source: https://doi.org/10.7892/boris.67095 | downloaded: 15.8.2020 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

source https doi org 10 7892 boris 67095 downloaded 15 8
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

source: https://doi.org/10.7892/boris.67095 | downloaded: 15.8.2020 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

source: https://doi.org/10.7892/boris.67095 | downloaded: 15.8.2020 The structure of the debate on EU integration issues A comparative analysis of party communication in the EP 2014 elections Beatrice Eugster Research question How is the


slide-1
SLIDE 1

The structure of the debate on EU integration issues

A comparative analysis of party communication in the EP 2014 elections

Beatrice Eugster

source: https://doi.org/10.7892/boris.67095 | downloaded: 15.8.2020

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Research question How is the debate on European integration issues structured?

Focus on:

>

  • n the political conflicts at the EU level

>

salient EU issues addressed by parties

slide-3
SLIDE 3

From national political conflicts to European political conflicts

Left Right

National level

All issues

slide-4
SLIDE 4

From national political conflicts to European political conflicts

Left Right Left Right Libertarian Authoritarian

Economic issues Cultural issues All issues

National level

slide-5
SLIDE 5

From national political conflicts to European political conflicts

Left Right

EU level

Left Right Libertarian Authoritarian Left Right Libertarian Authoritarian

Economic EU issues Cultural EU issues Economic issues Cultural issues

Left Right

All issues All EU issues

1a 1b

National level

slide-6
SLIDE 6

From national political conflicts to European political conflicts

EU dimension Left Right Libertarian Authoritarian

Economic EU issues Cultural EU issues

EU dimension Left Right

All EU issues

2a 2b

National level EU level

Left Right Left Right Libertarian Authoritarian

Economic issues Cultural issues All issues

slide-7
SLIDE 7

From national to European political cleavages (cont.)

(1) Absorption of EU issues along national political conflicts:

a) one single dimension:

– general left-right dimension (Tsebelis and Garrett’ regulation model) – left-libertarian/right-authoritarian dimension (Kitschelt 1994,

Hooghe et al. 2002)

b) in two dimensions:

– economic and cultural dimension (Kriesi et al. 2006, 2008) (2) No absorption, but emergence of a EU-specific dimension, in

addition to the: a) left-right divide (Hix-Lord model, and Marks-Hooghe model) b) economic and cultural dimensions (Bakker et al. 2012)

For an overview see also Marks and Steenbergen 2002

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Parties’ positions on European integration: the economic and political/ cultural dimension

Dilemma of mainstream parties with regard to European integration

Social democrats: divided on economic/market integration à competition from radical left (economic demarcation) Conservatives (and Christian democrats): divided on cultural integration à competition from radical right (cultural demarcation) Liberals: divided on political dimension (opposition to further political integration)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Hypotheses – issues and positions parties follow in their political campaign

“Distraction from internal party division”

>

Parties on the left tend to focus stronger on and support cultural/ political integration, while parties on the right put more emphasis on and support economic integration.

EU crisis as a chance to emphasize party division

>

Parties on the left tend to focus stronger on and support (regulative) economic integration, while parties on the right put more emphasis

  • n and oppose cultural/political integration.

Peripheral/fringe parties

>

Peripheral parties on the left tend to focus stronger on and oppose economic integration, while fringe parties on the right put more emphasis on and oppose cultural/political integration.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Methodological approach

>

Press releases referring to the European Union published 12 weeks before the 2014 EP elections in 7 countries

— Austria, France, Germany, Greece, Netherlands, Portugal, and the UK) or a selection thereof – suggestions are very welcome.

>

Indicator(s): combination of issues and positions communicated by political parties

>

Comparison across countries

slide-11
SLIDE 11
slide-12
SLIDE 12

Party positions: Economic and cultural dimension

SPO OVP FPO GRUNE BZO MARTIN

2 4 6 8 10 gal/tan or new politics position 2 4 6 8 10 economic left/right position

Source: Chapel Hill Expert Survey.

Party position in Austria (2010)

PCF PS PRG VERTS UMP FN MPF MODEM NC

2 4 6 8 10 gal/tan or new politics position 2 4 6 8 10 economic left/right position

Source: Chapel Hill Expert Survey.

Party position in France (2010)

CDU CDS−PP PS PSD BE

2 4 6 8 10 gal/tan or new politics position 2 4 6 8 10 economic left/right position

Source: Chapel Hill Expert Survey.

Party position in Portugal (2010)

CONS LAB LIBDEM SNP PLAID GREEN UKIP BNP

2 4 6 8 10 gal/tan or new politics position 2 4 6 8 10 economic left/right position

Source: Chapel Hill Expert Survey.

Party position in the UK (2010)

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Party positions: Economic and cultural dimension

CDU SPD FDP Grunen LINKE CSU

2 4 6 8 10 gal/tan or new politics position 2 4 6 8 10 economic left/right position

Source: Chapel Hill Expert Survey.

Party position in Germany (2010)

PASOK ND SYRIZA KKE DIKKI LAOS OP

2 4 6 8 10 gal/tan or new politics position 2 4 6 8 10 economic left/right position

Source: Chapel Hill Expert Survey.

Party position in Greece (2010)

CDA PvdA VVD D66 GL SP CU PVV PvdD SGP

2 4 6 8 10 gal/tan or new politics position 2 4 6 8 10 economic left/right position

Source: Chapel Hill Expert Survey.

Party position in the Netherlands (2010)

slide-14
SLIDE 14

From national political conflicts to parties’ position towards European integration

Parties Economic dimension (market integration) Cultural/political dimension (integration) Mainstream parties

Social democrats Internal division integration Christian democrats integration integration Conservatives integration demarcation Liberals integration Internal division

Peripheral parties

Radical left demarcation (moderate) integration Greens (moderate) demarcation (moderate) integration Radical right demarcation demarcation

Based on: Marks and Wilson 2000, Hooghe et al. 2004, Marks 2004, Kriesi 2007

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Issue categorization - (2) «inductive» logic

Issue categorization (EU project)

  • Economy

(1) Empirical verification whether two dimensions – economic and cultural – can be found (based on issue position) (2) «Alternative version»: combination of issue position (pro/contra) and the specific justification of the position

  • Economic
  • Cultural (ethnic, religious, political)
  • Other
  • (no justification)
  • Social and labor market policy
  • Education and research
  • Law and order
  • Immigration
  • International Affairs
  • Culture and Other
  • Environment and Energy
  • Infrastructure
  • Agriculture and Food
  • Consumer protection
  • Citizens’ rights
  • Constitutional questions and functioning of EU
  • Territorial questions
  • Administration and bureaucracy (corruption)
  • Elections