The intrinsic geometry of topological groups Christian Rosendal, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

the intrinsic geometry of topological groups
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

The intrinsic geometry of topological groups Christian Rosendal, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The intrinsic geometry of topological groups Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago Maresias, Brazil, August 2014 Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups Groups as


slide-1
SLIDE 1

The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago Maresias, Brazil, August 2014

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Groups as geometric objects

How may we view groups as geometric objects?

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Groups as geometric objects

How may we view groups as geometric objects? For a finitely generated group Γ there is an almost canonical manner of doing this.

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Groups as geometric objects

How may we view groups as geometric objects? For a finitely generated group Γ there is an almost canonical manner of doing this. Fix a finite symmetric generating set Σ for Γ and define the corresponding Cayley graph on Γ by letting the edges be all (g, gs) where g ∈ Γ and s ∈ Σ \ {1}.

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Groups as geometric objects

How may we view groups as geometric objects? For a finitely generated group Γ there is an almost canonical manner of doing this. Fix a finite symmetric generating set Σ for Γ and define the corresponding Cayley graph on Γ by letting the edges be all (g, gs) where g ∈ Γ and s ∈ Σ \ {1}. The resulting graph Cayley(Γ, Σ) is connected and hence Γ is a metric space, when given the shortest-path metric ρΣ.

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Consider first (Z, +) with generating set Σ = {−1, 1}.

  • −2

−1 1 2 3

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Consider first (Z, +) with generating set Σ = {−1, 1}.

  • −2

−1 1 2 3

Similarly, let F2 be the free non-abelian group on generators a, b and set Σ = {a, b, a−1, b−1}.

  • a−1

b ba−1 ba 1 b−1 a ab a−1b a−1b−1 ab−1 b−1a−1 b−1a b−2 b2 a2 a−2•

  • Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago

The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Observe that ρΣ(g, f ) = min(k

  • ∃s1, . . . , sk ∈ Σ: f = gs1 · · · sk).

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Observe that ρΣ(g, f ) = min(k

  • ∃s1, . . . , sk ∈ Σ: f = gs1 · · · sk).

Also, since f = gs1 · · · sk ⇔ hf = hgs1 · · · sk,

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Observe that ρΣ(g, f ) = min(k

  • ∃s1, . . . , sk ∈ Σ: f = gs1 · · · sk).

Also, since f = gs1 · · · sk ⇔ hf = hgs1 · · · sk, the metric ρΣ is left-invariant, i.e., ρΣ(hg, hf ) = ρΣ(g, f ).

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Observe that ρΣ(g, f ) = min(k

  • ∃s1, . . . , sk ∈ Σ: f = gs1 · · · sk).

Also, since f = gs1 · · · sk ⇔ hf = hgs1 · · · sk, the metric ρΣ is left-invariant, i.e., ρΣ(hg, hf ) = ρΣ(g, f ). ρΣ is called the word metric induced by the generating set Σ.

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-12
SLIDE 12

As mentioned, Cayley(Γ, Σ) is almost canonical for Γ, except that it involves the choice of a finite generating set Σ.

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-13
SLIDE 13

As mentioned, Cayley(Γ, Σ) is almost canonical for Γ, except that it involves the choice of a finite generating set Σ. Now, if Σ′ was another finite generating set, then every s′ ∈ Σ′ can be written as s′ = s1 · · · sn for some si ∈ Σ,

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-14
SLIDE 14

As mentioned, Cayley(Γ, Σ) is almost canonical for Γ, except that it involves the choice of a finite generating set Σ. Now, if Σ′ was another finite generating set, then every s′ ∈ Σ′ can be written as s′ = s1 · · · sn for some si ∈ Σ, which means that, for every g ∈ Γ, g

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-15
SLIDE 15

As mentioned, Cayley(Γ, Σ) is almost canonical for Γ, except that it involves the choice of a finite generating set Σ. Now, if Σ′ was another finite generating set, then every s′ ∈ Σ′ can be written as s′ = s1 · · · sn for some si ∈ Σ, which means that, for every g ∈ Γ, g gs1

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-16
SLIDE 16

As mentioned, Cayley(Γ, Σ) is almost canonical for Γ, except that it involves the choice of a finite generating set Σ. Now, if Σ′ was another finite generating set, then every s′ ∈ Σ′ can be written as s′ = s1 · · · sn for some si ∈ Σ, which means that, for every g ∈ Γ, g gs1 gs1s2

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-17
SLIDE 17

As mentioned, Cayley(Γ, Σ) is almost canonical for Γ, except that it involves the choice of a finite generating set Σ. Now, if Σ′ was another finite generating set, then every s′ ∈ Σ′ can be written as s′ = s1 · · · sn for some si ∈ Σ, which means that, for every g ∈ Γ, g gs1 gs1s2 . . . gs1s2 · · · sn

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-18
SLIDE 18

As mentioned, Cayley(Γ, Σ) is almost canonical for Γ, except that it involves the choice of a finite generating set Σ. Now, if Σ′ was another finite generating set, then every s′ ∈ Σ′ can be written as s′ = s1 · · · sn for some si ∈ Σ, which means that, for every g ∈ Γ, g gs1 gs1s2 . . . gs1s2 · · · sn is a path of length n in Cayley(Γ, Σ) from g to gs′ = gs1s2 · · · sn.

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-19
SLIDE 19

As mentioned, Cayley(Γ, Σ) is almost canonical for Γ, except that it involves the choice of a finite generating set Σ. Now, if Σ′ was another finite generating set, then every s′ ∈ Σ′ can be written as s′ = s1 · · · sn for some si ∈ Σ, which means that, for every g ∈ Γ, g gs1 gs1s2 . . . gs1s2 · · · sn is a path of length n in Cayley(Γ, Σ) from g to gs′ = gs1s2 · · · sn. Taking N to be the largest n needed for the finitely many s′ ∈ Σ′,

  • ne sees that

ρΣ N · ρΣ′.

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-20
SLIDE 20

By symmetry, we therefore see that there is a K so that 1 K · ρΣ′ ρΣ K · ρΣ′.

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-21
SLIDE 21

By symmetry, we therefore see that there is a K so that 1 K · ρΣ′ ρΣ K · ρΣ′. It follows that, for a finitely generated group Γ, the word metric ρΣ is canonical up to bi-Lipschitz equivalence.

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-22
SLIDE 22

By symmetry, we therefore see that there is a K so that 1 K · ρΣ′ ρΣ K · ρΣ′. It follows that, for a finitely generated group Γ, the word metric ρΣ is canonical up to bi-Lipschitz equivalence. Take again the example of (Z, +) with generating set Σ = {−1, 1}.

  • −2

−1 1 2 3

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-23
SLIDE 23

By symmetry, we therefore see that there is a K so that 1 K · ρΣ′ ρΣ K · ρΣ′. It follows that, for a finitely generated group Γ, the word metric ρΣ is canonical up to bi-Lipschitz equivalence. Take again the example of (Z, +) with generating set Σ = {−1, 1}.

  • −2

−1 1 2 3

Whereas, with generating set Σ = {−2, −1, 1, 2}, we have

  • −4

−3 −2 −1 1 2 3 4 5

❅ ❅ ❅ ❅ ❅ ❅ ❅ ❅ ❅ ❅ ❅ ❅ ❅ ❅ ❅

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Large scale geometry of locally compact groups

In non-discrete locally compact groups, word metrics are not compatible with the topology.

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Large scale geometry of locally compact groups

In non-discrete locally compact groups, word metrics are not compatible with the topology. However, R. Struble showed that if G is locally compact metrisable, then G admits a compatible left-invariant proper metric d,

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Large scale geometry of locally compact groups

In non-discrete locally compact groups, word metrics are not compatible with the topology. However, R. Struble showed that if G is locally compact metrisable, then G admits a compatible left-invariant proper metric d, i.e., so that finite-diameter sets are relatively compact.

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Large scale geometry of locally compact groups

In non-discrete locally compact groups, word metrics are not compatible with the topology. However, R. Struble showed that if G is locally compact metrisable, then G admits a compatible left-invariant proper metric d, i.e., so that finite-diameter sets are relatively compact. And with only a minimal amount of care this can be modified to if G is locally compact metrisable group generated by a compact symmetric set Σ, then G admits a compatible left-invariant metric d quasi-isometric with the word metric ρΣ.

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Definition A map F : (X, d) → (Y , ∂) between metric spaces is said to be a quasi-isometric embedding if there are constants K, C so that 1 K · d(x, y) − C

  • ∂(Fx, Fy)
  • K · d(x, y) + C.

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Definition A map F : (X, d) → (Y , ∂) between metric spaces is said to be a quasi-isometric embedding if there are constants K, C so that 1 K · d(x, y) − C

  • ∂(Fx, Fy)
  • K · d(x, y) + C.

Moreover, F is a quasi-isometry if, in addition, its image is cobounded, meaning that sup

y∈Y

∂(y, F[X]) < ∞.

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Definition A map F : (X, d) → (Y , ∂) between metric spaces is said to be a quasi-isometric embedding if there are constants K, C so that 1 K · d(x, y) − C

  • ∂(Fx, Fy)
  • K · d(x, y) + C.

Moreover, F is a quasi-isometry if, in addition, its image is cobounded, meaning that sup

y∈Y

∂(y, F[X]) < ∞. Definition Also, two metrics d and ρ on G are quasi-isometric if the identity map id: (G, d) → (G, ρ) is a quasi-isometry.

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Whereas the word metrics by compact generating sets are all quasi-isometric, the proper left-invariant metrics are only coarsely equivalent.

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Whereas the word metrics by compact generating sets are all quasi-isometric, the proper left-invariant metrics are only coarsely equivalent. Definition A map F : (X, d) → (Y , ∂) between metric spaces is said to be a coarse embedding if,

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Whereas the word metrics by compact generating sets are all quasi-isometric, the proper left-invariant metrics are only coarsely equivalent. Definition A map F : (X, d) → (Y , ∂) between metric spaces is said to be a coarse embedding if,

1 for all R > 0 there is S > 0 so that

d(x, y) R ⇒ ∂(Fx, Fy) S,

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Whereas the word metrics by compact generating sets are all quasi-isometric, the proper left-invariant metrics are only coarsely equivalent. Definition A map F : (X, d) → (Y , ∂) between metric spaces is said to be a coarse embedding if,

1 for all R > 0 there is S > 0 so that

d(x, y) R ⇒ ∂(Fx, Fy) S,

2 for all S > 0 there is R > 0 so that

d(x, y) R ⇒ ∂(Fx, Fy) S.

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Whereas the word metrics by compact generating sets are all quasi-isometric, the proper left-invariant metrics are only coarsely equivalent. Definition A map F : (X, d) → (Y , ∂) between metric spaces is said to be a coarse embedding if,

1 for all R > 0 there is S > 0 so that

d(x, y) R ⇒ ∂(Fx, Fy) S,

2 for all S > 0 there is R > 0 so that

d(x, y) R ⇒ ∂(Fx, Fy) S. Moreover, F is a coarse equivalence if, in addition, its image is cobounded.

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Large scale geometry of Polish groups

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Large scale geometry of Polish groups

Due to the absence of proper metrics and canonical generating sets, a priori, the preceding considerations have no bearing on general topological groups.

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Large scale geometry of Polish groups

Due to the absence of proper metrics and canonical generating sets, a priori, the preceding considerations have no bearing on general topological groups. For familiarity, we may restrict the attention to Polish groups, i.e., separable and completely metrisable topological groups.

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Large scale geometry of Polish groups

Due to the absence of proper metrics and canonical generating sets, a priori, the preceding considerations have no bearing on general topological groups. For familiarity, we may restrict the attention to Polish groups, i.e., separable and completely metrisable topological groups. Polish groups encompass most topological transformation groups, e.g., Homeo(M), Diffk(M), Isom(X, · ).

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Relative property (OB)

Our goal is to isolate an intrinsic metric geometry of Polish groups.

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Relative property (OB)

Our goal is to isolate an intrinsic metric geometry of Polish groups. We attain this by identifying the appropriate generalisation of relatively compact sets.

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Relative property (OB)

Our goal is to isolate an intrinsic metric geometry of Polish groups. We attain this by identifying the appropriate generalisation of relatively compact sets. Definition A subset A of a Polish group G is said to have property (OB) relative to G if, for every compatible left-invariant metric d on G,

  • ne has

diamd(A) < ∞.

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Relative property (OB)

Our goal is to isolate an intrinsic metric geometry of Polish groups. We attain this by identifying the appropriate generalisation of relatively compact sets. Definition A subset A of a Polish group G is said to have property (OB) relative to G if, for every compatible left-invariant metric d on G,

  • ne has

diamd(A) < ∞. By the existence of proper metrics, in locally compact groups, relative property (OB) coincides with relative compactness.

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Relative property (OB)

Our goal is to isolate an intrinsic metric geometry of Polish groups. We attain this by identifying the appropriate generalisation of relatively compact sets. Definition A subset A of a Polish group G is said to have property (OB) relative to G if, for every compatible left-invariant metric d on G,

  • ne has

diamd(A) < ∞. By the existence of proper metrics, in locally compact groups, relative property (OB) coincides with relative compactness. Also, in the additive group (X, +) of a Banach space (X, ·), the relative property (OB) coincides with norm boundedness.

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Using the mechanics of the Birkhoff–Kakutani metrisation theorem, we have the following characterisation.

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Using the mechanics of the Birkhoff–Kakutani metrisation theorem, we have the following characterisation. Lemma TFAE for a subset A of a G,

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Using the mechanics of the Birkhoff–Kakutani metrisation theorem, we have the following characterisation. Lemma TFAE for a subset A of a G,

1 A has property (OB) relative to G, Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Using the mechanics of the Birkhoff–Kakutani metrisation theorem, we have the following characterisation. Lemma TFAE for a subset A of a G,

1 A has property (OB) relative to G, 2 for every open V ∋ 1 there are a finite subset F ⊆ G and

some k 1 so that A ⊆ (FV )k.

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-49
SLIDE 49

Coarse geometry of Polish groups

Extending the definition of proper metrics on locally compact groups, we set Definition A compatible left-invariant metric d on G is said to be metrically proper if, for all A ⊆ G, diamd(A) < ∞ ⇔ A has property (OB) relative to G.

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-50
SLIDE 50

Coarse geometry of Polish groups

Extending the definition of proper metrics on locally compact groups, we set Definition A compatible left-invariant metric d on G is said to be metrically proper if, for all A ⊆ G, diamd(A) < ∞ ⇔ A has property (OB) relative to G. As in the locally compact case, we see that a metrically proper metric is unique up to coarse equivalence.

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-51
SLIDE 51

However, there are bad surprises. Namely, the infinite product Z × Z × Z × . . . admits no metrically proper metric.

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-52
SLIDE 52

However, there are bad surprises. Namely, the infinite product Z × Z × Z × . . . admits no metrically proper metric. So which groups do?

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-53
SLIDE 53

Theorem TFAE for a Polish group G,

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-54
SLIDE 54

Theorem TFAE for a Polish group G,

1 G admits a metrically proper metric, Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-55
SLIDE 55

Theorem TFAE for a Polish group G,

1 G admits a metrically proper metric, 2 G is locally (OB), i.e., there is a neighbourhood V ∋ 1 with

property (OB) relative to G.

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-56
SLIDE 56

Theorem TFAE for a Polish group G,

1 G admits a metrically proper metric, 2 G is locally (OB), i.e., there is a neighbourhood V ∋ 1 with

property (OB) relative to G. So locally (OB) Polish groups are those that have a well-defined coarse geometry type.

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-57
SLIDE 57

Theorem TFAE for a Polish group G,

1 G admits a metrically proper metric, 2 G is locally (OB), i.e., there is a neighbourhood V ∋ 1 with

property (OB) relative to G. So locally (OB) Polish groups are those that have a well-defined coarse geometry type. E.g., all locally compact second countable groups.

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-58
SLIDE 58

Maximal and word metrics

Our next step is to consider Polish groups G generated by subsets Σ with property (OB) relative to G.

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-59
SLIDE 59

Maximal and word metrics

Our next step is to consider Polish groups G generated by subsets Σ with property (OB) relative to G. Definition A metric space (X, d) is said to be large scale geodesic if there is K 1 so that, for all x, y ∈ X, there are z0 = x, z1, z2, . . . , zn = y satisfying

1 d(zi, zi+1) K, 2 n−1

i=0 d(zi, zi+1) K · d(x, y).

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-60
SLIDE 60

Maximal and word metrics

Our next step is to consider Polish groups G generated by subsets Σ with property (OB) relative to G. Definition A metric space (X, d) is said to be large scale geodesic if there is K 1 so that, for all x, y ∈ X, there are z0 = x, z1, z2, . . . , zn = y satisfying

1 d(zi, zi+1) K, 2 n−1

i=0 d(zi, zi+1) K · d(x, y).

  • y

x

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-61
SLIDE 61

Maximal and word metrics

Our next step is to consider Polish groups G generated by subsets Σ with property (OB) relative to G. Definition A metric space (X, d) is said to be large scale geodesic if there is K 1 so that, for all x, y ∈ X, there are z0 = x, z1, z2, . . . , zn = y satisfying

1 d(zi, zi+1) K, 2 n−1

i=0 d(zi, zi+1) K · d(x, y).

  • x = z0

z1 z3 z2 y = z4

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-62
SLIDE 62

Proposition TFAE for a metrically proper metric d on a Polish group G,

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-63
SLIDE 63

Proposition TFAE for a metrically proper metric d on a Polish group G,

1 G is generated by a set Σ with the relative property (OB) so

that d is quasi-isometric to the word metric ρΣ,

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-64
SLIDE 64

Proposition TFAE for a metrically proper metric d on a Polish group G,

1 G is generated by a set Σ with the relative property (OB) so

that d is quasi-isometric to the word metric ρΣ,

2 (G, d) is large scale geodesic, Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-65
SLIDE 65

Proposition TFAE for a metrically proper metric d on a Polish group G,

1 G is generated by a set Σ with the relative property (OB) so

that d is quasi-isometric to the word metric ρΣ,

2 (G, d) is large scale geodesic, 3 for every other compatible left-invariant ∂, the map

id: (G, d) → (G, ∂) is Lipschitz for large distances,

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-66
SLIDE 66

Proposition TFAE for a metrically proper metric d on a Polish group G,

1 G is generated by a set Σ with the relative property (OB) so

that d is quasi-isometric to the word metric ρΣ,

2 (G, d) is large scale geodesic, 3 for every other compatible left-invariant ∂, the map

id: (G, d) → (G, ∂) is Lipschitz for large distances, that is, ∂ K · d + C for some constants K and C.

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-67
SLIDE 67

Proposition TFAE for a metrically proper metric d on a Polish group G,

1 G is generated by a set Σ with the relative property (OB) so

that d is quasi-isometric to the word metric ρΣ,

2 (G, d) is large scale geodesic, 3 for every other compatible left-invariant ∂, the map

id: (G, d) → (G, ∂) is Lipschitz for large distances, that is, ∂ K · d + C for some constants K and C. Such metrics d are called maximal.

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-68
SLIDE 68

Maximal metrics, whenever they exist, are unique up to quasi-isometry.

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-69
SLIDE 69

Maximal metrics, whenever they exist, are unique up to quasi-isometry. Theorem TFAE for a Polish group G,

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-70
SLIDE 70

Maximal metrics, whenever they exist, are unique up to quasi-isometry. Theorem TFAE for a Polish group G,

1 G admits a maximal metric, Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-71
SLIDE 71

Maximal metrics, whenever they exist, are unique up to quasi-isometry. Theorem TFAE for a Polish group G,

1 G admits a maximal metric, 2 G is generated by a subset with the relative property (OB). Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-72
SLIDE 72

Maximal metrics, whenever they exist, are unique up to quasi-isometry. Theorem TFAE for a Polish group G,

1 G admits a maximal metric, 2 G is generated by a subset with the relative property (OB).

Such G may be considered as the Polish analogue of finitely or compactly generated groups.

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-73
SLIDE 73

Maximal metrics, whenever they exist, are unique up to quasi-isometry. Theorem TFAE for a Polish group G,

1 G admits a maximal metric, 2 G is generated by a subset with the relative property (OB).

Such G may be considered as the Polish analogue of finitely or compactly generated groups. Any choice of maximal metric on G defines the same quasi-isometry type of G. So we can speak of the latter without refering to a choice of metric on G.

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-74
SLIDE 74

The Milnor–ˇ Svarc lemma and the computation of quasi-isometry types

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-75
SLIDE 75

The Milnor–ˇ Svarc lemma and the computation of quasi-isometry types

Definition Let d be a metrically proper metric on a Polish group G.

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-76
SLIDE 76

The Milnor–ˇ Svarc lemma and the computation of quasi-isometry types

Definition Let d be a metrically proper metric on a Polish group G. For gn ∈ G, we write gn → ∞ if d(gn, 1) → ∞.

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-77
SLIDE 77

The Milnor–ˇ Svarc lemma and the computation of quasi-isometry types

Definition Let d be a metrically proper metric on a Polish group G. For gn ∈ G, we write gn → ∞ if d(gn, 1) → ∞. An continuous isometric action G (X, ∂) on a metric space is said to be metrically proper if, for all x ∈ X, ∂(gnx, x) → ∞ whenever gn → ∞.

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-78
SLIDE 78

The Milnor–ˇ Svarc lemma and the computation of quasi-isometry types

Definition Let d be a metrically proper metric on a Polish group G. For gn ∈ G, we write gn → ∞ if d(gn, 1) → ∞. An continuous isometric action G (X, ∂) on a metric space is said to be metrically proper if, for all x ∈ X, ∂(gnx, x) → ∞ whenever gn → ∞. Moreover, the action is cobounded if there is a set A ⊆ X of finite ∂-diameter so that X = G · A.

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-79
SLIDE 79

Theorem (Milnor–ˇ Svarc) Suppose G is a Polish group with a metrically proper cobounded continuous isometric action G (X, d) on a large scale geodesic metric space.

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-80
SLIDE 80

Theorem (Milnor–ˇ Svarc) Suppose G is a Polish group with a metrically proper cobounded continuous isometric action G (X, d) on a large scale geodesic metric space. (a) Then G admits a maximal compatible left-invariant metric.

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-81
SLIDE 81

Theorem (Milnor–ˇ Svarc) Suppose G is a Polish group with a metrically proper cobounded continuous isometric action G (X, d) on a large scale geodesic metric space. (a) Then G admits a maximal compatible left-invariant metric. (b) Moreover, for every x ∈ X, the map g ∈ G → gx ∈ X is a quasi-isometry between G and (X, d).

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-82
SLIDE 82

Let (X, +) be the underlying additive topological group of a Banach space (X, · ). Then (X, +) ≃q.i. (X, · ).

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-83
SLIDE 83

Let (X, +) be the underlying additive topological group of a Banach space (X, · ). Then (X, +) ≃q.i. (X, · ). Let T denote the ℵ0-regular tree, i.e., the connected acylic graph in which every vertex has countably infinite valence. Then Aut(T) ≃q.i. T.

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-84
SLIDE 84

Let (X, +) be the underlying additive topological group of a Banach space (X, · ). Then (X, +) ≃q.i. (X, · ). Let T denote the ℵ0-regular tree, i.e., the connected acylic graph in which every vertex has countably infinite valence. Then Aut(T) ≃q.i. T. Let U be the Urysohn metric space. Then Isom(U) ≃q.i. U.

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-85
SLIDE 85

Let X be one of ℓp or Lp([0, 1]), 1 < p < ∞. Then Aff(X) ≃q.i. X, where Aff(X) denotes the group of all (necessarily affine) isometries of X.

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-86
SLIDE 86

Let X be one of ℓp or Lp([0, 1]), 1 < p < ∞. Then Aff(X) ≃q.i. X, where Aff(X) denotes the group of all (necessarily affine) isometries of X. In the last example, we know by work of W. B. Johnson, J. Lindenstrauss and G. Schechtman that two such spaces X, Y are quasi-isometric only if either X = Y or if X, Y = ℓ2, L2([0, 1]).

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-87
SLIDE 87

Let X be one of ℓp or Lp([0, 1]), 1 < p < ∞. Then Aff(X) ≃q.i. X, where Aff(X) denotes the group of all (necessarily affine) isometries of X. In the last example, we know by work of W. B. Johnson, J. Lindenstrauss and G. Schechtman that two such spaces X, Y are quasi-isometric only if either X = Y or if X, Y = ℓ2, L2([0, 1]). So, apart from those cases, we conclude that Aff(X) ∼ = Aff(Y ).

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-88
SLIDE 88

Theorem The group Homeo0(M) of isotopically trivial homeomorphisms of a compact surface M has a maximal metric and thus a well-defined quasi-isometry type.

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-89
SLIDE 89

Theorem The group Homeo0(M) of isotopically trivial homeomorphisms of a compact surface M has a maximal metric and thus a well-defined quasi-isometry type. Theorem The group Homeo0(T2) of isotopically trivial homeomorphisms of the 2-torus has an unbounded maximal metric.

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-90
SLIDE 90

Theorem The group Homeo0(M) of isotopically trivial homeomorphisms of a compact surface M has a maximal metric and thus a well-defined quasi-isometry type. Theorem The group Homeo0(T2) of isotopically trivial homeomorphisms of the 2-torus has an unbounded maximal metric. However, the identification of its actual quasi-isometry type remains a significant challenge.

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-91
SLIDE 91

Proper affine isometric actions on Banach spaces

By the Mazur–Ulam theorem, every surjective isometry of a Banach space X is affine.

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-92
SLIDE 92

Proper affine isometric actions on Banach spaces

By the Mazur–Ulam theorem, every surjective isometry of a Banach space X is affine. Thus, if α: G X is an isometric action of a Polish group G, there are an isometric linear representation π: G X

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-93
SLIDE 93

Proper affine isometric actions on Banach spaces

By the Mazur–Ulam theorem, every surjective isometry of a Banach space X is affine. Thus, if α: G X is an isometric action of a Polish group G, there are an isometric linear representation π: G X and a cocycle b: G → X,

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-94
SLIDE 94

Proper affine isometric actions on Banach spaces

By the Mazur–Ulam theorem, every surjective isometry of a Banach space X is affine. Thus, if α: G X is an isometric action of a Polish group G, there are an isometric linear representation π: G X and a cocycle b: G → X, so that α(g)x = π(g)x + b(g).

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-95
SLIDE 95

Proper affine isometric actions on Banach spaces

By the Mazur–Ulam theorem, every surjective isometry of a Banach space X is affine. Thus, if α: G X is an isometric action of a Polish group G, there are an isometric linear representation π: G X and a cocycle b: G → X, so that α(g)x = π(g)x + b(g). Moreover, if the action α: G X is metrically proper, then b: G → X will be a coarse embedding of G into X.

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-96
SLIDE 96

Geometric properties of Banach spaces are emminently suited for use as yardsticks for the metric geometry of groups.

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-97
SLIDE 97

Geometric properties of Banach spaces are emminently suited for use as yardsticks for the metric geometry of groups. We may ask which Polish groups admits coarse or quasi-isometric embeddings into or proper affine isometric actions on spaces of various types.

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-98
SLIDE 98

Geometric properties of Banach spaces are emminently suited for use as yardsticks for the metric geometry of groups. We may ask which Polish groups admits coarse or quasi-isometric embeddings into or proper affine isometric actions on spaces of various types. Hilbert spaces, Super-reflexive spaces, Reflexive spaces, General Banach spaces.

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-99
SLIDE 99

By using Arens–Eells spaces, we first observe that the full category

  • f Banach spaces places no restriction on the groups.

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-100
SLIDE 100

By using Arens–Eells spaces, we first observe that the full category

  • f Banach spaces places no restriction on the groups.

Theorem Let G be a locally (OB) Polish group. Then G admits a metrically proper affine isometric action on a Banach space.

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-101
SLIDE 101

Also, in the case of Hilbert spaces, we may elaborate a construction due to I. Aharoni, B. Maurey and B. S. Mityagin for the case of abelian groups and extended to locally compact amenable groups by Y. de Cornulier, R. Tessera and A. Valette.

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-102
SLIDE 102

Also, in the case of Hilbert spaces, we may elaborate a construction due to I. Aharoni, B. Maurey and B. S. Mityagin for the case of abelian groups and extended to locally compact amenable groups by Y. de Cornulier, R. Tessera and A. Valette. Theorem TFAE for an amenable locally (OB) Polish group.

1 G admits a coarse embedding into a Hilbert space, 2 G admits a metrically proper affine isometric action on a

Hilbert space.

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-103
SLIDE 103

Also, in the case of Hilbert spaces, we may elaborate a construction due to I. Aharoni, B. Maurey and B. S. Mityagin for the case of abelian groups and extended to locally compact amenable groups by Y. de Cornulier, R. Tessera and A. Valette. Theorem TFAE for an amenable locally (OB) Polish group.

1 G admits a coarse embedding into a Hilbert space, 2 G admits a metrically proper affine isometric action on a

Hilbert space. Extending the definition from the locally compact setting, groups satisfying condition (2) are said to have the Haagerup property.

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-104
SLIDE 104

Also, in the case of Hilbert spaces, we may elaborate a construction due to I. Aharoni, B. Maurey and B. S. Mityagin for the case of abelian groups and extended to locally compact amenable groups by Y. de Cornulier, R. Tessera and A. Valette. Theorem TFAE for an amenable locally (OB) Polish group.

1 G admits a coarse embedding into a Hilbert space, 2 G admits a metrically proper affine isometric action on a

Hilbert space. Extending the definition from the locally compact setting, groups satisfying condition (2) are said to have the Haagerup property. Whereas all amenable locally compact groups have the Haagerup property, this may fail for amenable locally (OB) Polish groups.

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-105
SLIDE 105

Also, in the case of Hilbert spaces, we may elaborate a construction due to I. Aharoni, B. Maurey and B. S. Mityagin for the case of abelian groups and extended to locally compact amenable groups by Y. de Cornulier, R. Tessera and A. Valette. Theorem TFAE for an amenable locally (OB) Polish group.

1 G admits a coarse embedding into a Hilbert space, 2 G admits a metrically proper affine isometric action on a

Hilbert space. Extending the definition from the locally compact setting, groups satisfying condition (2) are said to have the Haagerup property. Whereas all amenable locally compact groups have the Haagerup property, this may fail for amenable locally (OB) Polish groups. Isom(U) and c0 are counter-examples.

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-106
SLIDE 106

Stronger than amenability we have Definition A Polish group G is approximately compact if there is a chain K1 K2 K3 . . . G

  • f compact subgroups whose union

n Kn is dense in G.

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-107
SLIDE 107

Stronger than amenability we have Definition A Polish group G is approximately compact if there is a chain K1 K2 K3 . . . G

  • f compact subgroups whose union

n Kn is dense in G.

E.g., unitary groups of AF von Neumann algebras (P. de la Harpe).

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-108
SLIDE 108

Stronger than amenability we have Definition A Polish group G is approximately compact if there is a chain K1 K2 K3 . . . G

  • f compact subgroups whose union

n Kn is dense in G.

E.g., unitary groups of AF von Neumann algebras (P. de la Harpe). Extending a previous construction due to V. Pestov, we have Theorem TFAE for an approximately compact, locally (OB) Polish group.

1 G admits a coarse embedding into a super-reflexive space, 2 G admits a metrically proper affine isometric action on a

super-reflexive space.

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-109
SLIDE 109

Stronger than amenability we have Definition A Polish group G is approximately compact if there is a chain K1 K2 K3 . . . G

  • f compact subgroups whose union

n Kn is dense in G.

E.g., unitary groups of AF von Neumann algebras (P. de la Harpe). Extending a previous construction due to V. Pestov, we have Theorem TFAE for an approximately compact, locally (OB) Polish group.

1 G admits a coarse embedding into a super-reflexive space, 2 G admits a metrically proper affine isometric action on a

super-reflexive space. Similar results hold for Rademacher type and cotype.

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-110
SLIDE 110

Finally, using the Krivine–Maurey theory of stable Banach and metric spaces, we have Theorem Suppose G carries a metrically proper stable metric. Then G admits a metrically proper affine isometric action on a reflexive Banach space.

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-111
SLIDE 111

Finally, using the Krivine–Maurey theory of stable Banach and metric spaces, we have Theorem Suppose G carries a metrically proper stable metric. Then G admits a metrically proper affine isometric action on a reflexive Banach space. We should mention that, by a result of N. Brown and E. Guentner extended by U. Haagerup and A. Przybyszewska, every locally compact group admits a proper affine isometric action on a reflexive space.

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups

slide-112
SLIDE 112

Finally, using the Krivine–Maurey theory of stable Banach and metric spaces, we have Theorem Suppose G carries a metrically proper stable metric. Then G admits a metrically proper affine isometric action on a reflexive Banach space. We should mention that, by a result of N. Brown and E. Guentner extended by U. Haagerup and A. Przybyszewska, every locally compact group admits a proper affine isometric action on a reflexive space. Again, c0 (N. Kalton) is a counter-example in the Polish setting.

Christian Rosendal, University of Illinois at Chicago The intrinsic geometry of topological groups