supportive research partnership: Lessons learned from SUPER - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

supportive research partnership lessons
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

supportive research partnership: Lessons learned from SUPER - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Schools working with Universities in a mutually supportive research partnership: Lessons learned from SUPER Research Leads Network Day, 13/12/2015 Clare Hood, Research Lead, Samuel Whitbread Academy Ruth Pineda, Research Lead, Biddenham School


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Faculty of Education Faculty of Education

Schools working with Universities in a mutually supportive research partnership: Lessons learned from SUPER

Clare Hood, Research Lead, Samuel Whitbread Academy Ruth Pineda, Research Lead, Biddenham School Jacq Emkes, SLE, Biddenham School Jan Schofield, Faculty of Education & Biddenham School Ros McLellan, Bethan Morgan, Faculty of Education

Research Leads Network Day, 13/12/2015

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Faculty of Education

11.25 – 12.00: Our Presentation - Overview

  • Introductions: who are we?
  • Faculty Ros/Bethan: the University perspective
  • Research ‘Lead’: Ruth: philosophical underpinnings
  • Faculty AND School: Jan
  • Research ‘Lead’: Clare
  • SUPER MEd Alumnus & School: Jacq
  • To close: key questions for discussion . . .
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Faculty of Education

12.00 - 12.45: Mediated Discussion

  • 12.00 - 12.35: table

level

  • 12.35 - 12.45:

Plenary: whole room

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Faculty of Education

Who are we? 16 Schools + Faculty

Stratton Upper School Samuel Whitbread Academy Biddenham Upper School Bottisham Village College Soham Village College

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Why?

The 'Schools-University Partnership for Educational Research’ (founded 1998) aims:

  • to create useful educational research within a schools-

university partnership;

  • to document and explore partnership between schools

and the university.

Key Questions include:

  • What kinds of research knowledge do schools and teachers value and

find useful, in what ways and why?

  • How can research with teachers be facilitated from within and without

schools?

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Faculty of Education

Standing on the shoulders of . . .

Professor Donald McIntyre (1937-2007)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

The ‘What’: Research - inquiry groups & support

  • An inquiry group of

Teacher Research Co-

  • rdinators (TRCs) and

faculty

  • meet around 6 times

a year to discuss, share and plan research

  • Critical friendship for

all schools from faculty team members

slide-8
SLIDE 8

The ‘What’: Research – online support for TRCs & all teachers via VLE/Moodle

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Research projects: Within schools

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Research projects: Within schools 2014

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Research Project across Schools: Embedding / enhancing a research culture – the Network Survey

What are the opportunities?

What are the barriers?

What are the constraints?

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Annual conference

Sharing & Planning

slide-13
SLIDE 13

UNIVERSITY SEMINARS

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Dissemination: External conferences

Dissemination of our work at national & international conferences: CARN, BERA, AERA, ECER

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Dissemination: Twitter & the blog

Inspired to create a blog after first researchED conference!

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Faculty of Education

University Perspective: The Power of the Collective

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Faculty of Education

International Links: SUPER in Kazakhstan

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Faculty of Education

Opportunities for Research

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Faculty of Education

Keeping us grounded and up-to-date

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Faculty of Education

University: Collaborative Research & Critical Friendship

slide-21
SLIDE 21

University: Masters in Education –

supporting & building research capacity in schools

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Faculty of Education

School Research Lead: Ruth

Making sense of Teacher Research: The value of reading and reflection

  • 1. Stenhouse, L. (1983). Research as a basis for Teaching. In Authority, Education and

Emancipation (pp. 177–195). London: Heinmann Educational Books.

  • 2. Hargreaves, D. H. (2007). Teaching as a research-based profession: possibilities and

prospects (The Teacher Training Agency Lecture 1996). In M. Hammersley (Ed.), Educational Research and Evidence-based Practice. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.

  • Hammersley, M. (1997) Educational Research and Teaching: A Response to David

Hargreaves’ TTA Lecture. British Educational Research Journal, 23(2), 141–161.

  • Hargreaves, D. H. (1997). In Defence of Research for Evidence-Based Teaching: A

Rejoinder to Martyn Hammersley. British Educational Research Journal, 23(4), 405–419

  • 3. McIntyre, D. (2005). Bridging the gap between research and practice. Cambridge Journal of

Education, 35(3), 357–382.

  • 4. Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical: education, knowledge and action research.

London: Falmer Press.

  • 5. Groundwater, S., & Mockler, N. (2007). Ethics in practitioner research: an issue of quality.

Research Papers in Education, 22(2), 199–211.

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Faculty of Education

University & School: Jan

From this…

to this…

Third Space (Bhabha, 1994:56) Behaviour is influenced by capital and habitus (Bourdieu,1980)

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Bridging the gap Closing the gap

Faculty

Research; Reflective; Discourse; Teaching; Supervision; Critical Friendship; Seminars; Research informed; Current, reliable and valid.

School

Professional learning community; Calendared

  • pportunities;

Building leadership capacity; Teacher Researcher Coordinators; Research culture; Realistic; National demands; Data driven.

Learning within collaborative partnerships is a two-way process. Annual SUPER Conference; Closing the Gap research (pupil premium); ResearchMeet; Seminars; Critical friendship; BERA & CARN.

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Whole School Improvement Plan

Department Improvement Plan Informed decision making CPD Pedagogy SLT What Biddenham knows...

Professional interests

Needs: perceived, school, Ofsted Understanding School Development Plan Research & Development Leadership: Appraisal, MEd, UPS Implementation: staff meetings, training days, briefings Reflection & evaluation

Coaching & mentoring A knowledge creating school

(Hargreaves, 1999:142)

Appraisal Lesson

  • bservation
slide-26
SLIDE 26

Research informed reflective practitioners It is teachers who, in the end, will change the world of the school by understanding it.

(Stenhouse, 1981) ………………………….. All SUPER members are teachers who understand and share expertise via research informed reflective practice and discourse.

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Kazakhstan Internship

SUPER culture, values & ethos; TRC model; Action Research; Sharing pedagogy; Leadership practice; Student voice; Ongoing reflective discourse…

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Faculty of Education

School Research Lead: Clare

Working in SUPER; the perspective of a new TRC (teacher research co-

  • rdinator)

Clare is head of music and dance at Samuel Whitbread Academy, whilst working alongside the senior team in her Head of Research role. She is currently completing her EdD at Cambridge, focussing on leadership, and is interested in teacher professionalism and networking.

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Faculty of Education

Which hat?

SCHOOL RESEARCH

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Faculty of Education

School priorities Action Evidence of impact Are these research questions the right ones?

Viewing school improvement with a research lens

What evidence suggests this action will work? Does the action match your research question? How do we disseminate this to staff and

  • ther schools?
slide-31
SLIDE 31

M

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Faculty of Education

Conditions, structures & organisational arrangements to support school-university partnerships Determining the clarity of key purpose(s) Developing and sustaining supportive and invigorating relationships Building a range of effective and flexible communication strategies Engaging and maintaining the commitment of school leaders Learning from the perspectives of other institutions Sufficient resources in terms of time and money

[McIntyre & Black-Hawkins, 2006]

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Faculty of Education

DISCUSSION: Schools working with Universities in mutually supportive research partnerships

  • How can we bridge the gap between theory and practice? Do partnerships

between universities and schools have a research evidence focus? Are shared ITT programmes evidence-led?

  • Can the differing needs / agendas of universities and schools be reconciled?
  • What ‘capital’ does each partner bring and how can this be realised?
  • What structures are necessary for such partnerships to flourish? What are the

features of successful school and university partnerships?

  • How can such partnerships be sustained?
  • What is in it for each partner - what is the motivation for continuing?
  • What are the potential difficulties of working together? How can these be
  • vercome?
slide-34
SLIDE 34

Faculty of Education

References

Bhabha, H.K. (1994). The Location of Culture. New York: Routledge. Hargreaves, D.H. (1999). The Knowledge Creating School. British Journal of Educational Studies, 47, 2, 122 – 44. Stenhouse, L. (1981). ‘What counts as research?’ British Journal of Educational Studies, 29 (2): 103 – 14. McIntyre, D. & Black-Hawkins, K. Reflections on schools-university research partnerships (Chapter 13) in McLaughlin, C., Black Hawkins, K., Brindley, S., McIntyre, D. and Taber, K. (2006) Researching Schools: Stories from a Schools-University Partnership for Educational Research. London: Routledge.