tcja international provisions reflections on the first
play

TCJA International Provisions: Reflections on the First Year T odd - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TCJA International Provisions: Reflections on the First Year T odd Castagno, Morgan Stanley Mindy Herzfeld, University of Florida David Noren, McDermott Will & Emery Michael Donohoe, Ed Outslay, Gary McGill ( Illinois, Michigan State, UF )


  1. TCJA International Provisions: Reflections on the First Year T odd Castagno, Morgan Stanley Mindy Herzfeld, University of Florida David Noren, McDermott Will & Emery Michael Donohoe, Ed Outslay, Gary McGill ( Illinois, Michigan State, UF ) National Tax Association, May 2019

  2. Behavioral Responses: Practitioner’s Perspective May 16, 2019 2

  3. A practitioner’s perspective • Most planning is still very preliminary; companies will start making any major changes once we have a comprehensive set of final regulations • Even then, there are real concerns about the stability of TCJA, and thus most planning will require “off ramps” • Democrats’ emerging approach to TCJA in the new Congress • Broader political uncertainty and turbulence • New expiring provisions • Grim budget outlook • Impact of developments outside the US • For all of the unprecedented complexity and uncertainty companies are dealing with now, there is also a sense that this is as good as we’re ever going to have it…. May 16, 2019 3

  4. A practitioner’s perspective, cont’d • At a high level, TCJA got a lot right • Broadened base • Lowered rate • Addressed income shifting • Addressed lock-out effect (although PTEP planning turns out to be more of an adventure than anticipated) • IP location and supply chain planning is more complex than ever, due to the proliferation of plausible alternatives to the standard pre-TCJA planning • GILTI – FDII comparison • BEAT impacts • Foreign branches • Practicalities of US IP onshoring • Practicalities of foreign-to-foreign IP onshoring • New limits on IP outbounding May 16, 2019 4

  5. A practitioner’s perspective, cont’d FDI FDII GILTI on on zer ero-ra rate IP IP 13.125% 10.5% or 0% or other 16.406% (starting in 2026) 13.125% (starting in 2026) or 0% or other WTO challenge N/A FDII documentation complexity N/A US use of IP disqualifying for lower rate US use of IP not disqualifying for lower rate QBAI unfavorable attribute QBAI favorable attribute May 16, 2019 5

  6. A practitioner’s perspective, cont’d • DEMPE alignment • Tax attributes—e.g., excess credits in general basket • Public/government relations • BEAT considerations—inbounding may increase US base but potentially increase outbound related party payments (e.g., R&D) May 16, 2019 6

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend