The Regulatory Environment and The Investor Perspective The - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
The Regulatory Environment and The Investor Perspective The - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
ACCC Regulatory Conference 26 th & 27 th March 2001. The Regulatory Environment and The Investor Perspective The Regulated Utility Predictability Transparency Efficiency The Investment Decision The profile of
The Regulated Utility
- Predictability
- Transparency
- Efficiency
The Investment Decision
- Operational profitability
- Capital expenditure
- Taxation
- Financial reserves
- Reporting
The profile of …
Financial Assessments
- The investment decision is based on the
value of cashflows received.
- Financing risks can be separated into
Funding risk Interest rate risk
Benchmark Interest Rates
- Nominal interest rates
- Inflation indexed bonds
- “Break-even” inflation
Benchmark Interest Rates
Nominal yield = Break-even Inflation + Real yield observed in the market = Average Prospective Inflation + Historic inflation effect +Real yield observed = Average Prospective Inflation + Real yield Real yield = Real yield observed in the market + Historic inflation effect.
Benchmark Interest Rates
- What happens if the market for Commonwealth
Bonds becomes distorted?
- Is there an increasing potential for utility debt to
be issued to the wholesale market?
- The potential for the formation of aggregated debt
financing vehicles, with an investment profile which reflects the financial risk of the utility.
Benchmark Interest Rates
Commonwealth CPI Bond Yields
2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 1 9 8 5 1 9 8 7 1 9 8 9 1 9 9 1 1 9 9 3 1 9 9 5 1 9 9 7 1 9 9 9 2 1
Revenue change potential
% Revenue change, with 5yr WACC reset
including inflation allowance, relative to year 1.
- 15%
- 10%
- 5%
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 1 6 11 16
Year
WACC
Revenue change potential
% Revenue change, WACC with annual interest rate adjustment including inflation allowance, relative to year 1.
- 15%
- 10%
- 5%
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 1 6 11 16
Year
WACC
WACC determination
!The benefit of all stakeholders will be improved where the process of determining financial rates
- f return are:
- Objective,
taken from market benchmarks
- Practical,
in that the implicit funding should be marketable
- Predictable,
relative to current market benchmarks.
Movement in Real WACC
- The regulation of utilities were initiated with
the Real WACC, pre tax, 10.5%
- Current Real WACC, pre tax, 7.0%?
- The total movement -3½ %
- real interest rates -2½ %
- model / parameters - 1%
- These movements have altered the investment
decisions and are driving changes to maintain equitable investment returns.
Compensating for the Changing Returns
Options Reduce Operating Costs More Efficient Funding Change Risk Apportionment
Asset Co Operating Contract Capex approval Audit of Assets
- 1. Operates the assets
- 2. Manages the business
- 3. Guarantees return to
Owner Co
- 4. Seeks approval of Asset
Co to Capex
- 5. Competes for Contract
- 1. Infrastructure Investor
(Institutional)
- 2. Funds Capex
- 3. Approves Capex Program
- 4. Audits Op Co’s
Performance on Asset Management
Concept of Asset Owner and Operator
Op Co Conventional Utility
Who Bears the Risks?
Asset Co:
- WACC Risk
- Stranded Assets
OP Co:
- Asset based risks eg breakdowns and supply outages
- Level of operating and maintenance costs
- Supply and operating agreements
- Meeting KPI’s
Potential Third Party:
- Revenue risk - potential to hedge?
Considerations for Regulators
Transparency
- Separation of ownership costs and operating costs
- Clear definition of Capex and Opex
- Audit of operator’s asset management
Efficiency
- Contestability of operation reduces regulation
- Lower cost due to funding and competition
- Focus on asset management
Predicability
- Returns to stakeholders
- Reduced risk
Rowville Transformer
Features:
- Asset Ownership is passive - TXU the operator
- O&M is contracted for 29.5 years
- No regulatory reset
- Debt which is inflation linked
- Revenue is inflation linked
Risks
- Operator has to ensure asset “is fit for purpose”
- Asset owner takes force majeure and tax risk
UK Example - Purchase of Welsh Water by Glas Consortium
Features:
- Community purchasing the utility-non profit entity
- Debt funded
- Operations tendered in multiple contracts
- Ofwat conditional approval
Concerns of Regulator:
- Minimal equity
- Lack of shareholders - incentive for continued efficiency
- Potential lack of control over contractors
The Regulated Utility
- Predictability
- Transparency
- Efficiency