Strateg egic E Enrollment M Managem emen ent T Taskfor orce - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Strateg egic E Enrollment M Managem emen ent T Taskfor orce Persisten ence a e and C Com ompletion HOSTE STED BY P PRESI SIDENT R NT ROBIN S N STEINB NBACK NOVEMBER 1, 1, 201 2017

Agenda Welco come & & Context • Contex ext – Dr. S Ste teinback • En Enrollment Data ta – Mr. r. L Lopez • Budg dget I Implications ns – Dr Dr. J Jon ones • Curren ent E Efforts s • Persistenc ence e and C nd Complet etion S n Strateg egies es • Action I Item ems a s and nd N Next S Step eps • Closing ng R Remarks • Data Source: RCCD Enrollment Management Dashboard, March 2017

Enrollment Data

MVC is the “home college” for majority of our students • Percent of students who complete at least 60% of their attempted coursework at only one college • Moreno Valley College is clearly a unique case in RCCD • Vast majority of MVC students complete majority of attempted coursework at MVC = 3 of every 4 students • Norco and RCC students complete or attempt coursework at more than one college • Strengthening our culture so that MVC is College of Choice!

Local School District Enrollment @ MVC 2000 1800 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 800 800 40% 600 50% 400 400 300 200 200 0 Moreno Valley USD ValVerde USD Graduates Enroll into PostSecondary Attend MVC Data Source: California Department of Education, CDE 2015; California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office, CCCCO 2017

MVC serves Students of Color proportionally at higher rates than State and District levels Race/Ethnicity Enrollment by Percentage Race/Ethnicity CCC State Total RCCD MVC Norco RCC 11.89 5.87 8.09 5.42 7.64 African American 0.40 0.32 0.25 0.37 American Indian 0.28 11.00 4.90 6.32 5.03 Asian 3.14 2.92 2.11 2.42 2.00 Filipino 2.05 63.78 45.08 60.93 58.61 60.75 Latina/o 3.76 2.31 2.32 2.09 Multi-Ethnicity 2.89 0.41 0.36 0.35 0.37 Pacific Islander 0.35 4.42 0.85 0.36 1.21 Unknown 0.58 26.14 20.13 15.04 24.07 20.55 White Non-Hispanic Data Source: California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office (CCCCO), February, 2017

Region 9 9 Succe cess, R Retenti tion, a and C Completi tion on R Rates es An Analysis • Based on Spring 2016 Data • MVC ranked 81 st in the state and 10 th in our region for student completion of degrees and certificates per student • MVC ranked 58 th in the state and 5 th in our region for retention and success • MVC ranked 62 nd in the state and 5 th in our region for overall success rates • MVC ranked 27 th in the state and 2 nd in our region for Latinx success rates Data Source: California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office (CCCCO), February, 2017 and March 10, 2017 MVC Strategic Enrollment Management Taskforce Meeting Presentation

MVC FTES Targets and Actuals 8000 7000 6833 6607 6573 6473 Fall 2017 6363 6347 6000 6262 6174 6062 6043 Unduplicated 5727 Headcount is 5000 up 9.9% and FTES Enrolled Seats 4000 is up 12.2% 3000 3032 3016 2000 1000 0 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 Fall 2017 Target Actual Data Source: Targets established via District Allocation Model; Annual Credit FTES Reported CCFS-320 Report Note: In order to make district targets, FTES earned in summer sessions were reported for previous year every year but 2013-2014

MVC First Time Students and Full-Time Status 1800 60% 55% 1684 1669 1600 1611 1585 50% 1549 1400 1200 40% 1000 FTES 30% 858 800 25% 24% 23% 600 20% 15% 400 414 387 368 10% 200 248 0 0% 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 Fall 2017 Number of First Time Students Number of First Time Full Time Students % FT Students *Average units attempted per Student is 11 for Fall 2017 alone. 2016-2017 Data Source: MVC Guided Pathways Key Performance Indicators, October 2017 annual attempted units was 15.

Number of Course Sections and Average Fill Rates 1800 100% 93% 91% 88% 1700 90% 1600 81% 1596 1521 80% 1520 80% 1475 1400 1428 78% 1370 77% 74% 70% 1200 Course Sections 60% 1000 Fill Rates 50% 800 40% 705 600 30% 400 20% 200 10% 0 0% 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 Fall 2017 Course Sections Average Fill Rates Data Source: RCCD Enrollment Management Dashboard, November 2017

2016-2017 MVC FTES Generation and Projections 8000.00 7108.25 7158.25 7000.00 Fall 17 FTES is projected 6000.00 to be up 10.2% compared to 5000.00 Fall 2016 FTES 4000.00 3016.15 3032.04 2936.81 2857.81 3000.00 2000.00 1000.00 639.74 604.31 578.66 600.98 0.00 SUM17 FALL17 WIN18 SPR18 TOTAL Original Credit FTES Target 639.74 3032.04 578.66 2857.81 7108.25 Earned, Projected, or Needed 600.98 3016.15 604.31 2936.81 7158.25

MVC Budget & RCCD Budget Allocation Model (BAM)

MVC Budget & District Budget Allocation Model (BAM) • MVC FY18 General Fund Budget is $39.2M • This budget allocation is largely based on a District FTES target of 30,525: MVC & NC 7,051.3, & RCC 16,442 • The state provides funding to community college districts primarily on the basis FTES, calculated on a growth model • Hence, RCCD’s BAM is based on FTES

Resource Implications of FTES Production • MVC’s general fund budget allocation amount • Allocations for faculty and staff positions • Allocations for equipment & network infrastructure • State funding for new facilities, which is based in part on fall Weekly Student Contact Hours (WSCH) • Allocation of Categorical funds (e.g., Guided Pathways, Equity, etc.)

Current Efforts Dialogue

Enrollment Management – Action Plan Developed from March 10, 2017 Task Force Meeting:  Data Driven Decisions  Campus Engagement  Integrated Marketing Campaign  Enhanced Staffing and Support Services  Course Scheduling and Refinement  Campus-wide Strategies and Initiatives

Current Strategies: Highlights for fall 2017 Eliminate course conflicts and increase efficiency of room utilization • Established FTES and FTEF allocations with targets to divisions/departments • Friday evening and Saturday course offerings • Launched “one more class” campaign • Community wide marketing efforts • Invite students who have applied but not yet registered to attend T2S (on-site • registration events) Launched the Promise initiative, MVC Summer Bridge, and FYE program • Implemented Registration Help Center during registration periods • Extended student service hours the week before and the week of new term • Changed the application deadline to be the start of each term •

2016-17 MVC 1 st Time Applicants 3,971 new applications were received 2016-17 61% completed Orientation (1,558 students did not) • 70% completed Assessment (1,174 students did not) • 54% completed Counseling (1,835 students did not) • 51% of all applicants completed the OAC Process 44% of all applicants enrolled in 2016-17

Current Strategies: Input & Feedback Which of our initiatives are most effective in supporting student enrollment at MVC? How might we scale these efforts to reach more students? What other ideas/suggestions do you have in supporting student enrollment at MVC?

Persistence and Completion Strategies Dialogue

Persistence and Completion • Building on our dialogue about our current efforts, what else can we do to improve student persistence and completion? • Think about current work that can be scaled and new initiatives • Strategies that can be employed now • Strategies for the mid- to long-term

Report Out: Each group is to report out their top 2-3 ideas or strategies to address student retention and completion. ◦ Can this strategy be enacted immediately? ◦ Can this strategy be scaled to reach most of our students?

Action Items and Next Steps

Closing Remarks and Thank You!