Fleischhack

Universit¨ at Paderborn Institut f¨ ur Mathematik

Jurekfest, Warszawa, September 2019

slide-2
SLIDE 2

1 Canonical Quantization Strategy

  • Given:

classical system with first-class constraints 1. Elementary Variables

  • choose separating space S of phase space functions

2. Quantization

  • choose “representation” of S on some kinematical Hilbert space H,

giving self-adjoint constraints 3. Group Averaging

  • choose constraint-invariant dense subset Φ in Hilbert space H
  • solve constraints using Gelfand triple Φ ⊆ H ⊆ Φ′

η(φ) :=

  • Z

dµ(Z) Zφ ∈ Φ′ 4. Physical Hilbert Space

  • inner product:

ηφ1, ηφ2phys := (ηφ1)[φ2]

  • completion of η(Φ) gives physical Hilbert space,

self-adjoint dual representation of observable algebra

Ashtekar, Lewandowski, Marolf, Mour˜ ao, Thiemann 1995

slide-3
SLIDE 3

1 Canonical Quantization Strategy

  • Given:

classical system with first-class constraints 1. Elementary Variables

  • choose separating space S of phase space functions

2. Quantization

  • choose “representation” of S on some kinematical Hilbert space H,

giving self-adjoint constraints 3. Group Averaging

  • choose constraint-invariant dense subset Φ in Hilbert space H
  • solve constraints using Gelfand triple Φ ⊆ H ⊆ Φ′

η(φ) :=

  • Z

dµ(Z) Zφ ∈ Φ′ 4. Physical Hilbert Space

  • inner product:

ηφ1, ηφ2phys := (ηφ1)[φ2]

  • completion of η(Φ) gives physical Hilbert space,

self-adjoint dual representation of observable algebra

thieMann, mourAo, marolF, lewandowskI, ashtekAr 1995

slide-4
SLIDE 4

1 Canonical Quantization Strategy

  • Given:

classical system with first-class constraints 1. Elementary Variables

  • choose separating space S of phase space functions

2. Quantization

  • choose “representation” of S on some kinematical Hilbert space H,

giving self-adjoint constraints

slide-5
SLIDE 5

1 Canonical Quantization Strategy

  • Given:

classical system 1. Elementary Variables

  • choose separating space S of phase space functions
slide-6
SLIDE 6

2 Basics Gravity

  • Given:

Ashtekar gravity (A, E) 1. Elementary Variables

  • choose separating space S of phase space functions
  • Basic functions

hγ(A) := Pe

  • γ A

ES,f :=

  • S

[∗E](f)

  • Cylindrical functions

b b

γ1 γ2 γ3 γ4

ψ := ψγ ◦ πγ

smooth (γ1, . . . , γn) hγ1 × · · · × hγn : A − → Gn

  • Derivations on Cyl

XS,fψ := {ψ, ES,f}

  • Diffeos act via γ, S, f, e.g.:

αΨ(f ◦ hγ) := f ◦ hΨ(γ)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

3 Holonomy-Flux Algebra LOST Theorem

  • Holonomy-Flux Algebra

H . . . ∗-algebra of all words in Cyl and X factorized by the relations a · X − X · a = i {a, X}

(CCR, a ∈ Cyl ∪ X)

ψ · ψ′ = ψ ψ′

(Cyl-module) + linearity

  • Standard Invariant State

ω0 ω0(a · X) =

(a ∈ H, X ∈ X)

ω0(ψ) =

  • Gn ψγ dµHaar

(ψ = ψγ ◦ πγ ∈ Cyl)

Theorem:

Lewandowski, Oko l´

  • w, Sahlmann, Thiemann 2005

Assume

  • dim M ≥ 2
  • hypersurfaces – semianalytic
  • diffeos – semianalytic
  • smearings with compact support

Then ω0 is the unique state on H that is invariant w.r.t. bundle automorphisms.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

4 Basics Gravity

  • Given:

Ashtekar gravity (A, E) 1. Elementary Variables

  • choose separating space S of phase space functions
  • Basic functions

hγ(A) := Pe

  • γ A

ES,f :=

  • S

[∗E](f)

  • Cylindrical functions

b b

γ1 γ2 γ3 γ4

ψ := ψγ ◦ πγ

smooth (γ1, . . . , γn) hγ1 × · · · × hγn : A − → Gn

  • Derivations on Cyl

XS,fψ := {ψ, ES,f}

  • Diffeos act via γ, S, f, e.g.:

αΨ(f ◦ hγ) := f ◦ hΨ(γ)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

4 Basics Cosmology

  • Given:

Ashtekar gravity (A, E) + homogeneity + isotropy 1. Elementary Variables

  • choose separating space S of phase space functions
  • Basic functions

hγ(A) :=

restricted

Pe

  • γ A

ES,f :=

  • S

[∗E](f)

  • Cylindrical functions

b b

γ1 γ2 γ3 γ4

ψ := ψγ ◦ πγ

smooth (γ1, . . . , γn) hγ1 × · · · × hγn : A − → Gn

  • Derivations on Cyl

XS,fψ := {ψ, ES,f}

  • Diffeos act via γ, S, f, e.g.:

αΨ(f ◦ hγ) := f ◦ hΨ(γ)

slide-10
SLIDE 10

4 Basics Cosmology

  • Given:

Ashtekar gravity (A, E) + homogeneity + isotropy 1. Elementary Variables

  • choose separating space S of phase space functions
  • Basic functions

hγ(A) :=

restricted

Pe

  • γ A

ES,f :=

not smeared

  • S

[∗E](f)

  • Cylindrical functions

b b

γ1 γ2 γ3 γ4

ψ := ψγ ◦ πγ

smooth (γ1, . . . , γn) hγ1 × · · · × hγn : A − → Gn

  • Derivations on Cyl

XS,fψ := {ψ, ES,f}

  • Diffeos act via γ, S, f, e.g.:

αΨ(f ◦ hγ) := f ◦ hΨ(γ)

slide-11
SLIDE 11

4 Basics Cosmology

  • Given:

Ashtekar gravity (A, E) + homogeneity + isotropy 1. Elementary Variables

  • choose separating space S of phase space functions
  • Basic functions

hγ(A) :=

restricted

Pe

  • γ A

ES,f :=

not smeared

  • S

[∗E](f)

  • Cylindrical functions

b b

γ1 γ2 γ3 γ4

restricted to R dense in A := C0(R) ⊕ CAP(R)

ψ := ψγ ◦ πγ

smooth (γ1, . . . , γn) hγ1 × · · · × hγn : A − → Gn

  • Derivations on Cyl

XS,fψ := {ψ, ES,f}

  • Diffeos act via γ, S, f, e.g.:

αΨ(f ◦ hγ) := f ◦ hΨ(γ)

slide-12
SLIDE 12

4 Basics Cosmology

  • Given:

Ashtekar gravity (A, E) + homogeneity + isotropy 1. Elementary Variables

  • choose separating space S of phase space functions
  • Basic functions

hγ(A) :=

restricted

Pe

  • γ A

ES,f :=

not smeared

  • S

[∗E](f)

  • Cylindrical functions

b b

γ1 γ2 γ3 γ4

restricted to R dense in A := C0(R) ⊕ CAP(R)

ψ := ψγ ◦ πγ

smooth (γ1, . . . , γn) hγ1 × · · · × hγn : A − → Gn

  • Derivations on Cyl

XS,fψ := {ψ, ES,f}

X =

d d t

  • Diffeos act via γ, S, f, e.g.:

αΨ(f ◦ hγ) := f ◦ hΨ(γ)

slide-13
SLIDE 13

4 Basics Cosmology

  • Given:

Ashtekar gravity (A, E) + homogeneity + isotropy 1. Elementary Variables

  • choose separating space S of phase space functions
  • Basic functions

hγ(A) :=

restricted

Pe

  • γ A

ES,f :=

not smeared

  • S

[∗E](f)

  • Cylindrical functions

b b

γ1 γ2 γ3 γ4

restricted to R dense in A := C0(R) ⊕ CAP(R)

ψ := ψγ ◦ πγ

smooth (γ1, . . . , γn) hγ1 × · · · × hγn : A − → Gn

  • Derivations on Cyl

XS,fψ := {ψ, ES,f}

X =

d d t

  • Diffeos

residual dilations

act via γ, S, f, e.g.: αΨ(f ◦ hγ) := f ◦ hΨ(γ)

slide-14
SLIDE 14

4 Basics Cosmology

  • Given:

Ashtekar gravity (A, E) + homogeneity + isotropy 1. Elementary Variables

  • choose separating space S of phase space functions
  • Basic functions

hγ(A) :=

restricted

Pe

  • γ A

ES,f :=

not smeared

  • S

[∗E](f)

  • Cylindrical functions

b b

γ1 γ2 γ3 γ4

restricted to R dense in A := C0(R) ⊕ CAP(R)

ψ := ψγ ◦ πγ

smooth (γ1, . . . , γn) hγ1 × · · · × hγn : A − → Gn

  • Derivations on Cyl

XS,fψ := {ψ, ES,f}

X =

d d t

  • Diffeos

residual dilations

act via γ, S, f, e.g.: αΨ(f ◦ hγ) := f ◦ hΨ(γ)

α

λ

( X ) = λ X

slide-15
SLIDE 15

5 Cosmological Holonomy-Flux Algebra LOST Theorem

  • Holonomy-Flux Algebra

H . . . ∗-algebra of all words in Cyl and X factorized by the relations a · X − X · a = i {a, X}

(CCR, a ∈ Cyl ∪ X)

ψ · ψ′ = ψ ψ′

(Cyl-module) + linearity

  • Standard Invariant State

ω0 ω0(a · X) =

(a ∈ H, X ∈ X)

ω0(ψ) =

  • Gn ψγ dµHaar

(ψ = ψγ ◦ πγ ∈ Cyl)

Theorem:

Lewandowski, Oko l´

  • w, Sahlmann, Thiemann 2005

Assume

  • dim M ≥ 2
  • hypersurfaces – semianalytic
  • diffeos – semianalytic
  • smearings with compact support

Then ω0 is the unique state on H that is invariant w.r.t. bundle automorphisms.

slide-16
SLIDE 16

5 Cosmological Holonomy-Flux Algebra THE Theorem

  • Restricted Holonomy-Flux Algebra

HC . . . ∗-algebra of all words in B and X factorized by the relations a · X − X · a = i {a, X}

(CCR, a ∈ Cyl ∪ X)

ψ · ψ′ = ψ ψ′

(B-module) + linearity

  • Standard Invariant State

ω0 ω0(a · X) =

(a ∈ HC, X ∈ X)

ω0(ψ0 + ψAP) =

  • RBohr ψAP dµBohr

Theorem:

Thiemann, Hanusch, Engle 2016; Fleischhack 2018

Assume

  • A := C0(R) ⊕ CAP(R)
  • B := {ψ ∈ A | ψ(n) ∈ A

∀n}

  • hypersurfaces – semianalytic
  • smearings with compact support

Then ω0 is the unique state on HC that is invariant w.r.t. dilations.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

5 Cosmological Holonomy-Flux Algebra THE Theorem

  • Restricted Holonomy-Flux Algebra

HC . . . ∗-algebra of all words in B and X factorized by the relations a · X − X · a = i {a, X}

(CCR, a ∈ Cyl ∪ X)

ψ · ψ′ = ψ ψ′

(B-module) + linearity

  • Standard Invariant State

ω0 ω0(a · X) =

(a ∈ HC, X ∈ X)

ω0(ψ0 + ψAP) =

  • RBohr ψAP dµBohr

Theorem:

Thiemann, Hanusch, Engle 2016; Fleischhack 2018

Assume

  • A := C0(R) ⊕ CAP(R)
  • B := {ψ ∈ A | ψ(n) ∈ A

∀n}

  • hypersurfaces – semianalytic
  • smearings with compact support

Then ω0 is the unique state on HC that is invariant w.r.t. dilations. Remark Holds also for A := CAP(R)

slide-18
SLIDE 18

6 Conclusions Jurek has found, created, inspired strong uniqueness results.

slide-19
SLIDE 19

6 Conclusions Jurek has found, created, inspired strong uniqueness results. Theorem: Jurek is unique.

slide-20
SLIDE 20

6 Conclusions Jurek has found, created, inspired strong uniqueness results. Theorem: Jurek is unique.

slide-21
SLIDE 21

6 Conclusions Jurek has found, created, inspired strong uniqueness results. Theorem: Jurek is unique. Proof:

slide-22
SLIDE 22

6 Conclusions Jurek has found, created, inspired strong uniqueness results. Theorem: Jurek is unique. Proof: Obvious.

slide-23
SLIDE 23

6 Conclusions Jurek has found, created, inspired strong uniqueness results. Theorem: Jurek is unique. Proof: Obvious. qed