Snarks that cannot be covered with four perfect matchings Edita M - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

snarks that cannot be covered with four perfect matchings
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Snarks that cannot be covered with four perfect matchings Edita M - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Snarks that cannot be covered with four perfect matchings Edita M a cajov a Comenius University, Bratislava GGTW 2017, Ghent, August 2017 joint work with Martin Skoviera Edita M a cajov a (Bratislava) ... August 2017 1


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Snarks that cannot be covered with four perfect matchings

Edita M´ aˇ cajov´ a

Comenius University, Bratislava GGTW 2017, Ghent, August 2017

joint work with Martin ˇ Skoviera

Edita M´ aˇ cajov´ a (Bratislava) ... August 2017 1 / 25

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Introduction

3-edge-colourings of cubic graph have been investigated for more than 100 years

Edita M´ aˇ cajov´ a (Bratislava) ... August 2017 2 / 25

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Introduction

3-edge-colourings of cubic graph have been investigated for more than 100 years cubic graphs

◮ 3-edge-colourabe ◮ snarks – cubic graphs that do not admit a 3-edge-colouring Edita M´ aˇ cajov´ a (Bratislava) ... August 2017 2 / 25

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Introduction

3-edge-colourings of cubic graph have been investigated for more than 100 years cubic graphs

◮ 3-edge-colourabe ◮ snarks – cubic graphs that do not admit a 3-edge-colouring Edita M´ aˇ cajov´ a (Bratislava) ... August 2017 2 / 25

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Introduction

almost all cubic graphs are hamiltonian and therefore 3-edge-colourabe [Robinson, Wormald, 1992]

Edita M´ aˇ cajov´ a (Bratislava) ... August 2017 3 / 25

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Introduction

almost all cubic graphs are hamiltonian and therefore 3-edge-colourabe [Robinson, Wormald, 1992] it is an NP-complete problem to decide whether given cubic graph is snark or not [Holyer, 1981] (reduction from 3SAT)

Edita M´ aˇ cajov´ a (Bratislava) ... August 2017 3 / 25

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Introduction

almost all cubic graphs are hamiltonian and therefore 3-edge-colourabe [Robinson, Wormald, 1992] it is an NP-complete problem to decide whether given cubic graph is snark or not [Holyer, 1981] (reduction from 3SAT) snarks are crucial for many conjectures and open problems (Cycle double cover conjecture, 5-Flow conjecture)

Edita M´ aˇ cajov´ a (Bratislava) ... August 2017 3 / 25

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Perfect matchings in cubic graphs

Fulkerson Conjecture (Berge, Fulkerson, 1971)

Every bridgeless cubic graphs contains a family of six perfect matchings that together cover each edge exactly twice.

Edita M´ aˇ cajov´ a (Bratislava) ... August 2017 4 / 25

slide-9
SLIDE 9

6 perfect matchings on I5

Edita M´ aˇ cajov´ a (Bratislava) ... August 2017 5 / 25

slide-10
SLIDE 10

6 perfect matchings on I5

Edita M´ aˇ cajov´ a (Bratislava) ... August 2017 5 / 25

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Berge Conjecture ⇔ Fulkerson Conjecture

Fulkerson Conjecture (Berge, Fulkerson, 1971)

Every bridgeless cubic graphs contains a family of six perfect matchings that together cover each edge exactly twice.

Edita M´ aˇ cajov´ a (Bratislava) ... August 2017 6 / 25

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Berge Conjecture ⇔ Fulkerson Conjecture

Fulkerson Conjecture (Berge, Fulkerson, 1971)

Every bridgeless cubic graphs contains a family of six perfect matchings that together cover each edge exactly twice.

Berge Conjecture (Berge, 1979)

Every bridgeless cubic graphs contains a family of five perfect matchings that together cover all the edges of the graph.

Edita M´ aˇ cajov´ a (Bratislava) ... August 2017 6 / 25

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Berge Conjecture ⇔ Fulkerson Conjecture

Fulkerson Conjecture (Berge, Fulkerson, 1971)

Every bridgeless cubic graphs contains a family of six perfect matchings that together cover each edge exactly twice.

Berge Conjecture (Berge, 1979)

Every bridgeless cubic graphs contains a family of five perfect matchings that together cover all the edges of the graph.

Theorem (Mazzuoccolo, 2011)

The Berge Conjecture and the Fulkerson Conjecture are equivalent.

Edita M´ aˇ cajov´ a (Bratislava) ... August 2017 6 / 25

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Fan-Raspaud Conjecture

Fan-Raspaud Conjecture, 1994

Every bridgeless cubic graph has three perfect matchings with empty intersection.

M1 ∅ M2 ∩ M3 M1 ∩ M2 M1 ∩ M3 M2 M3

Edita M´ aˇ cajov´ a (Bratislava) ... August 2017 7 / 25

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Perfect matching covers of cubic graphs

Theorem (Petersen, 1891)

Every bridgeless cubic graphs contains a perfect matching.

Edita M´ aˇ cajov´ a (Bratislava) ... August 2017 8 / 25

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Perfect matching covers of cubic graphs

Theorem (Petersen, 1891)

Every bridgeless cubic graphs contains a perfect matching.

Theorem (Sch¨

  • nberger, 1934)

Every edge of a bridgeless cubic graphs is contained in a perfect matching.

Edita M´ aˇ cajov´ a (Bratislava) ... August 2017 8 / 25

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Perfect matching covers of cubic graphs

Theorem (Petersen, 1891)

Every bridgeless cubic graphs contains a perfect matching.

Theorem (Sch¨

  • nberger, 1934)

Every edge of a bridgeless cubic graphs is contained in a perfect matching. perfect matchings index τ(G) – the smallest number of perfect matchings that cover E(G)

Edita M´ aˇ cajov´ a (Bratislava) ... August 2017 8 / 25

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Perfect matching covers of cubic graphs

Theorem (Petersen, 1891)

Every bridgeless cubic graphs contains a perfect matching.

Theorem (Sch¨

  • nberger, 1934)

Every edge of a bridgeless cubic graphs is contained in a perfect matching. perfect matchings index τ(G) – the smallest number of perfect matchings that cover E(G) τ(G) is a finite number for every cubic bridgeless graph G

Edita M´ aˇ cajov´ a (Bratislava) ... August 2017 8 / 25

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Perfect matching covers of cubic graphs

Theorem (Petersen, 1891)

Every bridgeless cubic graphs contains a perfect matching.

Theorem (Sch¨

  • nberger, 1934)

Every edge of a bridgeless cubic graphs is contained in a perfect matching. perfect matchings index τ(G) – the smallest number of perfect matchings that cover E(G) τ(G) is a finite number for every cubic bridgeless graph G τ(G) ≥ 3 for every bridgeless cubic graph

Edita M´ aˇ cajov´ a (Bratislava) ... August 2017 8 / 25

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Perfect matching covers of cubic graphs

Theorem (Petersen, 1891)

Every bridgeless cubic graphs contains a perfect matching.

Theorem (Sch¨

  • nberger, 1934)

Every edge of a bridgeless cubic graphs is contained in a perfect matching. perfect matchings index τ(G) – the smallest number of perfect matchings that cover E(G) τ(G) is a finite number for every cubic bridgeless graph G τ(G) ≥ 3 for every bridgeless cubic graph τ(G) = 3 ⇔ G is 3-edge-colourable

Edita M´ aˇ cajov´ a (Bratislava) ... August 2017 8 / 25

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Perfect matching covers of cubic graphs

Theorem (Petersen, 1891)

Every bridgeless cubic graphs contains a perfect matching.

Theorem (Sch¨

  • nberger, 1934)

Every edge of a bridgeless cubic graphs is contained in a perfect matching. perfect matchings index τ(G) – the smallest number of perfect matchings that cover E(G) τ(G) is a finite number for every cubic bridgeless graph G τ(G) ≥ 3 for every bridgeless cubic graph τ(G) = 3 ⇔ G is 3-edge-colourable Berge Conjecture ⇒ τ(G) ≤ 5 for every bridgeless cubic G

Edita M´ aˇ cajov´ a (Bratislava) ... August 2017 8 / 25

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Perfect matching covers of cubic graphs

Theorem (Petersen, 1891)

Every bridgeless cubic graphs contains a perfect matching.

Theorem (Sch¨

  • nberger, 1934)

Every edge of a bridgeless cubic graphs is contained in a perfect matching. perfect matchings index τ(G) – the smallest number of perfect matchings that cover E(G) τ(G) is a finite number for every cubic bridgeless graph G τ(G) ≥ 3 for every bridgeless cubic graph τ(G) = 3 ⇔ G is 3-edge-colourable Berge Conjecture ⇒ τ(G) ≤ 5 for every bridgeless cubic G Cubic graphs with τ(G) ≤ 4 are counterexamples to neither 5-CDCC nor Fan-Raspaud Conjecture

Edita M´ aˇ cajov´ a (Bratislava) ... August 2017 8 / 25

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Point-line configurations

sometimes useful: use more than 3 colours and specify the allowed triples

Edita M´ aˇ cajov´ a (Bratislava) ... August 2017 9 / 25

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Point-line configurations

sometimes useful: use more than 3 colours and specify the allowed triples configuration C = (P, B)

◮ P – finite set of points ◮ B – finite set of blocks (3-element subsets of P such that for each pair

  • f points of P there is at most one block of B which contains both of

them)

Edita M´ aˇ cajov´ a (Bratislava) ... August 2017 9 / 25

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Example: a configuration

Edita M´ aˇ cajov´ a (Bratislava) ... August 2017 10 / 25

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Example: a configuration

3 2 1 2 3 2 2 1 2 3

Edita M´ aˇ cajov´ a (Bratislava) ... August 2017 10 / 25

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Example: a configuration

3 2 1 2 3 2 2 1 2 3

this configuration is not universal

Edita M´ aˇ cajov´ a (Bratislava) ... August 2017 10 / 25

slide-28
SLIDE 28

“K4”-configuration and four perfect matchings

configuration T

Edita M´ aˇ cajov´ a (Bratislava) ... August 2017 11 / 25

slide-29
SLIDE 29

“K4”-configuration and four perfect matchings

configuration T 10 points, 6 blocks this configuration is not 3-colourable

Edita M´ aˇ cajov´ a (Bratislava) ... August 2017 11 / 25

slide-30
SLIDE 30

“K4”-configuration and four perfect matchings

configuration T 10 points, 6 blocks this configuration is not 3-colourable

Theorem (EM,ˇ Skoviera, 2017+)

A cubic graph G is T -colourable ⇔ the edges of G can be covered by at most 4 perfect matchings.

Edita M´ aˇ cajov´ a (Bratislava) ... August 2017 11 / 25

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Perfect matching covers of cubic graphs

until 2013 was the Petersen graph the only known nontrivial snark with τ(G) = 5

Edita M´ aˇ cajov´ a (Bratislava) ... August 2017 12 / 25

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Perfect matching covers of cubic graphs

until 2013 was the Petersen graph the only known nontrivial snark with τ(G) = 5

◮ A cubic graph is nontrivial if it has ⋆ cyclic connectivity ≥ 4 ⋆ girth ≥ 5 Edita M´ aˇ cajov´ a (Bratislava) ... August 2017 12 / 25

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Perfect matching covers of cubic graphs

until 2013 was the Petersen graph the only known nontrivial snark with τ(G) = 5

◮ A cubic graph is nontrivial if it has ⋆ cyclic connectivity ≥ 4 ⋆ girth ≥ 5

in 2013 [Brinkmann, Goedgebeur, H¨ agglund, Markstr¨

  • m] constructed

all nontrivial snarks up to 36 vertices; there are exactly 64326024 of them

Edita M´ aˇ cajov´ a (Bratislava) ... August 2017 12 / 25

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Perfect matching covers of cubic graphs

until 2013 was the Petersen graph the only known nontrivial snark with τ(G) = 5

◮ A cubic graph is nontrivial if it has ⋆ cyclic connectivity ≥ 4 ⋆ girth ≥ 5

in 2013 [Brinkmann, Goedgebeur, H¨ agglund, Markstr¨

  • m] constructed

all nontrivial snarks up to 36 vertices; there are exactly 64326024 of them

  • nly two of them have τ(G) = 4:

the Petersen graph and a snark of order 34

Edita M´ aˇ cajov´ a (Bratislava) ... August 2017 12 / 25

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Perfect matching covers of cubic graphs

until 2013 was the Petersen graph the only known nontrivial snark with τ(G) = 5

◮ A cubic graph is nontrivial if it has ⋆ cyclic connectivity ≥ 4 ⋆ girth ≥ 5

in 2013 [Brinkmann, Goedgebeur, H¨ agglund, Markstr¨

  • m] constructed

all nontrivial snarks up to 36 vertices; there are exactly 64326024 of them

  • nly two of them have τ(G) = 4:

the Petersen graph and a snark of order 34 both have τ(G) = 5

Edita M´ aˇ cajov´ a (Bratislava) ... August 2017 12 / 25

slide-36
SLIDE 36

A snark of order 34 with τ(G) = 5

Edita M´ aˇ cajov´ a (Bratislava) ... August 2017 13 / 25

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Snarks with τ(G) ≥ 5: Construction 1

Esperet & Mazzuoccolo (2014): windmill construction

Edita M´ aˇ cajov´ a (Bratislava) ... August 2017 14 / 25

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Snarks with τ(G) ≥ 5: Construction 1

Esperet & Mazzuoccolo (2014): windmill construction

Edita M´ aˇ cajov´ a (Bratislava) ... August 2017 14 / 25

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Snarks with τ(G) ≥ 5: Construction 1

Esperet & Mazzuoccolo (2014): windmill construction

Edita M´ aˇ cajov´ a (Bratislava) ... August 2017 14 / 25

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Snarks with τ(G) ≥ 5: Construction 1

Esperet & Mazzuoccolo (2014): windmill construction

Edita M´ aˇ cajov´ a (Bratislava) ... August 2017 14 / 25

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Snarks with τ(G) ≥ 5: Construction 1

Esperet & Mazzuoccolo (2014): windmill construction

Edita M´ aˇ cajov´ a (Bratislava) ... August 2017 14 / 25

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Snarks with τ(G) ≥ 5: Construction 2

Abreu et al. (2016+): treelike snarks

Edita M´ aˇ cajov´ a (Bratislava) ... August 2017 15 / 25

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Snarks with τ(G) ≥ 5: Construction 2

Abreu et al. (2016+): treelike snarks

Edita M´ aˇ cajov´ a (Bratislava) ... August 2017 15 / 25

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Snarks with τ(G) ≥ 5: Construction 2

Abreu et al. (2016+): treelike snarks

Edita M´ aˇ cajov´ a (Bratislava) ... August 2017 15 / 25

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Snarks with τ(G) ≥ 5: Construction 2

Abreu et al. (2016+): treelike snarks

Edita M´ aˇ cajov´ a (Bratislava) ... August 2017 15 / 25

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Snarks with τ(G) ≥ 5: Construction 2

Abreu et al. (2016+): treelike snarks

Edita M´ aˇ cajov´ a (Bratislava) ... August 2017 15 / 25

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Snarks with τ(G) ≥ 5: Construction 2

Abreu et al. (2016+): treelike snarks Treelike snarks have a more general shape than windmill snarks.

Edita M´ aˇ cajov´ a (Bratislava) ... August 2017 16 / 25

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Snarks with τ(G) ≥ 5: Construction 2

Abreu et al. (2016+): treelike snarks Treelike snarks have a more general shape than windmill snarks. However: Building blocks are restricted to the Petersen graph.

Edita M´ aˇ cajov´ a (Bratislava) ... August 2017 16 / 25

slide-49
SLIDE 49

Snarks with τ(G) ≥ 5: Construction 2

Abreu et al. (2016+): treelike snarks Treelike snarks have a more general shape than windmill snarks. However: Building blocks are restricted to the Petersen graph. Proofs heavily depend on computer-aided arguments.

Edita M´ aˇ cajov´ a (Bratislava) ... August 2017 16 / 25

slide-50
SLIDE 50

Snarks with τ(G) ≥ 5: Construction 2

Abreu et al. (2016+): treelike snarks

Edita M´ aˇ cajov´ a (Bratislava) ... August 2017 17 / 25

slide-51
SLIDE 51

Snarks with τ(G) ≥ 5: Construction 2

Abreu et al. (2016+): treelike snarks

Edita M´ aˇ cajov´ a (Bratislava) ... August 2017 18 / 25

slide-52
SLIDE 52

Tetrahedral Z4

2-flow

1110 1101 0101 1011 1100 0111 1001 0011 0110 1010

Edita M´ aˇ cajov´ a (Bratislava) ... August 2017 19 / 25

slide-53
SLIDE 53

Types of connector inputs of size 2

1101 1011 1110

axis angle

1100 0111 1001

altitude half−line

0011 0110 1010 1110 1101 0101 1011 1100 0111 1001 0011 0110 1010 1110 1101 0101 1011 1100 0111 1001 0011 0110 1010 1110 1101 0101 1011 1100 0111 1001 0011 0110 1010 1110 1101 0101 1011 1100 0111 1001 0011 0110 1010 1110 1101 0101 1011 1100 0111 1001 0011 0110 1010 1110 1101 0101 1011 1100 0111 1001

line−segment zero zero

0011 0110 1010 0101

Edita M´ aˇ cajov´ a (Bratislava) ... August 2017 20 / 25

slide-54
SLIDE 54

Set of transitions M

Let M be the set of all transition through a (2, 2; 1)-pole containing all the transition of the following types: axis

1

→ half-line line-seg

1

→ half-line zero

1

→ half-line angle

1

→ half-line angle

1

→ altitude altitude

1

→ line-seg axis

2

→ line-seg line-seg

2

→ line-seg line-seg

2

→ zero zero

2

→ line-seg zero

2

→ angle angle

2

→ angle angle

2

→ zero angle

2

→ line-seg altitude

2

→ altitude altitude

2

→ half-line

Edita M´ aˇ cajov´ a (Bratislava) ... August 2017 21 / 25

slide-55
SLIDE 55

Set of transitions M

half−line angle axis altitude edge

Edita M´ aˇ cajov´ a (Bratislava) ... August 2017 22 / 25

slide-56
SLIDE 56

Set of transitions M

Theorem (EM, ˇ Skoviera, 2017+)

Let S be a (2, 2)-pole created from a snark G with τ(G) ≥ 5 by removing two adjacent vertices. Then T(S ◦ I) ⊆ M.

Edita M´ aˇ cajov´ a (Bratislava) ... August 2017 23 / 25

slide-57
SLIDE 57

Set of transitions M

Theorem (EM, ˇ Skoviera, 2017+)

Let S be a (2, 2)-pole created from a snark G with τ(G) ≥ 5 by removing two adjacent vertices. Then T(S ◦ I) ⊆ M.

S

Edita M´ aˇ cajov´ a (Bratislava) ... August 2017 23 / 25

slide-58
SLIDE 58

Set of transitions M

Theorem (EM, ˇ Skoviera, 2017+)

Let S be a (2, 2)-pole created from a snark G with τ(G) ≥ 5 by removing two adjacent vertices. Then T(S ◦ I) ⊆ M. T(Mi) ⊆ M for i ∈ {1, 2}. Then T(M1 • M2) ⊆ M.

Edita M´ aˇ cajov´ a (Bratislava) ... August 2017 23 / 25

slide-59
SLIDE 59

Set of transitions M

Theorem (EM, ˇ Skoviera, 2017+)

Let S be a (2, 2)-pole created from a snark G with τ(G) ≥ 5 by removing two adjacent vertices. Then T(S ◦ I) ⊆ M. T(Mi) ⊆ M for i ∈ {1, 2}. Then T(M1 • M2) ⊆ M.

Edita M´ aˇ cajov´ a (Bratislava) ... August 2017 23 / 25

slide-60
SLIDE 60

Set of transitions M

Theorem (EM, ˇ Skoviera, 2017+)

Let S be a (2, 2)-pole created from a snark G with τ(G) ≥ 5 by removing two adjacent vertices. Then T(S ◦ I) ⊆ M. T(Mi) ⊆ M for i ∈ {1, 2}. Then T(M1 • M2) ⊆ M. T(Mi) ⊆ M for i ∈ {1, 2, 3}. Then each transition of T(M1 ◦ M2 ◦ M3) is of type angle → line-segment.

Edita M´ aˇ cajov´ a (Bratislava) ... August 2017 23 / 25

slide-61
SLIDE 61

Set of transitions M

Theorem (EM, ˇ Skoviera, 2017+)

Let S be a (2, 2)-pole created from a snark G with τ(G) ≥ 5 by removing two adjacent vertices. Then T(S ◦ I) ⊆ M. T(Mi) ⊆ M for i ∈ {1, 2}. Then T(M1 • M2) ⊆ M. T(Mi) ⊆ M for i ∈ {1, 2, 3}. Then each transition of T(M1 ◦ M2 ◦ M3) is of type angle → line-segment.

angle line−segment

Edita M´ aˇ cajov´ a (Bratislava) ... August 2017 23 / 25

slide-62
SLIDE 62

Results

Corollary (EM, ˇ Skoviera, 2017+)

Let G be a Halin snark. Then τ(G) ≥ 5

Edita M´ aˇ cajov´ a (Bratislava) ... August 2017 24 / 25

slide-63
SLIDE 63

Results

Corollary (EM, ˇ Skoviera, 2017+)

Let G be a Halin snark. Then τ(G) ≥ 5 For every even integer n ≥ 44 there exists a snark Gn of order n with τ(Gn) ≥ 5.

Edita M´ aˇ cajov´ a (Bratislava) ... August 2017 24 / 25

slide-64
SLIDE 64

Results

Corollary (EM, ˇ Skoviera, 2017+)

Let G be a Halin snark. Then τ(G) ≥ 5 For every even integer n ≥ 44 there exists a snark Gn of order n with τ(Gn) ≥ 5. τ-resistance of a cubic graph can be arbitrarily high

Edita M´ aˇ cajov´ a (Bratislava) ... August 2017 24 / 25

slide-65
SLIDE 65

Thank you!

Edita M´ aˇ cajov´ a (Bratislava) ... August 2017 25 / 25