the economic performance of
play

the Economic Performance of Manufacturing Sector: Indian Regional - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Violent Conflicts and the Economic Performance of Manufacturing Sector: Indian Regional State Level Analysis Atsushi Kato (Waseda University) and Takahiro Sato (Kobe University) 1 The paper is included in Social Statistics: Manifestation of


  1. Violent Conflicts and the Economic Performance of Manufacturing Sector: Indian Regional State Level Analysis Atsushi Kato (Waseda University) and Takahiro Sato (Kobe University) 1

  2. The paper is included in Social Statistics: Manifestation of Growth (Primus Books), published in 2020. 2

  3. Objective of the Study • We investigate the effects of internal violent conflicts on the economy. • We examine differentiated effects of different types of internal violent conflicts (e.g., ethnic, religious etc.) on three economic performance variables (GVA per worker, capital/labor ratio, TFP). Moreover, we take three different measures of the intensity of violent conflicts (number, deaths, participants) 3

  4. Internal Violent Conflicts • Interstate wars are on the decline after WW II, while civil wars has increased. (source: Blattman and Miguel 2010) 4

  5. Internal Violent Conflicts • Civil wars is defined to be internal conflict in which dissidents challenge the authority of government and involves more than 1000 deaths in a year. • There is a variety of internal violent conflicts such as civil wars, riots, terrorist attacks, demonstrations, protests, pogrom, genocide, lynching, feuds, gang assaults and so on. 5

  6. Violent Conflicts • Violent conflicts can be classified by motivation, participants, target, strategy, organization, location, duration, nesting relationship and so on. • We focus on participants and targets, as well as nesting relationship in this paper. 6

  7. Previous Studies • In contrast to the vast literature on the causes of violent conflicts, there is relatively scarce literature on the consequences of violent conflicts. • Within the scarce literature those on the economic consequence was even smaller around 2013, when we started the research. 7

  8. Previous Studies • Especially the effects of lower level violent conflicts than civil wars on the economic performance have not extensively been studied so far. • Although they are smaller in size or fatalities, if they occur more frequently and recurrently, their cumulative effects on economy could be large. 8

  9. Skaperdas (2008) • “… civil wars are not completely distinct from all other types of internal (or external) conflict. Rather, there is a continuum of conflict intensities ... The middle and lower ends of the spectrum have been understudied, and severely so when compared to the study of civil wars.” 9

  10. Previous Studies There recently emerged a great number of studies on the economic effects of internal violence, which include: • Daniele and Marani (2011) show that, based on the provincial level data in Italy on criminal offences related to mafia organizations, higher extent of criminal offences deter foreign investors. • Ashby and Ramos (2013), using the state level data on murders in Mexico and foreign direct investment from 116 countries, show that organized crime deters foreign investment in financial services, commerce and agriculture, but not in other sectors. In oil and mining sectors higher crime rate is correlated with higher investment. 10

  11. Previous Studies • Rodriguez and Sanchez (2012) find that in Colombia armed conflicts induce children aged 6 to 17 years old to drop out of school and enter labor market too early. • Shemyakina (2011) show that, during the period from 1992 to 1998 armed conflict in Tajikistan, girls were less likely to complete their mandatory schooling, and their enrollment rate was lower. But there were no significant effects on boys. • Gustavo and others (2015) found that, in Mexico, increase in violence have negative effects on labor participation and unemployment rate at a municipality level. It was also found that municipalities that observed dramatic spikes in violence in Mexico between 2006 and 2010 significantly reduced their energy consumption. 11

  12. Previous Studies • Bozzoli and others (2012) show that in Colombia, where violent conflict was intense between government and rebellion, and drug-related crime groups, many people were forced to move to other places. In regions, where those displaced people flow into, hourly income in self-employed sector sharply declined. • Enamorado and others (2014) show that in Mexico drug-related crime reduces the economic growth rates of municipalities of Mexico. However, they show that non-drug related crimes are not found to have any effect on the economic growth rate during the same period. 12

  13. Previous Studies • Villoro and Teruel (2004) estimate losses of up to 0.6% of the Mexican GDP due to homicides. • Roso (2018) shows that, when violence increases by one %, aggregate production falls by 0.39% in Colombia. Based on this estimation results, Colombia should have experienced the increase of its aggregate production by 19.6% during the period between 1995 to 2010, because there was 48% decline in the homicide rate. 13

  14. Previous Studies • Camacho et al. (2012) find that guerrilla and paramilitary attacks in a municipality increases the probability of plant exit in Colombia. According to their estimation, a one-standard deviation increase in the number of guerrilla and paramilitary attacks in a municipality increases the probability of plant exit by 5.5 percentage points. Especially, young manufacturing firms tend to exit more because of the violent attacks. 14

  15. Five Effects of Violent Conflicts • Collier (1999) lists five effects of civil wars: destruction, disruption, diversion, dissaving, and portfolio substitution. • The effects also apply to violent conflicts of a smaller scale to a different extent. 15

  16. Vulnerability to Conflicts • Collier (1999) also classified economic activities into war-invulnerable (arable subsistence agriculture), war-vulnerable (construction, transport, distribution, finance and manufacturing), and unclassified groups. • Since the effects of internal violent conflicts are expected to be small, we focus on the economic performance of manufacturing sector at regional state level in India. 16

  17. Hypothesis One • Among measures of violent conflicts, the number of deaths affects the economic performance of manufacturing sector, while the number of participants and the number of violent conflicts may not. 17

  18. Hypothesis Two • Violent conflicts reduce capital-labor ratio, while they may or may not affect total factor productivity as well as gross value added per worker. 18

  19. Hypothesis Three • The negative impacts of ethnic and religious violent conflicts are more salient than those of political or economic violent conflicts. 19

  20. The salience of ethnicity/religion • The success of ethnic parties (Chandra 2004) • The role of ethnic cleavage in sustaining clientelism (Kitschelt and Wilkinson 2007) • The vehemence of violence between ethnic/religious groups. (Wilkinson 2004) 20

  21. Hypothesis Four • The negative impact of violent conflicts nested in a larger conflict is larger than those that independently occur. 21

  22. India Sub-National Problem Set • The dataset constructed by Marshall, Sardesi and Marshall (2005) of Center for Systemic Peace. • They compiled the dataset from the Keesings Record of World Events (Keesings Online) and the period from 1960 to 2004 is covered. 22

  23. 23

  24. Total Number of Violent Conflicts Number of violent conflicts 20 40 60 80 0 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 24

  25. 6,000 2,000 4,000 Number of deaths 0 Total Number of Deaths in Violent 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 Conflicts 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 25

  26. Total Number of Participants in Violent Conflicts Number of participants 0 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 26

  27. Estimation Model • Our basic estimation model is as follows: 𝑎 𝑗𝑢 = 𝛽 + 𝜄 𝑢 + 𝜄 𝑗 + 𝑌 𝑗𝑢 𝛾 + 𝑍 𝑗𝑢 γ + 𝜁 𝑗𝑢 Z it : the natural log of the economic performance variable of the manufacturing sector of state i in year t , X it : the variable that captures the intensity of violent conflicts in year t and state i (log), Y it : the vector of control variables that may influence the economic performance of the manufacturing sector (log). The state dummy q i and year dummy q t are included in the estimation. Our sample period is from 1973 to 2004. 27

  28. Economic Performance Variables • Manufacturing Sectors of 22 States Gross Value Added per Worker Capital Labor Ratio Total Factor Productivity 𝑍 𝐿 They are related through: 𝑚𝑜 𝑀 = 𝑚𝑜𝐵 + 𝛽𝑚𝑜 𝑀 . Data is based on Annual Surveys of Industries. 28

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend