study of halo background in the koto experiment
play

Study of Halo ! " $% Background in the KOTO experiment Yuya - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Study of Halo ! " $% Background in the KOTO experiment Yuya Noichi Year End Presentation 2019 2019/12/23 2019 Year End Presentation 1 KOTO Experiment Search for ! " $ % &' & decay () undetectable &


  1. Study of Halo ! " → $% Background in the KOTO experiment Yuya Noichi Year End Presentation 2019 2019/12/23 2019 Year End Presentation 1

  2. KOTO Experiment • Search for ! " → $ % &' & decay () undetectable & Signal 2+ � Nothing (4 , veto ) veto counter ) Au Target K L CsI Calorimeter Proton ' & 2019/12/23 2019 Year End Presentation 2

  3. Halo ! " → $% Background • If beam halo K L decay for 2 ) , it may be confused with & ' → / 0 1* 1 signal. ! " → , - .* . halo ! " → $% ) ) K L ) ) K L z z + + * CsI CsI • P T of Halo K L must be measured correctly because it may cause Halo & ' → 2) background. 2019/12/23 2019 Year End Presentation 3

  4. COE(Center of Energy) • COE can be calculated from CsI information; Hit position and energy of each gamma. !"#$ = ∑(()*! + , + ) ∑(()*. + , + ) ."#$ = ∑ , + ∑ , + • This can be indicator of halo K L because COE represents the arrival point of K L for the case angle between P T and P Z is small. / COE 3 4 z 012 2019/12/23 2019 Year End Presentation 4

  5. Motivation • Conventional reconstruction method assumes mass of each 2gamma is ! " # and vertex position is on z axis. • Transverse position of K L was determined by the interpolation between target and COE. • However, assumption that K L fly from target to COE may not be correct because K L can scatter at the downstream of target. We want to develop new method without using this assumption. 2019/12/23 2019 Year End Presentation 5

  6. New Method Decay position of K L may be determined by minimizing χ 2 of following formula. " " " , -,.,/ 01 23 , -,.,/ 01 23 , -,.,/ 01 23 * + " * , " * 6 " ! " ($, &, ') = + + 4 + 4 , 4 6 7 8 7 8 ($, &, ') 7 8 z K L Target I checked the precision of this new method by using toy simulation. 2019/12/23 2019 Year End Presentation 6

  7. ! " → $% & Toy Simulation θ is fixed, KL does not go CsI through the beam hole 0 1 → 33 4 decay - + + / - + , 400 mm � P = ( Pt, Pz ) BH width θ : Fixed z K L (150 mm) (Pt - Pz angle) | P |: spectrum measured at the beam exit z[m] 2019/12/23 7

  8. Event Selection Criteria • 6 gamma positions are all inside the fiducial region of the CsI • Minimum gamma energy > 150 MeV • Minimum 2 gamma distance > 150 mm • 0 < Decay z < CsI (6168 mm) Using this toy simulation, I checked whether this new method can reconstruct the decay position. 2019/12/23 2019 Year End Presentation 8

  9. True information of Toy Simulation True X,Y position hist1 hist1 600 True vertex Y [mm] True z position Y position (mm) Entries Entries 10000 10000 # of Events 14 - - hist9 hist9 Mean x Mean x 0.6744 0.6744 350 Entries Entries 10000 10000 Mean y Mean y 0.8278 0.8278 400 Mean Mean 4072 4072 Std Dev x 223.2 Std Dev x 223.2 Std Dev 824.6 Std Dev 824.6 12 300 Std Dev y 223.4 Std Dev y 223.4 200 10 250 200 8 0 150 6 - 200 100 4 50 - 400 2 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 - 600 0 - - - Z position (mm) 600 400 200 0 200 400 600 True vertex Z [mm] X position (mm) True vertex X [mm] We want to reconstruct these vertex positions 2019/12/23 2019 Year End Presentation 9

  10. Reconstructed Vertex position(1) • Energy and position resolution of CsI... neither considered new reconstructed X,Y new reconstructed Z - true Z new reconstructed r - true r Rec. vertex Y [mm] hist2 hist2 hist3 hist3 # of Events hist11 hist11 # of Events 600 16 NEW Entries Entries 10000 10000 Entries Entries 10000 10000 Entries 10000 Entries 10000 NEW 10000 NEW - - 9000 - - 0 0 Mean x Mean x 0.8824 0.8824 Mean Mean 5.841e 5.841e 16 16 Mean Mean 14 - - Mean y Mean y 0.5082 0.5082 Std Dev Std Dev 1.513e 1.513e 13 13 Std Dev 0 Std Dev 0 400 8000 Std Dev x 194.3 Std Dev x 194.3 Std Dev y 193.5 Std Dev y 193.5 8000 12 7000 200 10 6000 6000 5000 0 8 4000 4000 6 - 200 3000 good 4 2000 2000 - reconstruction 400 2 1000 - 600 0 0 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - 600 400 200 0 200 400 600 200 150 100 50 0 50 100 150 200 100 80 60 40 20 0 20 40 60 80 100 Rec R – True R [mm] Rec. vertex X [mm] Rec Z – True Z [mm] Rec. vertex Y [mm] # of Events # of Events # of Events # of Events conventional conventional conventional conventional conventional conventional Rec R – True R [mm] Rec Z – True Z [mm] Rec. vertex X [mm] 2019/12/23 2019 Year End Presentation 10

  11. Comparison of new and conventional • Energy and position resolution of CsI... both considered Rec. vertex Y [mm] # of Events # of Events NEW NEW NEW can not see the larger image difference Rec R – True R [mm] Rec Z – True Z [mm] Rec. vertex X [mm] Rec. vertex Y [mm] # of Events # of Events conventional conventional conventional Rec R – True R [mm] Rec Z – True Z [mm] Rec. vertex X [mm] 2019/12/23 2019 Year End Presentation 11

  12. Chi2 distribution 1 sigma(ΔChi2 = 2.3) contour (for example 1 event) Rec vertex Y [mm] position resolution ~300mm ... not small 1σ Rec vertex X [mm] • The failure of reconstruction using new method is due to this bad position resolution. 2019/12/23 2019 Year End Presentation 12

  13. Reason for bad resolution • Constraint from 6 gamma looks like sphere, and sum of them become too shallow to minimize. CsI ! ! Constraint ! surface ! ! ! z ! ! 2019/12/23 2019 Year End Presentation

  14. Summary and Next Halo K L cause ! " → 2% background, so we need to measure • halo K L correctly. • I tried to develop new reconstruction method minimizing chi2 function of reconstructed mass of & ' . • Position resolution of new method was not enough to reconstruct vertex position correctly. • To know whether we need to develop more reconstruction method, I’m checking discrepancy of COE between data and MC. 2019/12/23 2019 Year End Presentation 14

  15. Backup 2019/12/23 2019 Year End Presentation 15

  16. Reconstructed Vertex position(1) • Energy and position resolution of CsI... neither considered new reconstructed X,Y new reconstructed Z - true Z new reconstructed r - true r Rec. vertex Y [mm] hist2 hist2 hist3 hist3 # of Events hist11 hist11 # of Events 600 16 NEW Entries Entries 10000 10000 Entries Entries 10000 10000 Entries 10000 Entries 10000 NEW 10000 NEW - - 9000 - - 0 0 Mean x Mean x 0.8824 0.8824 Mean Mean 5.841e 5.841e 16 16 Mean Mean 14 - - Mean y Mean y 0.5082 0.5082 Std Dev Std Dev 1.513e 1.513e 13 13 Std Dev 0 Std Dev 0 400 8000 Std Dev x 194.3 Std Dev x 194.3 Std Dev y 193.5 Std Dev y 193.5 8000 12 7000 200 10 6000 6000 5000 0 8 4000 4000 6 - 200 3000 good 4 2000 2000 - reconstruction 400 2 1000 - 600 0 0 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - 600 400 200 0 200 400 600 200 150 100 50 0 50 100 150 200 100 80 60 40 20 0 20 40 60 80 100 Rec R – True R [mm] Rec. vertex X [mm] Rec Z – True Z [mm] Rec. vertex Y [mm] # of Events # of Events # of Events # of Events conventional conventional conventional conventional conventional conventional Rec R – True R [mm] Rec Z – True Z [mm] Rec. vertex X [mm] 2019/12/23 2019 Year End Presentation 16

  17. Reconstructed Vertex position(2) • Energy and position resolution of CsI... both considered Rec. vertex Y [mm] # of Events # of Events NEW NEW NEW Rec R – True R [mm] Rec Z – True Z [mm] Rec. vertex X [mm] Rec. vertex Y [mm] # of Events # of Events conventional conventional conventional Rec R – True R [mm] Rec Z – True Z [mm] Rec. vertex X [mm] 2019/12/23 2019 Year End Presentation 17

  18. Sigma of M 2 #$ % (' ( ,* ( ,+ ( ,' % ,* % ,+ % ) #$ % (' ( ,* ( ,+ ( ,' % ,* % ,+ % ) #$ % (' ( ,* ( ,+ ( ,' % ,* % ,+ % ) ! M2 = ! ' ( + ! * ( + ... + ! + % #' ( #* ( #+ % = $ % ' ( -. ,* ( ,+ ( ,' % ,* % ,+ % /$ % ' ( ,* ( ,+ ( ,' % ,* % ,+ % #$ % (' ( ,* ( ,+ ( ,' % ,* % ,+ % ) #' ( . 2019/12/23 2019 Year End Presentation 18

  19. Chi2 distribution 2019/12/23 2019 Year End Presentation 19

  20. [1]Nakagiri-san’s Dr.thesis https://www-he.scphys.kyoto-u.ac.jp/theses/doctor/nakagiri_dt.pdf KL Generation in Toy Simulation(2) CsI Decay Position ' + % ) ' % & � P = ( Pt, Pz ) BH width z K L Generation | P |= [1] z[m] 2019/12/23 2019 Year End Presentation 20

  21. KL Generation in Toy Simulation(3) CsI Decay Position � P BH width z K L Flying Distance = &'() ∗ − log(012345[0,1]) z[m] 2019/12/23 2019 Year End Presentation 21

  22. MINUIT Detail used “MIGRAD” minimizer (also checked HESSE,MINOS) • used some limits in order to prevent the parameter • from taking on unphysical values e.g.) 0 < z < CsI, -1000< x,y <1000 fitting step width of (x,y,z)... (10,10,100) • max call ... 1000 times (500~ not chenged) • 2019/12/23 2019 Year End Presentation 22

  23. Problem of Conventional Reconstruction Method Reconstructed vertex point True '() vertex point z ! "#$%#& True Target Scatter point 23

  24. Resolution of CsI 24

  25. Only Position Resolution of CsI 25

  26. Only Energy Resolution of CsI 26

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend