sensors for physical activity pa measurement
play

! Sensors for physical activity (PA) measurement ! ! NIKE - PDF document

Clustering physical activity phenotypes using the ATLAS index on accelerometric data from an epidemiologic cohort study Michael(Marschollek ! ! Sensors for physical activity (PA) measurement ! ! NIKE Bodymedia AIRUN+ SenseWear Aipermon


  1. Clustering physical activity phenotypes using the ATLAS index on accelerometric data from an epidemiologic cohort study Michael(Marschollek ! !

  2. Sensors for physical activity (PA) measurement ! ! NIKE Bodymedia AIRUN+ SenseWear Aipermon ! Michael(Marschollek 0

  3. Physical activity measurement in cohort studies ! ! ● NHANES study Ac$Graph AM7164 ● UK Biobank Geneac$v ● Berlin Ageing Study 2 Humo$on/ Xybermind ● and many more … ● Common parameters: active energy expenditure (AEE), sedentary time, number of steps per day, sleep, … ! Michael(Marschollek 06/2/2011 0

  4. Physical activity and health outcome ! ! ● PA is associated with risk of – morbidity (cardiovascular/ musculoskeletal diseases; Sattelmair et al., Circulation, 2011 and Woodcock et al., Int J Epidemiol, 2011 ) and – mortality (e.g. Leitzmann et al., Arch Intern Med, 2007 ) ● Common PA recommendations include – AHA/ ACSM > 5 x per week 30 minutes of moderate PA (3-6 METS) or 3 x per week 20 minutes of vigorous PA (> 6 METS) – WHO > 150/75 minutes of moderate/ vigorous PA, better 300/150 mins. – But: only ca. 3% ‚comply‘ ● Problem: Dose-effect relationships and appropriate patterns remain unclear, as are currently predominant PA patterns and their effects. ● Preliminary work: ATLAS index ( Activity Types from Long-term Accelerometric Sensor data; Marschollek, PLOS One, 2013 ) – PA parameters: 1. intensity, 2. duration, 3. regularity ! Michael(Marschollek 06/2/2011 0

  5. Objective ! ! ● to apply the ATLAS index on a large cohort accelerometer data set to investigate whether physical activity archetypes can actually be extracted and if these match the ones proposed earlier by the author ! Michael(Marschollek 06/2/2011 0

  6. Methods ! ! ● Data set – NHANES (National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey) 2005- 2006, available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/nhanes2005- 2006/PAXRAW_D.htm – ActiGraph AM7164 uniaxial accelerometer – N=6386 persons ● Data processing – Splitting the data set into single patient data sets (handling) – PA event detection – Computation of ATLAS index parameters: intensity, duration, regularity – X-Means clustering (Pelleg and Moore, 2000; WEKA‘s x-Means algorithm implementation, Ver 3.6) ! Michael(Marschollek 06/2/2011 0

  7. PA parameter distribution ! ! ! Michael(Marschollek 06/2/2011 0

  8. Clustering results ! ! ! Michael(Marschollek 06/2/2011 0

  9. ! ! PA clusters ! ! ● C2 (N=4264): – very low mean activity duration (3.1 per 1000 minutes) – very low intensity and regularity scores (1.09, 0.2) – comprises two thirds of the entire population (N=4264), could be named “insufficiently active”, as proposed by Lee at al ( Am J Epidemiol , 2004) – inactive, sedentary lifestyle ● C4 (N=1892): – fair mean activity duration (28 per 1000 minutes; ca. 40 minutes/day) – higher intensity score (1.23) – low regularity score (0.07) – „irregularly active“ ! Michael(Marschollek 06/2/2011 0

  10. ! ! ! PA clusters ! ! ● C1: – low scores for mean activity duration (3.12 per 1000 minutes) and intensity (1.1), but high regularity (3.55) – „busy bee“, constant low-level activity ● C3 (N=72): – mean duration: 200/1000 minutes or 287 minutes/day – intensity level is very high (1.78), and the regularity is low (0.01) – mixed group: „physical worker“ and „weekend warrior“ (?) ! Michael(Marschollek 06/2/2011 0

  11. Discussion ! ! ● method : Identification of distinct PA groups, just using ATLAS parameters computed from accelerometer data, is feasible, and potentially useful for cohort studies (UK Biobank, German National Cohort, etc). ● Short-term activities, such as daily-life low-intensity ones (e.g. a short walk, vacuuming, etc.), can be detected from wearable sensor data using algorithms, and can be associated with health-related outcome parameters. ● The ‚athlete group‘ as proposed earlier (Marschollek, PLOS One, 2013) could not be identified. ● Daily and seasonal PA variations so far are not accounted for ● ToDo: investigate associations between cluster groups and health- related parameters. ! Michael(Marschollek 06/2/2011 0

  12. Outlook ! ! Inter-group comparisons for health outcome parameters (event duration threshold 5 mins, intensity threshold Q20; submitted to Int J Epidemiol ): ● For C-Reactive Protein (CRP) and BMI (but not HDL), ANOVA shows statistically significant differences between the groups 1-4 ● Quartile comparisons e.g. for resting systolic RR (upper [ ≥ 126mmHg] vs. lower [<106mmHg]): – Statistically significant differences for PA duration and regularity ➢ Detecting and denoting low-intensity, short-term activity events is relevant ! Michael(Marschollek 06/2/2011 0

  13. ! ! ! Michael(Marschollek 06/2/2011 0

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend