The structure of the debate on EU integration issues
A comparative analysis of party communication in the EP 2014 elections
Beatrice Eugster
source: https://doi.org/10.7892/boris.67095 | downloaded: 15.8.2020
source: https://doi.org/10.7892/boris.67095 | downloaded: 15.8.2020 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
source: https://doi.org/10.7892/boris.67095 | downloaded: 15.8.2020 The structure of the debate on EU integration issues A comparative analysis of party communication in the EP 2014 elections Beatrice Eugster Research question How is the
source: https://doi.org/10.7892/boris.67095 | downloaded: 15.8.2020
Left Right
All issues
Left Right Left Right Libertarian Authoritarian
Economic issues Cultural issues All issues
Left Right
Left Right Libertarian Authoritarian Left Right Libertarian Authoritarian
Economic EU issues Cultural EU issues Economic issues Cultural issues
Left Right
All issues All EU issues
1a 1b
EU dimension Left Right Libertarian Authoritarian
Economic EU issues Cultural EU issues
EU dimension Left Right
All EU issues
2a 2b
Left Right Left Right Libertarian Authoritarian
Economic issues Cultural issues All issues
(1) Absorption of EU issues along national political conflicts:
– general left-right dimension (Tsebelis and Garrett’ regulation model) – left-libertarian/right-authoritarian dimension (Kitschelt 1994,
Hooghe et al. 2002)
– economic and cultural dimension (Kriesi et al. 2006, 2008) (2) No absorption, but emergence of a EU-specific dimension, in
For an overview see also Marks and Steenbergen 2002
>
>
>
SPO OVP FPO GRUNE BZO MARTIN
2 4 6 8 10 gal/tan or new politics position 2 4 6 8 10 economic left/right position
Source: Chapel Hill Expert Survey.
Party position in Austria (2010)
PCF PS PRG VERTS UMP FN MPF MODEM NC
2 4 6 8 10 gal/tan or new politics position 2 4 6 8 10 economic left/right position
Source: Chapel Hill Expert Survey.
Party position in France (2010)
CDU CDS−PP PS PSD BE
2 4 6 8 10 gal/tan or new politics position 2 4 6 8 10 economic left/right position
Source: Chapel Hill Expert Survey.
Party position in Portugal (2010)
CONS LAB LIBDEM SNP PLAID GREEN UKIP BNP
2 4 6 8 10 gal/tan or new politics position 2 4 6 8 10 economic left/right position
Source: Chapel Hill Expert Survey.
Party position in the UK (2010)
CDU SPD FDP Grunen LINKE CSU
2 4 6 8 10 gal/tan or new politics position 2 4 6 8 10 economic left/right position
Source: Chapel Hill Expert Survey.
Party position in Germany (2010)
PASOK ND SYRIZA KKE DIKKI LAOS OP
2 4 6 8 10 gal/tan or new politics position 2 4 6 8 10 economic left/right position
Source: Chapel Hill Expert Survey.
Party position in Greece (2010)
CDA PvdA VVD D66 GL SP CU PVV PvdD SGP
2 4 6 8 10 gal/tan or new politics position 2 4 6 8 10 economic left/right position
Source: Chapel Hill Expert Survey.
Party position in the Netherlands (2010)
Parties Economic dimension (market integration) Cultural/political dimension (integration) Mainstream parties
Social democrats Internal division integration Christian democrats integration integration Conservatives integration demarcation Liberals integration Internal division
Peripheral parties
Radical left demarcation (moderate) integration Greens (moderate) demarcation (moderate) integration Radical right demarcation demarcation
Based on: Marks and Wilson 2000, Hooghe et al. 2004, Marks 2004, Kriesi 2007
Issue categorization (EU project)
(1) Empirical verification whether two dimensions – economic and cultural – can be found (based on issue position) (2) «Alternative version»: combination of issue position (pro/contra) and the specific justification of the position