Trademark Law (valid for 14 years) Prof. Madison Key concepts from - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

trademark law
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Trademark Law (valid for 14 years) Prof. Madison Key concepts from - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Design patent issued to TCCC, 1915 Trademark Law (valid for 14 years) Prof. Madison Key concepts from Class 4: Legal rules and concepts as tools for problem US trademark registration issued to TCCC, solving. 1960 Mark X for Product


slide-1
SLIDE 1

2 1 4 3

Trademark Law

  • Prof. Madison

Key concepts from Class 4: Legal rules and concepts as tools for problem solving. Mark X for Product (Service) Y. The Abercrombie distinctiveness spectrum. Acquired distinctiveness and secondary meaning for word marks.

Design patent issued to TCCC, 1915 (valid for 14 years) US trademark registration issued to TCCC, 1960 Do you recognize the design / look of this building as distinctive of a particular source (company, name / brand)? If you go to this place, do you know what to expect in terms of the quality of its products/services? If you are a rival, do you want to / need to copy this design?

slide-2
SLIDE 2

“Cheddar’s” received a cease and desist letter from In ‘n Out. In what respects is trademark law the right / best solution for In ‘n Out? In what respects should TM law protect Cheddar’s?

2 1 4 3 Trade dress: the design and/or appearance

  • f things, including both their features and

related marketing and advertising. Should trade dress ever be protected via the Lanham Act? If so, should the Abercrombie distinctiveness spectrum be applied to trade dress claims? If so, how? Do consumers rely on trade dress to distinguish the source of goods or services? Do producers acquire goodwill in trade dress?

Qualitex Co.

  • v. Jacobsen

Products Co., Inc. (U.S. 1995)

Color as trade dress.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Samara Brothers, Inc. (U.S. 2000)

Why are these colors distinctive as to source, or not? Ask: Do consumers recognize an X for Y equation? Ask: Why does the thing look like that?

2 1 4 3

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Samara Brothers, Inc. (U.S. 2000)

Plaintiff Defendant

slide-4
SLIDE 4

2 1 4 3

In re Slokevage (Fed. Cir. 2006): Is the design inherently distinctive? LVL XIII Brands, Inc. v. Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A. (S.D.N.Y. 2016)

For footwear. Are the “three stripes” product configuration, product packaging,

  • r something else

(“tertium quid”)? What questions do you ask your client? What else do you want to know?

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Is the star design (inherently) distinctive? Amazing Spaces, Inc. v. Metro Mini Storage (Fed. Cir. 2010)

Is Abercrombie or Seabrook the better test for evaluating distinctiveness of product packaging trade dress?

Fun-Damental Too,

  • Ltd. v. Gemmy

Industries Corp. (2d Cir. 1997)

2 1 4 3

slide-6
SLIDE 6

2 1 4 3

Maker's Mark Distillery, Inc.

  • v. Diageo North America, Inc.

(W.D. Ky. 2010; aff’d 6th Cir. 2012)

slide-7
SLIDE 7