Understanding unreported cases in the COVID-19 epidemic outbreak and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

understanding unreported cases in the covid 19 epidemic
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Understanding unreported cases in the COVID-19 epidemic outbreak and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Understanding unreported cases in the COVID-19 epidemic outbreak and the importance of major public health interventions Quentin Griette and Pierre Magal University of Bordeaux, France Modelling the propagation of COVID-19, EHESS Mai 20 2020.


slide-1
SLIDE 1

1/48

Understanding unreported cases in the COVID-19 epidemic outbreak and the importance of major public health interventions

Quentin Griette and Pierre Magal

University of Bordeaux, France Modelling the propagation of COVID-19, EHESS Mai 20 2020.

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2/48

Co-authors

Zhihua Liu, Beijing Normal University, China Ousmane Seydi, Ecole Polethnique de Thies, Senegal Glenn Webb, Vanderbilt University, USA

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3/48

Abstract

We develop a mathematical model to provide epidemic predictions for the COVID-19 epidemic in China. We use reported case data from the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention and the Wuhan Municipal Health Commission to parameterize the model. From the parameterized model we identify the number of unreported cases. We then use the model to project the epidemic forward with varying level of public health interventions. The model predictions emphasize the importance of major public health interventions in controlling COVID-19 epidemics.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4/48

Outline

1

Introduction

2

Results

3

Numerical Simulations

4

Age dependency in COVID-19 for Japan

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5/48

What are unreported cases?

Unreported cases are missed because authorities are not doing enough testing on people showing symptoms, or ’preclinical cases’ in which people are incubating the virus but not yet showing symptoms. Research published1 traced COVID-19 infections which resulted from a busi- ness meeting in Germany attended by someone infected but who showed no symptoms at the time. Four people were ultimately infected from that single contact.

1Rothe, et al., Transmission of 2019-nCoV infection from an asymptomatic contact

in Germany. New England Journal of Medicine (2020).

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6/48

Why unreported cases are important?

A team in Japan2 reports that 13 evacuees from the Diamond Princess were infected, of whom 4, or 31%, never developed symptoms. A team in China 3 suggests that by 18 February, there were 37,400 people with the virus in Wuhan whom authorities didn’t know about.

2Nishiura et al. Serial interval of novel coronavirus (COVID-19) infections, Int. J.

  • Infect. Dis.

(2020).

3Wang et al. Evolving Epidemiology and Impact of Non-pharmaceutical Interventions

  • n the Outbreak of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Wuhan, China, medRxiv (2020)
slide-7
SLIDE 7

7/48

Early models designed for the COVID-19

Wu et al. 4 used a susceptible-exposed-infectious-recovered metapopulation model to simulate the epidemics across all major cities in China. Tang et al. 5 proposed an SEIR compartmental model based on the clinical progression based on the clinical progression of the disease, epidemiological status of the individuals, and the intervention measures which did not consider unreported cases.

4Wu, Joseph T., Kathy Leung, and Gabriel M. Leung, Nowcasting and forecasting

the potential domestic and international spread of the COVID-19 outbreak originating in Wuhan, China: a modelling study, The Lancet, (2020).

5Biao Tang, Xia Wang, Qian Li, Nicola Luigi Bragazzi, Sanyi Tang, Yanni Xiao,

Jianhong Wu, Estimation of the transmission risk of COVID-19 and its implication for public health interventions, Journal of Clinical Medicine, (2020).

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8/48

Early results on identification the number of unreported cases

Identifying the number of unreported cases was considered recently in Magal and Webb6 Ducrot, Magal, Nguyen and Webb 7 In these works we consider an SIR model and we consider the Hong-Kong seasonal influenza epidemic in New York City in 1968-1969.

  • 6P. Magal and G. Webb, The parameter identification problem for SIR epidemic

models: Identifying Unreported Cases, J. Math. Biol. (2018).

  • 7A. Ducrot, P. Magal, T. Nguyen, G. Webb. Identifying the Number of Unreported

Cases in SIR Epidemic Models. Mathematical Medicine and Biology, (2019)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9/48

Outline

1

Introduction

2

Results

3

Numerical Simulations

4

Age dependency in COVID-19 for Japan

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10/48

The model

Our model consists of the following system of ordinary differential equations          S′(t) = −τS(t)[I(t) + U(t)], I′(t) = τS(t)[I(t) + U(t)] − νI(t), R′(t) = ν1I(t) − ηR(t), U ′(t) = ν2I(t) − ηU(t). (2.1) Here t ≥ t0 is time in days, t0 is the beginning date of the epidemic, S(t) is the number of individuals susceptible to infection at time t, I(t) is the number

  • f asymptomatic infectious individuals at time t, R(t) is the number of reported

symptomatic infectious individuals (i.e. symptomatic infectious with sever symp- toms) at time t, and U(t) is the number of unreported symptomatic infectious individuals (i.e. symptomatic infectious with mild symptoms) at time t. This system is supplemented by initial data S(t0) = S0 > 0, I(t0) = I0 > 0, R(t0) ≥ 0 and U(t0) = U0 ≥ 0. (2.2)

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11/48

Compartments and flow chart of the model.

S I R U

Symptomatic Asymptomatic

τS[I + U] ν1 I ν2I

Removed

η R ηU

Figure: Compartments and flow chart of the model.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12/48

Why the exposed class can be neglected?

Exposed individuals are infected but not yet capable to transmit the pathogen. A team in China8 detected high viral loads in 17 people with COVID-19 soon after they became ill. Moreover, another infected individual never developed symptoms but shed a similar amount of virus to those who did. In Liu et al. 9 we compare the model (2.1) with exposure and the best fit is obtained for an average exposed period of 6-12 hours.

8Zou, L., SARS-CoV-2 viral load in upper respiratory specimens of infected patients.

New England Journal of Medicine, (2020).

  • 9Z. Liu, P. Magal, O. Seydi, and G. Webb, A COVID-19 epidemic model with latency

period, Infectious Disease Modelling (to appear)

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13/48

Parameters of the model

Symbol Interpretation Method

t0

Time at which the epidemic started

fitted S0

Number of susceptible at time t0

fixed I0

Number of asymptomatic infectious at time t0

fitted U0

Number of unreported symptomatic infectious at time t0

fitted R0

Number of reported symptomatic infectious at time t0

fixed τ

Transmission rate

fitted 1/ν

Average time during which asymptomatic infectious are asymptomatic

fixed f

Fraction of asymptomatic infectious that become reported symptomatic infectious

fixed ν1 = f ν

Rate at which asymptomatic infectious become reported symptomatic

fixed ν2 = (1 − f) ν

Rate at which asymptomatic infectious become unreported symptomatic

fixed 1/η

Average time symptomatic infectious have symptoms

fixed

Table: Parameters of the model.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14/48

Estimation of the parameters for the model (2.1)

We fit the data by using a phenomenological model for the cumulative number of reported CR(t) CR(t) = χ1 exp (χ2t) − χ3. (2.3) By using our model the cumulative number of reported is given by CR(t) = ν1

t

  • t0

I(s)ds. (2.4)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15/48

By fixing S(t) = S0 in the I-equation of system (2.1), we obtain t0 = 1 χ2 [ln(χ3) − ln(χ1)] I0 = χ1χ2 exp (χ2t0) f ν = χ3χ2 f ν , (2.5) τ = χ2 + ν S0 η + χ2 ν2 + η + χ2 , (2.6) and U0 = (1 − f)ν η + χ2 I0 and R0 = fν η + χ2 I0. (2.7)

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16/48

Outline

1

Introduction

2

Results

3

Numerical Simulations

4

Age dependency in COVID-19 for Japan

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17/48

Numerical Simulations

We can find multiple values of η, ν and f which provide a good fit for the

  • data. For application of our model, η, ν and f must vary in a reasonable
  • range. For the corona virus COVID-19 epidemic in Wuhan at its current

stage, the values of η, ν and f are not known. From preliminary information, we use the values f = 0.8, η = 1/7, ν = 1/7.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18/48

Fit of the exponential model (2.4) to the data for China (top) Hubei province (middle) and Wuhan City (bottom)

20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 5.5 6 6.5 7 7.5 8 8.5 9 9.5 time in day log(CR(t)+χ3) 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 time in day CR(t) 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 6 6.5 7 7.5 8 8.5 9 9.5 time in day log(CR(t)+χ3) 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 time in day CR(t) 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 6 6.2 6.4 6.6 6.8 7 7.2 7.4 7.6 7.8 time in day log(CR(t)+χ3) 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200 2400 time in day CR(t)

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19/48

Time dependent transmission rate τ(t)

The formula for τ(t) during the exponential decreasing phase was derived by a fitting procedure. The formula for τ(t) is

  • τ(t) = τ0, 0 ≤ t ≤ N,

τ(t) = τ0 exp (−µ (t − N)) , N < t. (3.1) The date N is the first day of the confinement and the value of µ is the intensity of the confinement. The parameters N and µ are chosen so that the cumulative reported cases in the numerical simulation of the epidemic aligns with the cumulative reported case data during a period of time after January 19. We choose N = 25 (January 25) for our simulations.

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20/48

10 20 30 40 50 60 1.×10-8 2.×10-8 3.×10-8 4.×10-8

τ(t)

Figure: Graph of τ(t) with N = 25 (January 25) and µ = 0.16. The transmission rate is effectively 0.0 after day 53 (February 22).

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21/48

Predicting the epidemic in China with f = 0.8

20 30 40 50 60 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000

A: Data January 19 - January 31

μ = 0.16

Data CR(t) CU(t) R(t) U(t) 20 30 40 50 60 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 60000

B: Data January 19 - February 7

μ = 0.14

Data CR(t) CU(t) R(t) U(t) 20 30 40 50 60 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 60000

C: Data January 19 - February 14

μ = 0.14

Data CR(t) CU(t) R(t) U(t) 20 30 40 50 60 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 60000

D: Data January 19 - February 21

μ = 0.139

Data CR(t) CU(t) R(t) U(t) 20 30 40 50 60 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 60000

E: Data January 19 - February 28

μ = 0.139

Data CR(t) CU(t) R(t) U(t) 20 30 40 50 60 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 60000

F: Data January 19 - March 6

μ = 0.139

Data CR(t) CU(t) R(t) U(t)

slide-22
SLIDE 22

22/48

Daily number of cases

The daily number of reported cases from the model can be obtained by computing the solution of the following equation: DR′(t) = ν f I(t) − DR(t), for t ≥ t0 and DR(t0) = DR0. (3.2)

slide-23
SLIDE 23

23/48

Predicting the weekly data in China

Jan 21 Jan 28 Feb 04 Feb 11 Feb 18 Feb 25 Mar 03 Mar 10 Mar 17 2020 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000

DR(t) Daily Data

slide-24
SLIDE 24

24/48

Multiple good fit simulations

We vary the time interval [d1, d2] during which we use the data to obtain χ1 and χ2 by using an exponential fit. In the simulations below we vary the first day d1, the last day d2, N (date at which public intervention measures became effective) such that all possible sets of parameters (d1, d2, N) will be considered. For each (d1, d2, N) we evaluate µ to obtain the best fit

  • f the model to the data.

We use the mean absolute deviation as the distance to data to evaluate the best fit to the data. We obtain a large number of best fit depending on (d1, d2, N, f) and we plot the smallest mean absolute deviation MADmin. Then we plot all the best fit with mean absolute deviation between MADmin and MADmin + 5.

Remark 3.1

The number 5 chosen in MADmin + 5 is questionable. We use this value for all the simulations since it gives sufficiently many runs that are fitting very well the data and which gives later a sufficiently large deviation.

slide-25
SLIDE 25

25/48

Cumulative data for China until February 6 with f = 0.6

slide-26
SLIDE 26

26/48

Cumulative data for China until March 12 with f = 0.6

slide-27
SLIDE 27

27/48

Daily data for China until February 6 with f = 0.6

slide-28
SLIDE 28

28/48

Daily data for China until March 12 with f = 0.6

slide-29
SLIDE 29

29/48

Cumulative data for France until Mars 30 with f = 0.4

slide-30
SLIDE 30

30/48

Cumulative data for France until April 20 with f = 0.4

slide-31
SLIDE 31

31/48

Cumulative data for France until Mai 17 with f = 0.4

slide-32
SLIDE 32

32/48

Daily data for France until Mars 30 with f = 0.4

slide-33
SLIDE 33

33/48

Daily data for France until April 20 with f = 0.4

slide-34
SLIDE 34

34/48

Daily data for France until Mai 17 with f = 0.4

Mar Apr May Jun 2020 2000 4000 6000 8000

slide-35
SLIDE 35

35/48

Outline

1

Introduction

2

Results

3

Numerical Simulations

4

Age dependency in COVID-19 for Japan

slide-36
SLIDE 36

36/48

Early models with age designed for the COVID-19

Prem, Liu, Russell, et al., 10 They use an SIR model with age classes. They use a matrix of contacts which is obtained from real data. No comparison of their model with time dependent age structured data is presented. There are more results about age and COVID-19 Ayoub et al. 11 and Chikina and Pegden 12

  • 10K. Prem, Y. Liu, T. W Russell, et al., The effect of control strategies to reduce

social mixing on outcomes of the COVID-19 epidemic in Wuhan, China: a modelling study, The Lancet Public Health 5(5) (2020).

  • 11H. H. Ayoub, et al., Age could be driving variable SARS-CoV-2 epidemic trajectories

worldwide, medRxiv (2020).

  • 12M. Chikina and W. Pegden, Modeling strict age-targeted mitigation strategies for

COVID-19, arXiv (2020).

slide-37
SLIDE 37

37/48

Age dependence on the number of reported case of COVID-19 in Japan 13

[0,10[ [10,20[ [20,30[ [30,40[ [40,50[ [50,60[ [60,70[ [70,80[ [80,90[ [90,100[ 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600

Figure: In this figure we plot in blue the age distribution of the Japanese population for 10 000 people and we plot in orange the age distribution of the number of reported cases of SARS-CoV-2 for 13660 patients on April 29. We

  • bserve that 77% of the confirmed patients belong to the 20–60 years age class.

13https://covid19japan.com/

slide-38
SLIDE 38

38/48

Multiple exponential growth of cumulative reported number of case per age classe

Apr 500 2020 10 1000 Mar 20 1500 30 2000 40 Age 50 60 Feb 70 80 90 100

Figure: Time evolution of the cumulative number of reported cases of SARS-CoV-2 per age class.

slide-39
SLIDE 39

39/48

Multiple exponential growth of cumulative reported number of case per age classe

Jan 15 Jan 30 Feb 14 Feb 29 Mar 15 Mar 30 Apr 14 Apr 29 2020 250 500 750 1000 1250 1500 1750 2000 2250 Age in [0,10[ Age in [10,20[ Age in [20,30[ Age in [30,40[ Age in [40,50[ Age in [50,60[ Age in [60,70[ Age in [70,80[ Age in [80,90[ Age in [90,100[ Age over 100

Figure: Time evolution of the cumulative number of reported cases of SARS-CoV-2 per age class.

slide-40
SLIDE 40

40/48

Age dependence on the number of death due to COVID-19 in Japan 14

[0,10[ [10,20[ [20,30[ [30,40[ [40,50[ [50,60[ [60,70[ [70,80[ [80,90[ [90,100[ 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45

Figure: Cumulated number of SARS-CoV-2-induced deaths per age class. We

  • bserve that 83% of death occur in between 70 and 100 years old.

14https://covid19japan.com/

slide-41
SLIDE 41

41/48

Model with age structure

We consider N1, . . . , N10 the number of individuals respectively for the age classes [0, 10[, . . . , [90 The model for the number of susceptible individuals S1(t), . . . , S10(t), respectively for the age classes [0, 10[, . . . , [90, 100[, is the following

            

S′

1(t) = −τ1S1(t)

  • φ1,1 (I1(t) + U1(t))

N1 + . . . + φ1,10 (I10(t) + U10(t)) N10

  • ,

. . . S′

10(t) = −τ10S10(t)

  • φ10,1 (I1(t) + U1(t))

N1 + . . . + φ10,10 (I10(t) + U10(t)) N10

  • .

(4.1) The model for the number of asymptomatic infectious individuals I1(t), . . . , I10(t), re- spectively for the age classes [0, 10[, . . . , [90, 100[, is the following

            

I′

1(t) = τ1S1(t)

  • φ1,1 (I1(t) + U1(t))

N1 + . . . + φ1,10 (I10(t) + U10(t)) N10

  • − νI1(t),

. . . I′

10(t) = τ10S10(t)

  • φ10,1 (I1(t) + U1(t))

N1 + . . . + φ10,10 (I10(t) + U10(t)) N10

  • − νI10(t).

(4.2)

slide-42
SLIDE 42

42/48

The model for the number of reported symptomatic infectious individuals R1(t), . . . , R10(t), respectively for the age classes [0, 10[, . . . , [90, 100[, is

    

R′

1(t) = ν1 1 I1(t) − ηR1(t),

. . . R′

10(t) = ν10 1 I10(t) − ηR10(t).

(4.3) Finally the model for the number of unreported symptomatic infectious individuals U1(t), . . ., U10(t), respectively in the age classes [0, 10[, . . . , [90, 100[, is the following

    

U ′

1(t) = ν1 2 I1(t) − ηU1(t),

. . . U ′

10(t) = ν10 2 I10(t) − ηU10(t).

(4.4)

slide-43
SLIDE 43

43/48

Thanks to Prem, Cook and Jit 15 we obtain the matrix of conditional prob- ability φi,j of contact between age classes which is the following 0 102030405060708090

age of contact

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

age of individual

0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4

  • 15K. Prem, A.R. Cook, M. Jit, Projecting social contact matrices in 152 countries

using contact surveys and demographic data, PLoS Computational Biology 13(9) (2017)

slide-44
SLIDE 44

44/48

Dependency of other parameters

In order to describe the confinement for the age structured model (4.1)- (4.4) we will use for each age class i = 1, . . . , 10 a different transmission rate having the following form

  • τi(t) = τi, 0 ≤ t ≤ Di,

τi(t) = τi exp (−µi (t − Di)) , Di < t. (4.5) The date Di is the first day of public intervention for the age class i and µi is the intensity of the public intervention for each age class. The parameter fi (probability to become reported) is also assumed to be dependent on the age class.

slide-45
SLIDE 45

45/48

Best fit to the data from Japan

Mar 29 Apr 05 Apr 12 Apr 19 Apr 26 May 03 May 10 2020 500 1000 1500 2000 2500

Figure: In this figure we compare the 10 age classes coming to the data (black dots) and the 10 age classes coming for the model (color curves)

slide-46
SLIDE 46

46/48

Best fit to the data from Japan

500 1000 1500 May 10 2000 2500 3000 Apr 26 2020 100 80 Apr 12 60 40 20 Mar 29

Figure: In this figure we compare the 10 age classes coming to the data (black dots) and the 10 age classes coming for the model (color curves)

slide-47
SLIDE 47

47/48

Transmission matrices

April 11 April 16

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

age of contact

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

age of individual

0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

age of contact

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

age of individual

0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08

April 23 May 16

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

age of contact

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

age of individual

0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02 0.025 0.03

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

age of contact

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

age of individual

0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 10 -3

slide-48
SLIDE 48

48/48

References

  • Z. Liu, P. Magal, O. Seydi, and G. Webb, Understanding unreported cases in

the COVID-19 epidemic outbreak in Wuhan, China, and the importance of major public health interventions, MPDI Biology 2020, 9(3), 50.

  • Z. Liu, P. Magal, O. Seydi, and G. Webb, Predicting the cumulative number of

cases for the COVID-19 epidemic in China from early data, Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering 17(4) 2020, 3040-3051.

  • Z. Liu, P. Magal, O. Seydi, and G. Webb, A COVID-19 epidemic model with

latency period, Infectious Disease Modelling (to appear)

  • Z. Liu, P. Magal, O. Seydi, and G. Webb, A model to predict COVID-19

epidemics with applications to South Korea, Italy, and Spain, SIAM News (to appear)

  • Z. Liu, P. Magal and G. Webb, Predicting the number of reported and

unreported cases for the COVID-19 epidemic in China, South Korea, Italy, France, Germany and United Kingdom, medRxiv

  • Q. Griette, Z. Liu and P. Magal, Estimating the last day for COVID-19 outbreak

in mainland China, medRxiv.

  • Q. Griette, Z. Liu and P. Magal, Unreported cases for Age Dependent COVID-19

Outbreak in Japan, medRxiv