Strateg egic E Enrollment M Managem emen ent T Taskfor orce - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Strateg egic E Enrollment M Managem emen ent T Taskfor

• rce

Persisten ence a e and C Com

• mpletion

HOSTE STED BY P PRESI SIDENT R NT ROBIN S N STEINB NBACK NOVEMBER 1, 1, 201 2017

• Welco

come & & Context

• Contex

ext – Dr. S Ste teinback

• En

Enrollment Data ta – Mr.

• r. L

Lopez

• Budg

dget I Implications ns – Dr

• Dr. J

Jon

• nes
• Curren

ent E Efforts s

• Persistenc

ence e and C nd Complet etion S n Strateg egies es

• Action I

Item ems a s and nd N Next S Step eps

• Closing

ng R Remarks

Agenda

Data Source: RCCD Enrollment Management Dashboard, March 2017

Enrollment Data

MVC is the “home college” for majority of our students

• Percent of students who complete at least 60%
• f their attempted coursework at only one

college

• Moreno Valley College is clearly a unique case

in RCCD

• Vast majority of MVC students complete

majority of attempted coursework at MVC = 3 of every 4 students

• Norco and RCC students complete or attempt

coursework at more than one college

• Strengthening our culture so that MVC is

College of Choice!

Local School District Enrollment @ MVC

1800 800 800 400 300 200 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 Moreno Valley USD ValVerde USD Graduates Enroll into PostSecondary Attend MVC

40%

Data Source: California Department of Education, CDE 2015; California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office, CCCCO 2017

50%

Race/Ethnicity Enrollment by Percentage Race/Ethnicity CCC State Total RCCD MVC Norco RCC African American

5.87 8.09

11.89

5.42 7.64 American Indian 0.40 0.32 0.28 0.25 0.37 Asian 11.00 4.90 3.14 6.32 5.03 Filipino 2.92 2.11 2.05 2.42 2.00 Latina/o

45.08 60.93

63.78

58.61 60.75 Multi-Ethnicity 3.76 2.31 2.89 2.32 2.09 Pacific Islander 0.41 0.36 0.35 0.35 0.37 Unknown 4.42 0.85 0.58 0.36 1.21 White Non-Hispanic

26.14 20.13 15.04

24.07 20.55

MVC serves Students of Color proportionally at higher rates than State and District levels

Data Source: California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office (CCCCO), February, 2017

Region 9 9 Succe cess, R Retenti tion, a and C Completi tion

• n R

Rates es An Analysis

• Based on Spring 2016 Data
• MVC ranked 81st in the state and 10th in our region for student

completion of degrees and certificates per student

• MVC ranked 58th in the state and 5th in our region for retention and

success

• MVC ranked 62nd in the state and 5th in our region for overall

success rates

• MVC ranked 27th in the state and 2nd in our region for Latinx

success rates

Data Source: California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office (CCCCO), February, 2017 and March 10, 2017 MVC Strategic Enrollment Management Taskforce Meeting Presentation

6062 6043 6363 6607 6833 3032 6174 5727 6262 6473 6573 6347 3016

1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000

2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 Fall 2017 FTES

MVC FTES Targets and Actuals

Target Actual

Fall 2017 Unduplicated Headcount is up 9.9% and Enrolled Seats is up 12.2%

Data Source: Targets established via District Allocation Model; Annual Credit FTES Reported CCFS-320 Report Note: In order to make district targets, FTES earned in summer sessions were reported for previous year every year but 2013-2014

1585 1611 1684 1669 1549 368 387 414 248 858 23% 24% 25% 15% 55%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800

2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 Fall 2017

FTES

MVC First Time Students and Full-Time Status

Number of First Time Students Number of First Time Full Time Students % FT Students Data Source: MVC Guided Pathways Key Performance Indicators, October 2017 *Average units attempted per Student is 11 for Fall 2017 alone. 2016-2017 annual attempted units was 15.

1700 1475 1370 1428 1520 1521 1596 705 91% 88% 93% 81% 78% 77% 74% 80%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800

2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 Fall 2017

Fill Rates Course Sections

Number of Course Sections and Average Fill Rates

Course Sections Average Fill Rates Data Source: RCCD Enrollment Management Dashboard, November 2017

SUM17 FALL17 WIN18 SPR18 TOTAL Original Credit FTES Target 639.74 3032.04 578.66 2857.81 7108.25 Earned, Projected, or Needed 600.98 3016.15 604.31 2936.81 7158.25 639.74 3032.04 578.66 2857.81 7108.25 600.98 3016.15 604.31 2936.81 7158.25

0.00 1000.00 2000.00 3000.00 4000.00 5000.00 6000.00 7000.00 8000.00

FTES

2016-2017 MVC FTES Generation and Projections

Fall 17 FTES is projected to be up 10.2% compared to Fall 2016

MVC Budget & RCCD Budget Allocation Model (BAM)

MVC Budget & District Budget Allocation Model (BAM)

• MVC FY18 General Fund Budget is $39.2M
• This budget allocation is largely based on a District

FTES target of 30,525: MVC & NC 7,051.3, & RCC 16,442

• The state provides funding to community college

districts primarily on the basis FTES, calculated on a growth model

• Hence, RCCD’s BAM is based on FTES

Resource Implications of FTES Production

• MVC’s general fund budget allocation amount
• Allocations for faculty and staff positions
• Allocations for equipment & network

infrastructure

• State funding for new facilities, which is based in

part on fall Weekly Student Contact Hours (WSCH)

• Allocation of Categorical funds (e.g., Guided

Pathways, Equity, etc.)

Current Efforts Dialogue

Developed from March 10, 2017 Task Force Meeting:

• Data Driven Decisions
• Campus Engagement
• Integrated Marketing Campaign
• Enhanced Staffing and Support Services
• Course Scheduling and Refinement
• Campus-wide Strategies and Initiatives

Enrollment Management – Action Plan

• Eliminate course conflicts and increase efficiency of room utilization
• Established FTES and FTEF allocations with targets to divisions/departments
• Friday evening and Saturday course offerings
• Launched “one more class” campaign
• Community wide marketing efforts
• Invite students who have applied but not yet registered to attend T2S (on-site

registration events)

• Launched the Promise initiative, MVC Summer Bridge, and FYE program
• Implemented Registration Help Center during registration periods
• Extended student service hours the week before and the week of new term
• Changed the application deadline to be the start of each term

Current Strategies: Highlights for fall 2017

3,971 new applications were received 2016-17

• 61% completed Orientation (1,558 students did not)
• 70% completed Assessment (1,174 students did not)
• 54% completed Counseling (1,835 students did not)

51% of all applicants completed the OAC Process 44% of all applicants enrolled in 2016-17

2016-17 MVC 1st Time Applicants

Which of our initiatives are most effective in supporting student enrollment at MVC? How might we scale these efforts to reach more students? What other ideas/suggestions do you have in supporting student enrollment at MVC?

Current Strategies: Input & Feedback

Persistence and Completion Strategies Dialogue

Persistence and Completion

• Building on our dialogue about
• ur current efforts, what else can

we do to improve student persistence and completion?

• Think about current work that can

be scaled and new initiatives

• Strategies that can be employed

now

• Strategies for the mid- to long-term

Report Out:

Each group is to report out their top 2-3 ideas or strategies to address student retention and completion.

• Can this strategy be enacted

immediately?

• Can this strategy be scaled to reach

most of our students?

Action Items and Next Steps

Closing Remarks and Thank You!