Systems Gap Analysis – Substance Use Disorder Treatment Programs
Annika Skansberg JD/MPH Candidate Opioid Operational Command Center
Systems Gap Analysis Substance Use Disorder Treatment Programs - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Systems Gap Analysis Substance Use Disorder Treatment Programs Annika Skansberg JD/MPH Candidate Opioid Operational Command Center The Substance Use Epidemic in Maryland Gaps Analysis Objectives Evaluate the current treatment
Annika Skansberg JD/MPH Candidate Opioid Operational Command Center
The Substance Use Epidemic in Maryland
Evaluate the current treatment capacity for individuals with substance use disorders in Maryland counties and regions Ensure that individuals with substance use disorders in Maryland can access effective, evidence-based treatment Inform counties and regional leadership on areas where they are lacking services, and areas where they have a surplus of services
Variations of Treatment Programs – Levels of Care
A systems gap analysis is a method of assessing the differences in performance within a system in order to assess outcomes in relation to optimal service provision
Sources of Data Use of Anne Arundel, Wicomico, and Frederick County as Statewide Standards Formulas
City and Baltimore County
gaps based on our analysis
Dorchester County, Montgomery County, and Talbot County
consider regional solutions for expanding services to maximize individual resources
Maryland (Washington County, Allegany County); (2) Southern Maryland (Calvert County, Charles County, St. Mary’s County); (3) Central Maryland (Baltimore City, Baltimore County, Anne Arundel County, Howard County, Harford County, Carroll County); (4) Eastern Shore (Cecil County, Queen Anne’s County, Caroline County, Talbot County, Dorchester County, Somerset County, Wicomico County, Worcester County); (5) Capital Region (Frederick County, Prince George’s County, Montgomery County
Regional Treatment Capacity
level of service in Central Maryland
are residential services for levels 3.3-3.7 care
increased need for residential services
3.1 and 3.7 residential treatment
treatment capacity, with the exception of level 3.1 treatment
The use of Anne Arundel County, Wicomico County, and Frederick County as the comparison counties rather than developing statewide standards through other methods Classification of beds by their highest level of licensure This analysis does not account for payor type Some counties house national-level treatment facilities that are licensed for a large number of beds
Include the development of a new statewide standard using other methods Development of an alternative way to classify treatment programs since many are licensed for multiple levels of care Incorporate more data into their calculations Research how treatment facilities are being utilized within each county