Unified description of neutron-star interiors Nicolas Chamel - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

unified description of neutron star interiors
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Unified description of neutron-star interiors Nicolas Chamel - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Unified description of neutron-star interiors Nicolas Chamel Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics Universit Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium in collaboration with S. Goriely (ULB), J. M. Pearson (UMontral), A. F . Fantina (ULB, GANIL) P .


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Unified description of neutron-star interiors

Nicolas Chamel

Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics Université Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium

in collaboration with

  • S. Goriely (ULB), J. M. Pearson (UMontréal), A. F

. Fantina (ULB, GANIL) P . Haensel & J. L. Zdunik (CAMK)

  • Y. D. Mutafchieva & Zh. Stoyanov (INRNE)
  • A. Potekhin (Ioffe)

CAMK, Warsaw, 28 March 2018

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Prelude

Haensel, Potekhin, Yakovlev, “Neutron Stars - 1. Equation of State and Structure” (Springer, 2007)

The interior of a neutron star exhibits very different phases (gas, liquid, solid, superfluid, etc.)

  • ver a very wide range of densities

with possibly exotic particles (hyperons, quarks) in the inner core.

Blaschke&Chamel, contribution to the White Book of the COST Action MP1304, arXiv:1803.01836

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Main motivation

Ad hoc matching of different models can lead to significant errors on the neutron-star structure & dynamics.

12 13 14 15

R (km)

0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5

M (M ⊙)

1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5

M (M ⊙)

0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0

lcr (km)

Unified nm =0.01 nm =nc nm =nt nm =n0 nm =0.5n0 −n0 nm =0.1n0 −nt

Fortin et al., Phys.Rev.C94, 035804 (2016)

Combining different microscopic inputs lead to multiple interpretations of astrophysical phenomena (degeneracy). This calls for a unified description of neutron-star interiors.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Outline

1

Internal constitution of a neutron star

⊲ Main assumptions on dense stellar matter ⊲ Constraints from laboratory experiments ⊲ Predictions from the nuclear-energy density theory ⊲ Phase transitions in the inner core ?

2

Description of specific neutron-star classes

⊲ Highly-magnetized neutron stars ⊲ Accreting neutron stars

3

Conclusions & perspectives

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Neutron-star surface

The surface of a neutron star is expected to be made of iron, the end product of stellar nucleosynthesis (identification of broad Fe K emission lines from accretion disk around neutron stars in LMXB).

Stixrude, Phys.Rev.Lett. 108, 055505 (2012)

Compressed iron can be studied with nuclear explosions and laser-driven shock-wave experiments... But at pressures corresponding to about 0.1 0.1 0.1 mm below the surface (for a star with a mass of 1.4M⊙ and a radius of 12 km) ! Ab initio calculations predict various structural phase transitions.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Crystal Coulomb plasma

At a density ρeip ≈ 2 × 104 g cm−3 (about 22 cm below the surface), the interatomic spacing becomes comparable with the atomic radius.

Ruderman, Scientific American 224, 24 (1971)

At densities ρ ≫ ρeip, atoms are crushed into a dense plasma of nuclei and free electrons. Nuclei become more neutron rich with increasing pressure.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Description of the outer crust of a neutron star

Main assumptions:

cold “catalyzed” matter (full thermodynamic equilibrium)

Harrison, Wakano and Wheeler, Onzième Conseil de Physique Solvay (Stoops, Brussels, Belgium, 1958) pp 124-146

the crust is stratified into pure layers made of nuclei A

ZX

electrons are ∼ uniformly distributed and are highly degenerate T < TF ≈ 5.93 × 109(γr − 1) K γr ≡

  • 1 + x2

r ,

xr ≡ pF mec ≈ 1.00884 ρ6Z A 1/3 nuclei are arranged on a perfect body-centered cubic lattice T < Tm ≈ 1.3 × 105Z 2 ρ6 A 1/3 K ρ6 ≡ ρ/106 g cm−3

Pearson et al.,Phys.Rev.C83, 065810 (2011) Chamel&Fantina,Phys.Rev.D93,063001 (2016)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Experimental “determination” of the outer crust

The composition of the crust is completely determined by experimental atomic masses down to about 200m for a 1.4M⊙ neutron star with a 10 km radius The physics governing the structure of atomic nuclei (magicity) leaves its imprint

  • n the composition.

Due to β equilibrium and electric charge neutrality, Z is more tightly constrained than N: only a few layers with Z = 28.

Kreim, Hempel, Lunney, Schaffner-Bielich, Int.J.M.Spec.349-350,63(2013)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Plumbing neutron stars to new depths

Precision mass measurements of

82Zn by the ISOLTRAP

collaboration at CERN’s ISOLDE radioactive-beam facility in 2013 allowed to "drill" deeper.

Wolf et al.,Phys.Rev.Lett.110,041101(2013)

The composition is very sensitive to uncertainties in nuclear masses. Errors of a few keV/c2 can change the results. Deeper in the star, recourse must be made to theoretical models.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Theoretical challenge

Models of dense matter required to compute all the necessary inputs to astrophysical simulations of neutron stars should be: versatile: applicable to compute all properties under various conditions thermodynamically consistent: avoid spurious instabilities as microscopic as possible: make reliable extrapolations numerically tractable: systematic calculations over a wide range of temperatures, pressures, composition, magnetic field The nuclear energy density functional theory is the most suitable (quantum) approach. Nucleons are treated as independent quasiparticles in a self-consistent potential field (Hartree-Fock-Bogolyubov method).

Dobaczewski&Nazarewicz, in ”50 years of Nuclear BCS” (World Scientific Publishing, 2013), pp.40-60; Chamel,Goriely,Pearson, ibid., pp.284-296

In principle, this theory describes the many-body system exactly provided the exact functional is known (Hohenberg-Kohn theorem)...

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Nuclear-matter uncertainties

Because the exact functional is unknown, phenomenological functionals are employed. How to quantify nuclear-matter uncertainties ? The energy per nucleon of nuclear matter at T = 0 around saturation density n0 and for asymmetry η = (nn − np)/n, is usually written as e(n, η) = e0(n) + S(n)η2 + o

  • η4

where e0(n) = av + Kv 18ǫ2 − K ′ 162 ǫ3 + o

  • ǫ4

with ǫ = (n − n0)/n0 S(n) = J + L 3 ǫ + Ksym 18 ǫ2 + o

  • ǫ3

is the symmetry energy The lack of knowledge is embedded in av, Kv, K ′, etc. In order to make meaningful comparisons, energy-density functionals corresponding to different values of these parameters should be fitted using the same protocole.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Brussels-Montreal Skyrme functionals (BSk)

For application to extreme astrophysical environments, functionals should reproduce global properties of both finite nuclei and infinite homogeneous nuclear matter. Experimental data/constraints: nuclear masses (rms ∼ 0.5 − 0.6 MeV/c2) nuclear charge radii (rms ∼ 0.03 fm) symmetry energy 29 ≤ J ≤ 32 MeV incompressibility Kv = 240 ± 10 MeV Many-body calculations using realistic interactions: equation of state of pure neutron matter

1S0 pairing gaps in nuclear matter

effective masses in nuclear matter stability against spin and spin-isospin fluctuations

Chamel et al., Acta Phys. Pol. B46, 349(2015)

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Neutron-matter stiffness

BSk19, BSk20 and BSk21 were fitted to realistic neutron-matter equations of state with different of degrees of stiffness:

Goriely, Chamel, Pearson, Phys. Rev. C 82, 035804 (2010).

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Neutron-matter constraints at low densities

All three functionals are consistent with ab initio calculations at densities relevant for the inner crust and outer core of neutron stars:

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Symmetry-energy constraint

The functionals BSk22-26 were also fitted to realistic neutron-matter equations of state but with different values for J = 29 − 32 MeV:

Goriely, Chamel, Pearson, Phys.Rev.C 88, 024308 (2013).

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Theoretical predictions of the outer crust

0m

HFB-19 HFB-21

a t

inner crust core

  • uter

crust

200m 300m

62 64 66 86Kr 84Se 82Ge

Ni

124Mo

Sr

56Fe 80Zn 79Cu 122Zr 120 122 124

Ni

100m

78 80 121Y 62 64 66 86Kr 84Se 82Ge 80Ni 126Ru 124Mo 122 124

Sr

56Fe 80Zn 78Ni

Zr

120 122 124 126

Ni

82Zn

N≈82 N≈50 10km

Predictions from HFB-21 of

  • dd nuclei 79Cu, 121Y.

Composition dominated by nuclei with N close to magic number N = 82. Sr isotopes are the most abundant nuclides (∼ 40%).

  • nly 0.04% in Earth’s crust

Pearson et al.,Phys.Rev.C83,065810(2011) Wolf et al.,Phys.Rev.Lett.110,041101(2013)

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Role of the symmetry energy

The composition of the outer crust is only slightly influenced by the density dependence of the symmetry energy S(n). The proton fraction varies roughly as Yp = Z A ∼ 1 2 − (12π2(c)3P)1/4 8S

10

  • 5

10

  • 4

n [fm

  • 3]

0.3 0.35 0.4 Yp HFB-22 HFB-24 HFB-25 HFB-26

Pearson et al., Eur. Phys. J.A50,43(2014); Pearson et al. in prep.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Equation of state of the outer crust

The pressure, determined by electrons, is almost independent of the

  • composition. Analytical fits: http://www.ioffe.ru/astro/NSG/BSk/
slide-19
SLIDE 19

Stratification and equation of state

Transitions between adjacent crustal layers are accompanied by density discontinuities.

n P nmax

1

nmin

2

P

1 2

1 2 1+2 + Mixed solid phases cannot exist in a neutron star crust because P has to increase strictly monotonically with ¯ n (hydrostatic equilibrium).

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Compounds in neutron-star crusts?

Multinary ionic compounds made of nuclei with charges {Zi} might exist in the crust of a neutron star.

Dyson, Ann. Phys.63, 1 (1971); Witten, ApJ 188, 615 (1974)

Necessary conditions: stability against weak and strong nuclear processes.

Jog&Smith, ApJ 253, 839(1982).

stability against the separation into pure (bcc) phases: R({Zi/Zj}) ≡ C Cbcc f({Zi}) ¯ Z Z 5/3 > 1 where f({Zi}) is the dimensionless lattice structure function of the compound and C the corresponding structure constant.

Chamel & Fantina, Phys. Rev. C94, 065802 (2016).

Stellar vs terrestrial compounds: (i) they are made of nuclei; (ii) electrons form an essentially uniform relativistic Fermi gas.

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Substitutional compounds in neutron-star crusts

Compounds with CsCl structure are present at interfaces if Z1 = Z2.

n P nmax

1

nmin

2

nmin

1+2 nmax 1+2

P

1 1+2

P

2 1+2

P

1 2

1 2 1+2 But they only exist over an extremely small range of pressures.

Chamel&Fantina, Phys. Rev. C94, 065802 (2016).

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Neutron-star crust and nuclear masses

The composition of the outer crust is completely determined by nuclear masses M′(A, Z). Essentially exact analytical expressions valid for any degree of relativity of the electron gas and including electrostatic correction:

Chamel&Fantina,Phys.Rev.C94,065802(2016)

In the limit of ultrarelativistic electron Fermi gas: P1→2 ≈ (µ1→2

e

)4 12π2(c)3 , ¯ nmax

1

≈ A1 Z1 (µ1→2

e

)3 3π2(c)3 , ¯ nmin

2

≈ A2 Z2 Z1 A1 ¯ nmax

1

µ1→2

e

≡ M′(A2, Z2)c2 A2 − M′(A1, Z1)c2 A1 Z1 A1 − Z2 A2 −1 + mec2 Since ¯ nmin

2

> ¯ nmax

1

in hydrostatic equilibrium, nuclei become more neutron rich (Z2/A2 < Z1/A1) and less bound with increasing depth.

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Description of the inner crust of a neutron star

At densities ∼ 4.4 × 1011 g cm−3, neutrons drip out of nuclei thus marking the transition to the inner crust.

Negele&Vautherin,Nucl.Phys.A207,298(1973)

The neutron-saturated clusters owe their stability to the presence of a highly degenerate surrounding neutron liquid. Unbound neutrons are expected to be superfluid at T ≤ Tc by forming Cooper pairs analogously to electrons in conventional superconductors. The conditions prevailing in the inner crust of a neutron star cannot be reproduced in terrestrial laboratories.

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Fast numerical implementation of HFB equations

We use the Extended Thomas-Fermi+Strutinsky Integral (ETFSI) approach with the same functional as in the outer crust: semiclassical expansion in powers of 2: the energy becomes a functional of nn(r r r) and np(r r r) and their gradients only. proton shell effects are added perturbatively (neutron shell effects are much smaller and therefore neglected). In order to further speed-up the calculations, clusters are supposed to be spherical (no pastas) and nn(r r r), np(r r r) are parametrized.

Pearson,Chamel,Pastore,Goriely,Phys.Rev.C91, 018801 (2015). Pearson,Chamel,Goriely,Ducoin,Phys.Rev.C85,065803(2012). Onsi,Dutta,Chatri,Goriely,Chamel,Pearson, Phys.Rev.C77,065805 (2008).

Advantages of the ETFSI method:

very fast approximation to the full HFB equations avoids the pitfalls related to continuum states

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Structure of the inner crust of neutron star

With increasing density, clusters keep ∼ the same size but are more and more dilute, and dissolve at ¯ n ∼ 0.07 − 0.09 fm−3.

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 r [fm] 0.04 0.08 0.12 0.04 0.08 0.12 0.04 0.08 0.12 0.04 0.08 0.12 0.04 0.08 0.12 0.04 0.08 0.12 n = 0.0749994 n = 0.0608667 n = 0.0427486 n = 0.0210866 n = 0.0051307 nn(r), np(r) [fm

  • 3]

n = 0.00027

The crust-core transition is found to be very smooth.

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Proton shell effects in stellar environments

The ordinary nuclear shell structure is altered in dense matter: Z = 28, 82 disappear, while 40, 58, 92 appear (quenched spin-orbit).

Energy per nucleon obtained with BSk24:

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Z 6.956 6.958 6.96 6.962 6.964 6.966 6.968 6.97 e [MeV] n=0.0480922 fm

  • 3
slide-27
SLIDE 27

Role of shell effects and symmetry energy

The composition of the inner crust is strongly influenced by proton shell effects and the symmetry energy:

Terrestrial abundances: Zirconium (Z = 40): 0.02% Cerium (Z = 58): 0.007%

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Symmetry energy and proton fraction

The proton fraction Yp of the inner crust is governed by the density dependence of the symmetry energy S(n): the lower S the lower Yp. Analytical fits: http://www.ioffe.ru/astro/NSG/BSk/

0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.1

n [fm

  • 3]

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26

S(n) [MeV] BSk22 BSk24 BSk25 BSk26

Pearson et al. in prep.

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Equation of state of the inner crust

The pressure in the inner crust is related to the slope L of the symmetry energy P ∼ L 3 n2

n

n0 Analytical fits: http://www.ioffe.ru/astro/NSG/BSk/

0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.1

n [fm

  • 3]

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26

S(n) [MeV] BSk22 BSk24 BSk25 BSk26

Pearson et al., in prep.

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Unified equations of state of neutron stars

The same functionals used in the crust can be also used in the core (n, p, e−, µ−) thus providing a unified and thermodynamically consistent description of neutron stars. Analytical fits: http://www.ioffe.ru/astro/NSG/BSk/

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Adiabatic index

Unified equations of state can hardly be parametrized by polytropes!

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 log10 ρ [g cm

  • 3]

1 2 3 Γ BSk19 BSk20 BSk21 SLy FPS

Potekhin, Fantina, Chamel, Pearson, Goriely, A&A 560, A48 (2013)

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Symmetry energy and proton fraction

The proton fraction Yp of the core is governed by the density dependence of the symmetry energy S(n): the lower S the lower Yp. Analytical fits: http://www.ioffe.ru/astro/NSG/BSk/

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5

n [fm

  • 3]

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900

S(n) [MeV] BSk22 BSk24 BSk25 BSk26

The direct Urca process is allowed in all models but BSk19, BSk20 and BSk26.

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Gross properties of nonrotating neutron stars

Potekhin,Fantina,Chamel,Pearson,Goriely,A&A 560, A48 (2013) Fantina,Chamel,Pearson,Goriely,A&A 559, A128 (2013)

BSk19 is too soft: it is ruled out by observations of 2M⊙ neutron stars.

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Gross properties of nonrotating neutron stars

The radius of a 1.4M⊙ neutron star is predicted to lie between 11.8 and 13.1 km: this difference is potentially observable.

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Exotic neutron star cores

The inner core of a neutron star may contain hyperons, meson condensates, or even deconfined quarks:

Hydrogen/He atmosphere

R ~ 10 km n,p,e, µ neutron star with pion condensate quark−hybrid star hyperon star g/cm 3 10 11 g/cm 3 10 6 g/cm 3 10 14 Fe

− π

K−

s u e r c n d c t g p

  • n

i u

p r

  • t
  • n

s

color−superconducting strange quark matter (u,d,s quarks)

CFL−K + CFL−K0 CFL−

π

2SC+s 2SC n,p,e, µ

quarks u,d,s

crust N+e H traditional neutron star strange star N+e+n Σ,Λ,Ξ,∆ n superfluid nucleon star

CFL

CFL

2SC

picture from F . Weber

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Phase transition in neutron-star cores

Given the current uncertainties, we consider a 1st order transition to an exotic phase with the stiffest possible equation of state:

causality constraint vs ≤ c quarks vs ≤ c/ √ 3

Chamel, Fantina, Pearson, Goriely,A&A553, A22 (2013)

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Exotica and maximum neutron-star mass

causality constraint vs ≤ c quarks vs ≤ c/ √ 3

“Soft” nucleonic matter (BSk19) as suggested by heavy-ion collisions are not necessarily ruled out by observations. Neutron stars with M > 2M⊙ would be hardly compatible with the presence of free (noninteracting) quarks in their core.

Chamel, Fantina, Pearson, Goriely, A&A553, A22 (2013)

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Highly-magnetized neutron stars

Some neutron stars are endowed with extremely high surface magnetic fields ∼ 1014 − 1015 G, as inferred from spin-down and spectroscopic studies. According to simulations, the internal field could reach 1018 G. Very high magnetic fields are thought to be at the origin of giant flares observed in Soft Gamma-ray Repeaters.

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Role of a high magnetic field on dense matter?

At the surface of neutron stars B 2 × 1015 G. The electron motion perpendicular to B B B is quantised into Landau orbitals with a characteristic scale am = a0

  • Bat/B, where a0 is the Bohr radius

For B ≫ Bat = m2

ee3c/3 ≃ 2.35 × 109 G, atoms are expected to

adopt a very elongated shape along B B B and to form linear chains

Ruderman, PRL27, 1306 (1971); Medin&Lai, Phys.Rev. A74, 062508 (2006)

The attractive interaction between these chains could lead to a transition into a condensed phase with a surface density ρs ∼ 560AZ −3/5(B/1012 G)6/5 g cm−3 In deeper regions of the crust, matter is very stiff ρ ≈ ρs

  • 1 +
  • P

P0

  • ,

P0 ≃ 1.45×1020(B/1012 G)7/5 Z A 2 dyn cm−2

Lai, Rev.Mod.Phys.73, 629 (2001); Chamel et al., Phys.Rev.C86, 055804 (2012)

slide-40
SLIDE 40

The intriguing case of RX J1856.5-3754

X-ray observations with Chandra

Turolla et al., ApJ 603, 265 (2004) van Adelsberg et al., ApJ 628, 902 (2005) Trümper (2005), astro-ph/0502457

Recent review: Potekhin et al., Space Sci. Rev. 191, 171 (2015) The thermal X-ray emission is best fitted by a black body spectrum: evidence for a condensed surface? The presence of high B B B has found additional support from recent optical polarimetry measurements.

Mignani et al., MNRAS 465, 492 (2017)

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Composition of highly-magnetized crust

The composition changes with B, but not the structure (bcc).

Kozhberov, Astrophys. Space Sci.361, 256 (2016)

Equilibrium nuclides for HFB-24 and B⋆ ≡ B/(4.4 × 1013 G): Nuclide B⋆

58Fe(-)

9

66Ni(-)

67

88Sr(+)

859

126Ru(+)

1031

80Ni(-)

1075

128Pd(+)

1445

78Ni(-)

1610

79Cu(-)

1617

64Ni(-)

1668

130Cd(+)

1697

132Sn(+)

1989

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800

B/Brel

0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25 1.5 1.75 2 2.25 2.5 2.75

n [10

  • 4 fm
  • 3]

56Fe 64Ni 62Ni 86Kr 84Se 82Ge 80Zn 79Cu 78Ni 80Ni 124Mo 122Zr 121Y 124Sr 120Sr 122Sr

Chamel et al., Prog. Theor. Chem. & Phys. (Springer, 2017), pp 181-191.

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Quantum oscillations

The neutron-drip density exhibits typical quantum oscillations. Example using HFB-24:

500 1000 1500 2000 B/Bcrit 1.8 2 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3 3.2 n [10

  • 4 fm
  • 3]

HFB-22 HFB-23 HFB-24 HFB-25 HFB-26 HFB-27* DZ

Universal oscillations: ¯ nmin

drip

¯ ndrip(B⋆ = 0) ≈ 3 4 ¯ nmax

drip

¯ ndrip(B⋆ = 0) ≈ 35 + 13 √ 13 72 In the strongly quantising regime, ¯ ndrip ≈ A Z µdrip

e

mec2 B⋆ 2π2λ3

e

  • 1 − 4

3CαZ 2/3 B⋆ 2π2 1/3 mec2 µdrip

e

2/3

Chamel et al.,Phys.Rev.C91, 065801(2015). Chamel et al.,J.Phys.:Conf.Ser.724, 012034 (2016).

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Quantum oscillations

The neutron-drip density exhibits typical quantum oscillations. Example using HFB-24:

500 1000 1500 2000 B/Bcrit 1.8 2 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3 3.2 n [10

  • 4 fm
  • 3]

HFB-22 HFB-23 HFB-24 HFB-25 HFB-26 HFB-27* DZ

Universal oscillations: ¯ nmin

drip

¯ ndrip(B⋆ = 0) ≈ 3 4 ¯ nmax

drip

¯ ndrip(B⋆ = 0) ≈ 35 + 13 √ 13 72 In the strongly quantising regime, ¯ ndrip ≈ A Z µdrip

e

mec2 B⋆ 2π2λ3

e

  • 1 − 4

3CαZ 2/3 B⋆ 2π2 1/3 mec2 µdrip

e

2/3

Chamel et al.,Phys.Rev.C91, 065801(2015). Chamel et al.,J.Phys.:Conf.Ser.724, 012034 (2016).

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Accretion and X-ray binaries

The composition of the surface layers may be changed by the fallback of material from the supernova explosion, the accretion of matter from a stellar companion. The accretion of matter triggers explosive thermonuclear reactions giving rise to X-ray bursts. Ashes are further processed as they sink inside the star, releasing heat.

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Accreted neutron star crusts

The original crust is buried in the core and replaced by accreted material with very different properties.

Composition and crustal heating for ashes made of 56Fe:

Results are very sensitive to shell effects (magic number Z = 14)

Fantina,Zdunik,Chamel,Pearson,Haensel,Goriely, in prep.

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Compounds in accreted crusts

Various compounds can form from ashes of X-ray bursts:

CsCl NaCl Z1 Z2 Z1 Z2 BaTiO3 Z1 Z2 Z3

Rocksalt: AgNe. Cesium chloride: AgCa, AgTi, AgCr, AgFe, AgCo, AgNi, AgZn, AgGe, AgAs, AgSe, AgKr, KrCa, KrTi, KrCr, KrFe, KrCo, KrNi, KrZn, KrGe, KrAs, KrSe, SeCa, SeTi, SeCr, SeFe, SeCo, SeNi, SeZn, SeGe, SeAs, AsCa, AsTi, AsCr, AsFe, AsCo, AsNi, AsZn, AsGe, GeCa, GeTi, GeCr, GeFe, GeCo, GeNi, GeZn, ZnCa, ZnTi, ZnCr, ZnFe, ZnCo, ZnNi, NiCa, NiTi, NiCr, NiFe, NiCo, CoCa, CoTi, CoCr, CoFe, FeCa, FeTi, FeCr, CrCa, CrTi, TiCa. Perovskite: AgNeO3.

Chamel, J. Phys. Conf.S.932, 012039 (2017)

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Conclusions & Perspectives

We have developed a set of unified equations of state for neutron stars using accurately calibrated nuclear-energy density functionals varying the neutron-matter stiffness (BSk19-21) & symmetry energy (BSk22-26). Tables:

http://vizier.cfa.harvard.edu/viz-bin/VizieR?-source=J/A+A/559/A128

Analytical fits: (including composition & local nucleon distributions)

http://www.ioffe.ru/astro/NSG/BSk/

Unified equations of state for accreted neutron stars and magnetars are under development.

Perspectives:

Consistent calculations of superfluid properties, Extension to finite temperatures (neutron-star mergers), Allowance for nuclear “pasta” mantle (if any) beneath the crust, Inclusion of exotica in the core (neutron stars with M 1.4M⊙).