the picture space of a gentle algebra
play

The Picture Space of a Gentle Algebra The Story of a Counterexample - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The Picture Space of a Gentle Algebra The Story of a Counterexample Eric J Hanson Brandeis University Joint work with Kiyoshi Igusa Maurice Auslander Distinguished Lectures and International Conference April 29, 2019 Eric J Hanson The


  1. The Picture Space of a Gentle Algebra The Story of a Counterexample Eric J Hanson Brandeis University Joint work with Kiyoshi Igusa Maurice Auslander Distinguished Lectures and International Conference April 29, 2019 Eric J Hanson The Picture Space of a Gentle Algebra

  2. Outline Picture Groups and Picture Spaces 1 2-Simple Minded Collections and Semibrick Pairs 2 Mutation 3 What Goes Wrong? 4 The General Result for Gentle Algebras 5 Eric J Hanson The Picture Space of a Gentle Algebra

  3. The Setup Let Λ be a finite dimensional, basic algebra over an arbitrary field K . Denote by modΛ the category of finitely generated (right) Λ-modules. All subcategories are assumed full and closed under isomorphisms. τ is the Auslander-Reiten translate and ( − )[1] is the shift functor. S ∈ modΛ (or D b (modΛ)) is called a brick if End ( S ) is a division algebra. A collection of Hom-orthogonal bricks is called a semibrick . Eric J Hanson The Picture Space of a Gentle Algebra

  4. Our Main Example Let A be the K -algebra whose (bounded) quiver and AR quiver are: 1 2 3 3 2 1 4 3 2 1 2 41 4 3 2 2 4 3 4 1 4 2 Properties of A : It is representation (hence τ -tilting) finite. Every indecomposable A -module is a brick. It is cluster tilted of type A 4 . It is a gentle algebra. It is not hereditary. Eric J Hanson The Picture Space of a Gentle Algebra

  5. Picture Groups Recall a subcategory T ⊂ modΛ is a torsion class if it is closed under extensions and quotients. We assume modΛ contains only finitely many torsion classes (i.e., Λ is τ -tilting finite DIJ ’15). Theorem (Barnard-Carroll-Zhu ’17 1 ) Suppose T ′ � T is a minimal inclusion of torsion classes. Then there exists a unique brick S ∈ T \ T ′ such that T = Filt( T ′ ∪ { S } ) , called the brick label of the inclusion. 1 This brick labeling is also constructed by Asai, Br¨ ustle-Smith-Treffinger, and Demonet-Iyama-Reading-Reiten-Thomas. Eric J Hanson The Picture Space of a Gentle Algebra

  6. Picture Groups The definition of the picture group was first given by Igusa-Todorov-Weyman ’16. Definition The picture group of Λ, denoted G (Λ), is the finitely presented group with the following presentation. For every brick S ∈ modΛ, there is a generator X S . For every torsion class T , there is a generator g T . There is a relation g 0 = e . For every minimal inclusion of torsion classes T ′ � T labeled by S , there is a relation g T = X S g T ′ . Eric J Hanson The Picture Space of a Gentle Algebra

  7. The Picture Space Igusa, Todorov and Weyman also associate to Λ a topological space called the picture space of Λ. This space can be defined as the classifying space of the τ -cluster morphism category of Λ, defined by Buan and Marsh in ’18 to generalize a construction of Igusa and Todorov in ’17. Theorem (H-Igusa ’18) Let Λ be an arbitrary τ -tilting finite algebra. Then 1 The fundamental group of the picture space is G (Λ) . 2 If the 2-simple minded collections for Λ can be defined using pairwise compatibility conditions (plus one technical condition) then the picture space is a K ( G (Λ) , 1) . Eric J Hanson The Picture Space of a Gentle Algebra

  8. 2-Simple Minded Collections and Semibrick Pairs Definition-Theorem (Br¨ ustle-Yang ’13) Let X = S p ⊔ S n [1] with S p , S n semibricks in modΛ. Then X is called a 2-simple minded collection if 1 For all S ∈ S p , T ∈ S n , Hom ( S , T ) = 0 = Ext ( S , T ). 2 The smallest subcategory of D b (modΛ) containing X and closed under triangles, direct summands, and shifts is D b (modΛ). If only (1) holds, we will call X a semibrick pair . We call a semibrick pair completable if it is contained in a 2-simple minded collection. Being a semibrick pair is a pairwise condition! Being completable...? Eric J Hanson The Picture Space of a Gentle Algebra

  9. 2-Simple Minded Collections and Semibrick Pairs 1 2 3 2 1 4 3 2 41 4 3 2 2 3 4 1 4 2 Example S 1 ⊔ S 2 ⊔ S 3 ⊔ S 4 and S 1 [1] ⊔ S 2 [1] ⊔ S 3 [1] ⊔ S 4 [1] are 2-simple minded collections. S 1 ⊔ S 3 ⊔ 1 2 [1] ⊔ 3 4 [1] is a 2-simple minded collection. 4 2 ⊔ 2 3 [1] is a semibrick pair which is not completable. (nontrivial) Fact: if Λ is hereditary, then every semibrick pair is completable. Eric J Hanson The Picture Space of a Gentle Algebra

  10. The Pairwise 2-Simple Minded Compatibility Property Definition The algebra Λ does NOT have the pairwise 2-simple minded compatibility property if there exists a semibrick pair X which is not completable such that for every pair S , T ∈ X , the semibrick pair S ⊔ T is completable. Eric J Hanson The Picture Space of a Gentle Algebra

  11. Approximations Proposition (Br¨ ustle-Yang ’13) Let X = S p ⊔ S n [1] be a completable semibrick pair. Let S ∈ S p and T ∈ S n . Then every left minimal (Filt S ) -approximation g + ST : T → S T is either mono or epi. If dimHom ( T , S ) = 1 then g + ST is just a morphism T → S . Natural question: Is every semibrick pair with this property completable? No. Eric J Hanson The Picture Space of a Gentle Algebra

  12. Mutation Definition Let X = S p ⊔ S n [1] be a 2-simple minded collection and let S ∈ S p . The left mutation of X at S , denoted µ + S ( X ), is the new collection defined as follows. µ + S ( S ) = S [1]. For all other T ∈ X , µ + S ( T ) = cone( g + ST ), where g + ST : T [ − 1] → S T is a minimal left (Filt S )-approximation. Eric J Hanson The Picture Space of a Gentle Algebra

  13. Mutation 1 2 3 2 1 4 3 2 41 4 3 2 2 3 4 1 4 2 Example � � S 1 ⊔ S 3 ⊔ 1 2 [1] ⊔ 3 = S 3 ⊔ S 1 [1] ⊔ S 2 [1] ⊔ 3 µ + 4 [1] 4 [1]: S 1 Hom ( S 3 [ − 1] , S 1 ) = Ext ( S 3 , S 1 ) = 0. � � 3 Hom 4 , S 1 = 0. The nonzero morphism 1 2 → S 1 is epi with kernel S 2 . Eric J Hanson The Picture Space of a Gentle Algebra

  14. Mutation Definition Let X = S p ⊔ S n [1] be a 2-simple minded collection and let S ∈ S p . The left mutation of X at S , denoted µ + S ( X ), is the new collection defined as follows. µ + S ( S ) = S [1]. For all other T ∈ X , µ + S ( T ) = cone( g + ST ), where g + ST : T [ − 1] → S T is a minimal left (Filt S )-approximation. Observation: This is a ‘pairwise’ definition: µ + S ( T ) depends only on S and T . Definition Let X = S p ⊔ S n [1] be a semibrick pair. Then we can define the left mutation of X at S ∈ S p using the above formula. Eric J Hanson The Picture Space of a Gentle Algebra

  15. Mutation Proposition (H-Igusa ’19) Let X = S p ⊔ S n [1] be a semibrick pair and let S ∈ S p . 1 For all T ∈ X , the object µ + S ( T ) is a brick. 2 Assume for all T ∈ S n the minimal left (Filt S ) -approximation g + ST is either mono or epi. Then µ + S ( X ) is a semibrick pair. 3 X is completable if and only if µ + S ( X ) is completable. Natural question: Assume (2) and let S ′ ∈ µ + S ( X ) p . Is µ + S ′ ◦ µ + S ( X ) always a semibrick pair? No. Eric J Hanson The Picture Space of a Gentle Algebra

  16. Determining Completability Theorem (Asai ’16) Let X = S p ⊔ S n [1] be a semibrick pair. If S p = ∅ or S n = ∅ , (i.e. either X = S n [1] or X = S p ) then X is completable. Strategy: Start with an arbitrary semibrick pair X . If we mutate enough times, one of the following things will happen: 1 We will reach a semibrick pair Y = S n [1], which we know is completable. 2 We will reach a semibrick pair Y = S p ⊔ S n [1] containing some S ∈ S p and T ∈ S n for which the minimal left (Filt S )-approximation g + ST is neither mono nor epi, which we know is not competable. Eric J Hanson The Picture Space of a Gentle Algebra

  17. The Hereditary Case Theorem (Igusa-Todorov ’17) Suppose Λ is (representation finite) hereditary. Then Λ has the 2-simple minded pairwise compatibility property. Key Observation for the New Proof. Let f : M → N be any morphism. Then cone( f ) = ker ( f )[1] ⊔ coker ( f ) . In particular, cone( f ) can only be a brick if f is either mono or epi. Thus, given a semibrick pair X = S p ⊔ S n [1] and any S ∈ S p and T ∈ S n [1], the minimal left (Filt S )-approximation g + ST is either mono or epi. Eric J Hanson The Picture Space of a Gentle Algebra

  18. The Counterexample 1 2 3 2 1 4 3 2 41 4 3 2 2 3 4 1 4 2 1 Consider the semibrick pair X = 1 ⊔ 4 2 ⊔ 3 [1]. 2 Each pair of X is completable: 1 1 ⊔ 4 2 has S n = ∅ . 1 3 [1] at 1 to obtain 1[1] ⊔ 2 2 Mutate 1 ⊔ 3 [1]. This has S p = ∅ . 2 1 1 3 Mutate 4 3 [1] at 4 2 to obtain 4 2 ⊔ 2 [1] ⊔ 3 [1]. This has S p = ∅ . 2 2 Eric J Hanson The Picture Space of a Gentle Algebra

  19. The Counterexample 1 2 3 2 1 4 3 2 41 4 3 2 2 3 4 1 4 2 1 Consider the semibrick pair X = 1 ⊔ 4 2 ⊔ 3 [1]. 2 Mutate at 1 to obtain 4 2 ⊔ 1[1] ⊔ 2 3 [1]. The map 2 3 → 4 2 is neither mono nor epi, so X is not contained in a 2-simple minded collection! Eric J Hanson The Picture Space of a Gentle Algebra

  20. The General Result Theorem (H-Igusa ’19) Let Λ = KQ / I be a τ -tilting finite gentle algebra such that Q contains no loops or 2-cycles. Then Λ has the pairwise 2-simple minded compatibility property if and only if every vertex of Q has degree at most 2. Corollary If Λ is cluster tilted of type A n and not hereditary, then Λ has the 2-simple minded compatibility property if and only if n = 3 . Eric J Hanson The Picture Space of a Gentle Algebra

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend