Systematic Review: Interventions for Dyspnea in Advanced Cancer A - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

systematic review interventions for dyspnea in advanced
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Systematic Review: Interventions for Dyspnea in Advanced Cancer A - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Systematic Review: Interventions for Dyspnea in Advanced Cancer A PCORI Virtual Multi-Stakeholder Workshop July 9 th , 2019 Welcome! Todays PCORI Representatives: Bill Lawrence, MD, MS, Senior Clinical Advisor, Office of the Chief Engagement


slide-1
SLIDE 1

July 9th, 2019 A PCORI Virtual Multi-Stakeholder Workshop Systematic Review: Interventions for Dyspnea in Advanced Cancer

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Welcome!

Today’s PCORI Representatives:

  • Bill Lawrence, MD, MS, Senior Clinical Advisor, Office of the Chief Engagement and

Dissemination Officer, PCORI

  • Ellen Kimmel, MLIS, Program Officer, Office of the Chief Science Officer, Research Synthesis,

PCORI

  • Michelle Althuis, PhD, MA, Program Officer, Research Synthesis, Office of the Chief Science

Officer, PCORI

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

Housekeeping

  • Participants’ lines are live
  • Please mute your line when you are not speaking to reduce background noise
  • Today’s conversation is being recorded and will be posted to the PCORI website
  • We will take stakeholder comments in the order indicated
  • If you wish to speak during the open comments/questions period, please

indicate this by typing “permission to speak” in the chat box

  • Comments and questions from participants may be submitted via the chat

window

  • We cannot guarantee a question will be addressed
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Agenda

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

Agenda

  • Welcome
  • Background and goals for the webinar:
  • Background
  • Proposed Systematic Review Key Questions (KQs)
  • PICOTS
  • Moderated discussion
  • Summary and closing remarks
  • Adjourn
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Background

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

Background and Goals

  • Goals for the Systematic Review:
  • To provide evidence for a new clinical practice guideline developed by

the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO).

  • PCORI is commissioning, via the Agency for Healthcare Research and

Quality (AHRQ), a systematic evidence review of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for the management of dyspnea in adults with advanced cancer.

  • Goal for this webinar: to receive stakeholder input on the Key Questions

for this Systematic Review.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Proposed Systematic Review Key Questions

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

Key Question One: What are the benefits of pharmacological interventions (either alone or in combination) for improving dyspnea in advanced cancer patients, and how do they compare with each other?

PICOTS framework

Population Advanced cancer patients w/ cancer‐associated dyspnea ≥ 18 yr Intervention Pharma : Opioids, phenothiazines, anxiolytics, corticosteroids, bronchodilators, lidocaine, antiprostaglandins Comparator Placebo, usual care, other pharma intervention or a combination of pharma interventions Outcomes Dyspnea, anxiety, QoL, functional capacity Timing No limit on study length Setting Hospital, outpatient palliative care clinic, oncology clinic, home health care, hospice care Study design Randomized clinical trials

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

Key Question Two: What are the benefits of non-pharmacological interventions (either alone or in combination) for improving dyspnea in advanced cancer patients, and how do they compare with each other?

PICOTS framework Population Advanced cancer patients w/ cancer‐associated dyspnea ≥ 18 yr Intervention Non‐pharma: walking/mobility aids, fan therapy, behavioral interventions, exercise, respiratory training, oxygen therapy, acupuncture, neuromuscular electrical stimulation, changing the room environment Comparator Placebo, usual care, other non‐pharma intervention or a combination of non‐pharma interventions Outcomes Dyspnea, anxiety, QoL, functional capacity Timing No limit on study length Setting Hospital, outpatient palliative care clinic, oncology clinic, home health care, hospice care Study design Randomized clinical trials

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

Key Question three: What are the comparative benefits of pharmacological interventions as compared to, or in combination with non-pharmacological interventions, for improving dyspnea in advanced cancer patients?

PICOTS framework

Population Advanced cancer patients w/ cancer‐associated dyspnea ≥ 18 yr Intervention Pharma : Opioids, phenothiazines, anxiolytics, corticosteroids, bronchodilators, lidocaine, antiprostaglandins Comparator Placebo, usual care, other non‐pharma intervention or a combination of non‐pharma interventions, or combinations of pharma and non‐pharma interventions Outcomes Dyspnea, anxiety, QoL, functional capacity Timing No limit on study length Setting Hospital, outpatient palliative care clinic, oncology clinic, home health care, hospice care Study design Randomized clinical trials

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

Key Question Four: What are the harms of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for improving dyspnea in advanced cancer patients?

PICOTS framework

Population Advanced cancer patients w/ cancer‐associated dyspnea ≥ 18 yr Intervention Pharma : Opioids, phenothiazines, anxiolytics, corticosteroids, bronchodilators, lidocaine, antiprostaglandins Non‐pharma: walking/mobility aids, fan therapy, behavioral interventions, exercise, respiratory training, oxygen therapy, acupuncture, neuromuscular electrical stimulation, changing the room environment Comparator Pharma or non‐pharma interventions listed above Outcomes Dizziness, drowsiness, headache, constipation, nausea, vomitting, urinary retention, death Timing No limit on study length Setting Hospital, outpatient palliative care clinic, oncology clinic, home health care, hospice care Study design Randomized clinical trials, prospective and retrospective cohorts

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Moderated Discussion

Moderator: Bill Lawrence, MD, MS

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

Order of Comments

  • American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
  • American College of Physicians (ACP)
slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

Order of Comments Representatives

  • American College of Physicians

(ACP)

  • Banu E. Symington, MD,

MACP, Medical Director, Sweetwater Regional Cancer Center

  • American Society of Clinical

Oncology (ASCO)

  • Eric Roeland, MD, Palliative

Care and Medical Oncology Physician, Massachusetts General Hospital

  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
  • Janet Abrahm, MD,

Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

Key Questions

  • 1. What are the benefits of pharmacological interventions (either alone or in

combination) for improving dyspnea in advanced cancer patients, and how do they compare with each other?

  • 2. What are the benefits of non-pharmacological interventions (either alone or

in combination) for improving dyspnea in advanced cancer patients, and how do they compare with each other?

  • 3. What are the comparative benefits of pharmacological interventions as

compared to, or in combination with non-pharmacological interventions, for improving dyspnea in advanced cancer patients?

  • 4. What are the harms of pharmacological and non-pharmacological

interventions for improving dyspnea in advanced cancer patients?

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Open Comments and Questions Period

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Summary and Closing Remarks

slide-19
SLIDE 19

www.pcori.org @pcori /PCORInstitute PCORI /pcori

Contact Information

19

202.827.7700 sstothers@pcori.org

Sarah Stothers, RN, MSN, MPH, Senior Program Associate

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Thank you!