tensor invariants and kronecker coefficients
play

Tensor Invariants and Kronecker Coefficients Jiarui Fei University - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Tensor Invariants and Kronecker Coefficients Jiarui Fei University of California, Riverside November 23, 2013 Jiarui Fei Tensor Invariants and Kronecker Coefficients Tensor Invariants By a (tri-)tensor of vector spaces ( U , V , W ), we mean


  1. Tensor Invariants and Kronecker Coefficients Jiarui Fei University of California, Riverside November 23, 2013 Jiarui Fei Tensor Invariants and Kronecker Coefficients

  2. Tensor Invariants By a (tri-)tensor of vector spaces ( U , V , W ), we mean the vector space U ∗ ⊗ V ⊗ W ∗ . The product of special linear groups G := SL( U ) × SL( V ) × SL( W ) acts naturally on it. We are interested in the ring of invariants k [ U ∗ ⊗ V ⊗ W ∗ ] G = Sym( U ⊗ V ∗ ⊗ W ) G . The vector space can be identified with the ( n 1 , n 2 )-dimensional representation space of the m -arrow Kronecker quiver K m , where dim U = n 1 , dim V = n 2 , and dim W = m . The ring of invariants SI ( n 1 , n 2 ) ( K m ) := k [ U ∗ ⊗ V ⊗ W ∗ ] SL( U ) × SL( V ) is generated by Schofield’s determinantal invariants (Derksen-Weyman, Schofield-Van den Bergh). Jiarui Fei Tensor Invariants and Kronecker Coefficients

  3. Tensor Invariants By a (tri-)tensor of vector spaces ( U , V , W ), we mean the vector space U ∗ ⊗ V ⊗ W ∗ . The product of special linear groups G := SL( U ) × SL( V ) × SL( W ) acts naturally on it. We are interested in the ring of invariants k [ U ∗ ⊗ V ⊗ W ∗ ] G = Sym( U ⊗ V ∗ ⊗ W ) G . The vector space can be identified with the ( n 1 , n 2 )-dimensional representation space of the m -arrow Kronecker quiver K m , where dim U = n 1 , dim V = n 2 , and dim W = m . The ring of invariants SI ( n 1 , n 2 ) ( K m ) := k [ U ∗ ⊗ V ⊗ W ∗ ] SL( U ) × SL( V ) is generated by Schofield’s determinantal invariants (Derksen-Weyman, Schofield-Van den Bergh). Jiarui Fei Tensor Invariants and Kronecker Coefficients

  4. Variation of Schofield’s Invariants For simplicity, we will assume n 1 = n 2 = n . By a semi-invariants of degree d , we mean an element f ∈ SI ( n , n ) ( K m ) of weight ( d , − d ), i.e., for any x ∈ U ∗ ⊗ V ⊗ W ∗ and ( g 1 , g 2 ) ∈ GL( U ) × GL( V ) we have that f (( g 1 , g 2 ) x ) = det( g 1 ) d det( g 2 ) − d f ( x ) . We consider the determinant of the dn × dn matrix m � Λ k ⊗ A k , k =1 where Λ k = ( λ k ij ) is a d × d matrix and ⊗ is the Kronecker product. ij ) ( D k ) ij in the i , j , k ( λ k Let c ( D 1 , D 2 , . . . , D m ) be the coefficient of � expansion. Jiarui Fei Tensor Invariants and Kronecker Coefficients

  5. Variation of Schofield’s Invariants For simplicity, we will assume n 1 = n 2 = n . By a semi-invariants of degree d , we mean an element f ∈ SI ( n , n ) ( K m ) of weight ( d , − d ), i.e., for any x ∈ U ∗ ⊗ V ⊗ W ∗ and ( g 1 , g 2 ) ∈ GL( U ) × GL( V ) we have that f (( g 1 , g 2 ) x ) = det( g 1 ) d det( g 2 ) − d f ( x ) . We consider the determinant of the dn × dn matrix m � Λ k ⊗ A k , k =1 where Λ k = ( λ k ij ) is a d × d matrix and ⊗ is the Kronecker product. ij ) ( D k ) ij in the i , j , k ( λ k Let c ( D 1 , D 2 , . . . , D m ) be the coefficient of � expansion. Jiarui Fei Tensor Invariants and Kronecker Coefficients

  6. Example ( m = 2 , d = 3) λ 1 11 A 1 + λ 2 λ 1 12 A 1 + λ 2 λ 1 13 A 1 + λ 2   11 A 2 12 A 2 13 A 2 λ 1 21 A 1 + λ 2 λ 1 22 A 1 + λ 2 λ 1 23 A 1 + λ 2 21 A 2 22 A 2 23 A 2   λ 1 31 A 1 + λ 2 λ 1 32 A 1 + λ 2 λ 1 33 A 1 + λ 2 31 A 2 32 A 2 33 A 2 Lemma { c ( D 1 , D 2 , . . . , D m ) } linearly span the quiver invariants SI d ( n , n ) ( K m ) . Jiarui Fei Tensor Invariants and Kronecker Coefficients

  7. Example ( m = 2 , d = 3) λ 1 11 A 1 + λ 2 λ 1 12 A 1 + λ 2 λ 1 13 A 1 + λ 2   11 A 2 12 A 2 13 A 2 λ 1 21 A 1 + λ 2 λ 1 22 A 1 + λ 2 λ 1 23 A 1 + λ 2 21 A 2 22 A 2 23 A 2   λ 1 31 A 1 + λ 2 λ 1 32 A 1 + λ 2 λ 1 33 A 1 + λ 2 31 A 2 32 A 2 33 A 2 Lemma { c ( D 1 , D 2 , . . . , D m ) } linearly span the quiver invariants SI d ( n , n ) ( K m ) . Jiarui Fei Tensor Invariants and Kronecker Coefficients

  8. Relations We view c ( D 1 , D 2 , . . . , D m ) as formal variables, and denote � � ( λ k ij ) ( D k ) ij . F ( C , Λ) := c ( D 1 , D 2 , . . . , D m ) i , j , k Since we have for any elementary matrix F ij = I + E ij that, � � det( F ij Λ k ⊗ A k ) = det( Λ k ⊗ A k ) , k k such an equality generates a set of relations among c ( D 1 , D 2 , . . . , D m ), namely F ( C , F ij Λ) − F ( C , Λ) = 0 . Theorem The relations below span all relations among c ( D 1 , D 2 , . . . , D m ) ’s. F ( C , F ij Λ) − F ( C , Λ) = 0 , and F ( C , Λ F ij ) − F ( C , Λ) = 0 . Jiarui Fei Tensor Invariants and Kronecker Coefficients

  9. Relations We view c ( D 1 , D 2 , . . . , D m ) as formal variables, and denote � � ( λ k ij ) ( D k ) ij . F ( C , Λ) := c ( D 1 , D 2 , . . . , D m ) i , j , k Since we have for any elementary matrix F ij = I + E ij that, � � det( F ij Λ k ⊗ A k ) = det( Λ k ⊗ A k ) , k k such an equality generates a set of relations among c ( D 1 , D 2 , . . . , D m ), namely F ( C , F ij Λ) − F ( C , Λ) = 0 . Theorem The relations below span all relations among c ( D 1 , D 2 , . . . , D m ) ’s. F ( C , F ij Λ) − F ( C , Λ) = 0 , and F ( C , Λ F ij ) − F ( C , Λ) = 0 . Jiarui Fei Tensor Invariants and Kronecker Coefficients

  10. The Lie Algebra Action This set of generators behave well under the Lie algebra sl ( W ) action. Let ∂ kl be the differential operator corresponding to the matrix E kl ∈ sl ( W ). Then we have the following formula � � � � � ∂ kl c ( D 1 , . . . , D m ) = − ( D l ) ij +1 c ( . . . , D k − E ij , . . . , D l + E ij , . . . ) ( D k ) ij > 0 In particular, c ( D ) is T -invariant iff. n n D ij = dn � � m | dn and m (1 , 1 , . . . , 1) . i =1 j =1 n m n m � � � � (In priori, D k = D k = n (1 , 1 , . . . , 1) . ) i =1 k =1 j =1 k =1 Jiarui Fei Tensor Invariants and Kronecker Coefficients

  11. The Lie Algebra Action This set of generators behave well under the Lie algebra sl ( W ) action. Let ∂ kl be the differential operator corresponding to the matrix E kl ∈ sl ( W ). Then we have the following formula � � � � � ∂ kl c ( D 1 , . . . , D m ) = − ( D l ) ij +1 c ( . . . , D k − E ij , . . . , D l + E ij , . . . ) ( D k ) ij > 0 In particular, c ( D ) is T -invariant iff. n n D ij = dn � � m | dn and m (1 , 1 , . . . , 1) . i =1 j =1 n m n m � � � � (In priori, D k = D k = n (1 , 1 , . . . , 1) . ) i =1 k =1 j =1 k =1 Jiarui Fei Tensor Invariants and Kronecker Coefficients

  12. Finite-type Cases 222 The degree 2 invariant is Cayley’s hyperdeterminant c (11) 2 − 4 c (20) c (02) . 233 The degree 4 invariant is c (12) 2 c (21) 2 − 4 c (03) c (21) 3 − 4 c (12) 3 c (30) +18 c (03) c (12) c (21) c (30) − 27 c (03) 2 c (30) 2 . 223 The degree 3 invariant is � 000 001 100 � 000 001 100 � � 0 A 3 − A 2 � � c − c = det . − A 3 0 A 1 001 000 010 100 000 010 010 100 000 010 001 000 − A 1 0 A 2 224 The degree 2 invariant is c ( 1000 0100 0010 0001 ) − c ( 1000 0010 0100 0001 ) , whose square is the classical invariant of quaternary quadratic form. The invariant ring SI (2 , 2) ( K 4 ) is free over Sym( S 2 ) with basis S (1 4 ) , and has equivariant free resolution S (2 4 ) ⊗ A ( − 4) → A , Jiarui Fei Tensor Invariants and Kronecker Coefficients

  13. The 333 Case Proposition The tensor invariants are generated by three algebraically independent elements. The degree 2 invariant is c ( 111 000 � c ( 020 100 100 002 ) + c ( 002 010 010 200 ) + c ( 200 001 � 000 111 ) + 4 001 020 ) . � � 0 A 3 − A 2 The degree 3 invariant is det . − A 3 0 A 1 − A 1 0 A 2 The degree 4 invariant is the Aronhold invariant of ternary cubic form. The invariant ring SI (3 , 3) ( K 3 ) is free over Sym( S 3 ⊕ S (2 3 ) ) with basis S (3 3 ) , and has equivariant free resolution S (6 3 ) ⊗ A ( − 6) → A , where A = Sym( S 3 ⊕ S (2 3 ) ⊕ S (3 3 ) ) . Jiarui Fei Tensor Invariants and Kronecker Coefficients

  14. The 333 Case Proposition The tensor invariants are generated by three algebraically independent elements. The degree 2 invariant is c ( 111 000 � c ( 020 100 100 002 ) + c ( 002 010 010 200 ) + c ( 200 001 � 000 111 ) + 4 001 020 ) . � � 0 A 3 − A 2 The degree 3 invariant is det . − A 3 0 A 1 − A 1 0 A 2 The degree 4 invariant is the Aronhold invariant of ternary cubic form. The invariant ring SI (3 , 3) ( K 3 ) is free over Sym( S 3 ⊕ S (2 3 ) ) with basis S (3 3 ) , and has equivariant free resolution S (6 3 ) ⊗ A ( − 6) → A , where A = Sym( S 3 ⊕ S (2 3 ) ⊕ S (3 3 ) ) . Jiarui Fei Tensor Invariants and Kronecker Coefficients

  15. Kronecker Coefficients We want to know in advance how many linearly independent invariants in each degree and the degree-bounds. The number of invariants are given by some special Kronecker coefficients. Kronecker coefficients are by definition the structure coefficient of the representation ring of the symmetric groups � k λ S µ S ν = µ,ν S λ . λ By Schur-Weyl duality, it also appears as S λ ( V ⊗ W ) ∼ � k λ µ,ν S µ ( V ) ⊗ S ν ( W ) . = µ,ν Jiarui Fei Tensor Invariants and Kronecker Coefficients

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend