! Sensors for physical activity (PA) measurement ! ! NIKE - - PDF document

sensors for physical activity pa measurement
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

! Sensors for physical activity (PA) measurement ! ! NIKE - - PDF document

Clustering physical activity phenotypes using the ATLAS index on accelerometric data from an epidemiologic cohort study Michael(Marschollek ! ! Sensors for physical activity (PA) measurement ! ! NIKE Bodymedia AIRUN+ SenseWear Aipermon


slide-1
SLIDE 1

!

Clustering physical activity phenotypes using the ATLAS index on accelerometric data from an epidemiologic cohort study

Michael(Marschollek

!

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Michael(Marschollek

! ! !

Sensors for physical activity (PA) measurement

AIRUN+ NIKE Bodymedia SenseWear Aipermon

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Michael(Marschollek

! ! !

Physical activity measurement in cohort studies

  • NHANES study
  • UK Biobank
  • Berlin Ageing Study 2
  • and many more…
  • Common parameters: active energy expenditure (AEE), sedentary

time, number of steps per day, sleep, …

06/2/2011

Ac$Graph AM7164 Geneac$v Humo$on/ Xybermind

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Michael(Marschollek

! ! !

Physical activity and health outcome

  • PA is associated with risk of

– morbidity (cardiovascular/ musculoskeletal diseases; Sattelmair et al., Circulation, 2011 and Woodcock et al., Int J Epidemiol, 2011) and – mortality (e.g. Leitzmann et al., Arch Intern Med, 2007)

  • Common PA recommendations include

– AHA/ ACSM > 5 x per week 30 minutes of moderate PA (3-6 METS) or 3 x per week 20 minutes of vigorous PA (> 6 METS) – WHO > 150/75 minutes of moderate/ vigorous PA, better 300/150 mins. – But: only ca. 3% ‚comply‘

  • Problem: Dose-effect relationships and appropriate patterns remain

unclear, as are currently predominant PA patterns and their effects.

  • Preliminary work: ATLAS index (Activity Types from Long-term

Accelerometric Sensor data; Marschollek, PLOS One, 2013)

– PA parameters: 1. intensity, 2. duration, 3. regularity

06/2/2011

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Michael(Marschollek

! ! !

Objective

  • to apply the ATLAS index on a large cohort accelerometer data set

to investigate whether physical activity archetypes can actually be extracted and if these match the ones proposed earlier by the author

06/2/2011

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Michael(Marschollek

! ! !

Methods

  • Data set

– NHANES (National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey) 2005- 2006, available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/nhanes2005- 2006/PAXRAW_D.htm – ActiGraph AM7164 uniaxial accelerometer – N=6386 persons

  • Data processing

– Splitting the data set into single patient data sets (handling) – PA event detection – Computation of ATLAS index parameters: intensity, duration, regularity – X-Means clustering (Pelleg and Moore, 2000; WEKA‘s x-Means algorithm implementation, Ver 3.6)

06/2/2011

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Michael(Marschollek

! ! !

PA parameter distribution

06/2/2011

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Michael(Marschollek

! ! !

Clustering results

06/2/2011

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Michael(Marschollek

! ! !

PA clusters

  • C2 (N=4264):

– very low mean activity duration (3.1 per 1000 minutes) – very low intensity and regularity scores (1.09, 0.2) – comprises two thirds of the entire population (N=4264), could be named “insufficiently active”, as proposed by Lee at al (Am J Epidemiol, 2004) – inactive, sedentary lifestyle

  • C4 (N=1892):

– fair mean activity duration (28 per 1000 minutes;

  • ca. 40 minutes/day)

– higher intensity score (1.23) – low regularity score (0.07) – „irregularly active“

06/2/2011

! !

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Michael(Marschollek

! ! !

PA clusters

  • C1:

– low scores for mean activity duration (3.12 per 1000 minutes) and intensity (1.1), but high regularity (3.55) – „busy bee“, constant low-level activity

  • C3 (N=72):

– mean duration: 200/1000 minutes or 287 minutes/day – intensity level is very high (1.78), and the regularity is low (0.01) – mixed group: „physical worker“ and „weekend warrior“ (?)

06/2/2011

! ! !

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Michael(Marschollek

! ! !

Discussion

  • method: Identification of distinct PA groups, just using ATLAS

parameters computed from accelerometer data, is feasible, and potentially useful for cohort studies (UK Biobank, German National Cohort, etc).

  • Short-term activities, such as daily-life low-intensity ones (e.g. a short

walk, vacuuming, etc.), can be detected from wearable sensor data using algorithms, and can be associated with health-related outcome parameters.

  • The ‚athlete group‘ as proposed earlier (Marschollek, PLOS One,

2013) could not be identified.

  • Daily and seasonal PA variations so far are not accounted for
  • ToDo: investigate associations between cluster groups and health-

related parameters.

06/2/2011

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Michael(Marschollek

! ! !

Outlook

Inter-group comparisons for health outcome parameters (event duration threshold 5 mins, intensity threshold Q20; submitted to Int J Epidemiol):

  • For C-Reactive Protein (CRP) and BMI (but not HDL), ANOVA shows

statistically significant differences between the groups 1-4

  • Quartile comparisons e.g. for resting systolic RR (upper [≥ 126mmHg]
  • vs. lower [<106mmHg]):

– Statistically significant differences for PA duration and regularity

➢Detecting and denoting low-intensity, short-term activity events is relevant

06/2/2011

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Michael(Marschollek

! ! !

06/2/2011