Understanding the Australian electorate Workshop on elections and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

understanding the australian electorate
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Understanding the Australian electorate Workshop on elections and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Understanding the Australian electorate Workshop on elections and advocacy, Sydney Policy Lab Dr Shaun Ratcliff The United States Studies Centre, University of Sydney Download the slides at shaunratcliff.com/policy-lab-presentation/ 18 October


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Understanding the Australian electorate

Workshop on elections and advocacy, Sydney Policy Lab Dr Shaun Ratcliff The United States Studies Centre, University of Sydney

Download the slides at shaunratcliff.com/policy-lab-presentation/

18 October 2019

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Some questionable narratives have emerged around the 2019 election.

slide-3
SLIDE 3
  • Battlers. The working class.

Quiet Australians.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Mistaken ideas of economic interests (what is a ‘battler’?), ecological fallacies and problematic inferences leads to a few issues:

◮ Who actually voted for the Coalition, Labor?

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Mistaken ideas of economic interests (what is a ‘battler’?), ecological fallacies and problematic inferences leads to a few issues:

◮ Who actually voted for the Coalition, Labor? ◮ Did the voters who might benefit from Labors’ policies vote for

the Coalition?

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Mistaken ideas of economic interests (what is a ‘battler’?), ecological fallacies and problematic inferences leads to a few issues:

◮ Who actually voted for the Coalition, Labor? ◮ Did the voters who might benefit from Labors’ policies vote for

the Coalition?

◮ What lessons should we (and the parties) take from the

election?

slide-7
SLIDE 7

VIC WA TAS ACT QLD SA NSW

$50,000 $100,000 $150,000 $50,000 $100,000 $150,000 $50,000 $100,000 $150,000 −4% −2% 0% 2% 4% −4% −2% 0% 2% 4% −4% −2% 0% 2% 4%

Median household income Labor two−party swing

Labor two−party swing by income and state

Two−party is Labor−Coalition two−party estimate for all electorates, including those that were not Labor vs Coalition.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

SA WA VIC NSW ACT QLD TAS

$50,000 $100,000 $150,000 $50,000 $100,000 $150,000 $50,000 $100,000 $150,000 −4% −2% 0% 2% 4% −4% −2% 0% 2% 4% −4% −2% 0% 2% 4%

Median household income Labor first preference swing

Labor first preference swing by income and state

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Ecological fallacies.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Understanding public opinion.

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Coalition Labor

No assets Owns home Shares Business or trust Other real estate No assets Owns home Shares Business or trust Other real estate 30% 40% 50%

Assets owned Primary vote share

Primary vote by asset ownership

Australian Cooperative Election Survey

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Coalition Labor

< $52k $52−$78k $78−$156k > $156k < $52k $52−$78k $78−$156k > $156k 30% 40%

Household income Primary vote share

Primary vote by household income

Australian Cooperative Election Survey

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Coalition Labor

Disability Youth & student Family Other Carer None Age Disability Youth & student Family Other Carer None Age 30% 40%

Payments received Primary vote share

Primary vote by government payments

Australian Cooperative Election Survey

slide-14
SLIDE 14

The role of Labor policy: negative gearing.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Agree Neutral Disagree

No assets Owns home Shares Business or trust Other real estate No assets Owns home Shares Business or trust Other real estate No assets Owns home Shares Business or trust Other real estate 20% 40% 60%

Assets owned Primary vote share

Attitudes towards negative gearing by asset ownership

Australian Cooperative Election Survey

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Agree Neutral Disagree

< $52k $52−$78k $78−$156k > $156k < $52k $52−$78k $78−$156k > $156k < $52k $52−$78k $78−$156k > $156k 20% 35% 50%

Household income Proportion with each response

Attitudes towards negative gearing by household income

Australian Cooperative Election Survey

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Agree Neither agree nor disagree Disagree

$50 $150 $250 $50 $150 $250 $50 $150 $250 10% 30% 50%

Annual household income ($,000s) Proportion providing each response

Owns home (including with mortgage) Other voters

Support for negative gearing by home ownership and income

Australian Cooperative Election Survey

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Who changed their vote?

slide-19
SLIDE 19

< $52,000 $52,000 to $77,999 $78,000 to $155,999 > $156,000 Coalition Greens Other Coalition Greens Other Coalition Greens Other Coalition Greens Other 0% 10% 20%

Vote in 2019 Rate of defection

Who left Labor?

Australian Cooperative Election Survey

slide-20
SLIDE 20

< $52,000 $52,000 to $77,999 $78,000 to $155,999 > $156,000 Coalition Other Greens Coalition Other Greens Coalition Other Greens Coalition Other Greens 10% 20%

Vote in 2016 Rate of arrivals

Who came to Labor?

Australian Cooperative Election Survey

slide-21
SLIDE 21

And the Coalition?

slide-22
SLIDE 22

< $52,000 $52,000 to $77,999 $78,000 to $155,999 > $156,000 Labor Greens Other Labor Greens Other Labor Greens Other Labor Greens Other 4% 10% 16%

Vote in 2019 Rate of defection

Who left the Coalition?

Australian Cooperative Election Survey

slide-23
SLIDE 23

< $52,000 $52,000 to $77,999 $78,000 to $155,999 > $156,000 Other Labor Greens Other Labor Greens Other Labor Greens Other Labor Greens 0% 10% 20%

Vote in 2016 Rate of arrivals

Who came to the Coalition?

Australian Cooperative Election Survey

slide-24
SLIDE 24

The role of attitudes towards negative gearing in partisan defections.

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Agree Neutral Disagree Coalition Greens Other Coalition Greens Other Coalition Greens Other 6% 10%

Vote in 2019 Rate of defection

Who left Labor? Support for negative gearing use by landlords

Australian Cooperative Election Survey

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Agree Neutral Disagree Labor Greens Other Labor Greens Other Labor Greens Other 0% 10% 20%

Vote in 2019 Rate of defection

Who left the Coalition? Support for negative gearing use by landlords

Australian Cooperative Election Survey

slide-27
SLIDE 27

What happened?

◮ Loss aversion? People tend to prefer avoiding losses to

acquiring equivalent gains.

slide-28
SLIDE 28

What happened?

◮ Loss aversion? People tend to prefer avoiding losses to

acquiring equivalent gains.

◮ Complexity of policy. The only people that understood it were

those that benefitted from the status quo.

slide-29
SLIDE 29

What happened?

◮ Loss aversion? People tend to prefer avoiding losses to

acquiring equivalent gains.

◮ Complexity of policy. The only people that understood it were

those that benefitted from the status quo.

◮ Politics is about emotion and values, not technical policy.