Luiz Cheim, Lan Lin - IEEE Fall Meeting - Milwaukee 10/23/2012
TF Database Analysis Luiz Cheim and Lan Lin ABB Inc. Luiz Cheim, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
TF Database Analysis Luiz Cheim and Lan Lin ABB Inc. Luiz Cheim, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
IEEE C57.104 Revision (Nov 2011) TF Database Analysis Luiz Cheim and Lan Lin ABB Inc. Luiz Cheim, Lan Lin - IEEE Fall Meeting - Milwaukee 10/23/2012 Building the Database + HQ = 521,700 records Transformers Age Groups Transformers Power
Building the Database
+ HQ = 521,700 records
Transformers Age Groups
Transformers Power Ratings
Transformers Voltage Classes
Transformers Oil Preservation Type
Reason for DGA
Percentiles of Hydrocarbons (all data)
% ppm
Percentiles of CO,CO2 and TDCG (all data)
% ppm
Percentiles of H2, C2H2 and CO vs. Age Groups
% ppm
Percentiles of H2, C2H2 and CO vs. Voltage Class
% ppm
Percentiles of H2, C2H2 and CO vs. Power Ratings
% ppm
Percentiles of H2, C2H2 and CO vs. Source of Data
% ppm
Percentiles of All Gases (Suspicious Units)
% ppm
Percentiles of H2, C2H2 and CO vs. Power Ratings (Suspicious Units)
% ppm
Percentiles of H2, C2H2 and CO vs. Voltage Class (Suspicious Units)
% ppm
Percentiles of H2, C2H2 and CO vs. Oil Preservation
% ppm
Annual Rate of Gas Formation (ppm/year) Percentiles of All Gases
% ppm
After that…
- 1. HQ Data incorporated
- 2. Discussed unknown oil preservation system
- 3. Question of Rate of Gas Formation vs Levels
Montreal Meeting (May 2o12)
Revisited Percentiles with Following Condition: O2/ (N2 + O2) < 5% and N2 > 70,000 => N2 Blanket 5 – 15% Membrane/Rubber Bag > 15% Open Breather
Legend (next slides)
IEEE Condition 1 Limit Cigre Typical Value (Brochure SCD1.32, 2010) AFMo Arc Furnace, 90th Percentile (mineral oil) AFSi Arc Furnace, 90th Percentile (Silicon oil)
H2 – All Data
IEEE AFMo AFSi Cigre
CH4 – All Data
IEEE AFMo AFSi Cigre
C2H2 – All Data
IEEE AFMo AFSi Cigre
C2H4 – All Data
IEEE AFMo AFSi Cigre
C2H6 – All Data
IEEE AFMo AFSi Cigre
CO – All Data
IEEE AFMo AFSi = 1936
Cigre
CO2 – All Data
IEEE AFMo AFSi = 25,387
Cigre
TDCG – All Data
IEEE AFMo AFSi = 2,160
Cigre
Further Breakdown…
Given a type of oil preservation (say, N2 Blanket) What happens to Gas Levels vs Voltage Class, MVA, Age?
H2, 90th Percentile – Per Voltage Class
IEEE AFMo AFSi Cigre
H2, 90th Percentile – Per MVA Rating
IEEE AFMo AFSi Cigre
H2, 90th Percentile – Per Age Group
IEEE AFMo AFSi Cigre
C2H6, 90th Percentile – Per Voltage Class
Cigre
Revision C57.104 – TF on Data Analysis Gas Rate Subject
- 1. Should we calculate rates percentiles for all gases?
- 2. Should we associate rates to levels? How?
- 3. Cigre recent experience
Revision C57.104 – TF on Data Analysis Cigre Levels vs Sampling Intervals
Cigre SCD1.32 Brochure, December 2010
Revision C57.104 – TF on Data Analysis Cigre Rates vs Sampling Intervals
Cigre SCD1.32 Brochure, December 2010
Revision C57.104 – TF on Data Analysis Cigre SCD1.32 Brochure December 2010
Revision C57.104 – TF on Data Analysis Proposal Under Discussion – Level vs Rate
Frequency of DGA
Revision C57.104 – TF on Data Analysis Proposal Under Discussion – Level vs Rate
Severity of Fault (?)
Revision C57.104 – TF on Data Analysis Gas Rates (IEEE Database)
t ppm
Revision C57.104 – TF on Data Analysis Gas Rates (IEEE Database)
Revision C57.104 – TF on Data Analysis Gas Rate Issues
72 115 133 days
day ppm t ppm / 323 . 133 72 115
Revision C57.104 – TF on Data Analysis Gas Rate Issues
72 115 133 days
year ppm t ppm / 118 133 72 115
Revision C57.104 – TF on Data Analysis Gas Rate Issues ± 15% Cigre Typical Lab Accuracy
133 days
year ppm t ppm / 41 133 83 98
Revision C57.104 – TF on Data Analysis Gas Rate Issues
72 115 343 days
year ppm t ppm / 50 343 115 68
68
?
Revision C57.104 – TF on Data Analysis Gas Rate Issues
year ppm t ppm / 5 . 13
Revision C57.104 – TF on Data Analysis Another Example
Revision C57.104 – TF on Data Analysis Another Example 27 ppm/year
500 ppm/year
Revision C57.104 – TF on Data Analysis Inherent Uncertainty in Trend Calculation
- 1. Multiple Laboratories
- 2. Lab Variations (repeatability, reproducibility, accuracy)
- 3. Seasonal variations (temperature, etc)
- 4. Sampling errors (humans, sample contamination, etc)
- 5. Type of Transformer (N2, etc…)
- 6. Sampling interval??
Revision C57.104 – TF on Data Analysis Distribution of DGA Sampling Interval
Revision C57.104 – TF on Data Analysis Distribution of DGA Sampling Interval
Revision C57.104 – TF on Data Analysis Distribution of DGA Sampling Interval
Revision C57.104 – TF on Data Analysis Gas Rates Distribution vs DGA Sampling Interval
Revision C57.104 – TF on Data Analysis Gas Rates Distribution vs DGA Sampling Interval
Revision C57.104 – TF on Data Analysis Gas Rates Distribution vs DGA Sampling Interval
Revision C57.104 – TF on Data Analysis Gas Rates Distribution vs DGA Sampling Interval
Revision C57.104 – TF on Data Analysis Gas Rates Distribution vs DGA Sampling Interval
Revision C57.104 – TF on Data Analysis Gas Rates Distribution vs DGA Sampling Interval
Revision C57.104 – TF on Data Analysis Gas Rates Distribution vs DGA Sampling Interval
38%
Revision C57.104 – TF on Data Analysis Rates Distribution vs DGA Sampling Interval
Revision C57.104 – TF on Data Analysis
53 204
Revision C57.104 – TF on Data Analysis
Revision C57.104 – TF on Data Analysis
Revision C57.104 – TF on Data Analysis
Revision C57.104 – TF on Data Analysis
Revision C57.104 – TF on Data Analysis Food for Thought!
Revision C57.104 – TF on Data Analysis Proposal for Discussion – Level vs Rate
Severity of Fault (N2 Blanket, etc)
90th | t 95th | t …
Table conditioned to t = Sampling Interval